Feral Jundi

Friday, November 21, 2008

Weapons: The MK 38 Mod 2 Machine Gun System

Filed under: Maritime Security,Weapons — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:43 AM

     I thought in light of the recent piracy buzz, I would review an excellent weapon system that could be used to combat these thugs.  There are plenty of weapons out there that could do the job of fighting off these guys. I think the MK 38 Mod 2 would be a good start for that search.  It has reach, and it could mess up the hull of a boat really well.  Plus if an electronic aiming system is used, precision fire could be directed at engines.  Not to mention using night vision equipment, like FLIR to own the night as well.  Most of all, a shot across the bow with this thing, and these guys would think twice about messing with your boat.  

    The other thing I like about this gun, is the ability to remove the weapon system with a special mount(Mk 88 mount).  That would be good for a company that wants to move this gun from boat to boat.  That and you can set this up to fire manually, in case the electronics break down.(please note photo)  I also like the idea that it is based off a weapon system that is being used all over the place(Mk 242) and parts should be available for it.   Like I said, it is not the only weapon out there, and there are plenty to choose from in order to get the job done, but this is a great start.  

    So why would I talk about such things on a security industry blog?  Well for one, I don’t think a couple of M-4’s would suffice as adequate protection for 100 million dollar super tankers cruising around in pirate country.  You must have a weapon that can effectively keep pirates away, so they will not be able to use their weapons–our weapons range must beat their weapons range.  So stand off distance is essential in this game.  But you don’t want to overkill these guys with a main gun, that is slow.  You need a gun that is light and quick, yet very effective at stopping a vessel if you have to.  

    Now would security contractors on a vessel be able to secure a weapon like this for operations?  Sure, they could get anything they want.  But money, licenses, and the various laws and regulations out there that dictate the use of such weaponry would be the obstacles.  And if Iraq and Afghanistan is any indicator of what we can or cannot use as security contractors, then I might have to suggest something else.  The largest caliber weapon system I have seen contractors use is a DShK, or a .50 caliber M-2 Machine Gun.

Then there is the automatic grenade launchers like the Mk 19 or the AGS 17 , but that is another story.

     Or I guess we could tone it down a little and use a M-107 or something? But honestly, if I was defending a big ship from a well organized gang of thugs attacking from fast moving vessels, I want the right tool for the job.  And trust me, if the pirates have been making millions of dollars off of these operations, they now have the resources to buy big guns. Even the DShK was being used by Somalis on land–what’s to say they won’t convert their boats into a maritime versions of a ‘Technical‘?  

     Also, the other nice thing about showing some ‘cannons on deck’ is the intimidation factor.  Right now, pirates are operating on the idea that these boats are not armed and do not want to fight, hence making them easy targets.  All they have to worry about is avoiding the large and cumbersome Navies floating around, and board a boat.  Once on the boat, they know the company will roll over and pay them the ransom.  We must stop this cycle, and we must have the tools to send the right message ‘of don’t mess with this boat’. 

    Another idea, is to do what was mentioned on one of the blogs I highlighted, and that was to place an Abrams or Bradley on top of tanker.  Or something smaller, with the idea of having a gun that can move around on the deck.  The US Navy or Marines could put small detachments of guys on merchant ships and tankers, and actually protect these vessels. Or the UN could provide these troops, or that ship’s country of origin could provide the troops.  But yet again, this becomes a man power issue, and a law of the sea issue that is way beyond my pay grade.  That is the idea though, and protecting these vessels is of the utmost importance to our national security.  When the cost of oil goes up, because of some pirates taking down a tanker, then that is when we should take notice.  

    Finally, the reason I am more focused on protecting the vessels with an onboard security team, is because we do not have enough navies to actually protect each individual boat.  The area to patrol is too big, and there are too many ships to coordinate and protect.  It would be like herding cats over thousands of square miles.  And what is really crazy, is trying to identify these pirates.  They do not fly the Jolly Roger, they act like fishing vessels in distress or pretend to be a friendly vessel of some sort.  They will do all they can to blend in and to deceive, to accomplish their mission of taking down multi-million dollar boats. They are smarter than we give them credit for, and they have a method that is working.  –Head Jundi 

——————————————————————- 

The Mk38 Naval Weapons System. Image is official U. S. Navy photograph, taken aboard the USS Ingraham (FFG-61) in June 2003.  

History

The MK 38 machine gun system (MGS) was employed aboard various combatant and auxiliary ships in the Mid-East Force escort operations and during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. The weapons are maintained in a rotatable pool, available for temporary installation on various deploying ships and permanent installation on certain amphibious and auxiliary ships, patrol craft and Coast Guard cutters.

(more…)

Thursday, November 20, 2008

History: How the Royal Navy Dealt with the Pirate Blackbeard

Filed under: History,Maritime Security,United Kingdom — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 10:58 PM

Royal Navy

 

How the Royal Navy Dealt with the Pirate Blackbeard..

In the 19th century, British warships largely eradicated piracy when they policed the oceans. The death penalty for piracy on the high seas remained on the statute books until 1998. Modern piracy ranges from maritime mugging to stealing from merchant ships with the crew held at gunpoint. 

Wiki for Blackbeard 

Legal News: Contractor Charged With Murder in Afghan’s Death

Filed under: Afghanistan,Legal News — Tags: , , — Matt @ 2:39 PM

     Boy, this is a terrible story.  Obviously Ayala was severely impacted by the incident, to do such a thing as shoot this combatant point blank to the head.  I wasn’t there, nor will I judge.  But you can see the kind of emotions this could have brought up–to see your comrade be purposely burned by some random individual in a village.  I know I would be furious.  But that gives no justification to be the judge and jury for such a horrific criminal act, by just killing the guy out right.  

     Although, Ayala could make the argument that he saw the guy move wrong, or reach for something, and that is why he fired.  But still, if he purposely executed an unarmed individual, despite the horrible act this Afghani committed, then that is wrong.

     All I have to say at this point is that Ayala is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. If he did in fact commit this act, then he should pay the price. I would hold that standard towards anyone in the military, law enforcement, and the security contracting community, and justice should be served.

   On another note, this sounds like the Human Terrain Systems contract BAE has, where they use civilian anthropologists in military civilian affairs units out in the field.  It is an initiative to better understand the villages, so the military forces know how to best work with them. And the reason we use anthropologists like this, is because the military cannot home grow that type of resource to meet the demands of the war effort.  And that is where BAE stepped in, by filling that need. –Head Jundi

——————————————————————

Contractor Charged With Murder in Afghan’s Death

By Jerry Markon

Washington Post Staff Writer

Thursday, November 20, 2008; B05

 

A defense contractor who once protected top foreign leaders was charged yesterday with second-degree murder in the shooting of an Afghan civilian who had attacked one of his colleagues with a flammable liquid during a routine patrol.

Don M. Ayala, 46, of New Orleans was charged in U.S. District Court in Alexandria in the Nov. 4 shooting. Court documents said he works in Afghanistan for Rockville-based BAE Systems, but he formerly provided personal security to the Iraqi prime minister and the Afghan president.

(more…)

Jobs: Security Leader, Iraq

Filed under: Iraq,Jobs,Management Positions — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:33 AM

GE Careers Iraq

 

Iraq Security Leader

Business Unit:  GE Infrastructure, Energy

Function:    Security

Location:   UAE/Jordan/Iraq, Iraq

Job #:            856009

Posted:            Oct 28, 2008

Responsibilities – General

*Conduct site security audits and design security protocols for GE Energy projects and service sites in the MEA region.

*Actively participate in crisis management planning and preparedness, decision-making, and communications.

*Assure appropriate loss prevention, fire safety, access control, intrusion detection and alarm systems are in place and maintained.

(more…)

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

News: PSC Prospects in Darfur

Filed under: Africa,News,Sudan — Tags: , , — Matt @ 10:22 PM

    Boy, there’s that R2P thing again.  Talk is cheap, and the Sudan and the Congo are disasters right now.  It is extremely frustrating to know that there is a capable company like Blackwater–ready to go into the fire and protect the weak, and yet we do nothing.  Good job to Mrs. Bennett for putting together a great article. –Head Jundi 

—————————————————————— 

18 Nov 2008

PSC prospects in Darfur

With the international community slow to react to the conflict in Darfur, private security companies weigh their options for entering the region, Jody Ray Bennett writes for ISN Security Watch.

By Jody Ray Bennett for ISN Security Watch

For almost five years the world has watched hundreds of thousands of Darfur civilians be massacred, raped and displaced from their families and homes.

Even though world leaders have issued calls to action, such as the 2005 international manifesto Responsibility to Protect (R2P), which called for states responsible for widespread harm to its population to face repercussions, the international community has been slow to respond to crisis in Darfur. Two years after the issuing of the R2P, approximately 200,000 to 400,000 Dafuris were dead and 2.5 million displaced.

As the US stretches its own forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, it has also been politically unable to justify the invasion of yet another Islamic country. China, Sudan’s closest economic, political and military ally, has failed to respond to the ongoing genocide despite its ability to do so.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress