Feral Jundi

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

DIY: Printable UAV’s, DIY Drones, And Dronepedia

Filed under: Aviation,DIY,Technology — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 1:03 PM

This is a quick one, and falls under the Opensource Military Hardware concept.  Imagine this–building a weaponized drone using open source maker’s sites like DIY Drones and Dronepedia and utilizing a 3D printer to make hundreds if not thousands of them? That is where all of this stuff is going, and the possibilities are endless.

The other reason why I wanted to bring this up is that this kind of thing is definitely competition for the defense industries that specialize in UAV sales. Why buy an expensive drone from a company when you can just print out a bunch of them? And because anyone can access the information on how to build these things, then now you have the ability to continuously improve your drone program based on the input of the crowds.

My last point to bring up with this is that as this technology becomes cheaper and more available, then the odds of these things being used by criminals or terrorists increase. The other day, a DIY crew made a drone that could hack into computers via Wifi, and it is only a matter of time until we see the bad guys use this stuff to do all sorts of interesting things. Or even today’s terrorists/enemies, and all of the possible deadly uses of drones.  Cartels or pirates could also get into the game of making and using drones. Especially for pirates, because drones could help them to find vessels to take down. Perhaps having shotguns for site security will be a required weapon in the near future? Or some kind of grenade launcher outfitted with special rounds to counter drone attacks?

Now what I would be interested to see is a drone that could be launched by an RPG launcher, and either used for surveillance or as a flying missile. A drone that you could quickly get into the air and use it as a ‘bird of prey’ for a fire fight.  Or something that you could launch and have it fly farther than any of your unit’s weapon’s effective ranges, and have the ability to locate and destroy an enemy across the canyon or up in the hills. Something like that could end one of these DShK cross canyon ambushes, and especially if you did not have CAS on deck to deal with the attackers. While everyone is returning fire, this drone could be launched and flown above enemy positions so precise targeting data could be collected, or targets of opportunity could be taken out by the drone itself. –Matt

 

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Technology: Using Hyperspectral Satellites To Find IED’s, Tunnels, Caves And Other ‘War Stuff’

     Exactly what sorts of objects and substances ARTEMIS is able to pick out of its region-spanning hyperspectral cubes is a military secret. However this briefing pdf given in 2006 by US airforce lab officials suggests that it was expected to pierce overhead camouflage that would deceive optical or thermal sensing; that it would be able to spot disturbed earth and “concealed adits” (that is cave or tunnel entrances invisible from above) and generally “detect and identify” unspecified “targets”.

     Evidently the TacSat-3 can do at least some of this, as we now learn that following a year as an experiment it has proved so successful that it is now being handed over to US air force Space Command to become a full-time operational asset – America’s first hyperspectral spy sat.

*****

   If true, this could be pretty significant.  A satellite like this could also be used to identify minerals in certain areas, enemy emplacements, tunnels, you name it.  I am sure there will be an army of analysts going over the information, as well as super computers, all with the focus of uncovering the battlefield secrets of our wars. That is pretty cool if it can work as advertised.

   It also looks like a commander in the field who has a AN/PRC 117F, can actually tap into the feeds of this hyperspectral satellite, and get some close to real time information on his battle space.  I am sure the satellite can identify all sorts of stuff that might be valuable to a commander out in the field, and give him the heads up on targets and things of interest. There might even be some non-military applications for this thing, that could help out the commander as well. (farming, road construction, etc.)

    Also, a satellite like this might help to find Osama Bin Laden.  I mean if it can find caves or tunnels, then we could conceivably find the coordinates of every tunnel in our areas of focus in Pakistan or Afghanistan. You could also probably fine tune the satellite to pick up the signatures of any of the tools of warfare that these guys would have.  Sat phones, bombs, gun metal, etc. Who knows, but I do know that this project was given top priority and fielded at a break neck speed. Interesting stuff.

   For this industry, the one thing that this satellite could do, to help out the enormous contractor logistics battle we are fighting, is to watch the roads for us, and somehow get that information out to the masses if there is an IED hole or whatever.  Stuff like this could not only save the lives of military folks, but contractors as well, and increase the success rate of cargo delivery.

    Finally, one idea for this thing is to use bomber drones who can drop sensor drones on top of these targets identified by the satellite.  The idea being is that you could use thousands of sensor drones (that are also equipped with warheads), and land them on these targets identified by the satellites.  If these sensor drones actually had sniffers or small cameras to identify wires or whatever, the sensor drone could report that to the operator and they could determine the course of action. What is great about sensor drones like this, is that you could use them to detonate the IED, or to kill the enemy if they try to destroy the drone.(use it drone archer style)  If it is a child or innocent that is just curious, just fly the sensor drone away to keep it out of their hands. Or give commands through the thing, and tell them to stay away. If you cannot recover the drone, then just blow it up or use a safer self destruct ‘elephant chisel’ mechanism. And the way things are going now, drones that could perform this task are getting cheaper, smaller, smarter, faster, and more feasible for this kind of mission. –Matt

——————————————————————

New prototype US spy satellite rushed into active use

‘Hyperspectral cube’ eye can spot buried bombs, tunnels

By Lewis Page

June 11, 2010

An experimental “hyperspectral” spy sat which is able to detect buried roadside bombs and concealed cave or tunnel entrances has been handed over to the US forces for operational use in the Wars on Stuff.

The TacSat-3 was launched aboard a Minotaur-1 rocket along with several other small satellites from Wallops Island, Virginia, in May 2009. The TacSat was designed to prove the US concept of “operationally responsive space”, where a military user can make a request and a small inexpensive satellite can be in a suitable orbit within days rather than months or years.

Thus the TacSat is designed to be fitted with a variety of different payloads as required by an operational commander. TacSat-3, as a prototype, carried one in particular known as the Advanced Responsive Tactically Effective Military Imaging Spectrometer, or ARTEMIS. This is a “hyperspectral” sensor able to detect not just visible light but infrared and ultraviolet as well.

The idea of hyperspectral sensing is not, however, merely to “see” in the usual sense of optical telescopes, infrared nightscopes and/or thermal imagers. This kind of detection is used on spy satellites and other surveillance systems, but it suffers from the so-called “drinking straw effect” – that is, you can only view a small area in enough detail to pick out information of interest. It’s impossible to cover an entire nation or region in any length of time by such means; you have to know where to look in advance.

(more…)

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Aviation: Life Imitates Art–A Look At The Next Generation Combat Drone

Filed under: Aviation,Film,Technology — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 7:43 AM

   My first thought that popped into my mind when I read this article was Skynet and their Hunter Killer drones from the Terminator movies. lol  And really, there isn’t much of a difference between Hunter Killers and the next generation of combat drones.  I am also sure that if jet turbines were a better option than ducted fans, we will see that pop up in the near future as well.

   The interesting thing with drone aviation development, is that all and any ideas can be explored for the creation of these things, because there is no human element to worry about with the design.  So insanely fast drones that move around like hummingbirds, that can launch precision weapons is something that can be worked on without a care in the world towards the human in the cockpit.  That is what makes the future of drones so interesting to me, and Moore’s Law has some application to this whole process as well. –Matt

——————————————————————

This is a model of the AD-150. 

hunter killer

The Hunter Killer drone from the movie Terminator.

‘Transformer’ Touted as Next-Gen Combat Drone

May 26, 2010

Sharon Weinberger

It takes off like a helicopter, flies like a plane and doesn’t need a pilot. That’s what one U.S. aerospace company is proposing as the latest in combat drones.

Maryland-based American Dynamics Flight Systems is working on a concept for an aircraft that can take off vertically but then switch to flying forward. Called the AD-150, the aircraft works by using ducted fans mounted on the wingtips to generate lift. Those fans can then tilt when the aircraft transitions to forward flight.

“As a tilt-duct aircraft, it doesn’t have the limitations a helicopter has,” Wayne Morse, president and CEO of the company, tells AOL News. Once it transitions, it can travel at speeds of up to 300 knots, surpassing even the fastest traditional helicopters.

(more…)

Friday, April 16, 2010

Mexico: Drug Cartels Using IEDs

Filed under: Industry Talk,Law Enforcement,Mexico — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 12:10 AM

   This was expected.  I suspect the learning curve will be especially short do to all the available information and examples for use out there.  The thing to watch here is the possibility of Mexico tapping into private industry in order to deal with this threat.  IEDs in Iraq and Afghanistan have created a need for specialists in the private industry, and of course those same folks will probably be called upon by Mexico through the Merida Initiative. The UAV industry will definitely be called upon for this latest phase of the drug war as well.

   The second story below that ties into the whole IED thing, is cellphones.(Thanks to Matt for sending me this) Mexico is now forcing everyone that has a phone, to register their identity with the cell company/government.  I am sure the cartels will find ways around this, but at least it is a start.  The big one here to remember is when cartels start using cellphones for IED triggering, much like insurgents have done in Iraq or Afghanistan, that is when it will be vital to have a handle on cellphone IDs. Or at least the forensics for this stuff, as well as tracking signals.

   That and tips that come in via cellphone text, can be better confirmed based on this registration. That whole ‘garbage in, garbage out’ HUMINT concept is one area that the Mexican government would probably like to clean up for their SMS strategy in their war. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Mexican Cartels Using IEDs

4/09/2010

AUSTIN – The Mexican military seized improvised explosive devices just miles from the Valley.  The IEDs (or roadside bombs) are the same weapons terrorists use in the Middle East.

The homemade explosives can be sophisticated or crude.  They’re often deadly.  They’ve killed troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

CHANNEL 5 NEWS learned the weapons are also in the hands of the drug cartels in Mexico.

On March 30, more than 50 cartel members attacked the Mexican military in Matamoros and Reynosa.  Eighteen people died.

(more…)

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Aviation: Drone Operators Climb On Winds Of Change In The Air Force

     Like with contractors, drones have been the ‘new thing’ that the military has been trying figure out. Now a kid who is really good at video games, could essentially fly these drones.  Hell, I think drone piloting will only become easier and more user friendly in the future.  We will also see drones that are more intuitive, that will actually help out the drone archer in their missions.  Of course we will also see autonomous drones come on to the scene, but I believe the military will still want some kind of human interface to be that ‘elephant chisel’ for that drone.

     I don’t think human flight will go away in the Air Force per se. It’s just now commanders have the choice between risking the life of a pilot for a mission versus using a UAV. So human powered missions will more than likely be the stuff that requires the utmost in human discretion.  Humans can also feel out a situation and provide more random strategies in the air, that machines would have a hard time deriving patterns from.

     But yet again, a human in a small box in Nevada, could apply the same strategies with a highly maneuverable UAV.  There are no physical limitations for the drone archer either.  They can go to the bathroom, eat, work in shifts, and the G Forces or altitude of the aircraft will not impact the mission.  Most importantly, there is no fog of war for the pilot.

     That leaves another question.  For some pilots, physically being in the battle, is a good thing.  It empowers them by heightening their senses and really pushing their strategies and desire to kill the enemy.  In other words, there are high stakes involved with human piloting, and that causes a person to really perform. The drone archer in the box, just looks at it like a video game. There might be a strategic edge to a pilot that is ‘more connected’ to the battlefield.  Who knows, and this stuff is a little out of my lane.  Either way, drones are here to stay, and they are causing a significant shift in military aviation mindset. I wonder what Col. John Boyd would have to say about drones? –Matt

——————————————————————-

Combat Generation: Drone operators climb on winds of change in the Air Force

By Greg JaffeSunday, February 28, 2010

The question, scrawled on a Pentagon whiteboard last fall, captured the strange and difficult moment facing the Air Force.

“Why does the country need an independent Air Force?” the senior civilian assistant to Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, the service’s chief of staff, had written. For the first time in the 62-year history of the Air Force, the answer isn’t entirely clear.

The Air Force’s identity crisis is one of many ways that a decade of intense and unrelenting combat is reshaping the U.S. military and redefining the American way of war. The battle against insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq has created an insatiable demand for the once-lowly drone, elevating the importance of the officers who fly them.

These new earthbound aviators are redefining what it means to be a modern air warrior and forcing an emotional debate within the Air Force over the very meaning of valor in combat.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress