Archive for category Washington DC
Locations: WASHINGTON, DC
Job Description (Please follow all instructions carefully)
Department: Executive Office of the President Agency: Office of the US Trade Representative
Job Announcement Number: USTR-09-17-PZ
Security Specialist
Salary Range: 50,408.00 – 79,280.00 USD /year
Vacancy No. USTR-09-17-PZ
Department Office of the US Trade Representative
Salary $50,408.00 to $79,280.00
Grade 09 to 11
Perm/Temp Permanent
FT/PT Full-time
Open Date 6/12/2009
Close Date 6/25/2009
Job Link Application instruction listed in job description
Who may apply Public
Open Period: Friday, June 12, 2009
to Thursday, June 25, 2009
Series & Grade: GS-0080-09/11
Position Information: Full-Time Permanent
Promotion Potential: 11
Duty Locations: 001 vacancies – Washington, DC
Who May Be Considered:
Applications will be accepted from US Citizens, from current and former competitive service Federal employees, and people eligible under special hiring authorities.
“Never take your guard force or your security people for granted,” Parsons said. “They did exactly what they were supposed to do.”
Certainly a tragedy, and from the looks of it, Big John didn’t have a chance to draw his .38. I guess the issue of body armor being requested by the union is on the front page as well. Although, I think if the guard wanted armor and the company wasn’t providing that, then the guard should have made it a personal responsibility to get that armor. In this industry, it behooves everyone to get their own armor if they are serious about their job.
There comes a point where a person must seek personal responsibility and ‘be prepared’. So from a Jundism point of view, the company failed to protect their employee with the necessary equipment (.38 revolver and no armor), or a refusal to”Take Care of Your People”. The security professional failed by not accomplishing the mission of getting a vest, if in fact they thought the post had a threat that required it-”Be Prepared”.
This is why I have bought all of my own equipment for this work, because it is not enough to depend upon the government or companies to provide everything. And if cost is an issue, then start creating a gear fund or put the word out and borrow that equipment until you can afford it. That is the Kaizen way, and to not continually prepare mentally or physically is not good. Invest in yourself, and do what you have to do to get ready-people’s lives depend on your readiness.
We should never stop holding these organizations accountable either, so that they do get this equipment to employees and contractors. But you cannot depend on them to do so and for every contract, until it is mandated by law or by the contract or both.
And if you are a student of OODA, and Destruction and Creation, and understand the concept behind OODA, then you can really see why ‘being prepared’ and having your own stuff or training is so important. Here is what Boyd had to say in his ‘Goals’ section of Destruction and Creation.
And of course, Big John could have had his own body armor, and wasn’t wearing it. Who knows, but I do know that he had been working that post since 2002. In this case, he made his judgement about the threat by not wearing a vest. And all of us do this out there, constantly weighing in on wearing the vest or having certain gear, and not having it or using. Mobility, actual threat and practicality issues are the big one here. Either way, it is hard to say in this case, but this is a story that all of us can learn from in the context of whatever job we are on.
Rest in peace to Big John, and my thoughts and prayers go out to his family and friends. He died in defense of others. -Matt
*****
Destruction and Creation, by Col. John Boyd
(second paragraph)
Studies of human behavior reveal that the actions we undertake as individuals are closely related to survival, more importantly, survival on our own terms. Naturally, such a notion implies that we should be able to act relatively free or independent of any debilitating external influences—otherwise that very survival might be in jeopardy. In viewing the instinct for survival in this manner we imply that a basic aim or goal, as individuals, is to improve our capacity for independent action. The degree to which we cooperate, or compete, with others is driven by the need to satisfy this basic goal. If we believe that it is not possible to satisfy it alone, without help from others, history shows us that we will agree to constraints upon our independent action—in order to collectively pool skills and talents in the form of nations, corporations, labor unions, mafias, etc.—so that obstacles standing in the way of the basic goal can either be removed or overcome. On the other hand, if the group cannot or does not attempt to overcome obstacles deemed important to many (or possibly any) of its individual members, the group must risk losing these alienated members. Under these circumstances, the alienated members may dissolve their relationship and remain independent, form a group of their own, or join another collective body in order to improve their capacity for independent action.
——————————————————————

In this image provided by the U.S. Holocaust Museum, museum guard Stephen T. Johns, is seen. Johns was killed Wednesday, June 10, 2009, in Washington, when an elderly gunman opened fire at the museum. (AP Photo/U.S. Holocaust Museum)
Grief, Shock After a ‘Gentle Giant’ Loses His Life in the Line of Duty
By Christian Davenport and Paul Duggan
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Colleagues called Stephen T. Johns “Big John,” for he was well over 6 feet tall. But mostly friends recalled the security guard’s constant courtesy and friendliness.
“A soft-spoken, gentle giant,” said Milton Talley, a former employee of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, where Johns was killed yesterday in the line of duty — shot, authorities said, by an avowed white supremacist who entered the museum with a rifle.
Details of the shooting remained sketchy last night, but apparently the 39-year-old, who was armed with a .38-caliber revolver, did not have time to react when James W. von Brunn walked into the museum, according to police sources.
“Immediately upon entering the front doors of the museum, he raised the rifle and started shooting,” D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier said of von Brunn, 88, adding that he “was engaged by security guards, and there was an exchange of gunfire.”
When the smoke cleared, von Brunn was critically wounded. The only casualty among the guards was Johns, who lived in Prince George’s County. At least one bullet from a small-caliber rifle hit Johns in his upper-left torso, according to Johns’s employer, the Wackenhut security company.
“Two other . . . armed security officers opened fire with their service revolvers,” the company said. “The intruder was hit at once” and wounded.
Johns died at George Washington University Hospital.
“There are no words to express our grief and shock over these events,” the museum said in a statement, describing Johns as “an outstanding colleague who greeted us every day with a smile.”
Johns, a 1988 graduate of Crosslands High School in Temple Hills, lived in an apartment in the Temple Hills area. Friends said he had a son.
Allen Burcky, another former museum employee, said last night that workers there considered each other “like family” and that Johns was “very courteous, very helpful.”
Lourdes Padilla, the mother of a close friend, said that Johns trained as a plumber but that she didn’t think he had ever entered the trade. He remarried about a year ago, Padilla said.
Johns’s sister, Jacqueline Carter, declined to comment as she entered her home in Temple Hills. “She’s in bad shape right now,” said a man who was driving her.
Wackenhut describes itself as the U.S. government’s “largest contractor for professional security services.” An official with the union that represents Wackenhut employees at the museum said Johns was paid about $20 an hour.
“It’s a heavy loss,” said Assane Faye, the Washington district director of the Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America.
Like other guards at the museum, on Raoul Wallenberg Place SW near the Mall, Johns underwent training for which he received the D.C. police designation of “special police officer,” which permitted him to carry a revolver on duty.
Faye said that during contract negotiations with Wackenhut two years ago, the union pressed for company-issued protective vests. Although Wackenhut seemed open to the idea, vests have not been issued, Faye said.
“I hammered this in our negotiations two years ago because of how sensitive that museum is,” he said. “Our guards needed more protection.” He said that one of the guards at the museum was “verbally assaulted by one guy walking by, saying anti-Semitic remarks. For that reason, I made that the center of the negotiation.”
Authorities said Johns was not wearing a protective vest.
Susan Pitcher, a Wackenhut spokeswoman, declined to comment on the shooting beyond the company’s statement.
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and director of the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles, said officials at those institutions took immediate steps to enhance security after the shooting in Washington.
“The key component is not only to have your own security, but to work with the local police force,” he said. “In our case, the LAPD has a very good grasp of where all sorts of extremists might be and are able to deploy very quickly.”
William S. Parsons, the Holocaust museum’s chief of staff, praised Johns and his colleagues.
“Never take your guard force or your security people for granted,” Parsons said. “They did exactly what they were supposed to do.”
Story here.
——————————————————————
Union Wanted Bullet-Proof Vests for Holocaust Museum Security Guards
June 11, 2009
The union representing security guards at the Holocaust museum in Washington had been fighting for bullet-proof vests, but the company hadn’t issued them at the time of Wednesday’s deadly shooting.
One guard was killed when police say, a lone white supremacist gunman burst into the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and opened fire.
Stephen T. Johns, 39, wasn’t wearing a protective vest when James W. von Brunn allegedly shot him, according to The Washington Post.
The Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America said the union lobbied security contractor Wackenhut Services Inc. for protective vests during contract negotiations two years ago, the Post reported.
But the company-bought vests weren’t provided, even though Wackenhut seemed in favor of the proposal, the union’s Washington district director Assane Faye told the Post.
“I hammered this in our negotiations two years ago because of how sensitive that museum is,” Faye said. “Our guards needed more protection.”
One of the museum’s guards had been “verbally assaulted by one guy walking by, saying anti-Semitic remarks,” Faye told the paper. “For that reason, I made that the center of the negotiation.”
Wackenhut spokeswoman Susan Pitcher declined to comment on the matter.
Johns worked for Wackenhut, which has contracted security services at the museum since 2002, according to a company statement. Johns had been posted at the museum since joining the firm in 2003. The museum has about 70 officers and supervisors on the force.
Guards are armed with .38-caliber revolvers and dress in police-type uniforms, the company said. It said preliminary details indicate the officers responded appropriately when facing the gunman, who opened fire with a rifle.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Story Here
I hope and pray that the security guard that was wounded in this incident is able to survive, and my thoughts and prayers go out to the family and friends. I think the angle I want to highlight here, is that this shooter was there to kill, and thus gets the title of ‘active shooter’. And the ones that responded and were able to stop him from killing, are the security guards. It wasn’t a SWAT team, or a special forces team, or some other SRT team, it was trained and ready to go security guards.
Without a doubt, today’s security professionals who carry weapons are completely aware of the active shooter scenario. That timing is everything, and you cannot wait on the cavalry to stop something like this or people will die. It is on the first responders (a security guard with a gun or even a private citizen with a gun) to stop it, and that is the reality of security and crime in today’s world.
The more we can train and keep on top of the best industry practices for dealing with active shooters, the better. It sounds to me like these guys did what was necessary to stop the guy, and certainly sacrificed to stop him. Right now, a security guard is sitting in a hospital bed hanging on to dear life, but because of their courage, they did their job and stopped this asshole.
It also sounds like the shooter was prior military and WW2 veteran, a member of MENSA, a white supremacist and had a criminal background. And what did he do? He decided to engage targets in a museum, before going through the screening machines and stations. So the targets would be anyone in that lobby or security guards in this scenario, and he bypassed the security apparatus, and made the security station area the target area. The shotgun is also a perfect weapon for shooting at multiple targets at close range, and quickly. Oh, and I guess he had a book as well, and possibly this was a way to promote his book. Now this guy is in the hospital, thanks to the good work of some security professionals. -Matt
Edit: The guard has died. Rest in peace, and thank you for your sacrifice.
——————————————————————
2 People Shot at U.S. Holocaust Museum
By Debbi Wilgoren and William Branigin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:52 PM
A gunman armed with a shotgun walked into the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in downtown Washington today and opened fire on a security guard before being shot and seriously wounded by two other guards, authorities said.
The security guard and the gunman were both transported to George Washington University Hospital with serious injuries, police said. A hospital spokesperson declined to release information on the condition of the two.
A third person sustained minor injuries in the shooting, according to police.
A law enforcement source identified the gunman as James W. von Brunn, who is known to authorities as a white supremacist.
In this post, I wanted to hit on a little bit of history in regards to contracting. I think it is important that today’s US tax payers get what they pay for and I do not find fault with this kind of ‘accounting’ scrutiny. I also salute what Truman did back in the day in regards to cutting wasteful spending with contracting companies, and it certainly saved this country a lot of money. And with that said, I do think that today’s Commission on Wartime Contracting Establishment(S.1825) is important–but with a few stipulation.
Invariably these things are more political than just pure business. It’s Capital Hill, and that is what makes the machine move. So I am happy that this proposed Commission is bi-partisan. If this commission can be more like Truman’s, and remain as objective as possible, then I would be happy and I applaud that effort. I will be saddened if this process turns more into a With Hunt, stacked with personal agendas. Honest scrutiny and debate is what the country deserves about this subject, and the end product should be the result of objective hard work. My smart monkey instincts says that this commission will be more ‘politics as usual’.
The other thing that worries me about this Commission, is who will set the pay scales as to what is the proper payment for a contracted security specialist overseas? The government, the companies, who? It has always been a mystery to me, as to what the standard is and most of the companies I have worked for were all over the place with pay and benefits. And that is why I am hoping that this commission will be honest in their assessment of what security contractors are truly worth, and in evaluating what the true cost of doing business in today’s wars is. If the companies are punished in some kind of politically motivated ‘Witch Hunt’, then what will the trickle down effect be for the guys overseas doing the protecting and dying for US government clients? And most importantly, how will this impact the war effort and the security of these US government clients?
And seeing how security contractors really have no union representation on the Hill, then I could totally see how our voice would be just a murmur in this debate. I am sure the big companies have plenty of lobbyists on the Hill fighting for them, and that is great. But for the little guy, I have not seen anything that has impressed me as far as a voice in this field of giants.
I have seen a few unions pop up, with some attempt to organize, but overall there really isn’t much out there. The two unions I have seen are the Pipe Hitters Union and SEIU . I am sure there are others, but I really haven’t heard of any kind of voice for the guys overseas. I could be wrong, and if the readers know of any other unions or associations that are fighting for overseas security contractors specifically, I would love to hear about them. (With SEIU, they are more of a domestic union that is fighting for guards here in the US.)
Now one thing everyone can do, is send letters to your local politicians and to the members of the commission. The letters should be respectful and to the point. The members of this commission are:
Clark Kent Ervin, Grant Green, Linda Gustitus, Dean Popps, Michael Thibault, Charles Tiefer, Dov Zakheim and of course you could also contact Jim Webb or Claire McCaskill(these two came up with the commission)
Below I have posted the details about this latest move in DC, and the history of the Truman Commission. I hope I have come across as objective as possible in this article, and I have no intention of offending anyone. My only intent is to make sure everyone out there knows what is going on. -Head Jundi
——————————————————————

Commission on Wartime Contracting Establishment Act S.1825
* Introduced: July 18, 2007
* Status: Introduced
* Next step: Voted on by Senate
* Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
* Sponsor: Sen. Jim Webb [D, VA]
——————————————————————
Truman Committee
Truman gained fame and respect when his preparedness committee (popularly known as the “Truman Committee”) investigated the scandal of military wastefulness by exposing fraud and mismanagement. The Roosevelt administration had initially feared the Committee would hurt war morale, and Under Secretary of War Robert P. Patterson wrote to the president declaring it was “in the public interest” to suspend the committee. Truman wrote a letter to the president saying that the committee was “100 percent behind the administration” and that it had no intention of criticizing the military conduct of the war. The committee was considered a success and is reported to have saved at least $15 billion. Truman’s advocacy of common-sense cost-saving measures for the military attracted much attention. In 1943, his work as chairman earned Truman his first appearance on the cover of Time. He would eventually appear on nine Time covers and be named the magazine’s Man of the Year for 1945 and 1948. After years as a marginal figure in the Senate, Truman was cast into the national spotlight after the success of the Truman Committee.

Department: Department Of Agriculture
Agency: Office of the Secretary of Agriculture
Sub Agency: Homeland Security Office
Job Announcement Number:
OSEC-08-167A
Security Specialist (Special Agent of Executive Protection Operations)
Salary Range: 58,206.00 – 107,854.00 USD per year
Open Period: Tuesday, June 24, 2008
to Wednesday, July 09, 2008
Series & Grade: GS-0080-11/13
Position Information: Full-Time Permanent
Promotion Potential: 13
Duty Locations: 0001 vacancies – Washington, DC
Who May Be Considered:
Applications will be accepted from United States citizens and nationals.
Job Summary:
This position is located in the Office of the Secretary, Homeland Security Office (HL), and reports to the Supervisory Protection Specialist (Special Agent-in-Charge) and Senior Protection Specialist (Deputy Special Agent-in-Charge) for Executive Protection Operations. The incumbent serves as a special agent and participates in coordinating security, communications, transportation, accommodation and logistics requirements for the Secretary of Agriculture as well as for accompanying dignitaries or family, as appropriate, to assure the personal safety of the protectee and his party at all times during any emergencies which may arise, regardless of the physical location of the protectee.

Security Spec (Executive Protection) ZA-0080-III (LK)
Vacancy Number: OS-OSY-2008-0035
Salary: $58,206.00 to $90,698.00
Open Date: 6/17/2008
Close Date: 7/1/2008
Who may apply: Public
Locations: WASHINGTON, DC ; BRUNSWICK, GA
Department: Department Of Commerce
Agency: Office of the Secretary of Commerce
Sub Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce
Job Announcement Number: OS-OSY-2008-0035
Salary Range: 58,206.00 – 90,698.00 USD per year
Series & Grade: ZA-0080-03/03
Position Information: Career/Career-Conditional Permanent
Promotion Potential: 03
Duty Locations: 1 vacancy – Washington DC Metro Area, DC
Who May Be Considered: US Citizens and Status Candidates
Note: This job contains selective factors: refer to the qualifications section for more detail. This position qualifies for Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) retirement.
Job Summary:
The Office of Security is looking for bright, energetic and dedicated professionals committed to making a difference by assisting Department of Commerce leaders reduce the security risks in emergency management, anti-terrorism, and counterespionage.The selected candidate will support the Department’s goal of keeping the Secretary and his designees staff from the very real threat of harm.
I thought that this was interesting. This would be an excellent opportunity for anyone that is wanting to contribute to the study of Iraq and Iran. I think security contractors would make for great contributors to this kind of institute.
Plus, if you read the last Op-Ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, you can see what kind of group you would be contributing too. This is not a shooter job, but if you have an urge to tell the story accurately and would like to hang at home for awhile, something like this would be a good deal. These jobs do require some formal education though, but still, it would be a great opportunity if you are interested in this kind of work. -Head Jundi
——————————————————————
EMPLOYMENT
Research Analyst, Iran Project
The Institute for the Study of War publishes regular research reports on the Iraq conflict in order to inform policy makers and journalists in Washington, DC, as well as the general public. ISW is expanding its research, education, and publishing plan to Iranian foreign policy and military activity throughout the Middle East, a natural outgrowth of its research on Iraq. ISW aims to develop a comprehensive description of Iranian behavior in Iraq and related theaters in order to understand enemy objectives, predict trends, identify decision points in Iranian and U.S. policy, and influence U.S. policy based on this information. ISW will produce four or five long research reports about Iranian policy in 2008, as well as shorter publications aimed specifically at the policy debate: backgrounders, graphics, timelines, and fact sheets. ISW will expand its program of public events and private roundtables to share its Iran research.
The Research Analyst, Iran Project, is expected to conduct research in support of ISW’s research agenda; to work alongside other members of the research staff to analyze complex topics; write research reports for ISW to publish via its website; assist with editing, documenting, and preparing graphics and supporting materials for products of the Institute; assist with the planning, preparation, and execution of public events and private briefings of employees of the Institute; conduct other activities in support of Institute projects.
The Research Analyst at the Iran Project will have the following qualifications:
1. A Bachelor’s degree in a field of study related to the ISW’s core mission and research agenda. A Master’s degree in a related field is preferred.2. The ability to read modern Farsi or Arabic language materials and to conduct research in one of those languages.3. Excellent writing skills, proven independent research skills, and the ability to collaborate on research projects.4. The dedication and drive to produce policy-relevant research in a timely manner.5. Interest in and enthusiasm for ISW’s research agenda and mission.
The Research Analyst reports to the President and Research Manager.
This position is available immediately, and applications will be considered on a rolling basis. To apply, please submit a letter of interest, a CV, and an academic/professional writing sample to Marisa Cochrane, Research Manager, at mcochrane@understandingwar.org.
Research Assistant, Iraq Project
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) seeks a full-time Research Assistant for the Iraq Project, the Institute’s flagship program. ISW publishes regular research reports on the Iraq conflict in order to inform policy makers and journalists in Washington, DC, as well as the general public.
The Research Assistant for the Iraq Project is expected to conduct research in support of the Institute’s research agenda; to work alongside other members of the research staff to analyze complex topics; to assist in the writing and production of research reports for ISW to publish via its website; to assist with the production of a short video documentary on dynamics in Iraq during the Surge; to assist with editing, documenting, and preparing graphics and supporting materials for products of the Institute; to assist with the planning, preparation, and execution of public events and private briefings of employees of the Institute; and to conduct other activities in support of Institute projects.
Department: Department Of Commerce
Agency: Office of the Secretary of Commerce
Sub Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce
Job Announcement Number:
OS-OSY-2008-0025
Supv Security Spec (Executive Protection) ZA-0080-IV (LK)
Salary Range: 82,961.00 – 135,203.00 USD per year
Open Period: Tuesday, April 01, 2008
to Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Series & Grade: ZA-0080-04/04
Position Information: Career/Career-Conditional Permanent
Promotion Potential: 04
Duty Locations: 1 vacancy – Washington DC Metro Area, DC
Who May Be Considered:
THIS POSITION IS BEING ADVERTISED TO REPLACE VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT
NUMBER OS-OSY-2008-0024 THAT DID NOT CORRECTLY REFLECT THE MANATORY
SELECTIVE PLACEMENT FACTORS.
APPLICANTS THAT APPLIED UNDER VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT NUMBER
(OS-0SY-2008-0024) MUST REAPPLY TO THIS POSITION TO BE CONSIDERED.
US Citizens and Status Candidates
Note: This job contains selective factors: refer to the
Qualifications section for more detail. This position qualifies for
Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) retirement.
Job Summary:
The Office of Security is looking for bright, energetic and
dedicated professionals committed to making a difference by
assisting Department of Commerce leaders reduce the security risks
in emergency management, anti-terrorism, and counterespionage.
The selected candidate will support the Department’s goal of keeping
the Secretary and his designees staff from the very real threat of
harm.
Key Requirements:
Must meet the qualification requirements for the grade (see Qualifications)
Must meet the requirement of the Lautenberg Amendment (See Quals.)
Completion of basic Police/Criminal Investigation course (See Quals.)
Be under age 37 or have qualifying Federal Civilian LEO exp. (See Quals.)
Major Duties:
As supervisor for the Secretary’s executive protection team, the
incumbent will support the Department’s goal of keeping the
Secretary and his designees safe from the very real threat of harm.
This includes overseeing the travel plans of the Secretary and
ensuring proper protection before, during and after arrival at
designated stops, handling security before and during visits and
stops; and ensuring that all laws and policies, including Federal,
state, local and international, are followed. The incumbent will
also guide policy and programmatic efforts in the areas of executive
protection by advising operating unit heads and other senior-level
officials on matters related to security, intelligence, law
enforcement and other executive protection related procedures. Read the rest of this entry »















