Archive for category Paracargo

Paracargo: Gates Rules Out Airdropping Aid For Fear Of Riots–What?

   I disagree with this wholeheartedly, and I think this was the wrong decision.  We could have airdropped tools, food, water, and medical supplies in small bundles, evenly distributed throughout the city, and we could have saved lives.  It is so typical for the government to make these kinds of calls, without thoroughly thinking this through. This is not a food drop in the Sudan, where people fight over that food, this is about initial attack on an incident and empowering people to save others.

    We should be focusing on giving the Haitians the means to help themselves in the beginning days of the disaster, so that at least they can do something to even the odds of survival.  We cannot and should not tell the Haitians to stop and lay down, just so we can load up all of our fancy gear and specialists, so we can come to the rescue.  Government needs to empower people to save themselves in this case, and I believe more innocents will have died because of this terrible decision.

   By now, we have witnessed the pictures and videos of Haitians clawing at the rubble with their bare hands in order to save people.  You would hear them screaming for hacksaws, shovels, picks, crowbars, and just the basic necessities to help in the rescue of their friends and family.  It is heart breaking that we have taken this position on airdrops within these first few days of the disaster.  Especially when the capability is there in the West, with Fire Caches filled with paracargo chutes, and tools/food/water bladders/medical supplies and smokejumper loadmasters and pilots that do small scale paracargo operations every summer. Did I mention the fire season is over right now, and smokejumpers could be utilized for this crisis? Matter of fact, smokejumpers drop tons of equipment in the form of small bundles, all over the west during the fire season. To do so in Haiti would not have been a problem. They could have also dropped smokejumpers as an initial attack management team for the disaster, and to secure the drop zones so they can keep folks out.  This is not a new concept, or impossible.  We respond to disasters every summer.

   Not to mention the paracargo capabilities of the Air Force and Air National Guard.  Even Blackwater has been contracted for paracargo drops in Afghanistan, and they could have been called up for this. RAM and SOAR is an NGO that could have gotten involved with dropping medical personnel and supplies.

   Now I do agree that if folks are in complete starvation mode, and desperate for food and water, then people might riot over those drops.  But I am talking about the initial attack, or the first three days of the disaster.  That is when people are either in shock, or they are screaming for a way to rescue their friends and family.  Rioting over air drops would not happen in this case, and especially if the drops were done properly.  And I will argue that if you keep the bundles small, and strategically drop them with smaller aircraft, you can totally alleviate the concerns of possible rioting.

   The beautiful part about small scale paracargo, is that you can kick bundles out of most any kind of aircraft. And all you need is a hard point in the aircraft to attach to in order to deploy the chute on the bundle. You also need loadmasters and pilots that are familiar with the process, and the bundles need to be prepared by competent folks.

   I also want to mention that the chutes of paracargo bundles, could be used as blankets, or tarps to provide shade or rain protection for people. They are instant shelters. The para-chord on each chute can also be used for lashing things or helping in the rescue effort. Each box should have gloves, food, water, and medical supplies, along with tools.  Because in order to sustain rescue, you need energy, you need gloves to protect your hands, and you need water to stay hydrated.  Those items will increase the work output of the rescuers.

    Like I said, this could have all been done in the beginning with an aggressive initial attack, and more lives could have been saved. A Berlin Airlift style assault is what was needed, in order to empower the people of Haiti to save themselves. That is my opinion on the whole matter. -Matt

Edit: 01/18/2010- And finally the Air Force has decided to do air drops into secured drop zones.  Duh.

—————————————————————–

4Paracargo: Gates Rules Out Airdropping Aid For Fear Of Riots  What?

Gates rules out airdropping aid for fear of riots

By Jeff Schogol, Stars and StripesMideast edition, Saturday,

January 16, 2010

ARLINGTON, Va. — Top defense officials have ruled out airdropping food, water and medical supplies over Haiti, fearing that chaos would be the unintended result.

“It seems to me that without having any structure on the ground, in terms of distribution, that an airdrop is simply going to lead to riots as people try and go after that stuff,” said Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Friday.

On Thursday, an Air Force official said that a lack of fuel and equipment was slowing air operations at the Port-au-Prince airport.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , ,

Podcasts: NPR-Behind The Business Plan of Pirates Inc.

     I posted the initial story awhile back under ‘paracargo’, with a photo of some cash being dropped to a boat to pay off the pirates.  That part was fascinating to me, but this part of the operation is equally fascinating.  Matter of fact, the whole thing should be a case study at some maritime institute for modern day piracy and kidnap and ransom negotiations on the high seas.  -Matt

—————————————————————–

Podcast Here

—————————————————————–  

pirate 540Podcasts: NPR Behind The Business Plan of Pirates Inc.

David B. Hudson/U.S. Navy/AP

A container is parachuted to a ship being held by Somali pirates on Jan. 9. It’s believed the container held ransom money for the ship and its crew — the usual way pirates collect “pay” for their “work” in the piracy business model. 

Behind The Business Plan Of Pirates Inc.

by Chana Joffe-Walt

All Things Considered, April 30, 2009 · 

Piracy off the coast of Somalia has become an international problem — and an international business. Navy SEALS rescued an American merchant captain earlier this month after Somali pirates raided the Maersk Alabama as it was making its way around the Horn of Africa to deliver aid.

But the issues of criminality and the potential for violence aside, a closer look at the “business model” of piracy reveals that the plan makes economic sense.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , ,

Afghanistan: Life at Combat Outpost Keating

    This is a story that kind of piggybacks the other one below, as to the kind of issues we are seeing with combat outposts in Afghanistan.  With the support and security of these outposts, are the troops getting enough face time with the local populations?  Perhaps if they were freed up to actually get out more, as opposed to dedicating troops for static security functions or support functions, then we could see more efficiency in these operations.  

   As for resupply, this is interesting.  In the smokejumpers, we lived on paracargo for our fire operations.  Helicopters were used as well, when we needed something bigger flown in, or when we needed to fly firefighters out.  The final analysis of both the fixed wing aircraft dropping paracargo and jumpers and the helicopter, is that fixed wing operations were cheaper to operate.  But ideally, you would have roads that were open and secure to provide that re-supply.  In Afghanistan, supply via road is a tough one and not that feasible.

   Another angle for re-supply is to buy locally.  At the camps I worked at in Iraq, we not only ate MRE’s and A rations, but we also bought locally to add some fresh vegetables or meat to our diets.  The farmers and local merchants were happy too, because they were making money locally. We should be doing more of this at these outposts in Afghanistan, if they are not doing it already.

   The location of these outposts are important as well, and it would be curious to hear the thought process of the original engineers and commanders, on why they picked that spot for Combat Outpost Keating.  And it would be interesting to ask them the question ‘ if they could do it differently, what would they do?’  For our industry, I would also like to hear the thoughts of the commander at this outpost what could be contracted out and what services are needed to help him and his troops do their job.  The point being, is that if there is any way we can make their job a little easier, then why not explore those possibilities?  It sounds like they hired local Afghani cooks for the outpost, so obviously there is some contracted services there.

   This outpost is interesting, because if there are thousands of more troops coming into Afghanistan in the near future, then where are they going to post them at?  They must be thinking about creating more outposts like this one.  And if we want to get that ’25 soldiers to every 1000 civilians’ for optimum COIN operations, could contractors play a vital role in making that happen?  

   The things I could see being contracted out are purely defensive(static security at the outpost) or support(cooks, mechanics, camp manager, bridge and road engineers, etc.) roles, all with the idea of freeing up the troops to do what they need to do in the villages.  I could also see the paracargo or helicopter operations being contracted out as well. We are seeing some use of contractors for these types of services already in Afghanistan, but it could easily be ramped up more to meet the needs of the oncoming troops this spring and summer.  Blackwater already performs troop transport and paracargo operations with their CASA 212′s.  Base security is already beginning to be contracted out, as well as convoy protection services.  I see more of the same picking up in the future, and private industry will definitely answer the call.  The question I have, is if the DoD and DoS plan on contracting this stuff out, are they ready to manage it?  Or better yet, are they doing what is necessary to prepare for it? -Matt

——————————————————————-  

Few comforts, much danger for outpost GIs

Thursday, January 15, 2009 

Jason Motlagh 

COMBAT OUTPOST KEATING, Afghanistan — | Entombed by steep faces of jagged rock, this coalition outpost deep in the Afghan borderlands plays a role as grim as it looks: drawing the attention of insurgents flocking from tribal areas in nearby Pakistan.   The machine-gun, mortar and rocket-propelled-grenade (RPG) fire usually subsides in the winter, when the insurgents go home. These days, however, local militants stoke the fight. They find refuge in caves and villages whose fiercely independent residents say the presence of U.S.-led forces is the root of the problem. ”Right now, we´re like the ring of a boxing ring,” said Army Capt. Daniel Pecha, who took over command of Combat Outpost Keating after his predecessor was killed in late October.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,

Paracargo: $3 Million Paracargo Drop for Saudi Tanker, Somalia

   This is the first time I have ever heard of paying off pirates by using the paracargo method.  I imagine the chute was a guided system so it landed where they wanted it to go.  What a dramatic finish to the world’s biggest ship hijacking, and this one is for the books.  Then the clown shoe pirates sank in their get away boat, and lost their loot to Davy Jones.  You can’t make this stuff up, and thanks to Doug for sending me this. -Matt

——————————————————————-

article 1110585 03004226000005DC 32 468x366Paracargo:  $3 Million Paracargo Drop for Saudi Tanker, Somalia

The apparent ransom payment is delivered via a parachuted container to pirates holding the Sirius Star.

 

Pictured: The moment a $3million ransom was parachuted to Somali pirates

By David Gardner

Last updated at 11:53 PM on 09th January 2009

This is the dramatic moment a ransom of $3million was paid to Somali pirates to end the world’s biggest ship hijacking.

The canister full of cash was parachuted onto the Sirius Star – observed by the U.S. Navy who provided these images – and the two-month ordeal of the 25 crew, including two Britons, was finally over.

However things went badly wrong for the pirates soon after the drop – they squabbled over how to split the money and then a wave washed off their getaway boat and drowned five of them.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,

Paracargo: The C-23 Sherpa

     Ahhhh, this video of the CASA 212 below reminded me of my smokejumper days.  We used the same aircraft for smokejumper operations, and they are a good aircraft for parachuting and paracargo work.  We would dump out paracargo at about 450 to 500 AGL, depending on terrain and weather conditions.  Our pilots were awesome at getting bundles onto mountain top ridges, or little meadows.  

     I also got to assist in kicking cargo as a jumper.  There is a lot involved with these types of operations, and we definitely took it seriously.  If you get a bundle that does not deploy because of a poorly packed cargo chute, or it hangs up in the door and tears apart the tail of the aircraft, then you could be in a world of hurt.  As a jumper, a big portion of my work during the off season was dedicated to repairing cargo chutes, or packing them.  

     The other aspect of paracargo that doesn’t get much mention is climbing trees for the stuff.  You haven’t lived until you had to climb a 200 ft fir tree rocking back and forth in the wind, just to retrieve cargo or retrieve your parachute after a tree landing.  In the aircraft, we would drop tree climbing equipment for such missions.

     One thing I am surprised at, is why the military doesn’t use it’s fleet of C-23 Sherpas for these kinds of operations?  They are just a little bit bigger than CASA 212′s, and you can get a ramp kit for them, so you can kick out cargo out of the tail. I called them flying ‘Winnebagos’ because of their box-like appearance. I think the military uses them to haul around jet engines or something.

     In the jumpers we used a bunch of different aircraft to include the Dornier 228 202Douglas DC-3, and the DH-600 series Twin Otter.  The Twin Otter was probably the best all around aircraft for smokejumper operations.  Although jumping out of that DC-3 is cool too.  The DC-3′s we used were the same ones used during WW2.  Obviously the newer ones are highly upgraded, but it is literally the same aircraft, because the airlogs on most of these craft go back that far!  It is a solid aircraft and truly an honor to jump out of it. -Head Jundi

——————————————————————

800px C 23A 7Paracargo:  The C 23 Sherpa 

An air to air right side view of a 10th Military Airlift Squadron C-23A Sherpa aircraft. In the background is a castle. 

Tags: , ,

Video: Blackwater CASA 212 and Paracargo Operations

Tags: , , ,

News: NGO’s to Deploy Airborne Medical Teams in South America

     I talked with some dude from this group awhile back. They found my info somewhere and were asking about smokejumping operations and developing their own air operation. It looks like they will finally be doing the South America air drop thing, to fix a runway near a remote village and do some remote medicine. Great concept, and I hope it takes off as it get’s more attention.

     SOAR will be doing a partnership with RAM, and it should be cool to see how this pans out. Hopefully no one breaks a leg doing this shit. ha ha

     Air Drop Assist is the training side of the operation. For a small fee, they will train you for paracargo and parachuting operations. This group is working with both RAM and SOAR, and these are the guys I think I talked with. -Head Jundi

———————————————————-

This is a great little video about what they do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly9gLb1enxg&feature=user

————————————————-
http://www.airdropassist.org/en/index.html

————————————————–

http://www.aidrelief.org/

http://www.ramusa.org/
SOAR to deploy airborne medical team in South America
On March 25th of 2008, SOAR will send its airborne trained medical personnel on an important mission in Guyana. SOAR, in partnership with RAM Airborne, will deploy medical and non-medical skydivers into remote areas of the Guyana. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , ,

News: Low Cost, Low Altitude Airborne Resupply, Afghanistan

     I wanted to post this, because this is right up my ally.  As a smokejumper, we did these kind of operations all the time for resupply.  So this concept is really not new.  Air America used to do these type of operations during the Southeast Asia conflict, and Blackwater USA Aviation is providing the same kind of services now a days in Afghanistan.  The aircraft they use are CASA 212′s, which are the same aircraft that a few of the smokejumper bases use out there.  -Matt

——————————————————————

 

 An innovative approach to combat logistics: low cost, low altitude airborne resupply in AfghanistanMichael PetermanHistory has shown that without combat service support and sustainment operations, the warfighting capability of any unit is certainly diminished, and potentially leads to interruption of combat operations. Hence, the ability to develop innovative, adaptive combat service support sustainment processes remains a strong principle within contingency operations.The 782nd Brigade Support Battalion (BSB) has brought such innovation to the modern battlefield of Afghanistan. Due to the expertise and initiative of the Soldiers of the 782nd BSB, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, the Army has a new aerial resupply capability in the form of the Thestral “Speedball” Low Cost, Low Altitude (LCLA) Aerial Delivery System.The LCLA program is a new and innovative means of aerial delivery currently being employed throughout portions of Afghanistan. The program differs from the Air Force high velocity container delivery system (CDS) drops in that bundles are smaller in size and delivered at a very low altitude from a smaller civilianstyle aircraft with almost pinpoint accuracy–usually within 20 meters of the established point of impact (PI).

 

CONCEPTIf you have never seen LCLA firsthand, you would not understand the true disposable nature of this system. This system is truly “low cost,” based on parachutes made of sandbag materials, risers made of swingset plastic rope, and the total cost of the system is less than $100 each. These systems are truly expendable as well. In other words, there is no need to backhaul air items for reuse based on the high consumption rate. Ultimately, the Soldier on the drop zone (DZ) can cut the lashings, take the supplies, and leave the chute and lashings behind.LCLA bundles can comprise virtually all classes of supply and have a ranged in weight from 250 to 560 ponds. Bundles are ConstrUcted on 2-foot by 4-foot wooden skids using A-7A cargo straps to attach the loads to the skids as well as to hold the loads together. The three parachutes used in conducting the LCLA drops are the T-10 personnel parachute, the T-10R reserve parachute, and the Stalker (Cross) parachute. The T-10 parachutes are beyond their useful lifespan for personnel use and are taken from Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office (DRMO) inventories and utilized in this disposable fashion. They are a one-time use parachute and are “free of cost,” per se. The Stalker parachute is made of extruded polypropylene (much like sandbag material) and is also considered disposable.The LCLA system is designed to provide a “one-time” solution that is reliable and inexpensive. LCLA also was designed to require NO rigger support. The intent of LCLA was to improve the “speedball” method of airdrop and was intended for units that don’t have rigger support (non-airborne units). If this intent is maintained, then the requirement for rigger and jumpmaster (JM) support increases the opportunities for units that typically don’t have riggers/JMs. This is a topic of discussion amongst the test evaluators back in the United States. However, the 782nd BSB’s current stance is that LCLA missions should have one JM-qualified paratrooper on the aircraft to ensure safe delivery of the bundle. However, we do see utility of non-airborne units taking advantage of this method of aerial resupply. To bridge this gap we see some form of application training course being developed in one of the combat service support proponents.FROM CONCEPT TO COMBAT OPERATIONSThe 782nd BSB is the only unit within the U.S. Army that has fully planned, tested, and executed LCLA operations in a combat environment. With full testing at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) at Fort Polk, Louisiana, the organization has gained approval from the Army Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Natick, Massachusetts, for execution within the Afghanistan area of responsibility (AOR). In the first six months of its deployment, the battalion conducted more than 55 LCLA resupply missions and delivered more than 620 bundles of all classes of supply. As a result of this capability, it is now common for maneuver units to plan, request, and execute LCLA operations during normal mission planning and concept of operations (CONOP) development.The aircraft used to conduct LCLA drops in Afghanistan is the CASA 212. At home station and at Fort Polk, C-23 Sherpas were used. Changing aircraft necessitated adaptation of rigging procedures. The aircraft in Afghanistan are flown by Blackwater Corporation pilots, who primarily transported personnel and mail across the battlefield before getting the LCLA contract. The aircraft can carry up to six bundles and a jumpmaster team to deliver the bundles on the drop zone. Depending on the temperature, altitude and flight time, the total weight of cargo and crew is approximately 3,500 pounds.Currently, LCLA aircraft teams consist of tour airborne-qualified personnel, at least two of whom need to be qualified jumpmasters. During the flight to the drop zone, the jumpmasters will verify the loads are properly hooked up to the anchor line cable and prepared for delivery. As the aircraft approaches the DZ, the jumpmaster team positions the bundles to be dropped by pushing them onto the ramp of the aircraft. Two personnel hold the bundles in place while the other two prepare to push the loads. The loadmaster, in concert with the pilots, calls one-minute, 30-second, and 10-second warnings and then “execute.” Upon the command to execute, the jumpmaster team pushes the rear bundle along the roller systems on the floor of the aircraft which deploys all bundles and their parachutes.The DZ setup includes a modified version of the raised angle marker (RAM). The modifications made to the RAM were based on the differences in delivery between the Air Force CDS and the LCLA. The standard RAM is designed for high performance aircraft to deliver the bundles from 800 feet above ground level (AGL), which gives the pilots visibility of the DZ a mile or so away. Since the CASA 212 is traveling at roughly 30 feet AGL during transit and 120 feet AGL during the drop, the RAMDA (Raised Angle Marker Developed for Afghanistan) is raised to a height of roughly 20 feet to ensure visibility and give the pilots maximum time to acquire the DZ. This DZ can subsequently be utilized in an omni-directional manner to minimize the enemy threat to aircraft during the operation.An air mission briefing is conducted prior to the operation where the air crew is briefed by the battalion $2 on weather, terrain and any enemy threats, using past enemy patterns, drop zone imagery and current situation report (SITREP) analysis.PURPOSE AND BENEFITS (REASONS TO CONDUCT LCLA OPERATIONS): Simplicity:Simplicity:* LCLA operations can resupply platoon-size units during missions when normal sustainment delivery means are impossible due to the factors of METT-TC (mission, enemy, terrain, troops, time, civilians). Furthermore, the 782nd BSB has tailored these droppable bundles in a matter that allows for a two-man lift into the back of a trailer or variants of the HMMWV guntruck (M1025/MII51/ M 1152, for example).[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]* Bundle design that does not require de-rigging by the ground unit at the drop zone. This allows the maneuver unit to quickly receive the resupply with minimal exposure time at the drop zone.* As an evolving process that has become quite refined by the 782nd BSB, LCLA operations are quite simplistic in nature. Hence, opportunities exist to cross-train other units in LCLA operations. Currently, the jumpmasters of the BSB are cross-training the 173rd Airborne Brigade (the other BCT currently deployed in CJTF-82) with the SOPs and lessons learned by the 782nd BSB over the last six months in theater.* Based on the simplicity of the bundle design and parachute rigging, the system offers the sustainment organization an inexpensive and efficient system of aerial combat resupply. Versatility:Versatility:[] Small unit operations, especially small units in maneuver (such as CJSOTF, ETTs and conventional platoon and below operations), are easily supported by LCLA.[] LCLA operations deliver all classes of supply, to include larger bundles such as Class III fuel blivets and Class V ammunition up to 155mm rounds, that would not be possible by other means due to the factors of METT-TC.[] LCLA operations do not require drop zone surveys prior to delivery. This allows these operations to take place in merely any terrain condition on the battlefield, to include drops on hillsides, mountain tops, and valleys.[] LCLA operations provide the U.S. Army the capability to conduct organic aerial resupply operations via Army fixed-wing (Army C-23 Sherpa or Casa 212) or rotary-wing (UH-60 Blackhawk or CH-47 Chinook) assets it other joint capabilities (Air Force, Navy, or Marine Corps assets) are unavailable. The versatility of these airframes has proven to be a combat multiplier in the harsh and hostile environmental conditions of Afghanistan. Thus these airframes are subsequently proven candidates for the expansion of future LCLA operations within the AOR and other worldwide contingency operations.[] Similarly, using the CASA 212 aircraft for logistics missions has not only opened up a new means of aerial resupply, but has also decreased the operational requirements on military rotary-wing assets utilized in other operational and transportation missions. Contracted STOL (short take-off and landing) aircraft do not take the place of military air assets, but they allow the maneuver commander more options to conduct full-spectrum operations across the battle space.Risk Mitigation:* More than 620 bundles have been dropped to date (February-July 2007), and there have been no significant safety issues or parachute malfunctions based on the simplicity of the operation.* Due to low altitude of the aerial delivery platform (actual AGL withheld to maintain operational security), the resupply bundle descends to the drop zone within seconds; this short descent time limits the ability of the enemy to observe the “glide path” of the bundle, reducing the risk and potential exposure of the ground element.* With the development of a new marking system–RAMDA, LCLA operations are precise and have been within +/- 20 meters of the heavy impact point of impact (HEPI) on every delivery. Hence, this refinement makes the LCLA operation repeatable and reduces the risks associated with “misses” on the drop zone.* Currently, the LCLA drops that have been completed have taken place during the hours of daylight. Future LCLA operations will include night operations with the Blackwater air crews flying under night vision goggles (NVGs). This will make this method of aerial delivery even safer from enemy threats. It will also avoid setting a pattern of delivery, allowing utilization of all hours of day and night for air drops.LESSONS LEARNED:Nearly every phase related to LCLA operations is a definitive lesson learned by the 782nd BSB, which is the only unit in the Army to successfully execute LCLA operations within a combat zone. Hence, all the SOPs, procedures, and appendices that accompany this observation, albeit in draft form, are in themselves lessons learned from the planning, preparation, and execution phases of LCLA operations both at Fort Bragg, and in the Regional Command–East (CJTF-82) AOR in Afghanistan.Combat LCLA operations have grown exponentially and are now a common form of combat aerial resupply within 4th BCT, 82nd Airborne Division. All the lessons learned, to include all documentation, are currently being transferred to the 173rd Airborne Brigade via “train-the-trainer” instruction between both of the brigades.LCLA operations in the 4th BCT’s AOR are fully institutionalized and are now planned via normal air mission request procedures (to include all necessary documentation and coordination, such as CONOP development and approval).THE “WAY AHEAD:”The 782nd BSB is continuing to collect data after each LCLA operation. This data should be subsequently reviewed by appropriate proponents prior to institutionalization of LCLA operations by the U.S. Army. Furthermore, with maturation of the program, the potential clearly exists to conduct LCLA operations without a jumpmaster, which will allow non-airborne units (armor, mechanized and other light infantry units) to conduct LCLA operations within the GWOT AOR.All drops currently being conducted in theater have been, and are still technically experimental. The only trained personnel in-theater include paratroopers assigned to the 4th BCT that are currently conducting LCLA drops. Furthermore, the 782nd BSB continually reviews all safety notifications/ requirements developed by the Airborne Special Operations Test Directorate (ABNSOTD), the U.S. Army Developmental Test Command, and the Natick Soldier Center; these safety issues are continually vetted in Afghanistan through the 4th BCT safety team and jumpmasters.As a result of these efforts, the 782nd BSB has developed robust documentation that is has codified them as the “LCLA” appendix to the 82nd Airborne Division’s “Airborne SOP,” as outlined below:LCLA Operations SOP:Chapter 1–General Overview Chapter 2–Unit Training and Sustainment Chapter 3–Drop Zone Safety Officer Duties Chapter 4–Jumpmaster Duties Chapter 5–Rigging Chapter 6–Loading Aircraft Chapter 7–Exiting Procedure Chapter 8–Recovery of Equipment Chapter 9–ReportsLCLA SOP Appendices:Appendix A–CONOP Appendix B–Joint Inspection Checklist Appendix C–Strike Report Appendix D–Load Data CardOther Documentation:Chute Consumption: Growth of LCLA operationsLCLA Jumpmaster Card LCLA Parachute Packing Procedures Example CONOP from the Afghanistan AOR Raised Angle Marker Developed for Afghanistan (RAMDA) Instructions LCLA Training Standards LCLA Training TimelineWithin continued coordination with the aforementioned proponents, training and institutionalization of LCLA operations becomes applicable in global contingency and humanitarian assistance and relief operations (for example: natural disaster relief or NGO-support operations), when and where applicable. All individuals are encouraged to recommend additions and/ or changes to improve the program and its current SOPs.CONCLUSIONAlthough doctrine and field manuals exist for airdropping supplies, there are no publications related to the LCLA operational concept. Hence, the aforementioned documentation, lessons learned, and TTPs developed by the 782nd BSB are a valuable source of information and should be treated as such.The LCLA program is and will continue to be effective throughout the region. The challenges of Afghanistan’s terrain, weather, and remoteness lend directly to this method of resupply. Whether it is a supply mission to a forward base or a platoon experiencing mechanical problems on the side of a road, the LCLA program offers the flexibility, responsiveness, and accuracy to greatly improve the ability to resupply our maneuver forces. The program is one of the quickest and most efficient means to get the supplies to the battlefield with minimal cost in terms of equipment and personnel.LCLA demonstrates great application of logistics technology that will continue to maintain the tempo of our fight in this theater. Again, thanks go out to many who have provided this capability to the 782nd BSB team and the paratroopers of 4th BCT. The 782nd BSB will continue to partner with Blackwater Corporation, the CJTF-82 staff, the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL), and the Army Research, Development, and Engineering Center during the upcoming months to ensure all TTPs are documented for the team and the U.S. Army.Lieutenant Colonel Michael Peterman is currently deployed to Afghanistan and assigned as commander of the 782nd Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. He has served in a variety of Airborne and Special Operations assignments. His combat service includes deployments as part of Operation Just Cause as well as Operation Enduring Freedom.Major Paul J. Narowski II is currently deployed to Afghanistan and assigned as the executive officer of the 782nd BSB, 4th BCT, 82nd Airborne Division. He has served in a variety of Airborne and Special Operations assignments. His combat service includes two deployments as part of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and one to Operation Iraqi Freedom.Major Ernest Litynski is currently deployed to Afghanistan and attached to the 82nd Airborne Division as the CALL liaison officer; he has worked extensively with the 4th Brigade Combat Team during the deployment. He has served in multiple Airborne assignments. His combat service includes deployments as part of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.Sergeant First Class Edwin Clouse is currently deployed to Afghanistan and assigned as the air NCOIC, 782nd BSB, 4th BCT, 82nd Airborne Division. He has served in a variety of Airborne assignments. His service includes six operational combat deployments to include Somalia, Haiti, two tours to Bosnia, and one each to Iraq and Afghanistan.The authors would like to give special thanks to all the paratroopers, service members, and Blackwater aviators who have taken this conceptual idea through creation, documentation, and to current execution of combat-proven, LCLA airborne operations in Afghanistan. Airborne–All the Way.

Story Here 

Tags: , , , ,