Feral Jundi

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Cool Stuff: Merry Christmas Feral Jundis!!!

    Merry Christmas and happy holidays to all you hard charging Feral Jundis out there. May your next contract or current contract, be the best contract you have ever had, and that you make it home alive and in one piece to spend that hard earned money!

     Here’s to those of you that do things right, when no one is looking. And here’s a really big thanks to those leaders out there that have applied Jundism to all that they do. I thank you, the industry thanks you, and whomever you are protecting thanks you for a job well done! –Matt

 

Industry Talk: Two Perspectives On Wartime Contractor Cost Effectiveness

   What I did was put up two perspectives on contractor cost effectiveness with one article written by Doug Brooks and the other one by David Isenberg. Check it out and tell me what you guys think. Both Doug and David have a lot to say about the subject.

    My take away on all of it, is that the true cost effectiveness should be determined by the ones that are actually paying for the product or service. Until then, folks on both sides of the debate of contractor cost effectiveness will continue to argue and debate over who is right or wrong. My take away on all of it, is that governments will do whatever serves them best both politically and militarily, and not necessarily what is most cost effective. –Matt

——————————————————————

Think Globally. Hire Locally

Journal of International Peace Operations

Nov/Dec 2009

by Doug Brooks

The Benefits of Employing Local Nationals in Conflict And Post-Conflict Operations

LOCAL nationals make up the majority of the personnel on the ground in the stability operations industry, a fact too often overlooked by media and pundits. Not only do these locals offer enormous advantages to our industry in terms of costs, language capabilities, local knowledge and skills, but at the policy level they contribute to rebuilding the economy and vastly benefit larger stability policies. Nevertheless, some important concerns and caveats remain when hiring locals; and thus certain essential policies should be adopted by all companies setting up business in conflict and post-conflict operations.

Personnel working for the stability operations industry are generally divided into three categories:

* Local Nationals (LNs, also known as Host Country Nationals, or HCNs) who originate from the country of the operation.

* Third Country Nationals (TCNs) who come from a country not involved in the intervention or peace operation. Most TCNs are from developing countries, attracted by salaries far above what they could earn at home. Some, however, are drawn from developed countries as well.

* Finally, Western expatriates, who are usually hired for management, contractual compliance or oversight tasks; although for some contracts they may be engaged in work from security to truck driving.

LNs represent the bulk of this industry’s personnel. For example, as of June 30, 2009, LNs made up 69 percent of U.S. Department of Defense contractor personnel operating in Afghanistan – and 95 percent of security contractors in the operation. TCNs account for most of the remainder, with citizens of Western nations making up a relatively small minority. The LN proportion can be even higher for contractors supporting UN operations, and that number only increases with the duration of the operation as local hires learn new skills, gain the trust of companies and clients and earn management positions.

(more…)

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Industry Talk: US To Switch Afghan Police Training from DoS CIVPOL, to DoD CNTPO, DynCorp Protests

   This is big news, because there is a lot of money riding on the current set up, and DynCorp was sitting all fat and happy on the CIVPOL contract as the incumbent.  Now that DoD is taking it over and issued a new task order, only companies that are pre-qualified contractors for CNTPO get to participate.  Those companies are Lockheed, NG, Raytheon, Xe, and ARINC.

   The general feeling I am getting about this latest move, is that the DoD wants to have more control over the training of the Afghan police, and give them training that is more military-like.  The reason for this, is so these poor guys can actually survive the war, so they can go on to be effective in their normal police work.

   The Afghan police are already fighting more war, than doing police work, so it makes sense to harden them up a little.  Not too mention that when you have cops teaching Afghan police forces to shoot PKMs or RPGs, then the realm of police work skills gets trumped by war fighting skills.  So yeah, DoD would be a better choice.

   The other one that was interesting, was the hearing at CSPAN about Afghan National Security Forces.  Executives from Dyncorp, MPRI, and Xe all made a showing at this thing, and they all had something unique to say about their little chunk of the war.  Which further emphasizes the CNAS report as to the importance of contractors in the war effort.

   One thing that was mentioned by Xe, which I think is a great suggestion, is to integrate military trainers with Xe trainers, to insure a quality product.  That way, there is no blaming Xe for a poor job, when in fact, there is direct military oversight and integration into the training.  This makes sense for unity of effort, and totally makes sense about getting everyone on board with the strategy of the war.  I say mix that chocolate with the peanut butter! lol

   Probably the best part of military integration with programs like this, is security.  It is big military that has the guns, the air support and the communications necessary to make any enemy’s day, a bad day.  So for these sites that are located up in the hills, where training and security go hand in hand, having some military folks around with the big guns, would be a nice insurance policy for the defense.

   Be sure to check out the thread on this subject at SOCNET, and I look forward to any input from the readership about this. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Afghan National Security Forces Contract Training

Friday, December 18, 2009

The December 18, 2009, hearing of the Commission on Wartime Contracting reviewed the adequacy and oversight of contract training for Afghanistan’s national army, national police, and border police — organizations critical for stability as the United States moves toward its newly stated goal of beginning withdrawal of U.S. forces from the country in July 2011.

At the end of November 2009, Afghan National Army strength was about 96,000; it is expected to grow to 134,000 by the end of October 2010 (40% growth) and is targeted reach 240,000 by 2013 (80% growth). The Afghanistan National Police was near 94,000 and is expected to be almost 97,000 strong by the end of 2009. While there is no programmed end strength set for 2010, the U.S.-led Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan has proposed growing the ANP to 160,000 by 2013 (65% growth).

(more…)

Cool Stuff: TED–Bruce Bueno De Mesquita Predicts Iran’s Future

Filed under: Cool Stuff,Iran,Video — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 10:25 AM

Legal News: Amendment in Defense Bill Ensures Contractors Have Legal Rights

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 8:34 AM

Under the congressionally approved provision, the federal government would not be able to do business with companies with $1 million or more in contracts that deny court hearings for victims of assault, false imprisonment or emotional distress. Victims of assault would be able to sue the employers of the alleged attacker, as well as the attacker. The Defense Department can apply a waiver for national security reasons. 

*****

   Interesting news, and I am not too sure how this ‘really’ applies to contractors, both male and female, who are ‘victims of assault, false imprisonment or emotional distress’. I assume this only applies to U.S. citizens, and this law only works if they are seeking legal action against others who U.S. citizens and working as contractors? But yeah, I think it is great that individual contractors have a little more teeth to deal with companies who mistreat us.

   The problem here though, is that I am not a legal expert about this stuff, and I do not know how this new legal mechanism will fair in court. Boy, where is the Feral Jundi legal team when you need them? Guns, money, and lawyers is all you need for a party. lol

     I think the most important part to look at in this amendment in the defense bill, is that the DoD reserves the right to apply a waiver for national security reasons.  That is smart, because I could easily see this law being abused.  I want those that have truly been wronged, to get justice.  But I also want to emphasize how much more important it is to maintain national security and to not hinder the war effort in any way. We will see how it goes, and hopefully commonsense dictates on how this is used.

     Oh, and for the guys that did those things to Jamie Leigh Jones, and to those leaders that allowed it to happen or did nothing about it, may you all rot in hell for your crimes. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Amendment ensures contractors have legal rights

Dec. 20, 2009

By MARIA RECIO

McClatchy Newspapers

Four years ago, Jamie Leigh Jones, a 20-year old Texas contract employee working in Iraq, was drugged, stripped, beaten and gang-raped by her co-workers on her fourth day in country. She finally managed to get a phone call out from the shipping container where she was being detained – by her employer, KBR, then a Halliburton company.

That call to her father led to a call to her congressman, Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, and her rescue after Poe had the State Department locate her. But Jones’ attempts at justice – and restitution – were blocked by a little-noticed compulsory arbitration clause in the contracts of private employees working for federal government contractors.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress