Feral Jundi

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Iraq: Winning The Sniper War In Iraq

Filed under: Iraq,Military News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 2:48 PM

     The most dangerous enemy snipers proved to be the insurgents who mimicked the Washington, D.C.-area snipers who terrorized our nation’s capital in 2002 by firing from the concealment of a car. Cruising the streets of Baghdad, Mosul and other towns, these mobile sniper teams sought G.I.s manning roadside checkpoints, fixed security posts and sitting in armored vehicle cupolas. As quickly as they fired, the insurgent riflemen disappeared into urban traffic. Some sniping vehicles carried extra license plates, phony taxi markings and secret compartments for stowing a sniper rifle. Insurgent Web sites boasted that quick reaction forces arrived too late to catch them.

     Because al-Qaeda paid the gunmen up to $5,000 per kill, the mobile snipers documented their engagements on videotape, the spotter serving as both observer and videographer.

***** 

   This is a fantastic article, and kind of rare. The sniper guru talks about insurgent tactics and how we stopped them. If you would like to further expand your knowledge on how our guys did it, Plaster added a whole new chapter in his book dedicated to the current war.  Not only is he famous for his books and lectures on sniping, but he is also a veteran of MACV SOG during the Vietnam War and certainly a living legend.

   Why is this significant?  To me, SOG was probably the most daring and most innovative unit to come out of the Vietnam War, and I put them right on par with the Selous Scouts. Both units had to be masters of their environment and of their task, because both had to operate behind enemy lines.  They also had to operate in other countries, which made the advent of getting caught even more dangerous and extremely embarrassing to their home countries. I look at the Pakistan problem in today’s war as the same dilemma.

    Al Qaeda has no problem exploiting the borders of sovereign nations, and that is how they are able to survive and grow.  It is an aspect of this war that will most certainly have to be fought by covert warriors for a very long time, and in some very dangerous places.

   But back to this article.  Mr. Plaster mentioned one thing that caught my eye.  Al Qaeda introduced free market warfare into their strategy, and the end result was some pretty dangerous and innovative sniper teams.  Please note the quote up top. –Matt

—————————————————————-

Winning the Sniper War in Iraq

A war within a war.

By Maj. John L. Plaster, USAR (Ret.)

As an American military convoy rumbled along a dusty street in Habbaniyah, Iraq, 50 miles west of Baghdad, a silver van eased to the curb. Preoccupied with operating their heavy trucks, the U.S. Marine drivers didn’t notice the van and its civilian occupants.

Fortunately the convoy was overwatched by guardian angels: a Marine sniper and his spotter atop a nearby roof. Alerted by his spotter, the Marine marksman shifted his 10X optic to the silver van—and discovered the driver videotaping the convoy while his passenger raised a scoped rifle! As one, the Marine sniper and his spotter fired, shooting dead the cameraman and his sniping partner. By itself this was a dramatic accomplishment, but there was more: Pried from the dead terrorist’s hands was a Marine-issue M40A3 sniper rifle—taken from a Marine sniper killed by insurgents in August 2005. It was now back where it belonged.

The Habbaniyah engagement was a limited but significant milestone in this unnoticed war-within-a-war, a quiet triumph of skill and courage, strategy and technology, which yielded a victory as great as that of British snipers who wrested domination of the World War I trenches from Germany’s snipers in 1915.

(more…)

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Training: The Ultimate Sniper, By Maj. John L. Plaster (USAR Ret.)

Bounties: Mexico Offers Rewards For 33 Drug Gang Suspects

    In Chihuahua City (1849) Michael H. Chevallié and Glanton may have influenced the state legislature to pass the Fifth Law over the veto of the governor, empowering Chevallié to contract with guerrillas to capture or kill troublesome Indians on an individual basis. Chevallié entered the first contract the next day, and Glanton was in his company on several successful expeditions north of the capital.- From Handbook of Texas Online on John Joel Glanton

***** 

   Wow, this is quite a list below.  You know, in my research on John Coffee Hays I also stumbled upon an infamous group called the Glanton Gang. These guys were contracted to hunt down Indians for a bounty in Mexico, and they used scalps as a proof of death.  The problem with this gang is that they ran out of Apache or Comanche warriors to kill, and they started going after innocents. In other words, the industry of killing the enemy was extremely effective.  But as soon as hunters violated the contract and tried to cheat the system, that is when the state put down the hammer.

   Mexico decided to put a bounty out on the Glanton Gang after they found out about their scheme, and that effectively ended the gang’s work in Mexico. From bounty hunter to fugitive, all due to a violation of the contract. If the Mexicans would have demanded a bond from these bounty hunters, I think that would have further kept hunters like this in check. Either way, the line of criminal behavior was crossed, and the gang instantly turned into criminals because of their actions.

   It should also be noted that John Glanton fought as a civilian scout for the US Army under John Ford, and was a Texas Ranger with Hays.  But it seemed that everywhere John went, he pissed off folks by killing the wrong guys or not playing well with others. lol So I would classify him as a guy who lacked discipline and was an extreme liability to anyone that used him. The book Blood Meridian is supposed to be based on the Glanton Gang as well.

   To get back to my point.  Mexico has a history of bounty hunting, and they have contracted outsiders before.  And seeing how the city of Juarez is now the most dangerous city in the world, maybe some consideration should be given to creating an industry that could clean it up.  They could issue Letters of Marque and Reprisals, or initiate the Fifth Law (what ever that entailed), and fire up the industry necessary to clean up these cartels. –Matt

——————————————————————

John Joel Glanton

John Joel Glanton.

Mexico offers rewards for 33 drug gang suspects

By E. EDUARDO CASTILLO

May 29, 2010

MEXICO CITY — Mexico’s government unveiled a list of 33 wanted drug suspects Friday, including three men allegedly tied to a cartel responsible for much of the bloodshed in the northern border city of Ciudad Juarez.

The Attorney General’s Office did not specify the criminal bands affiliated with each suspect.

However, a security official in the northern state of Chihuahua, where Ciudad Juarez is located, said the three at the top of the list belong to La Linea, a gang tied to the Juarez cartel. Rewards of $1.1 million (15 million pesos) were offered for each.

One of the three, Juan Pablo Ledezma, is believed to be the head of La Linea, said the official, who is with the joint army and police operation in charge of security in Chihuahua. He agreed to discuss the list only on condition of not being quoted by name, because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter.

A turf battle between the Juarez and Sinaloa drug cartels has turned Ciudad Juarez into one of the world’s deadliest cities. More than 4,300 people have been killed over the past three years in the city, which lies across the border from El Paso, Texas.

Five men were killed in a Ciudad Juarez shooting Friday, said Arturo Sandoval, a spokesman for the Chihuahua state prosecutors’ office.

The five were riding in a car when gunmen drove up beside them and opened fire, Sandoval said. Two of the five were killed inside the car. The others tried to flee into a restaurant but were gunned down in front of panicked customers.

The Attorney General’s Office offered rewards of $387,000 (5 million pesos) each for five other suspects on the list. The other 25 had $232,000 (3 million peso) bounties on their heads.

(more…)

Al Qaeda: Drone Strike Is Said To Kill Number Three AQ Leader

Filed under: Al Qaeda,Pakistan — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 11:36 AM

   Ok, my first thought on this, is that it sucks to be the number three guy in AQ.  It always seems like the number three guy gets killed all the time at all the countries AQ is operating at.  But this is a little different.  This is a big big fish, and we killed him.  But this is where I have a big problem with this strike.

   If we had a fix on AQ’s number three guy, then I think a capture mission would have been in order.  It would have been worth the risk in my view, and we probably could have captured a couple of other fish and documents along with the raid. We are talking about a target that is part of the inner circle of Al Qaeda, and not some junior varsity booger eater.      Of course Pakistan would not approve.  But in this case, that would be a part of the risk, and I think going in would have been extremely profitable for this war.

   That is the downside to all of these drone strikes.  For every big fish we kill, we lose out on a bunch of intelligence on the organization.  That bonanza of intel could completely open up Al Qaeda, and lead to a massacre of that group. His capture could have led to the capture of Bin Laden, and I think the political or tactical risk involved with such a capture mission would have been acceptable in this case. We are at war with a non-state enemy, and yet we continue to allow this group to take advantage of the of a state in places like Pakistan. –Matt

——————————————————————

Strike Is Said to Kill a Top Qaeda Leader

May 31, 2010

By ERIC SCHMITT

WASHINGTON — The operational leader for Al Qaeda in Afghanistan was killed in an American missile strike in Pakistan’s tribal areas in the last two weeks, according to a statement the group issued late Monday that American officials believe is correct.

The militant leader, Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, an Egyptian, was a top financial chief for Al Qaeda as well as one of the group’s founders, and was considered by American intelligence officials to be the organization’s No. 3 leader, behind Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, another Egyptian.

“His death will only be a severe curse by his life upon the infidels,” Al Qaeda said in a statement issued to jihadist Web sites and translated by the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors statements by jihadists.

(more…)

Podcasts: Private Security Contractors And The U.N.-Global Policy Forum

     I thought this was interesting, because the whole intent of the discussion was to highlight the fact that the UN is using private security contractors and at the same time, the UN is tasked with defining how countries are to use and regulate private security contractors. Hell, they even put together a group called the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries(UNWG).  The title of the group should give you some indication of the irony here.

     So my question is this.  Does the UNWG classify the security contractors that the UN uses as mercenaries?  Does the UNWG classify the UN’s private security contractors as lawful combatants? Check out what the IPOA feels about the whole thing here, and this should give you some context before listening to these guys.

   Finally, there are other speakers at this forum, and follow the link below if you would like to listen to them as well. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Private Security Contractors and the UN – May 19, 2010

From the Global Policy Forum Website

On 19th May 2010, GPF hosted a lunchtime discussion on Private Security Contractors and their involvement with the United Nations….

 …..In January 2010, the UN announced it would hire a British private security firm to protect its staff in Afghanistan. This contradicted past statements made by UN officials that condemned PSCs and argued against their use.  As the UN’s relationship with PSCs changes, some crucial questions need answering: how many private security contractors does the UN hire? What does the UN hire PSCs for? What means are being used to monitor them?  And more generally, can the UN be used as a vehicle to make PSCs accountable for their actions?

The Draft International Convention on the Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring Of Private Military and Security Companies has been circulating since 2009, with a UN working group prepared to announce the results of its consultations in September 2010. But even if the UN is able to ratify a convention, does it have the capacity to enforce it?

*****

Click here to listen to James Cockayne, Part One

Jame Cockayne was the first speaker at GPF’s event on Private Security Contractors and the United Nations.  Cockayne addresses three things in his speech: does the United Nations use private security contractors; what policy does the UN have towards private security contractors; and how can the UN, in the future, use strong policy to better regulate private security contractors.

Click here to listen to James Cockayne, Part Two

*****

Click here to listen to Scott Horton – Part One

Scott Horton was the second speaker at this event.  Horton’s experiences as a journalist and New York attornee, gave valuable insight to the role Private Security Contractors play in global conflict.  Horton focussed particuarly on the PSCs and the use of unmanned drones.

Click here to listen to Scott_Horton – Part Two

Link to Global Policy Forum here.

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress