Feral Jundi

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Maritime Security: Pirates Take Down a Super Tanker, Somalia

Filed under: Africa,Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , — Matt @ 11:11 AM

 

     Thanks to Jeff for sending me this article.  This is significant.  These pirates took down a ‘super tanker’, at 450 nautical miles off the coast of Somalia!  Those are two records–the biggest ever ship taken, and the furthest out to sea hijacking.  They must be using a mother ship out there in order to do an operation like this.  

     The other interesting angle to this, is the shift of attacks further out to sea, mean a larger patrol area.  A herculean task, and I think this will change the thinking about the way piracy will be dealt with.  That security forces will have to escort each ship, or post a robust force on the ship itself in order to properly protect it.  To just post a security ship in the general area is not going to work, if pirates are willing to go so far out to sea.

   And with this subject, if you have been watching the show on History Channel called Shadow Force, the first two episodes have dealt with maritime operations.  Although what they are doing is busting illegal fishing operations off the coast of Liberia.  The cool thing about the operation, are the obstacles and challenges that they had to over come just to get up and running over there. They used a RIB, with a FLIR camera and an LRAD non-lethal sound weapon system. Cool show. –Head Jundi

—————————————————————— 

 

super tanker

The MV Sirius Star super tanker. 

Tanker taken to Somali pirate stronghold

U.S. and other naval forces decide — for now — against intervention

The Associated Press

updated 6:16 a.m. PT, Tues., Nov. 18, 2008

MOGADISHU, Somalia – Pirates who seized a Saudi supertanker loaded with $100 million in crude oil anchored the ship within sight of impoverished Somali fishing villages Tuesday, while the U.S. and other naval forces decided — for now — against intervention.

(more…)

War Art: ‘Waltz With Bashir’, an Israeli Animated War Documentary

Filed under: Film,War Art — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:39 AM

     This is a first for me.  I have never seen an animated documentary, and I was really enthralled with how the trailer looked and felt.  If you go to the website, the director has more trailers to check out. 

     I guess the film will be opening up on December 25th in New York and Los Angeles.  The politics and controversy that surround this film is an area that I will not comment on, and that is really not what hit me with this thing.  To me, this is more of an intimate film about the director’s war experience and how he conveyed that through animation.  I really liked the style of this thing, and I am sure we will see more of this type of animation in the future. –Head Jundi

Website Here

 

News: Kilcullen on Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,News — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:26 AM

The New Yorker

George Packer

November 14, 2008

Kilcullen on Afghanistan: “It’s Still Winnable, But Only Just.”

I wrote about David Kilcullen two years ago, in a piece called “Knowing the Enemy.” Few experts understand counterinsurgency and counterterrorism better than this former Australian army officer and anthropology Ph.D, who has advised the American, British, and Australian governments, was one of General Petraeus’s strategic whizzes at the start of the surge, in early 2007, and writes so well that you’d never imagine he’s spent his whole career in government, the military, and academia. Kilcullen is now a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, which has provided Obama with foreign-policy advisers and advice.

This week, Kilcullen agreed to do an e-mail Q. & A. on Afghanistan and Pakistan, where he’s spent a lot of time, and where the most pressing foreign crisis awaits the new Administration. Though Kilcullen is still an adviser to the State Department, he emphasized that his views are his own. And they are characteristically blunt.

The White House briefed both campaigns on Afghanistan before the election. Apparently that’s how little time we have to turn things around. So how bad is it?

It’s bad: violence is way up, Taliban influence has spread at the local level, and popular confidence in the government and the international community is waning fast. It’s still winnable, but only just, and to turn this thing around will take an extremely major effort starting with local-level governance, political strategy, giving the Afghan people a well-founded feeling of security, and dealing with the active sanctuary in Pakistan. A normal U.S. government transition takes six to nine months, by the time new political appointees are confirmed, briefed, and in position. But nine months out from now will be the height of the Afghan fighting season, and less than a month out from critical Presidential elections in Afghanistan. If we do this the “normal” way, it will be too late for the Obama Administration to grip it up. I think this is shaping up to be one of the smoothest transitions on record, with the current Administration going out of its way to assist and facilitate. That said, the incoming Administration has a steep learning curve, and has inherited a dire situation—so whatever we do, it’s not going to be easy.

It sounds like you’re proposing classic counterinsurgency strategy: a combination of offensive and defensive military operations, political and economic development, and diplomacy. Isn’t that what we’ve been doing these past seven years? Have we just not been doing enough of all these? Or do we need to change strategy to something fundamentally new?

(more…)

Monday, November 17, 2008

Industry Talk: The Future of Security Contracting on the Border?

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 1:29 PM

   Interesting little interview with a former Security Chief with DHS about Dyncorp at the border, and the future of contractor use by DHS.  –Head Jundi 

——————————————————————- 

 

 

The Future of Security Contracting on the Border?

November 17, 2008

As the former chief security officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Dwight Williams directed and managed security matters related to the department and its 200,000 employees and contractors for close to three years. Williams, a 30-year security veteran whose resume also includes over a decade with the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, now serves as a vice president overseeing security at DynCorp International, a private defense contractor, which he joined in June 2007. CSO caught up with Williams for his thoughts on the future of homeland security and its increasing partnership with private contract firms.

CSO: Dyncorp has had a presence with contract security forces on the border, as well as with contingency efforts in the Gulf after Hurricane Katrina. Drawing upon your expertise both with DynCorp, and previously with the Department of Homeland Security, do you anticipate an increasing private presence in homeland security efforts?

Williams: From its formation, DHS relied heavily on contractor support to stand up the organization and roll out new initiatives. From my experience, it was a public-private partnership that worked very well. I am certain the private sector will continue to play a prominent role with DHS, particularly in the development of new technologies to protect the homeland and by providing surge support in response to natural or man-made disasters.

Other key roles for the private sector include the protection of our critical infrastructure and government facilities, thus freeing valuable government resources to concentrate on detection and elimination of threats to our way of life.

(more…)

Industry Talk: Two Reports about Contractors from the Army War College Quarterly

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:12 PM

PARAMETERS

US Army War College Quarterly

Autumn 2008, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 3

Website Here

Contractors:  The New Element of Military Force Structure

By Mark Cancian

From Parameters, Autumn 2008, pp. 61-77.

Read the Whole Report Here

Conclusion

There is still a great deal of hand-wringing related to “relying on mercenaries” and nostalgia about returning to an all-military warfighting force. As a result many are in denial with regard to contractors. But it is time to move forward. The experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan have shown what future conflict will look like when fought by an all-volunteer force. On the whole the record is vastly superior to the experience in Vietnam, a war fought by a conscript Army. 

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress