Archive for the 'Strategy' Category
This is a good little post on a subject you don’t hear much about, yet is pretty important to today’s ranchers and farmers along the border with Mexico, or to farmers who are caught in the middle of conflicts throughout the world. If you look at farms and ranches as a strategic asset of […]
April 26th, 2010 | Posted in Strategy | 7 Comments
The RAND study found:
• Modern insurgencies last approximately 10 years and the government’s chances of winning increase slightly over time.
• Withdrawal of state sponsorship cripples an insurgency and typically leads to its defeat, while inconsistent or impartial support to either side generally presages defeat.
• Pseudo-democracies do not often succeed against insurgencies and are rarely successful in fully democratizing.
*****
[…]
April 24th, 2010 | Posted in Afghanistan, Publications, Strategy | No Comments
The attacks “are not about armed confrontation. They are about subversion of the government,” said Terrence K. Kelly, a senior researcher at the Washington-based RAND Corporation who has studied how rebuilding efforts work in war zones. America’s strategy counts on development work to increase the legitimacy and reach of the Karzai government. With these […]
April 24th, 2010 | Posted in Afghanistan, Industry Talk, Strategy | No Comments
Furthermore, the introduction of sophisticated weapons (e.g., ATGMs, MANPADS) could radically escalate the challenges faced by U.S. forces in Afghanistan, as it did for the Soviet Union in the 1980s.
*****
That quote up top is the one part I really clued in on, and I have talked about this […]
April 14th, 2010 | Posted in Israel, Publications, Strategy | No Comments
Boy, this is a long one and this will take you a little bit to read through all the speeches and various articles. But hey, if you are a student of strategy and are wanting to take a look into the future of defense contracting, you have to figure out what the big boys […]
April 13th, 2010 | Posted in Strategy | No Comments
It strikes me that the significance of Mitchell, Arnold, Schreiver, and Boyd and their travails was not that they were always right. What strikes me is that they had the vision and insight to see that the world and technology had changed. They understood the implications of that change, and they pressed ahead in […]
April 12th, 2010 | Posted in Aviation, Building Snowmobiles, Military News, Strategy | No Comments
Rule 1: “Many and Small” Beats “Few and Large.”
Rule 2: Finding Matters More Than Flanking.
Rule 3: Swarming Is the New Surging.
*****
This was an awesome interview, and if you want, you can watch this in five parts or in one viewing. If you are overseas and bandwidth is a problem, the first […]
April 9th, 2010 | Posted in Letter Of Marque, Strategy, Video | 2 Comments
I love papers like this, because these are the kind of deals that ruffle the feathers of Tankers and Armor fans, as well as status quo military thinkers. Thanks to Small Wars Journal for publishing it. Basically, William has presented some excellent low cost hybrid warfare concepts that should be of great interest to the […]
April 8th, 2010 | Posted in Iran, Israel, PMC 2.0, Publications, Strategy | No Comments
For traditional defense companies, the operative word is “non-kinetic,” another speaker asserted.
“We love our kinetic weapons, and we don’t want to let them go,” he said. “But the world is moving in a different direction.”
Here’s the problem: Kinetic weapons only are useful in phases two, three and four of war. Gates […]
March 19th, 2010 | Posted in Books, Industry Talk, Strategy | No Comments
Just a heads up, John was one of Rumsfeld’s advisors. lol But he does bring up some good points to think about, and I wanted to put them out there for the FJ readership to analyze. Here is a quick run down of the rules the author came up with:
Rule 1: “Many and Small” Beats “Few […]
March 6th, 2010 | Posted in Al Qaeda, Strategy | 2 Comments