Feral Jundi

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Industry Talk: The Difference Between Fault and Responsibility, by Jake Allen

   Excellent post by Jake about the AGNA stuff, and the difference between fault and responsibility. Check it out, and this was also posted at Combat Operator and Private Military Herald. –Matt

——————————————————————

The Difference Between Fault and Responsibility

Sep 16, 2009

By Jake Allen

The more I read about our government in the mainstream media the more I realize how neither one seems to understand the difference between ‘fault’ and ‘responsibility’.  The ArmorGroup fiasco at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul is only the latest incident but I will use it here because it is fresh on everyone’s mind and it is particularly illustratrative.

It’s critically important that we separate the terms fault and responsibility. Sometimes a person or an entity is both ‘at fault’ and ‘responsible’ but the two are not synonymous.  In other words there is room for ‘blame’ or ‘fault’ at both ArmorGroup and at the State Department but the ‘responsibility’ for what happened only comes down in one place.

There is little doubt that the antics being conducted primarily by C-shift on the expatriate guard force was nearly 100% the doing of immature and poorly supervised and lead ArmorGroup contractors.  ArmorGroup is ‘at fault’ for hiring these low-end nonprofessionals.

(more…)

India: Becoming a Private Guard Becomes Tougher

   Bravo, and I am pretty impressed with the standards they have put together. It is a start at least and hopefully we will get some feedback, good or bad, from any industry folks from India about this.

   It is also important to point out, that incidents like the Mumbai attacks require competent first responders to stop the attack.  Police cannot be everywhere, nor can the military, but all of the hotels in Mumbai use private security (I assume).  This new focus on standards for guards is a good thing, if they want to increase the chances of stopping future attacks.

     Strangely enough, it almost looks like they are implementing a system that looks a lot like what I have been promoting here on FJ.  Something that resembles the Red Card system with the Federal Fire Services here in the states.  Even the mentor program reminds me of the task book system that I am familiar with. Oh, and they are teaching disaster management? That sounds like Incident Command stuff there. Hmmmm, interesting. –Matt

——————————————————————

Becoming a private guard becomes tougher

Anil Kumar M, TNN

2 September 2009

BANGALORE: You’ve probably wondered how some podgy men in uniform ended up as security guards. Simply because it was open house with few standards. But not anymore.

The government has framed fresh guidelines — Karnataka Private Security Rules — and brought all private security agencies in the state under its ambit.

(more…)

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Media News: Death and Politics For Contractors–A Cautionary Tale

Filed under: Iraq,Media News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:51 PM

Adam Hermanson 

Security contractor Adam Hermanson at the Swords of Qadisiyyah in Zawra Park, Iraq.

Death and Politics For Contractors–A Cautionary Tale

09/16/2009

     The other day I was watching a show called Democracy Now headlined by Amy Goodman and Jeremy Scahill, and I was appalled.  They had the family of Adam Hermanson on the show, and the supposed focus was the accidental death of Adam Hermanson in Iraq.  You would think the show would be centered on who did the electrical work that caused the death of this security contractor?  Or maybe even a focus on the lack of management and quality control by the contracting officers and construction company that was tasked with building Camp Olympia and it’s facilities?  But that wasn’t the case, and instead it was a disgusting display of politics.

(more…)

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Gear Review: The TAG Havoc Armor Carrier

Filed under: Gear Review — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:52 AM

I just ordered a medium sized version of this rig and it just came in the mail the other day. There was a bit of a wait, but not too bad. (About two months) And for disclosure, I bought this and I picked this product based on my own research on low profile BALCS carriers.
First impressions is that this vest is built well. All of the velcro is in strips, so that you can have each piece separately replaced, as opposed to dealing with really fat pieces of velcro that would require total replacement and sewing surgery. That is good, because most shops that do repairs overseas on the bases carry the smaller strips of velcro.
The color is a good looking coyote brown, and not ‘puke green’ or whatever weird version of coyote brown you see floating around out there. So I like the color.
Now on to the functionality of this carrier. Mine is a medium, because I own RBR BALCS cut medium sized armor panels. My panels did fit in this medium sized Havoc, so for you BALCS owners, that is good news and the product works as advertised.
On that subject, I own a CIRAS vest (land version) by Eagle Industries, and that is a great vest. It serves the purpose of having a molle capable vest that I can put pouches on and set up for contracts that require that kind of equipment. But I also wanted a low profile vest, and I want the ability to use the BALCS armor in my CIRAS vest for that low profile vest. Dual purpose kit is cool. (less stuff to carry as well).
Better yet, I prefer wearing a harness (my Tactical Tailor Two Piece MAV) over a low profile rig, and whenever I can use that set up, I do. That allows me to use a layering principle for my kit. If I want to just wear my vest, and not the pouches and rifle ammo, then I can. Or I can throw on the harness–it gives me choices, and I like choices with kit.
I even have a plate carrier (Tactical Tailor’s PC, but I prefer the low profile plate carrier from DBT) that allows me to use just my plates. That is great for hot weather or when contracts stipulate that I wear a plate carrier.
So there you have it, I have three types of vests to answer any and all types of contracts that I might work. Everything from the low profile gigs (the Havoc and plate carriers work there) to the everyday field rig (CIRAS). That is my system, and it works for me.
Back to the Havoc. The really neat feature of this vest is that you can adjust the position of the plate inside the vest, so that it correctly covers key areas of the body. (like positioning the thing right below the suprasternal notch) There is also a side plate pocket which holds a 6×6 plate. I don’t have a side plate to test this out, but I do plan on getting some in the future. It looks to me like it would fit just fine in there. (it might even fit a 6×8)
Another cool deal is that you can use different shape plates in this vest. Unfortunately, I have the square plates that RBR sells.(size 10×12) I recommend getting plates that have the corners cut, just so you can present a rifle and your butt stock has contact in the shoulder pocket. But I am glad the vest holds the plates I have, and there is space to fit all types of plates out there. The pocket inside has a little wiggle room to meet your needs.
The down side? I don’t have any yet, because even the price is decent in my book. (about 150 bucks, depending on where you go to buy). The wait sucked, but good things come to those that wait. I guess after wearing it for awhile, I can comment about durability. The weight is good, and I really like how it sucks in tight with the side flaps.
Oh, that is another thing about this vest. I don’t like having to mess around with three straps or whatever on each side, when putting a vest on. The Havoc is perfectly set up to throw on and slap one large strap of velcro on one side to tighten. Simple and quick to put on is good. So there you have it, FJ recommends this product, and it is about the best offering for a low profile BALCS carrier that accepts plates and side plates out there. –Matt

Edit: Also sign up for TAG’s newsletter and check the forums from time to time for any coupon codes. You can save a bunch of money with that stuff, and thanks to Matt for reminding me.

 

 

Detailed Description from the Company

Tactical Assault Gears Havoc armor carrier is designed to carry the SPEAR/BALCS cut soft armor. The Havoc has plate pockets for front and back trauma plates. The carrier also has built in 6”x6” side plate pockets inside the carrier. The Havoc is made of 500 Denier Cordura Nylon to reduce the overall weight. The Havoc is lined with mesh on the inside, and has the ability to accept ballistic groin protectors if needed. This is a great solution for operators who prefer to use chest rigs or assault vests over their armor carriers. Made in the United States, 100% lifetime warranty.

Link to product here.

Soldier System’s review of the Havoc here.

Lightfighter post with pictures about the Havoc here.

Buy the Havoc at Amazon here.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Cool Stuff: DEA FAST Teams in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Law Enforcement,Video — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 11:32 PM

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress