Feral Jundi

Friday, August 14, 2009

Africa: U.S. Boots On Congo Ground

Filed under: Africa,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 2:02 AM

    This is a joke, right?  I get the impression that Mr. O’Hanlon, like many journalists and authors out there, has completely written out of the dialogue any mention of PMC’s.  It’s as if they have all committed to the idea that security contractors are a bad idea, and that somehow a reworking of the military structure will solve the problems of manpower issues for these types of missions.

    I have news for you guys, kids these days are smart, and a program like this is still the military and it is still serving in a war zone.  How is that different, other than calling it something different?

   Further more, once you put these ‘safe and sane’ troops on the ground in the Congo, and they are confronted with a force of rebels that see an opportunity to go kinetic on this new style western force, what will these forces answer back with?  Will this new peace force answer rebel bullets and bombs, with high velocity love letters and flower bombs?  This kind of thinking is dangerous and idiotic to say the least, and I am highly skeptical.

   Perhaps Mr. O’Hanlon should get some shared reality, and talk to Eeben Barlow of Executive Outcomes about what is required in these countries if we really care to keep some kind of peace?

(more…)

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Maritime Security: Aegis to Help Combat Piracy Off Somali Coast

   Interesting news.  I wonder if this is a precursor to Aegis coordinating a massive security contractor effort in Africa to deal with piracy? Kind of like the ROC in Iraq.  We will have to keep our eye on this one. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Aegis to help combat piracy off Somali coast

By Sylvia Pfeifer in London

April 21 2009

Tim Spicer, the founder and chief executive of Aegis Defence Services, the private security company whose main market is in Iraq, is preparing to do battle on the high seas by tackling piracy off the coast of Somalia.

The company is in talks with several states in the region, including the Yemeni and Djibouti governments, about setting up a command and control centre that would monitor the threat of piracy and act as an information exchange centre for vessels in the area. Somali pirates have stepped up attacks in the Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean in recent weeks, forcing the issue on to the agenda of Western governments.

(more…)

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Rwanda: ‘We Were Lying in Pools of Blood’-15th Anniversary of the Genocide

Filed under: Africa,Rwanda — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 8:15 PM

   I have talked about the Rwandan genocide in past posts, and I think it is worthy to bring up the anniversary of that horrific event.  Truly awful. –Matt 

—————————————————————– 

“We Were Lying in Pools of Blood”

April 12, 2009

On the 15th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide, survivors recall how the world abandoned them in their hour of need

by Michael Abramowitz

Thousands fell silent last week at a hillside memorial here in Kigali, the capital city of Rwanda, as Karasira Venuste told the story of how the world community, as represented by blue-helmuted U.N. peacekeepers, abandoned him and 5,000 other Tutsi near this exact spot 15 years ago.

On the morning of April 7, 1994, Venuste and his neighbors in a nearby village heard the news on the radio that the plane of Rwanda’s Hutu president had been shot down the night before. Thinking of the threats and violence directed at his fellow Tutsi over the past several years, he believed it likely that he and his neighbors would be blamed by the government and its allies for the assassination.

“We are done for,” Venuste thought to himself. “We are finished.”

(more…)

Thursday, April 16, 2009

History: 8 US Marines, 500 Mercenaries, and the ‘Shores of Tripoli’

Filed under: Africa,History,Maritime Security — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:47 PM

   Ah yes, more history.  This stuff never slips into the conversation about our early history here in the US, and I thought this little factoid is certainly relevant to today’s discussion.  Using security contractors to defend ships is possible, is not that crazy of an idea, and we even took the concept a little further back in the day when we were dealing the Barbary pirates with this land assault.  I also wrote a Building Snowmobiles deal, that talked about PMCs combined with Special Forces to fight a conflict, and that is worth a look if you are interested in exploring the concept.  So with that said, here is the Battle of Derne and Semper Fi.  –Matt

—————————————————————– 

The Battle of Derne

The Battle of Derne was a decisive victory of a mercenary army led by a detachment of United States Marines over the forces of the Barbary coast nation of Tripoli during the First Barbary War.

Background

The former Consul to Tunis, William Eaton returned to the Mediterranean with the title of ‘Naval Agent to the Barbary States’ in 1804. Eaton had been granted permission from the United States government to back the claim of Hamet Karamanli, the rightful heir to the throne of Tripoli, who had been deposed by his brother Yussif Karamanli. Upon his return Eaton sought out Hamet, who was in exile in Egypt, and made a proposal to reinstate him on the throne. Hamet agreed to Eaton’s plan.

(more…)

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Maritime Security: The Pathetic Non-Action of Today’s Shipping Industry Off the Coast of Africa

Filed under: Africa,Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 8:20 PM

   If you are the owner of a shipping company, and your ship’s routes go anywhere near Africa, then you should be hiring armed security to protect your ships and crews.  To not defend your boats, is pathetic and damn near criminal.  I say criminal, because you are purposely sending people into harms way, without giving them adequate protection.  It is stupid and this is not taking care of your people.  What this is called, is putting more value on money and minimizing liability, and putting zero value on the lives of your crew, and that is criminal in my book. The security companies and consultants that continue to promote the concept of ‘no weapons’ on ships, are pathetic as well. It is terrible advice and it is not protecting these crews and boats, and it is advice that only caters to the financial goals of these companies. Ship captains need to speak up as well, because your crew is depending on you to do everything in your power to protect them.

   The only winner in this whole deal, are the pirates.  They have completely exploited this weakness in the shipping industry, and the ineffectual maritime strategy.  They are thumbing their noses at us all, and I see them continuing their wonderful business strategy.  It works, and they are making some good money–why should they stop? pffft. 

   I also believe the current maritime strategy to combat these pirates, is completely lacking.  What good is naval security, when it is 100’s of miles away?  What naval strategist thought that this was an adequate method of protection?  It would be like sending a principle out in his car in the worst areas of Iraq, with no PSD team, and telling him to call when he is in trouble. I wouldn’t do this on the roads of Iraq, and I wouldn’t do this off the coast of Somalia.  The Gulf of Aden is clearly dangerous, and certainly requires armed security on each boat.  If anything, the security on each boat could allow enough time during the fight, for a Quick Reaction Force to come to the rescue.  That’s if a naval QRF force could close the distance fast enough.  But really, how embarrassing if this is the best strategy folks can come up with?  

   Either way, both the naval strategy and the shipping company strategy is not working, and the pirates are still able to do their thing.  Put a fully armed Maritime Security Detail on each boat and make this happen.  And if there are issues with being armed while going through various country’s waters, then post a ship in international waters that can fly these MSD teams on to the boats when the time is right.    

   And these MSD teams should be adequately armed and trained to handle this stuff.  That means having something bigger than a Glock 19 or a smoke grenade on the boat.  I am talking about something that has reach and can sink a boat.  Do the math, and let your imagination go with it.  I have mentioned several weapon possibilities, and the time is over for messing around.  How many more boats and crews are we going to allow to be taken by these clowns?  Pathetic I say. –Matt 

——————————————————————

Somali pirates find US ship _ and a fight

By CHARLES J. HANLEY 

04/08/09

The equatorial sun had just passed high noon Wednesday when a text message flashed on reporters’ cell phones in Nairobi: 17,000-ton boxship seized 400 miles off Somali coast.

The informants, a local Kenyan seamen’s group, then added this startling note: All 20 crewmen were American.

The tropical seas off Somalia had grown treacherous with pirates in recent years. In 2008, the seaborne marauders stormed and seized a record number of commercial vessels, a giant Saudi supertanker among them, though never an American crew.

The high-seas hijackings, generating tens of millions of dollars in ransoms for the pirates, had eased off early this year, as a U.S.-led international naval force aggressively patrolled the Gulf of Aden. When they managed to mount attacks, the Somali pirates were left in ships’ wakes, foiled nine out of 10 times.

It was a lull during which Shane Murphy, a veteran of east African sea lanes as first mate of the U.S.-flagged freighter Maersk Alabama, returned home to talk to a class at his alma mater about this 21st-century scourge.

He told the Massachusetts Maritime Academy students he thought the pirates “knew better than to go against the American ships,” one recalled.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress