Feral Jundi

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Weapons: MICOR Leader 50 Lightweight Bullpup .50 BMG

Filed under: Maritime Security,Weapons — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 1:03 PM

This is cool. The MICOR Leader 50 weighs 17 lbs. and is a semiautomatic, magazine fed bullpup .50 BMG! In the video, the manufacturer says it is accurate out to 2000 yards as well, and I think that would make this weapon an outstanding choice for ship security.
It answers several needs for this industry. It is compact, lightweight, and portable. A weapon like this gives the shooter quick follow up shots and the ability to quickly reload with a ten round magazine. This is important, because if you want to take out the engine of a boat at distance, a weapon like this will help you to get on target and adjust quickly.
A semiautomatic weapon can also help a team to engage multiple boats, and at distance. This is important, because you do not want these boats maneuvering close enough to the vessel so they can use their weapons at an effective range. A pirate that can lob shots at a boat, without any fear of the return fire, is a dangerous pirate and certainly a threat to your vessel.
Think PKM’s, RPG’s, Dragunov SVD’s, AK-47’s, and what kind of weapons your security team can carry to not only compete with these weapons, but actually give you an advantage over them. A weapon like the MICOR Leader 50, along with good supportive weapons, a sound strategy, a well led and trained team, all could give you the edge out there.
Now I cannot fully endorse this weapon quite yet, just because I have yet to hear any serious tests or real world usage of the thing. Once the gun community puts this weapon through the paces, then we will get a good idea about how it stacks up. But I do support the concept of giving the armed security team out there, every advantage they can get.
Here is another reason why I support this kind of weaponry. Today’s pirate forces are evolving and seeking advantage too. The amount of money each ransom brings in (4 to 5 million), is only increasing, and only fueling today’s piracy operations. They will do everything they can to protect their money making machine, much like the cartels in Mexico protect their cash machines called drug sales. With more revenue, comes more options for these pirates, and each pirate company out there will take the path that will help them to secure a capture.
At this time, if only 10 percent of the boats that transit through pirate infested waters have armed security, then the other 90 percent will be the group these pirates will focus in on. But what happens when that 10 percent becomes 80 or 90 percent with armed security? These pirates will have a choice–go back to fishing at home and being poor, or attempt to take down the armed vessels to maintain their business. Yet again, the cartels of Mexico are a good example of how powerful this profit motive is, and what men are willing to do to keep the money coming in.
To underestimate the lethal effects of that kind of entrepreneurial death machine, or offense industry, is a lesson that the entire world is learning and experiencing as we speak. Doom on those security companies and shipping companies who think they can compete against such offense industries, by poorly paying, equipping and ‘arming’ their security teams. –Matt


Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Legal News: Sexual Assault Is The Act Of Cowards–The Story Of Jamie Leigh Jones

There is so much about this story that is wrong and unjust. The men who did this to Jamie, and the way KBR staff treated this woman afterwords is despicable. Sexual assault/rape is the act of cowards, and I truly hope those that are responsible will pay. For that, I totally endorse Jamie and her legal fight to seek justice.

I am also highly disappointed in the management of that camp at that time. Locking Jamie into a conex box to ‘protect her’ was a cowardly act. (Big Boy Rules?–pfffft…) It sounds like what they were really trying to do, is lock her up so it would buy that management team at that camp some time to figure out how to deal with the case. Pathetic…..

There is something severely wrong with a management team that locks up the victim, as opposed to locking up the rapists.  How many other women did these men assault, and did the management lock up those victims as well? Talk about a total failure of leadership.

For that, I certainly hope Jamie and Tracy (the other woman in this video) who were sexually assaulted or harassed in the war zones, will get the justice they deserve. These women, also define what Jundism is all about. They have the courage to do what is right, and come forward publicly about what happened to them. Any company that refuses to hire these women because they came forward with their cases against KBR, should strongly reconsider. These are the kind of brave employees or contractors you would want in your organization! –Matt

Edit: 07/08/2011- After news came out about the details of this case, and after the ruling in the courts, I would like to personally apologize to KBR and the men that were accused of rape in this deal. I have also removed the ‘Jamie Leigh Jones foundation’ from the links section. Although I still stand by my statement up top that sexual assault is the act of cowards, I also believe that lying about sexual assault is equally despicable. I truly hope that this particular case will not stop women who were truly raped and sexually assaulted, from coming forward and pursuing justice. My heart will always lean towards the true victim. In this particular post, I was only reacting to the available information.

Afghanistan: As Troops Draw Down, Security Contractors Will Fill In The Gaps

The latest news these days is the draw down in troops. It has been expected and talked about, but now it is becoming reality. I have yet to read any analysis on how the security contracting industry itself will be impacted by this draw down, so this is my attempt at such things. I believe given all of the investment into Afghanistan’s reconstruction and security, that our industry will be in high demand as the troops pull out. It will also be a dangerous time period because of security vacuums created by a lack of troops, or a lack of Afghan police/military.

Below I have posted three stories that discuss all of the foreign investment or organizations interested in reconstruction in Afghanistan. The troops might be pulling out, but these investment projects will still be there, and they will be ongoing for awhile. With that reduction in troop related security, someone is going to have to fill that security vacuum. I believe that ‘someone’ will be a combination of local security contractors, and expats.

Not to mention that the State Department mission in Afghanistan will be ongoing for awhile. So WPS is going to be a viable source of employment for security contractors in Afghanistan and elsewhere. DoS and USAID both have reconstruction projects, government mentor-ship programs and diplomatic missions to maintain as the troops draw down.  Security contractors are going to be vital to the continuation of those missions.

The other source of work that will be ongoing in Afghanistan is training police and military.  The troop draw down strategy is highly dependent upon Afghanistan’s ability to provide it’s own security and stand on it’s own.  As US troops pull out, these training missions will probably require even more contractor trainers. And let’s not forget about NATO, and their inability to provide training assets. Contractors will be an essential part of maintaining this aspect of the strategy.

Then of course there are the foreign investments in mining in Afghanistan.  The mines and the railroads required to ship that stuff out of the country, are necessary for the reconstruction and stability of Afghanistan. It will also help to pay for this massive army we have helped Afghanistan build, and hopefully sustain. (although foreign donors will continue to be the main source of maintaining this army)  So local security contractors will be essential for those projects, and expat security contractors will be required to handle the PSD of engineers and upper management.

Probably the most important things to remember about the draw down is that troops must be approved by congress, but there is no limit as to the number of security contractors that can be hired. Matter of fact, the only limit to security contractors is financial. So if the investments and interest in Afghanistan is still there, contractors will continue to be very important. Probably more important than ever, just because the enemy will want to exploit the draw down of troops is an excellent time to attack and turn up the pressure. We will see….-Matt

The US Isn’t the Only Donor in Afghanistan

As U.S. Pulls Back, Fears Abound Over Toll on Afghan Economy

In Afghanistan, who will pick up where the U.S. leaves off?

The US Isn’t the Only Donor in Afghanistan
06/22/11
Jordan Dey
Fmr. US Director, UN World Food Program
As the Obama Administration announces its Afghanistan drawdown tonight, much has been said about what will change — the number of troops — but there has been virtually no discussion of what will remain largely the same — the continued assistance of more than four dozen countries, 20 UN agencies, and hundreds of NGOs in providing everything from road-building contracts to health care investments in Afghanistan.?As President Obama has shifted US foreign policy from the unilateralism of the Bush Administration to a more collaborative approach with our allies there is no country on earth where that multi-country approach is more apparent than Afghanistan. And, no country on earth where the US is better prepared to reduce its footprint, and leave some work to others.

(more…)

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Bounties: The FBI Posts A Reward For Catherine Greig, The Girlfriend Of Fugitive James ‘Whitey’ Bulger

I love posting these types of deals. It is my way of supporting an offense industry designed to capture fugitives. Plus, I would love to see one of my readers out there get lucky and actually be responsible for the capture of these thugs.
Catherine has a $100,000 reward, and Whitey has a $2 million reward. So if you actually did find Catherine, you might want to hang tight for a little bit, just to watch who she hangs out with. Just saying….lol Good luck out there, and happy hunting. –Matt

Edit: 06/23/2011- Talk about quick?  Someone turned both of these fugitives into authorities after watching the PSA.  They were in California. See the comments section below for more details.


Letter Of Marque: Inching Closer To A World Of Cyber Privateering

Lately, there has been an increased intensity of hacking attacks on government and business. Of course, government is doing all it can to keep up and stop these hackers. And like the piracy problem on the high seas, hackers in the commons called cyber space are operating with virtual impunity.

To me, there are several areas of weakness that today’s hackers are exploiting. One is the shear enormity of the internet and cyber space, and all the potential targets that a hacker can attack. Like with the pirates of Somalia, hackers have plenty of ocean and are constantly searching for new hunting grounds and weaknesses to exploit.

Their rewards can be immense. Hack into a bank, steal information from a technology firm, or hack a government website and exploit that information. Or they do it because of the ‘lulz’ or the hell of it, just to prove they are the best. Or worse, they attack individuals. (companies or the government has done nothing to protect the little guys– like this blog, from attacks)  And these hackers can do it all from a terminal at some random location in the world.

The other thing at play here is scale. Once folks see for themselves how successful one group or individual is, then others will copy them. They will borrow brilliance and follow a model of operation that works, all to achieve a goal. And like today’s example of piracy, hacking spreads because it is inspired by the success of others and by the rewards of the risk taking.

It also spreads when money or organizational influence comes into play. China or a cartel from Mexico can easily do things to add fire to the world of hacking and cyber warfare. All nations add to scale of such things. Just wait until ‘plomo o plata‘ comes to the world of hacking, and then that is when cyber lances will really become essential.

Which brings me to the point of this post. Because this problem is only growing, there must be measures that equal the size and scale of this global deluge. Legal tools like the LoM must be considered to even the scale between black hat and the company use of white hat hackers. Of course it would be nice if government and it’s law enforcement apparatus could be large enough enough to apply the rule of law to all corners of the cyber universe. But like with today’s modern day scourge of piracy, government cannot be everywhere and at all times.

So here is where I like to take the next step forward.  Companies need the legal authority to effectively combat black hat hackers. That legal authority can and should come in the form of a Letter of Marque and Reprisal.  Or maybe a government can come up with a different title for this license.  But either way, by giving companies the legal authority to do what they need to do to combat the problem, they in essence help to put ‘the armed guards on boats’. (another analogy with today’s piracy problem)

Here is some more food for thought. If the targets of hackers are companies, then is the government the best tool to use to protect all of these companies out there?  Who would have more interest and incentive to protect a company’s infrastructure–a government or the the company itself?  Of course a company would love for someone to do it for free, but the problem here is that there is too much at stake to put the security of a company simply in the hands of a burdensome, bureaucratic and highly inefficient  government organizations. Government does not have the resources to watch over every company, and it does not have the personal motivation to defend a company’s assets to the fullest degree.

Yet again, the piracy analogy works for this example. All of the navies in the world have not stopped piracy, and if anything, the problem has grown. Likewise, the US government was not able to protect Sony, Google or Lockheed Martin from vicious hacking attacks, even though the government has cyber warfare units and tons of agencies tasked with monitoring cyber related activities.

So what is the solution?  I say government should listen to what the companies have to say about how best to help them. The government would also have to re-evaluate what ‘help’ really means, in the context of this problem. If a company says it is legally constrained when trying to defend against black hat hackers, then what is the logical solution?  Do you put the government’s police forces in charge of a company’s security anti-hacking units, or do we license a company to combat this problem?  To me, issuing a license to companies so they can actually compete with these black hat hackers, is the equivalent of putting ‘armed guards on boats’ to defend against Somali Pirates. It makes sense, and it answers the problem of scale.

It also sounds like this is the natural progression anyways?  The new DIB Cyber Pilot program sounds like another step towards empowering companies. With companies like Lockheed Martin, it behooves the government to help them because this company is very much a part of our national security.  So will licensing companies be the next ‘natural progression’ as an answer to this world wide scourge? I know myself, and the Morgan Doctrine blog will be following this stuff, and we will see….-Matt

 

 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress