Feral Jundi

Monday, November 2, 2009

Industry Talk: Still No Count of U.S. Contractors in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 7:42 PM

“I kind of want to scream…. Why if it’s so important, are we failing to do something so basic?” said Christopher Shays, a former Republican lawmaker and a co-chair of the bipartisan committe 

*****

   What?  Are you kidding me?  How long have we been doing this, and the government still hasn’t a clue on how to count how many of us are over there? Eight years in Afghanistan, and we can’t even get a basic census done? This is pathetic and a total lack of leadership, and on so many levels.

    The taxpayer is paying for it, and there should be no excuse about not knowing how many folks we have on the books. Amateur hour I say, amateur hour! –Matt

——————————————————————

Still no count of U.S. contractors in Afghanistan

Mon Nov 2, 2009

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. government does not know exactly how many contractors it employs in Afghanistan, a U.S. commission said on Monday, raising basic questions about oversight of wartime operations.

Contractors in Afghanistan outnumber U.S. troops there and scandals involving misconduct by employees of private firms on the U.S. payroll in Afghanistan and Iraq have prompted calls by Congress for greater accountability.

The Commission on Wartime Contracting, a bipartisan, independent commission mandated by Congress, presented data at a hearing showing major discrepancies in different accounting methods used to determine the number of U.S. contractors.

A traditional manual count by the U.S. military’s Central Command turned up nearly 74,000 U.S. Defense Department contractors in Afghanistan as of June 30 — more than twice the number shown in another survey by the Pentagon.

“I kind of want to scream…. Why if it’s so important, are we failing to do something so basic?” said Christopher Shays, a former Republican lawmaker and a co-chair of the bipartisan committee.

Gary Motsek, an assistant deputy undersecretary of defense, acknowledged in testimony that U.S. efforts to create a system to better count the number of contractors in Afghanistan had so far come up short.

“We failed,” Motsek said, calling for better funding and regulations to require all U.S. agencies to report figures for contractors. “You should be concerned about the gap, because we are concerned about the gap.”

Motsek and Redding Hobby, deputy director of logistics, contracting, and engineering at Central Command, indicated that while the manual count system was not 100 percent precise, it was still the best gauge available.

Michael Thibault, another co-chair appointed by Democratic congressional leaders, questioned whether not knowing the number and identities of Afghan contractors on the U.S. payroll exposed U.S. personnel to greater security risks.

“It’s going to take one tragedy and there’s going to be a scorched-earth effort looking for accountability, and that’s why it’s so important,” Thibault said.

Motsek, however, described the lack of a firm tally as an administrative shortcoming that did not endanger U.S. forces. He said contractors needed separate security clearance to enter U.S. military bases in Afghanistan.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Peter Cooney)

Story here.

2 Comments

  1. I think it’s a little confusing what is meant by the term ‘contractor’ in this instance. Are they talking about contractors at the company level such as Boeing, L3, Triple Canopy, etc, etc… Or are they talking about contractors as the personal level like Dave, Mark, Jim, etc, etc…If it is the former then that is rediculuous, but I doubt if that is accurate. If it is the later then I would not have expected precise ‘headcount’ accountability at that level because the government would have no idea how many people that a contracting company uses to accomplish its mission/tasks. The govt will only pay $ X million for cleaning services. If that takes 500 people or 600 people this is up to the contractor to work out.

    Comment by Jake — Tuesday, November 3, 2009 @ 1:25 AM

  2. Yeah, it is curious. I watched part of the hearing on CSPAN the other day, and I wasn’t impressed. It was typical political ballet, and everyone was dancing.

    Comment by headjundi — Tuesday, November 3, 2009 @ 7:19 PM

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress