Feral Jundi

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Video: IDF Soldier Using The Enemy as a Grenade Blast Shield

Filed under: Israel,Video — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 12:02 AM

Monday, June 8, 2009

Israel: 4 Palestinians with Explosives-laden Horses Killed

Filed under: Israel — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:16 AM

   I would be curious if the explosives were primed on the horses or not?  Because then we could call this the Horse Born Improvised Explosive Device or HBIED. lol  On a grand strategy level, using horses for martyrdom missions will totally piss off the animal rights folk like PETA.(causing moral isolation-killing defenseless animals) So keep it up booger eaters. –Matt 

—————————————————————— 

4 Palestinians with explosives-laden horses killed

By IBRAHIM BARZAK, Associated Press Writer Ibrahim Barzak, Associated Press June 8, 2009

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip – Gaza militants equipped with explosives-laden horses approached the Israeli border early Monday, igniting a battle that left four gunmen dead, Israeli and Palestinian officials said.

The incident marked a serious flare-up along the border, which has remained tense but relatively quiet since a three-week military offensive in January.

Officials were trying to determine whether the animals were to be used as weapons, or to carry the fighters into Israel. At least one animal was killed in the shootout.

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said the army prevented a “severe attack” and said the militants might have planned to capture an Israeli soldier.

(more…)

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Cool Stuff: The 60 Ton Robot Bulldozer Named ‘Black Thunder’

Filed under: Cool Stuff,Israel,Weapons — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 5:56 PM

   60 tons of robotic mayhem.  Now that gets the cool stuff vote and I want one. LOL –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Israel

‘Black Thunder’ unmanned dozers to play greater role in IDF

Mar. 30, 2009

Yaakov Katz , THE JERUSALEM POST

The IDF Ground Forces Command plans to double the number of unmanned D9 armored bulldozers in the Engineering Corps arsenal after the vehicle provided exceptional results during Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip in January.

The unmanned version of the D9 bulldozer – called “Black Thunder” – was developed several years ago by the Engineering Corps and was only recently declassified.

“The unmanned D9 performed remarkably during Operation Cast Lead, clearing roads of mines and explosive devices,” explained one officer in the Ground Forces Command. “There was even one vehicle that was damaged, which demonstrates how it did its job since no one was injured.”

The Black Thunder looks like a regular D9 bulldozer but is equipped with a number of cameras that transmit images to the operator, who controls the vehicle with a wireless remote control. The unmanned D9 participated widely in Operation Cast Lead as well as in the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

“The unmanned version is important since if there is a concern that an area is loaded with mines it can save lives,” the officer said, adding that in the event of a communications malfunction the vehicle can be turned into a manned vehicle and operated like a regular D9.

The Engineering Corps receive praise within the IDF for its participation in the operation in Gaza in January, with soldiers specializing in bomb disposal and detection leading regular infantry and armored forces on searches of Palestinian homes.

“There were explosive devices planted all over the Gaza Strip and particularly at the entrance to homes,” another officer in the Ground Forces Command said. “The Engineering Corps soldiers were instrumental in keeping the number of fatalities to a minimum by leading units and detecting and dismantling bombs.”

As a result, OC Ground Forces Command Maj.-Gen. Avi Mizrachi is considering adding another battalion to the Engineering Corps as well as expanding the corps’ elite Yahalom Unit, which specializes in tunnel detection and destruction, counterterror operations, pinpoint detonations and explosive ordinance disposal.

 This article can be found here 

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Iraq: The End of War, the Joker Effect, and Dangerous Times Ahead.

Filed under: Iraq — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 2:05 PM

“I just did what I do best, I took your little plan and I turned it on itself. I mean look what I did to this city with a few drums of gas and a couple of bullets, hmm.” –The Joker

***** 

The End of War, the Joker Effect, and Dangerous Times Ahead.

     So now we are at that point, where we are seeing the end of the war in Iraq.  I think that is good news, if we are in fact honest about the progress and where we are at with that war.  There have been many excellent milestones achieved in Iraq, and we have come a long way from the bloody years of this conflict.  So much sacrifice, and so much effort, and I truly hope that Iraq is able to handle this next phase of the war.  Because if history tells us anything, the beginning and the end of a war, are usually the most dangerous for all involved.

     As we pull out, and especially if we pullout at a rapid pace, the potential for attacks increase.  I know if I were the insurgency in Iraq, this is the time where I would pick up operations and make things bloody.  The image that I would want the world to see, is one of western failure, and the way you make that happen is through the ‘Joker Effect’ (from the movie Dark Knight).  A couple of guys, with a good plan and some bombs and bullets, can certainly cause chaos in Iraq–even at this stage. Hell, the entire war can be defined by this concept, and this is nothing new.  But at this point of the war, it will be the Iraqis taking more of that responsibility of dealing with this, and the Coalition taking less responsibility, and all with each day of this ratio changing. Once the drawdown machine begins, it is game on.  The insurgency will certainly take advantage of this.

     I point to the tactics of Hamas, as Israel was pulling out of Gaza.  They continued to shoot rockets as the Israelis left, and that very act defeated one of the objectives of the Israelis–to stop the rocket attacks.  The image presented to the world, was that the Israelis failed to stop the rocket attacks, and they just killed a bunch of civilians in the process–so Israel lost on the front as well.  We all know the IDF certainly killed many of Hamas’ leadership and soldiers, and certainly outmatched them.  But the rockets kept flying, despite all the efforts, and that is the point to remember, when talking about the end of a conflict and the perception of order versus chaos.  It is very easy to present a situation of chaos, and the enemy knows this.

     We also have images of Vietnam, with helicopters picking up folks off of rooftops, and total chaos as the communists marched upon the cities. (and on a side note, it was Air America helicopters conducting those operations)  Will something similar happen in Iraq? I doubt it, but this is the perception the insurgency will want to present.  We must understand that the insurgency will do what it can, to make our withdrawal look like a Vietnam/Israeli style withdrawal and that we did not achieve our stated goals.   

     The other factor to remember for our industry, is that we will certainly be called upon, to assist in this drawdown.  This could be an extreme test for everyone involved with security contracting in Iraq.  The logistics trains will need protection, and these things will be attacked.  The roads will be thick with targets of opportunity, and the potential for bottleneck and choke points is great.  Remember, we have supplies coming in, and war equipment leaving–the roads are going to be packed.

     I also think that the looting of bases will be a huge problem as we leave.  Perhaps we should set up an auction for these materials of the base, and the money of the auction will go to the military and police forces of the Iraqis?  That way, the Iraqis will show an interest in controlling the security of those bases, as they are stripped down and cleaned out.  Because if they don’t, you will see what happened when the British left their bases down in the south–looting and chaos.  I have even seen this kind of thing at a small scale, when you leave an outpost, and how the local populations fight over and loot those facilities. The state must have control over that process, because anything else will show a complete lack of respect for the state. Order is essential, chaos is the enemy.

     President Obama has also stated that a reserve force will remain.  That is good, and I certainly hope that if that reserve force needs more troops in the future, just in case the situation on the ground in Iraq starts to get active again, then we will do what is necessary to help. Because if the Iraqis are not keeping up with the fire of insurgency, we could see things crumble again, and that small force stationed in Iraq will be in danger.  It is in the best interest of the forces stationed there, that the Iraqi military and police, along with government is able to maintain it’s power.  Will President Obama be committed to Iraq, or will he forsake Iraq if they are tested and shaken.  I tend to go with the idea that Iraq must learn to take care of itself. But like with a child learning to walk, you must be there to catch them if they fall, until they can walk without any assistance at all. I just don’t want our sacrifice and good work we have done in Iraq, to be all for not, just because we did not give the end of the war the proper attention it needs. 

     The other thing I wanted to mention is the vacuum created, once forces have left and Iraqi police and military are left to themselves.  The insurgency will certainly test these two tools of the state, and they will do all they can to make the public distrust or lack confidence in the police and military.  I go back to the Joker Effect, because it only takes a few guys, to really infuse chaos into a country.  For the end of this show, the insurgency will definitely do what they can to make all of the successes in Iraq, disappear under the pale of chaos.  If our standard for success in Iraq was peace and stability, then the standard of success for the insurgency in Iraq will be war and chaos.  Our departure and the end of the war will be the greatest test of the Iraqis, and of all the efforts we have put into this endeavor.  Only time will tell….-Matt

————————————–  

Obama’s Speech at Camp Lejeune, N.C.

February 27, 2009

Following are the prepared remarks of President Obama about withdrawing from Iraq at Camp Lejeune, N.C., on Feb. 27, 2009, as provided by the White House.

Good morning Marines. Good morning Camp Lejeune. Good morning Jacksonville. Thank you for that outstanding welcome. I want to thank Lieutenant General Hejlik for hosting me here today.

I also want to acknowledge all of our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. That includes the Camp Lejeune Marines now serving with – or soon joining – the Second Marine Expeditionary Force in Iraq; those with Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force in Afghanistan; and those among the 8,000 Marines who are preparing to deploy to Afghanistan. We have you in our prayers. We pay tribute to your service. We thank you and your families for all that you do for America. And I want all of you to know that there is no higher honor or greater responsibility than serving as your Commander-in-Chief.

(more…)

Friday, January 16, 2009

Israel: How to Close the Gaza Tunnels, by William Saletan

Filed under: Israel,Tactical Thought Process,Technology — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 4:36 PM

    An excellent collection of ideas, on how to shut down these tunnel systems on the borders of Gaza.  I think a combination of several of these ideas are the way to go.  Who knows, there might be some contracting opportunities with this one for some construction company.  It would either be an Egyptian or Israeli company to work on this stuff, but you never know who they might contract for this stuff.  I posted some stuff regarding the SBInet Boeing project along the US border, and they experiment and use a lot of the same stuff to detect tunnels.

   My favorites are the combination of UAV/with sensors, and ground sensors, all tied into one center.  It sounds expensive, but anything that could reduce the smuggling operations would equate to less rockets being manufactured and launched. The tunnel issue will be a big deal during the ceasefire–when it comes. –Matt

——————————————————————- 

Holey War

How to close the Gaza tunnels.

By William Saletan

Posted Friday, Jan. 16, 2009, at 7:58 AM ET

In the skies over Gaza, Israel rules. Its planes, helicopters, and drones patrol and fire at will. On the ground, Israeli troops advance while Hamas lies in wait. But the ultimate battleground isn’t visible from the sky or on your television news. It’s underground.

Gaza is riddled with tunnels. Some are for smuggling; others are for transporting weapons; others are for hiding or ambushing Israeli troops. The crucial passageways—400 to 600, by recent estimates—run from Gaza to Egypt, circumventing the closed border. That’s how Hamas gets parts and material for the missiles it fires into Israel. Any deal to end the current fighting has to include “an effective blockading” of that border, “with supervision and follow-ups,” according to Israel’s prime minister. To stop the war—and to keep it stopped—you have to figure out how to stop the tunnels.

But how? Here are some of the options.

1. Buffer zone. Israel used to control a 300-meter strip between Gaza and Egypt. That wasn’t enough to stop Gazans from tunneling under it to Egypt. But what if the strip were thicker? Would that raise the cost of tunneling, or the probability of a collapse somewhere along the passage, enough to deter diggers? Israeli hawks want a buffer zone three kilometers thick, which would make tunnel excavation much more difficult, expensive, and time-consuming. Lately, the Israeli Defense Forces have dropped leaflets urging Gazans along the border to leave their homes—an attempt, some experts believe, to use the war to widen the buffer zone. But good luck getting Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, or European intermediaries to hand over three kilometers of south Gaza, much less remove the inconvenient residents from their homes.

2. Wall. Instead of thickening the old buffer zone, how about deepening it? Years ago, Israel tried a concrete-iron wall that extended 10 feet underground. A nice try, but fairly useless, since the tunnels went at least 20 feet underground. Then, just more than a year ago, two high-ranking officials from the U.S. Defense and State Departments went to Egypt with a proposal to build a new barrier, including “piles driven deep into the earth.” But even if you extend a wall far enough underground, tunnelers can dig through it.

3. Moat. Maybe, instead of burying a solid barrier that could be dug through, we should make the barrier hollow and fill it with water. That way, anyone trying to dig through would—well, let’s just say you wouldn’t want to be there when it happened. This was such an intriguing idea that Israel tried it several years ago, soliciting bids for a moat four kilometers long, 100 meters wide, and 80 feet deep. Estimated cost: $250 million. Israel scrapped the plan because the water would come from the sea and might contaminate Gaza’s groundwater. But the idea keeps coming back. Two years ago, Israel broached it again, and Egypt considered it. The U.S. officials who went to Egypt a year ago raised it again. Even the president of the Palestinian Authority has lobbied Egypt to do it.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress