Feral Jundi

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Maritime Security: Italy To Use Military To Guard Merchant Ships Against Pirates

Filed under: Italy,Maritime Security — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 8:15 AM

Interesting news, and this is coming right after a report of another Italian vessel being taken. The reason why it was taken is because their guard force on the boat was not armed. Funny how some folks still think that a less than lethal, unarmed guard force is still a good idea?  On the bright side, it sounds like the MV Montecristo was retaken by British and US commandos and all of the hostages have been released.

As far as using military assets on merchant vessels, I guess that will work. Although I certainly hope that these shipping companies are paying the bill for such a thing, because that is a pretty sweet deal to get a military protection force on their boats for free.  Maybe Italian banks or jewelry stores should write their lawmakers and ask if they will provide military details to protect their businesses?

The Italian navy will have to re-adjust as well to service all of these private vessels. And what is interesting with that is aren’t these vessels losing their merchant status by posting military folks on them?  Aren’t they now technically military vessels?  For example, if these vessels were attacked by an enemy of Italy, that the vessel would be considered a military target and not a civilian target. And who would be in charge on these vessels, the ship’s captain or the military force? I don’t know, and these are some interesting legal questions that I do not have an answer for. –Matt

 

Italy to use military to guard merchant ships against pirates
October 11, 2011
By Barry Moody
Italy is to station military forces on its merchant vessels to guard against attacks by Somali pirates, shipping sources said on Tuesday, the day after another of its ships was attacked off the anarchic east African country.
Many ships already carry private security contractors to try to prevent hijacks, but deployment of military forces on merchant vessels would mark a clear escalation in measures to combat piracy, which costs the world economy billions of dollars each year.
The sources said Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa would sign an agreement later on Tuesday with the confederation of Italian ship owners to put military guards on board vessels in the huge area of the Indian Ocean at risk from Somali pirates, who have hijacked several Italian ships.
The Montecristo, an Italian cargo ship, was attacked by five men in a small boat off the coast of Somalia on Monday, its owner the D’Alesio Group said. A pirate told Reuters by phone that it was under their control. The ship had 23 crew from Italy, India and Ukraine.


Somali pirates, operating from the shores of the lawless state in the Horn of Africa, have raked in millions of dollars a year in ransoms from scores of hijacked ships from around the world, including oil super tankers.
Last month the shipping industry called on the United Nations to create an armed military force to be deployed on vessels to counter the escalating menace from armed seaborne gangs.
While there has been a growing acceptance of using armed security guards, sovereign military forces are preferred by the shipping industry because they have clearer rules of engagement and the reduced risk of legal issues in the event of fatalities.

NEW PIRACY SEASON
Better armed and increasingly violent pirate gangs are set to ramp up attacks in the coming weeks in the Indian Ocean as the monsoon ends.
Around 17 ships are currently being held by the pirates who can operate hundreds of miles from the Somali coast.
Negotiations often take many months before the ships and crews are released for ransom. The Socotra 1, a Yemeni-owned ship, was seized on Christmas Day 2009 and is still being held.
A spokesman for the D’Alesio group old Reuters on Tuesday there had been no contact with the crew since the apparent hijacking.
“What interests us at the moment is to bring the members of the crew to safety,” Nello D’Alesio, the group’s Vice President, said in a statement on Monday night.
The ship left Liverpool on Sept. 20 heading for Vietnam, and passed through the Suez canal at the beginning of October. It was escorted by a Japanese warship — part of an international anti-piracy force in the area — as it crossed the Gulf of Aden.
While naval patrols, including vessels from the European Union, the United States and other nations such as South Korea, Iran and Turkey, have curbed the number of attacks in the Gulf of Aden, piracy in the Indian Ocean has continued to rise due to the vast tracts of water involved, which represent a huge logistical challenge for foreign navies.
Story here.

2 Comments

  1. Some are asking for the UN to put Blue Berets on ships and others asking for military protection. Well, Most of us know that if you put Blue Berets on ships you will have a bunch of Ethiopians or others protecting your vessels with no maritime experience whatsoever, never mind that the UN has no money to make this happen. Ship owners want their protection for free of course. Putting military on the merchant vessels changes the entire threat picture against the vessels, motivating the terrorist to attack merchant vessels to target the military on board, instead of the pirate seeking the kidnap for ransom. knee jerk reactions are what places innocents indanger

    Comment by M.M. — Tuesday, October 11, 2011 @ 10:02 AM

  2. kind of curious, how much the IMO has put in their circulars to vet private security companies and the experience they must have, then ship companies and the ICS asking for Blue Berets to go on board ships for protection. I can guarantee that the majority of Blue Berets have never even been on a ship, don't know port from starboard and you want to put these guys on your ships?

    Comment by M.M. — Tuesday, October 11, 2011 @ 10:09 AM

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress