Feral Jundi

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Media News: Tactical Success, Strategic Defeat–A Raid in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Media News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 2:54 AM

   Doug brought this to my attention, and it is a very interesting look at the speed in which the Taliban was able to distribute their propaganda about this raid in Afghanistan.  It really doesn’t matter if the guy was a bad guy or not, the perception was that he was not, and that the raiding party was in the wrong.  Although I am sure if our military media machine was able to pre-plan the media release and information distribution about this raid before the Taliban did, like Doug was telling me, then they could have controlled the message better.  The enemy is able to twist the details, and do whatever they can to make us out to be the bad guys, and that is exactly what they did here.  They could say ‘of course this man had an AK 47 in his hand, there were men that came in the middle of the night, and he had no idea who they were’.  No mention that he was a bomb maker. 

   With that little twist to the details, the Taliban could easily promote a concept that this guy was innocent, and that the Americans are the Russians incarnate. We must do a better job of defeating the Taliban propaganda machine, during raids like this.  And yes, maybe it would have been better to find a different way of nabbing this guy.  Like using the local police, or just sitting the guy out until he moves away from the village.  

   Either way, if we are to do any actions in these villages, we must look at it from their perspective, and from the Taliban’s perspective, and figure the best way to navigate that deal.  The information operations effort must do better than this, to stay ahead of this enemy.  

   I will even take it a step further. The Taliban could easily take a new media approach, and I am sure they have.  As soon as a raid happens, a Taliban info warrior blogs the crap out of it, and gets that info out to their network.  That network puts their slant on it, and keeps expanding the net.  New media has the potential to spread this fast, and spread it amongst a key group of opinion leaders out there in the jihadist networks. And then guess who monitors this kind of stuff?  The anti-war and human rights crew, and the pure gold of Info War for the Taliban, is to get the international community thinking that they have been wronged, or that the ISAF forces are committing the next ‘Mai Lai Massacre’.

   PMC’s and PSC’s need to be aware of the Taliban media machine as well.  They would love to create another Nisour Square situation, and pull start the population hate machine against western security contractors.  Things to think about. –Matt 

——————————————————————- 

Tactical success, strategic defeat

Afghan outrage at U.S. raid highlights challenges facing new military push

By Pamela Constable

The Washington Post

March. 1, 2009

FORWARD OPERATING BASE ALTIMUR, Afghanistan – The U.S. soldiers entered the sleeping village in Logar province in the dead of night on Feb. 20, sure of their target and heavily armed. They surrounded a mud-walled compound, shouting commands, and then kicked down the gate as cries of protest erupted within.

Exactly what happened next is disputed, but shots were fired and a man inside fell dead. Four other men were grabbed and arrested. Then the soldiers departed, leaving the women to calm the frightened children and the rumors to spread in the dark.

By midmorning, hundreds of angry people were blocking the nearby highway, burning tires and shouting “Death to America!” By mid-evening, millions of Afghan TV news viewers were convinced that foreign troops had killed an unarmed man trying to answer his door.

“We are afraid of the Taliban, but we are more afraid of the Americans now,” said Abdul Ghaffar, a truck driver in the raided village. “The foreign forces are killing innocent people. We don’t want them in Afghanistan. If they stay, one day we will stand against them, just like we stood against the Russians.”

(more…)

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Publications: Tell Me Why We’re There? Enduring Interests in Afghanistan (and Pakistan) by Fick, Kilcullen, Nagl, Singh

Filed under: Afghanistan,Pakistan,Publications — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 4:01 PM

   If you care about the direction we are taking in the war, then I highly recommend reading this report.  The authors should give you a clue as to how important this thing is. If President Obama was smart, he would read this report as well, and not have some staffer spoon feed it to him. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Tell Me Why We’re There? Enduring Interests in Afghanistan (and Pakistan)Publication Type: Policy Brief

Publication Date: 01/22/2009

Author(s): Nathaniel C. Fick, David Kilcullen, John A. Nagl, Vikram J. Singh 

January 2009 – In 2009, the Obama administration will attempt to deliver on campaign promises to change the Afghan war’s trajectory. In April, the Strasbourg NATO summit will determine the alliance’s role in shaping the future of the country and the region. By the fall, Afghans will have voted for their president for only the second time since 2001, an event which may irrevocably set the country’s course. By the end of this summer’s fighting season, the war in Afghanistan will not yet be won, but it could well be lost.

After seven years and the deaths of more than a thousand American and coalition troops, there is still no consensus on whether the future of Afghanistan matters to the United States and Europe, or on what can realistically be achieved there. Afghanistan does matter. A stable Afghanistan is necessary to defeat Al Qaeda and to further stability in South and Central Asia. Understanding the war in Afghanistan, maintaining domestic and international support for it, and prosecuting it well requires three things: a clear articulation of U.S. interests in Afghanistan, a concise definition of what the coalition seeks to achieve there, and a detailed strategy to guide the effort.

U.S. interests in Afghanistan may be summarized as “two no’s”: there must be no sanctuary for terrorists with global reach in Afghanistan, and there must be no broader regional meltdown. Securing these objectives requires helping the Afghans to build a sustainable system of governance that can adequately ensure security for the Afghan people—the “yes” upon which a successful exit strategy depends.

Read the Rest of the Paper Here

Monday, February 23, 2009

Industry Talk: DoD Contractor Numbers as of December 2008

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk,Iraq — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 1:50 PM

     It’s always nice to see just exactly where the numbers sit in this industry.  This report does not include all the NGO’s or other companies using security or contractors in the war, but it is an interesting look at DoD related contracts. The numbers are interesting, and especially in Afghanistan. –Matt

—————————————————————– 

U.S. Department of Defense Contractor numbers as of December 2008

CONTRACTOR SUPPORT OF U.S. OPERATIONS

IN USCENTCOM AOR, IRAQ, AND AFGHANISTAN

BACKGROUND:  This update reports DoD contractor personnel numbers in theater and outlines DoD efforts to improve management of contractors accompanying U.S. forces.  It covers DoD contractor personnel deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR) as of December 31, 2008.

KEY POINTS: Ending 1st quarter FY 2009, USCENTCOM reported approximately 259,400 contractor personnel working for the DoD in the USCENTCOM AOR. 

Total DoD contractor numbers in Iraq: 148,050

*9,218 are doing security (about 6%) 

*782 of those security contractors are American/Coalition citizens, 7,226 are Third Country Nationals and 1,210 are Local Nationals.

Total DoD contractor numbers in Afghanistan: 71,755

*3,689 are doing security (about 6%)

*15  of those security contractors are American/coalition citizens, 23 are Third Country Nationals and 3,651 Local Nationals.

Go Here to Read the Report

 

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Jobs: Personal Security Specialist for WPPS, OCONUS

Filed under: Afghanistan,Iraq,Jobs — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 10:17 PM

     Hey guys, this is the latest word from DynCorp.  I am not the POC, just posting some open source job stuff from the forums. –Matt

—————————————————————–

DynCorp International, WPPS is currently looking for Personal Security Specialist (PSS) Operators. To be accepted into the DI WPPS program, applicants must meet the minimum requirements below:

1.     Must be a U.S. Citizen

2.     Three (3) years military, law enforcement, or protective security.

3.     One (1) of these years including experience in protective security.

 If interested, please send your correspondence and resume to dynwpps@gmail.com

 NOTE* If you are currently employed with BW, in Al Hillah or Baghdad, there is NO need to apply to work for DI WPPS at this time. In the event that we win the Baghdad and / or Al Hillah Task Orders, we will send a transition team who will transfer you to DynCorp. 

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Job Tips: Control Risks Looking for CP Operatives, Holding Recruitment Day

Filed under: Afghanistan,Iraq,Job Tips,Jobs — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 9:32 AM

Outsourced Consultant Recruitment Day

Control Risks will be holding a recruitment day at our Jersey office on Friday 27th February 2009, at 10.00.

We are currently looking for Close Protection operatives to fill forthcoming vacancies in the Middle East. All potential candidates will need to be SIA licenced (Level 3) and HECPO trained prior to deploying on to the contract.

 If you meet the criteria or are willing to undertake the relevant qualifications, please email Tony Morell with a current CV (tony.morell@control-risks.com)

Location details

Control Risks

Cottons Centre

Cottons Lane

London

SE1 2QG

United Kingdom

Tel: + 44 20 7970 2100

Fax: + 44 20 7970 2222 

Website Here

 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress