Feral Jundi

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Industry Talk: Israeli Security Firm ‘Global CST’ on the World Stage

    Well, I have been busy with trying to find the unique stories and angles out there that no one is covering, and I think I may have found one.  Who has heard of the Israeli companies Global CST or Defensive Shield?  I have never heard of them, but I tell you what, they are certainly making a splash now!

 

     For the Georgia deal, as you can see below, the work these security firms did there was significant.  The Syrians are using that work as propaganda to rub it in the face of Israel as ‘another loss’.  This to me is amazing, because it is a sign of how significant the roll of security companies can have on the world stage.  And for the record, I tend to agree with the Israeli side, that Georgia was no match for Russia, no matter who trained them.  It’s a numbers game.  

 

     And this idea of security companies getting involved with highly volatile and political situations, reminds me of the US private security company Steele Foundation and their contract to protect Aristide in Haiti several years ago.  This was a prime example of a security company getting thrown into the middle of a sticky situation, while just trying to do their job.   

 

     With that deal, the State Dept. was using Steele Foundation security teams to protect Aristide, and then later run him out of Haiti towards the end of his crumbling Presidency.  The funny thing about this, is that I guess Aristide had no idea that he was stepping down, according to him.  And that the State Dept. blocked his request for more security guys to reinforce his current detail.  Very interesting time period for the Steele Foundation guys and kudos to them for working through a complex deal like that.

 

     But back to these Israeli Security Firms. They were also involved with the training of Colombia’s forces and rumored to have influenced the planning for Operation Jacque(hostage rescue).  This was a huge deal and very complex.  It looks like Global CST was involved with that one too–and was once again thrust onto the world stage in a highly public rescue.  Even Ingrid Betencourte, one of the rescued hostages, commented that it was run like a ‘Israeli commando operation’.

 

    So I guess this is an indicator that we will probably see more of these companies in the future?  I know I am paying attention now.  Here is a link to their website. Interesting stuff.  –Head Jundi    

 

——————————————————————-

 

 

Major General (res.) Israel Ziv, owner of Global CST. 

 

2 Israeli firms say they left Georgia before fighting

By Amos Harel

 

Two Israeli security companies, Defensive Shield and Global CST, announced yesterday that they had completed their projects in Georgia before fighting between that country and Russia broke out on Friday. The two are among several Israeli companies advising Georgia on security matters, training its army and occasionally supplying it with weapons.

 

Defensive Shield, owned by Brig. Gen. (res.) Gal Hirsch, said all its employees, including its subcontractors, are no longer in Georgia. It said it completed the work it had been contracted to do, and that all its contracts with Georgia had been approved by Israel’s Defense Ministry. Security systems services company Global CST, managed by Maj. Gen. (res.) Israel Ziv, said it finished its work in Georgia at the end of July.

 

Russia expanded its bombing blitz against neighboring Georgia yesterday, targeting the country’s capital for the first time, while Georgian troops pulled out of the breakaway province of South Ossetia, as Russia demanded, the Associated Press reported.

 

Georgia launched a major offensive to regain control over South Ossetia overnight Friday, and some 1,500 people have reportedly been killed there since then, with the death toll rising. South Ossetia split from Georgia in the early 1990s and has since built up ties with Moscow.

(more…)

Thursday, July 10, 2008

News: The IRAM, Flying IED and Barrack Buster

Filed under: Colombia,Iraq,Technology — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 10:06 AM

Thanks to Doug for sending me this article.  I posted the Long War Journal article about the ‘flying IED’ a couple of weeks ago and it sounds like it’s use is not a fluke.  So I decided to delve further into the history of these improvised munitions, and it looks like the IRA used to call these things a ‘barrack buster’.  But like the Post article mentions, this weapon is rocket assisted, and not explosively launched like the barrack buster.  I am sure that the IRA and the FARC have fooled around with rockets on these things before.

Now the question I have is where are these 107 mm rocket motors coming from?  Some say from Iran, and some say these engines were taken out of old ammo supply depots littered throughout Iraq.  A lot of these depots were vulnerable to looting back in 2003 after the invasion.  And we also bombed a lot of these depots, which made getting through fences and bunkers a little easier for the locals.  Luckily we have been working hard over the years to secure these sites and clean them up, but it is a massive and ongoing effort.  Or the other idea is that they are making homemade engines out of the tubes of fired 107 mm rockets .

I posted a video of Hezbollah in Gaza building a rocket and it’s engine from scratch.  I do not doubt that technologies and techniques are being passed freely via the internet or otherwise.  Our enemies are very good at building ‘snow mobiles’ , to use a Colonel John Boyd phrase, when it comes to making munitions.

So how do you defeat this?  I have to say that the limiting factor of this system is range.  So patrols should be focusing on the area around bases up to the maximum range.  It looks like they also want to put these things on trucks with open truck beds.  And I say if propane tanks are a common theme in these weapons, then they must be controlled.  Like with a weapon, maybe licenses should be distributed coupled with biometrics ID to track the movement and sales of propane tanks.  If this continues to be a problem, then all and any solutions must be considered.

As for defenses, roofs definitely need to be reinforced.  This is a top down weapon, with IED power.  But it is also very inaccurate.  If you look at it’s deployment, they like using clusters of this weapon.  So another thing that they are trying to achieve is blanketing an area with these things.  So markets or places where a lot of soldiers gather would be the easiest and best targets for these weapons.  So patrols should be focused on IRAMs that are within range of these types of areas.  I have no doubt that the Coalition is formulating a plan for these things, and so are the Private Security Companies tasked with static security at the various bases.  The IRAM is just one more thing to consider. –Matt

 

IRA with Barracks Buster

An IRA’s ASU (Active Service Unit) displaying a Mark-10 mortar in a propaganda video (1994).

 

U.S. troops in Iraq face a powerful new weapon
Use of rocket-propelled bombs spreads; at least 21 killed in IRAM attacks
By Ernesto Londoño
July 10, 2008
Suspected Shiite militiamen have begun using powerful rocket-propelled bombs to attack U.S. military outposts in recent months, broadening the array of weapons used against American troops.
U.S. military officials call the devices Improvised Rocket Assisted Munitions, or IRAMs. They are propane tanks packed with hundreds of pounds of explosives and powered by 107mm rockets. They are often fired by remote control from the backs of trucks, sometimes in close succession. Rocket-propelled bombs have killed at least 21 people, including at least three U.S. soldiers, this year.
The latest reported rocket-propelled bomb attack occurred Tuesday at Joint Security Station Ur, a base in northeastern Baghdad shared by U.S. and Iraqi soldiers. One U.S. soldier and an interpreter were wounded in the attack.
U.S. military officials say IRAM attacks, unlike roadside bombings and conventional mortar or rocket attacks, have the potential to kill scores of soldiers at once. IRAMs are fired at close range, unlike most rockets, and create much larger explosions. Most such attacks have occurred in the capital, Baghdad.
‘Flying IEDs’

(more…)

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

News: American Contractors Rescued in Colombia!

Filed under: Colombia,News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:51 PM

    This is outstanding news and certainly an excellent outcome to a frustrating story.  There will be a ton of happy families about this one.  This is also an indicator that the FARC is losing, and the government of Colombia and it’s military are finally seeing the fruits of their labor in their war there.  Bravo.  It will be interesting to see all the details of this, in the coming articles and books.  –Head Jundi 

 American Contractors, Colombia

Colombia Rescues Hostages Held by Guerrilla Group for Years

By William Branigin

Washington Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, July 2, 2008; 6:13 PM

The Colombian military said today it has rescued 15 hostages from a leftist guerrilla group, including three American defense contractors and former Colombia presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt.

Colombian Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos told a news conference in Bogota that all the rescued hostages are in reasonably good health after being held for years in jungle camps by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known as FARC. Eleven of those rescued are members of the Colombian army and police.

(more…)

Monday, June 2, 2008

News: Pawns In The Jungles of Colombia

This story still pisses me off.  It’s been this long, and those guys are still being held captive?  I have slightly more hope that they will eventually be released as the FARC slowly diminishes, but who knows.  Private contractors do not add up to squat in this world, when you get captured.  Please note the Crescent guys that were captured in Iraq in 06. -Head Jundi

Pawns In The Jungles Of Colombia

June 2, 2008

By Jackson Diehl

Though it may be losing the battle in Congress over free trade withColombia, the Bush administration is close to recording a major success inColombia itself. Thanks in part to billions of dollars in U.S. aid andtraining for the Colombian army, the FARC terrorist group — which hasravaged Colombia’s countryside for four decades — is close to collapse.Since March it has lost three of its top seven commanders, includinglegendary leader Manuel Marulanda. Laptops containing its most sensitivesecrets have been seized by the Colombian government, and foot soldiers aredeserting in droves.

Yet this achievement has come at painful costs — some of which areshamefully little known to Americans. That point was brought home to merecently by Luis Eladio Pérez, a spirited survivor of Colombia’s war againstthe FARC who has made the rescue of three of its American victims a personalcause.American victims? Don’t be surprised if you have never heard of MarcGonsalves, Thomas Howes and Keith Stansell; The Post has published onlythree substantial stories about them in the past five years. All three areU.S. citizens who were working for Pentagon contractor Northrop Grumman whentheir surveillance plane crashed in a remote Colombian jungle on Feb. 13,2003. Since then, they have been hostages of the FARC, confined with chainsand forced to endure a nightmarish life of isolation, disease and brutality.The State Department and U.S. Southern Command routinely say that obtainingthe men’s release is a top priority. In practice not much has been done overthe years, largely because any action would be difficult or contrary tolarger U.S. interests. The Americans are among the most prized of the morethan 700 hostages held by the FARC; they are heavily guarded and nearlyimpossible to find in Colombia’s vast, triple-canopy jungle.Even worse, from the perspective of the captives, their government and mediararely even speak about them. It’s not just The Post: Both President Bushand Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have visited Colombia in the pastyear, but neither mentioned Gonsalves, Howes and Stansell in their preparedpublic statements.Pérez, a former Colombian senator, could not help but feel the men’sdistress. At the time Bush visited, Pérez was chained by the neck to Howe.Taken hostage himself in June 2001, Pérez lived with the Americans from late2003 to late 2004, and then again from October 2006 until his release inFebruary. The 55-year-old politician was freed in a deal orchestrated byVenezuelan President Hugo Chávez and appears to be in remarkably good healthnow. But he is anguished about those he left behind. “It hurts me to be hereenjoying coffee and knowing that they are there in the jungle chained toeach other,” Pérez told me. “I’m not happy to think of them rotting. Ihaven’t stopped one day trying to help them.”Pérez came to Washington in part because the men gave him letters addressedto President Bush, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the presidential candidatesand The Post, among others. FARC guards confiscated the letters, so Pérez istrying to deliver their messages himself. “They are asking the country toplease not abandon them,” he said. “They are saying that they love theircountry, they love the flag, that they are rotting in the jungle and pleasedo something for them.”What could be done? Pérez wishes that Bush would consider the FARC’s demandthat two of its members imprisoned in the United States — including onesentenced in January to 60 years for conspiring to hold the Americanshostage — be exchanged for the three men. He points out that ColombianPresident Álvaro Uribe has expressed a willingness to exchange FARCprisoners for hostages and that French President Nicolas Sarkozy haspromised to accept FARC detainees temporarily in France if it will lead tothe release of Ingrid Betancourt, a former Colombian presidential candidatewho holds French citizenship.Such suggestions get a cold reception in Washington, and for good reason.Among other things, the release of convicted FARC terrorists would underminewhat has been a successful extradition program between Colombia and theUnited States and give a political boost to a crumbling movement. Theimplosion of the FARC has been a huge setback to Chávez, who was trying torehabilitate it and use it as a vehicle to export his “Bolivarianrevolution” to Colombia.Therein may lie the Americans’ best hope. Pérez confirms that the FARC “islooking for a political solution” in conjunction with Chávez. He’s hopingits leaders can be convinced that such an end must begin with a unilateralrelease of the remaining hostages. “The FARC must make a decision,” Pérezsaid. If Betancourt or other hostages die, he added, “it will be the end ofthe FARC.” That would be a triumph for Colombia and for the Bushadministration — but not much consolation for three American families.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/01/AR2008060101914.html

The Website for the three hostages.

http://www.marc-gonsalves.com/

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress