Now this is interesting and a big thanks to Adam for sending me this one. The deal here that perked me up is this move by Exxon might be tied into Rep. Dana Rohrabacher’s letter (which I posted below) in regards to Karzai doing deals with China on oil contracts. Rohrabacher’s views on supporting the new ‘Northern Alliance’ as Karzai does deals with the Taliban was noted earlier on the blog, and Karzai definitely does not like this guy. lol
I would be interested in any other theories or speculations as to why Exxon would be willing to risk it in these areas. Is this the ‘Kurdistan’ of Afghanistan once all the western forces move on and the Taliban come back to restart where they left off? –Matt
Exxon considers oil/gas exploration in Afghanistan
Mon, Jul 2 2012
By Anna Driver
Exxon Mobil Corp is contemplating participation in an oil and gas tender of six blocks in northern Afghanistan, a company spokesman said on Monday.
Access to the world’s oil reserves for companies like Exxon has gotten tougher in recent years as governments assert tighter control of their resources. Opportunity exists, however, in countries like Afghanistan or Iraq where foreign oil companies’ budgets and expertise are needed.
“Esso Exploration International Ltd’s expression of interest in the Afghan-Tajik Basin tender is part of our ongoing evaluation of oil and gas resources around the world,” Alan Jeffers, a spokesman for Exxon, said.
Afghanistan is seeking bidders for the exploration, development and production of oil and gas in six blocks in the western portion of the Afghan-Tajik Basin of northern Afghanistan, according to its Web site.
Bids are due in late October and winning bidders will be announced in late 2012, the government said.
Afghanistan signed a deal late last year with China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) for the development of oil blocks in the Amu Darya basin in the north, a project expected to earn billions of dollars over two decades for the war torn state.
That agreement was the first international oil production agreement reached by the Afghan government for several decades.
Shares of Exxon fell 68 cents to $84.88 in midday New York Stock Exchange trading. The energy sector was broadly lower on a $2 per barrel decline in crude oil prices.
Story here.——————————————————
***PRESS RELEASE***
Rep. Rohrabacher to Investigate Karzai Family-China Corrupt Oil Deal
Washington, Jun 27 – Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, has expressed grave concern about the recent deal made by the Karzai family and the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), to develop oil and natural gas in the Amu Darya Basin of Afghanistan. He intends to hold a hearing into how the state-owned Communist Chinese enterprise colluded with the notoriously corrupt administration of President Hamid Karzai to gain a foothold in a strategic part of Afghanistan.
CNPC chose as its “partner” the Watan Group, a Karzai family firm run by two of President Karzai’s cousins (Rashid and Rateb Popal) and includes his brother Qayum Karzai as a major stockholder. The conflict of interest displayed by President Karzai in ordering his Minister of Mines to sign the China contract with the Watan Group confirms that he is running a family-based kleptocracy.
“The strategic consequences of this “partnership” between the Karzai family and China are immense, and go beyond Beijing’s desire to control new energy sources,” says Rep. Rohrabacher. “The establishment of a large Communist Chinese government presence in the northern tier of Afghanistan will undoubtedly include armed security forces which Beijing always sends to its foreign oil fields. This enterprise should be seen as part of the long-term goal of the Sino-Pakistan alliance to dominate Afghanistan.”
The $3 billion, 25-year deal gives Watan and CNPC access to an estimated 160 million barrels of oil from three fields in northern Afghanistan. CNPC has pledged to produce 150,000 barrels by the end of this year. CNPC is additionally interested in the larger Afghan Tajik fields, also in the north. The massive project will put a Chinese presence in the heart of Uzbek and Tajik regions which are the strongest centers of resistance to the Taliban. Local leaders of the Northern Alliance are opposed to the deal. President Karzai’s response has been to threaten to send troops to put down local opposition, which he has labeled “treason.”
“This is not just another example of President Karzai exercising dictatorial power to enrich his family,” warns Rohrabacher. “It is an example of his growing alignment with Pakistan and China. The objective is to wipe out those northern communities most opposed to the Taliban and to Karzai. If successful, it means the U.S. has sacrificed blood and treasure for a decade only to benefit our enemies. Our brave soldiers are being stabbed in the back by corruption and subversion in Kabul working in cahoots with Beijing.”
Rep. Rohrabacher is outraged that U.S. officials supervised the bidding process and allowed the award to go to the Chinese Communist firm and the Karzai family mafia.
“The Chinese state-owned and run corporation is an agent of America’s greatest rival in world affairs,” says Rohrabacher. “Beijing uses its rising wealth to buy influence, support rogue states and build armaments that threaten our security. To let them establish a major base in Afghanistan indicates that the Obama administration has no concept of strategy or understanding of the connection between international economics and national power.
“Instead of our failed and misguided policy of pretending Pakistan is an ally and Chinese investment is a stabilizing factor, we need to understand that we are returning to the pre-9/11 policy of permitting Pakistan’s use of terrorists to conquer Afghanistan with Chinese help. We need to change our strategy. We need to support the Northern Alliance against Karzai’s dangerous plot to sell his country and strengthen our alignment with India to counter Sino-Pak ambitions.”
Rep. Rohrabacher’s Subcommittee held a hearing on June 6th titled, “Investigating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in Afghanistan.”
Press release here.
LOL, ya…have fun with that. I didn’t see a province mentioned but based on the “Afghan/Tajik” border is not a place I would want to be right now. I have a friend in Kunar and the insurgency is very active up there, lots of Hizb and foreign fighters. From my experience, American oil companies tend to be risk averse when it comes to security and the taliban types are going to see Esso/Exxon as just one more tentacle of the America vampire squid. Unless they are ready to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and pay to play with the local shadow government I see infrastructure being sabotaged and personnel being abducted or attacked on a pretty frequent basis. The question of course is, will they hire security or simply pull out.I’m also curious as to how the Chinese will handle this post 2014. I foresee them taking a lot of the resource rights because of the security and health hazard risks as well as their willingness to deal with regional players, trading guns for transit and exploration permissions in Africa.
Comment by MattFanning — Saturday, July 7, 2012 @ 9:40 AM
LOL, ya…have fun with that. I didn’t see a province mentioned but based on the “Afghan/Tajik” border is not a place I would want to be right now. I have a friend in Kunar and the insurgency is very active up there, lots of Hizb and foreign fighters. From my experience, American oil companies tend to be risk averse when it comes to security and the taliban types are going to see Esso/Exxon as just one more tentacle of the America vampire squid. Unless they are ready to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and pay to play with the local shadow government I see infrastructure being sabotaged and personnel being abducted or attacked on a pretty frequent basis. The question of course is, will they hire security or simply pull out.I’m also curious as to how the Chinese will handle this post 2014. I foresee them taking a lot of the resource rights because of the security and health hazard risks as well as their willingness to deal with regional players, trading guns for transit and exploration permissions in Africa.
Comment by feraljundi — Saturday, February 2, 2013 @ 11:02 AM