Feral Jundi

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Fish And Game: North Dakota Takes Aim With Bounty On Coyotes

     The number of complaints USDA Wildlife Services receives from livestock producers confirms the coyote abundance.      According to Phil Mastrangelo, director of USDA Wildlife Services in North Dakota, coyote complaints increased from 374 in 2007 to 498 last year. He said Wildlife Services has nine wildlife-control experts across the state, and coyotes account for the bulk of their workload.

     “These guys work a large area, a minimum of five counties apiece, and they’re stretched pretty thin,” he said.

    I guess the Senate Bill for this was shot down.  But the House Bill is still in play and I think something like this would be a fantastic idea.

    First, lets look at the opponent’s view on this.  Of course the North Dakota Game and Fish Department would be opposed to a bounty program because it would threaten their good deals. Meaning if a bounty program succeeds, then why fund inefficient programs in the NDGFD?  I compare this to the TSA and their opposition to private industry taking over their airport screening services.(notice how the TSA shot private industry down as well)  This is government versus private industry, or in this case, government versus private hunters.

     But if you read the quote above, they are only using nine USDA government hunters to cover 5 counties apiece! How can they possible put a dent in the coyote population there?  Let alone, if these guys are being paid by the feds, they are probably getting health care and everything else that government jobs entail.  Or they could be contractor hunters–who knows? What I do know is that the state must scale up the hunting of this animal if it want’s to reduce it’s numbers, and it is not enough to just depend upon the whims of recreational hunters to do the job or nine government hunters.

    I think a bounty program would work just fine, and it would be a way for the state to spread the work load and incentivize the process. It would also infuse money back into the local communities where jobs are scarce. Hell, if a hunter was able to bag three coyotes in a day, that would be 300 dollars. Not bad for a day’s work?

     If you want professional hunters to really get involved with the eradication of these animals, you need to make killing coyotes a viable occupation for them.  Hunters pay for their gun, bullets, a tank of gas, food, and maybe even lodging to go out and hunt recreationally. But there is no way a recreational hunter will be driven to expend this much time and treasure to continually do this, unless they have another profession or trust fund that can support this lifestyle. (and some do out there) Hell, I have to really plan and budget to make an effort to go out hunting once or twice a year.

    But if you want to ramp up interest in the task, then it must be incentivized and there must be good rules and management of the process in order for it to be effective. The end result of such an effort will be the desired outcome.  Hell, if commercialized hunting almost decimated the buffalo back in the wild west days, a coyote bounty system could equally be successful.

     Or we can continue to depend upon an inefficient and undermanned government system to do the job–and meanwhile the coyote problem continues to rise and threaten livestock and deer populations. –Matt

North Dakota takes aim with bounty on coyotes

Feb. 09, 2011

By BRAD DOKKEN

Not a day goes by, Gerald Berthold says, when he doesn’t hear coyotes howling nearby on his farm west of Arvilla, N.D.

“You can be out in the evening, and you can hear them just about in every direction howling,” Berthold said.

Coyotes have killed at least two of his calves in recent years, Berthold said. And last summer, he said two calves simply disappeared from a pasture near Emerado, N.D.

Berthold can’t say for sure it was coyotes, but he has his suspicions.

“I don’t know where else they would have went,” he said. “They were too young to take off on their own. They were still nursing. They were month-old calves.”

Coyotes have become an increasingly hot topic in North Dakota in recent years. As the population grows, so, too, have the reports of coyotes causing problems. Berthold said the increase in coyote numbers has been especially apparent the past 10 to 15 years.

“They’re definitely on the increase,” he said. “There’s no doubt about that.”

Prompted largely by hunters who believe coyotes are hurting deer populations, a couple of bills have surfaced this winter in the North Dakota Legislature taking aim at reducing coyote numbers. House Bill 1454 and Senate Bill 2224 each would establish a $100 bounty on coyotes until 2,000 are taken.

Legislators haven’t yet acted on the bills.

(more…)

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Fish And Game: Bagging A Five Point Buck In The Palouse

Bagging A Five Point Buck In The Palouse

October 23, 2010

     The reason why haven’t blogged for the last week or so is that I have been deer hunting.  It was a successful trip and I had a great time doing a little ‘live tissue training’. lol

     This trip was special for me because I got to be with my father and uncle for a hunt I used to do when I was younger. Work has gotten in the way of me doing this hunt for a long time, and my schedule this year finally produced a window for something like this. Plus, hunting in the Palouse is special unto itself.

The Palouse

A good shot of the rolling hills and wheat country of the Palouse.

     The Palouse is a region of Southeast Washington State that is defined by lots of wheat fields mixed with steep and rocky cliffed river valleys and patches of forest eyebrows. These eyebrows are basically areas of wheat fields that cannot be tilled and are used by deer in the area to bed down. The river valleys have cliffs and steep edges, with lots of gullies and areas where deer can hide. They are lush areas and can be very interesting to hunt.

     For this trip, I had to buy a bunch of new equipment and square away my rifle. That meant lots of trips to the gun stores and the local Cabelas here in Boise. I had fun doing this, and Boise is definitely a hunter’s town.

     I also rented a 2010 Ford F150 from a rental car place(the flex fuel model), and I abused the crap out of this vehicle. It was used for the trip to the Palouse from Boise and back, and it was used for all the wandering around in the wheat country and river valleys. It was also used to haul out deer, cross rivers, climb steep hills, and even tow a deer off of a cliff edge.

     So after getting my gear, rifle and truck assembled, I headed on out to the town we stay in. I was to link up with my father and uncle there and it was about a 8 hour trip from Boise. I pulled into the town in the afternoon.

     The camp we were to call home was a garage that was converted into a hunting lodge of sorts. Inside was lots of deer horns, a wood stove, power, and enough space for us to set up some tables and chairs to eat at and hang out.

That night we prepared for hunting and talked shop with the local farmers, and the various land owners and farmers/ranchers/hunters of the area that stopped by. It was great fun to touch base with all of these folks, and everyone was excited for opening day the next morning. (a big shout out to Tim for being such a great host and hunting guru)

     The first day we started hunting, I probably hit a record for observing the most amount of deer in one day.  The problem was that our party couldn’t get a shot at anything shootable. The deer have to be three pointers, or have three tines on one horn to include the eye guards. Anything less than a three point and you could be heavily fined.

     Opening day sounds like a war zone. There are gun shots going off all over the place, and guys are slinging large rifle calibers all over the place.  This is why wearing hunter orange vests is required, because you definitely do not want to be accidently shot by any of the dozens of hunters scattered throughout the area. I also thought to myself if a hunter orange plate carrier might have some interest to some folks?  Who knows, and maybe someone is already selling such a thing?

Cliffs

The cliff area I was hunting. 

     The next day is when I got my deer. I was up on cliff edges above the river doing some glassing (using binoculars) and decided to try and get lower on the stepped edges of the cliff. I definitely had to be careful doing this, and find an access point that was safe enough. But these stepped areas of the cliff edges are where the big Whitetail deer like to hang out, and especially the bucks, so it is worth the effort.

     Over the years, our hunting party has taken quite a few bucks in the cliff areas of the Palouse. Most hunters of the area will not go up there because getting a deer there requires a lot of work to get out, and it is just tough hunting. But those cliffs are where the big guys like to hang, to include the one I got.

     How I got him was an interesting story. As I was crawling down, I heard some noise in the bushes below me and a two point buck popped out. I raised the rifle on him and looked at his horns to identify how many he really had. You look for little nubs on the eye guards, or any kind of growth on the horns to give you any indicators for a shot. But nothing on this guy’s horns would indicate a three point, so I had to let him go. I notified my uncle via a small Motorola ‘talk-about’ radio we use, that this deer was heading his way.

     So as I was going down the slope, I was looking for another point to glass from.  I found a good edge and was able to start glassing again.  It was a great spot because it allowed me to look at the cliffs around me with a better angle. It also shortened up my range if I had to shoot into the river valley. I had a Nikon range finder at the time, and most of my shots would have been in the 200 to 300 yd range. Perfect for the rifle I had set up.

     Then while I was glassing and talking with my father on the radio about another doe we spotted, I had heard some noise in the brush from where the two point buck came out of. I brought my rifle up again and had to move closer to it in order to see what it was. To my astonishment, it was another buck that decided to get up. This guy was definitely shootable and big, and was holding tight in his little hiding spot. I had to shoot quick because he was getting ready to bolt, and I popped him dead on in the chest at about 36 yds.(he walked a little from his position, and then was squared up facing me when I shot).

My deer

The five point buck I shot up on the cliffs.

    The shot thwacked him in the chest and he went down immediately. He then rolled down the slope and I put my safety back on the rifle to go after him. Basically, I had to follow him over the cliff edge and through the ravine that he was rolling down. Luckily he was going down a ravine that was passable and I felt I could do it safely.

     As I came up on him, I poked his eyeball to make sure it was dead. You always dead check these things because a wounded animal with horns can certainly hurt you. This guy was dead and it was a good clean shot. The 185 grn. bullet entered the chest and stayed in the body. The bullet did reach the right side tenderloin and was a little screwed up–but not bad.

     From that point on I had to plan on how to get the deer out of there. I unloaded my rifle and slung it on my back and took some clothing off so I did not overheat. I then dragged the animal down the slope with gravity being my friend. The thing felt like it weighed about 190 lbs.

     Once at the bottom of the slope I came across the river that the cliff was overlooking. On the banks of the river, I gutted the deer and washed him out in the river. The river is also what I used to float the deer to a pick up point for my vehicle. (After shooting the deer, I notified my father and uncle to go get the pick up and meet me below to pick up the deer.)

     This next part of the deer hauling process was interesting as well. I had two choices for dragging the deer. Drag it across the river and over land for about 300 yds, or float the body down the river a ways and drag it up the banks to a pick up point for the vehicle, which would make my drag just 30 yds. I chose the ‘Deliverance’ method. (movie reference) lol

     It worked well and I only tripped in the water once.  The water was cold but not that bad, and the animal was floating just fine in the water. Once I got it to the bank on the other side, that is when my hunting party arrived and was able to help me get it up on the road.

     After loading up the deer into the truck, we took it back to camp and hung it on a tractor. Once it was hanged we skinned the thing and parked in a cool dark area of a tractor garage. We then loaded up the truck and went back out to catch a little hunting before dark.

     I was pretty happy. It was an ethical kill meaning it did not suffer, and I did not get hurt hauling it off of the cliffs or through the river. The meat was in one piece and there was tons of fat on this deer. (these deer are basically grain fed animals with all of the wheat and corn in the area, and taste like really lean beef)

     As the week progressed, my uncle shot a deer up on the cliffs as well. We actually had to haul that ‘up the cliff edge’ using my truck as a tow. That was a first for us, and  the potential for falling off the edge was definitely there. My uncle’s deer was a four point. I guess we could have pushed the deer over the ledge, but then that would have damaged the meat and horns.

     Once the week ended I drove back to Boise to drop off my deer at the butcher and rent a meat locker. I asked the butcher to make steaks and hamburger out of it. (and add a little beef to the burger) I will also cut the horns off the head and put it on a mount. I can’t wait to taste the meat, and I already have some recipes that I want to try.

     All and all this was probably my best hunt in this area and I hope to go back again next year. I can’t tell you how many deer we saw, to include shootable bucks. The weather was perfect, the company was excellent, the food was outstanding and all the planning and preparation produced a fantastic experience. The Palouse is a winner! –Matt

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Iraq: Baghdad To Cull A Million Stray Dogs

Filed under: Fish and Game,Iraq,Medical — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Matt @ 1:53 PM

     This is actually a good thing.  The wild dog population in Iraq is out of control and a huge problem there.  One thing for everyone to think about when you are out there is don’t be surprised if you see these guys walking around with shotguns, shooting up dogs in the streets and cities.  It would be very easy to mistake these guys as the enemy or think there is some kind of firefight with all of the gun fire caused by this culling operation. It looks like they are operating in teams of four–two shooters, two vets, and possibly some police escorting them around.  And this is just for Baghdad.  I can’t even imagine how big the stray dog population is throughout Iraq. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Iraq dogs

Baghdad to cull a million stray dogs as rogue canine population soars

June 11, 2010

More than a million stray dogs roaming Baghdad are facing destruction.

The initiative has so far led to 42,000 strays being killed in only two months.

Teams of riflemen and vets are trying to thin out a rogue canine population that has reached at least 1,250,000.

Numbers grew hugely after the fall of Saddam because of the lawless state of the Iraqi capital.

But with the streets now much safer, the authorities are trying to clear out the stray dogs.

(more…)

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Fish And Game: Hog Bounty Program In The Upper Peninsula, Michigan

     This is cool.  Although I think their intent is to only offer bounties to locals who shoot pigs. You will have to call the phone number below to ask if they offer the program to folks outside of the state.

     Also, check out the show Pig Bomb on Discovery Channel.  The series is entirely dedicated to the feral hog explosion throughout the US.  I hope to see more bounty hunting programs pop up. Especially if these hogs are causing $800 million in damages every year.  –Matt

—————————————————————-

Hog Bounty Program Up and Running in U.P.

The Delta County Conservation District is administering a privately-funded program aimed at eradicating, or at least reducing, the number of wild hogs in the Central Upper Peninsula. The two-year pilot program got started in mid-April with funding from the U.P. Whitetails organization and the District.

In early January, the Michigan Wildlife Conservancy had publicly called for hog bounties across the state to avoid serious, long-term damage to Michigan’s agricultural and natural resources. Nationwide, wild hogs conservatively cause $800 million worth of damage annually to crops, golf courses, lawns and forests by their feeding and rooting habits. They are also vicious predators of livestock, deer fawns and ground-nesting birds.

(more…)

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Fish And Game: Fox Stop Versus The Fox And Wild Dog Bounty Program In Australia

    “In reintroducing the bounty, we are aiming to replicate the success of the 2003 program when about 198,000 foxes were killed,” Mr Ryan said.

     Mr Walsh said the State Government’s token ‘Fox Stop’ program had proved to be an abject failure.

     “Just 6,200 foxes were killed last year under the Fox Stop program last year, as opposed to 198,000 when the Fox Bounty was trialled in 2003,” Mr Walsh said.

*****

   Wow, the numbers speak for themselves. lol I say bring back the bounty program because the Fox Stop program looks pretty ineffective.  If you read through the rules and such for the Fox Stop program, you can kind of see why it sucks.  The bounty program is simple and plays well to free market forces that work.  You assign a value to the animal, and you open up the hunt to those who have a license.  Simple and easy to understand. –Matt

——————————————————————

Coalition vows to bring back the bounty

10 May, 2010

A VICTORIAN Liberal Nationals Coalition Government will implement a year-round statewide bounty to control fox and wild dog numbers across Victoria.

Shadow Minister for Regional and Rural Development and Leader of The Nationals Peter Ryan, and Shadow Minister for Agriculture and Deputy Leader of The Nationals Peter Walsh today announced $4 million over four years to establish a Fox and Wild Dog Bounty if elected to government.

Mr Ryan said Victorian fox and wild dog numbers had exploded in recent years and were a serious threat to farming communities and the natural environment.

“Foxes and wild dogs are exposing farmers to severe stock losses, resulting in hefty costs to farm businesses and Victoria’s economy,” Mr Ryan said.

“Under the Coalition’s program all licensed shooters, including rural landholders, will be eligible for a $10 bounty for every fox and a $50 bounty for every dog killed.

“Research shows foxes are estimated to cost Australia more than $228 million per year in combined environmental and agricultural impacts and control costs, with the direct impact on sheep production alone estimated at $17.5 million every year – in some areas they have been known to take up to 30 per cent of lambs.

“In reintroducing the bounty, we are aiming to replicate the success of the 2003 program when about 198,000 foxes were killed,” Mr Ryan said.

Mr Walsh said the State Government’s token ‘Fox Stop’ program had proved to be an abject failure.

“Just 6,200 foxes were killed last year under the Fox Stop program last year, as opposed to 198,000 when the Fox Bounty was trialled in 2003,” Mr Walsh said.

Story here.

—————————————————————-

FoxStop 2010 website here.

—————————————————————-

Fox, wild dog bounties under state coalition

David McKenzie

May 10, 2010

BOUNTIES for killing foxes and wild dogs will be re-introduced next year if the Liberal Nationals Coalition wins the November state election.

The $4 million, four year proposal was unveiled today by Shadow Minister for Regional and Rural Development and Nationals leader of  Peter Ryan and Shadow Agriculture Minister and deputy Nationals leader Peter Walsh.Under the proposed Fox and Wild Dog Bounty, all licensed shooters, including rural landholders, would be eligible for a $10 bounty for every fox and a $50 bounty for every dog killed. (more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress