Feral Jundi

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Industry Talk: DoD Takes Over Afghan Police Training After IG Cites DoS Failures

   Late last year, I brought this story up during the time that DynCorp was protesting the whole deal.  Now it is official that DoD is taking over the project. Which is probably good, because of how much infantry related activities are involved with war time policing. That, and getting the training standardized so that police forces could be more utilitarian.  The standardization process will also allow for more accurate assessments of the program, and more input from folks who are all implementing the same training.  That means a more efficient learning organization, which is good. –Matt

——————————————————————

DoD takes over Afghan Police training after IG cites State Dept. failures

By Lisa M. NovakThursday, February 25, 2010

NAPLES, Italy — The Defense Department is taking over training of the Afghan National Police because State Department-hired trainers failed to keep pace with the growing instability in Afghanistan or address the security needs of the civilian population, according to a joint State and DOD Inspector General report released late last week.

“The ANP training program that is in place does not provide the ANP with the necessary skills to successfully fight the insurgency, and therefore, hampers the ability of DOD to fulfill its role in the emerging national strategy,” according to the report.

The report, initiated by members of the Senate Appropriations Committee last year, said the State Department failed on a number of fronts, mainly in its ability to provide training that adequately reflected the security needs of the country.

A Clinton administration-era directive gave the State Department responsibility for training civilian police forces around the world. Under that directive, the DOD transferred $1.04 billion to the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs to support training programs for the ANP.

(more…)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Industry Talk: Being Criticized For Arming Yourself In A War Zone, By The Juicebox Mafia

   More ramblings from the Juicebox Mafia (thanks to Blackfive for that one-lol).  These contractors were working in a war zone, where people want to kill them. Why are we then criticizing them for wanting to be armed, or actually receiving weapons from a military unit that just handed them over?  I see no problems at all with that process, and this is some serious whining from the critics that haven’t a clue. It’s a war zone, you dorks.

    I also think that if these weapons were in US military possession, then they can issue them out to whomever they please.  Hell, to not give these guys a weapon should be a crime.  These contractors are the guys tasked with training Afghans, and there have been several reported incidents of ‘werewolves’ or basically good guys that go bad and shoot trainers or soldiers. To not have a weapon to deal with that, or any attacks on persons out in the war zone, is just stupid.

    If there is to be any criticism at all, it should be geared towards the US military folks tasked with watching those weapons. I don’t have a beef with what they did though, and it sounds to me like these military guys were just trying to help out the Paravant guys, so they could defend themselves in a war zone. Whoaa, that’s crazy talk… arming yourself in a war zone?  Crazy.

   Also, this is not a new practice.  In both Iraq and Afghanistan, weapons captured on the battlefield that were slated for destruction or just sitting in a Conex box, were often just given away to contractors who needed them for protective work.  This is a very common practice, and especially in the beginning of the wars. It was not uncommon to see many different types of weapon systems in the hands of contractors, all because they were able to get a hook up from a military unit that wanted to get rid of the stuff.

    To be honest, I would much rather see those weapons in the hands of contractors, as opposed to the enemy or in a demolition pit. Of course it would be nice for everything to be registered and controlled, but in this case, all I see is the military trying to help out some contractors that wanted a means to defend themselves in a war zone. Or maybe Senator Levin wishes to deny contractors their right to self defense in a war zone? The enemy would love that one. Pfffft. –Matt

——————————————————————–

Key senator plans to lambast Blackwater actions in Afghanistan

February 24, 2010

Washington (CNN) — The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee plans to unleash a withering attack Wednesday on private contractors working for the company formerly known as Blackwater in Afghanistan, accusing them of flouting regulations and endangering the U.S. mission.

Key to beating the Taliban in Afghanistan will be the ability of U.S. forces to win support from the Afghan people, many of whom do not distinguish between U.S. contractors and the U.S. military, Sen. Carl Levin will say, according to an advance text of his remarks.

“If we are going to win that struggle, we need to know that our contractor personnel are adequately screened, supervised and held accountable — because in the end, the Afghan people will hold us responsible for their actions,” the Michigan Democrat will say.

(more…)

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Books: Start-Up Nation–The Story Of Israel’s Economic Miracle, By Dan Senor And Saul Singer

   Outstanding book, and I give it two thumbs up.  I don’t get a chance to read many books these days, and this was a book that I wanted to get my hands on and read ever since it came out. No disappointments either.  So let me do a run down of what inspired me, and how this book relates to our industry.

   I also want to mention that I realize that the US has given aid to Israel.  So you could easily say that their economy and war machine has benefited from that infusion of aid.  But the return on investment in Israel, has been phenomenal for the amount of patents, inventions, and business innovation that has come out of that small country. How is it that Israel– a country of 7.1 million, only 60 years old, surrounded by enemies, in a constant state of war since its founding, with no natural resources– produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada and the UK? How can anyone look at how much has come out of Israel, and not be inspired or curious as to the ‘why’?  With that said, lets get started.

   If I was to sum up the theme of this book, it would be the Hebrew word ‘Davka‘, or ‘to succeed in spite of’.  The Israelis are surrounded by people and countries that hate them and want nothing more than to destroy them.  In turn, the Israelis have to be smart to survive and they have to have a strong military that can deal with multiple threats. Do to such a small population, everyone must serve in the military too.  They also need a vibrant economy to pay for it all.  And like Dan Senor and Saul Singer have so eloquently spelled out in their book, the Israelis know exactly what it takes to survive.

   It is a country filled with entrepreneurs who are not afraid to fail, and they all have gained valuable leadership and innovation experience at an early age while in the military.  The companies in Israel are extremely innovative and are resilient in the face of war, because of this military infusion in their culture.  It’s not because they want to be a militaristic society, it’s because they have to be, do to a shortage on manpower.  It is that dynamic, that has helped produce such highly resilient economy filled with entrepreneurs.

   So let me cover some points as a teaser that really stood out for me.  The Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffet, actually invested in an Israeli firm, and that was something he promised he would never do.  At face value, investing in a company located in such a volatile part of the world, doesn’t make sense.  But because the companies in Israel are driven by Davka and have a supreme dedication to the customer and delivering on their promises, that during times of war, production levels actually increased.

    During the Gulf War 1, the Israeli economy persevered, because the thinking was that Saddam would not get the best of Israel or impact it’s economy negatively.  The production levels increased during that war, just because they wanted to succeed in spite of the attacks.  The same thing happened during the Second Lebanon war, and production levels increased.

   These companies were also run by reservists or former IDF, and that battlefield resolve translated into economic resolve in the face of crisis.  Buffet recognized this, and that is why he invested there.  Cisco has bought nine companies in Israel, and the list goes on. Everyone knows that the Israelis produce the most innovative stuff, and they are extremely resilient in the face of crisis.  Investors love that stuff.

   Israel also has a culture in which the military veteran is highly regarded, and business recognizes the value of that veteran.  It is much like how after WW 2 in America, where if you were applying for a job and ‘weren’t a veteran’, you were an oddball.  In today’s America, it is the other way around.  We have one half of the society that has never served in the military, and really doesn’t understand the benefits behind hiring veterans, and then we have the other half of society, that does serve or has served, and understands those benefits clearly.  We are not taking full advantage of this leadership resource.  Today’s business is also missing out on the innovation capabilities of this abundant resource, and continue to think that they will get better leaders out of ‘universities that produce book smart kids’, but certainly fall short in the leadership manufacturing department.

(more…)

Friday, February 19, 2010

Industry Talk: War Contractors Receive Defense Of Freedom Medal For Injuries, But Attract Little Notice

     The Labor Department, which tracks injuries to contract workers abroad, recently updated the tally: Since 2001, more than 1,700 civilian contractors have died in Iraq and Afghanistan and nearly 40,000 have been reported injured.

     More than a hundred contract workers have been given the Defense of Freedom medal, a Pentagon citation that is the civilian equivalent of the military’s Purple Heart.

*****

   So wait, if there have been 40,000 contractors injured and 1,700 killed, shouldn’t there be 41,700 Defense of Freedom medals issued?  If this medal is the civilian equivalent to the Purple Heart, then that would make sense to me. If any lawmakers are reading this, you would win a lot of contractor(voters) over if you were able to bring up legislation to make this happen.  It is the least we can do for the contractor guy or gal that is missing a leg or an eye do to an injury from the war, or for the friends and family that lost loved ones. And I am not just talking about expats from the US, I am talking about guys and gals from all over the world that sacrificed in this war.  The medal is a symbol of thanks and appreciation, and to not recognize that sacrifice is just wrong.

    Either way, good article from T. Christian Miller, and I always enjoy reading his stuff.  Pro-publica is doing good things by bringing to light what has happened to our dead and injured contractors in this war. They should not be forgotten, and they should be treated with the respect they deserve.  It’s nice to know that at least someone in the media actually cares, so thank you. –Matt

—————————————————————–

War Contractors Receive Defense of Freedom Medal for Injuries, But Attract Little Notice

by T. Christian Miller

February 18, 2010

Falls Church, Va. — A former sheriff’s deputy from South Dakota named Tate Mallory got a medal for service to his country on Wednesday, but it didn’t get much attention.

There was no top military brass at the ceremony, no long line of politicians waiting to shake his hand. Instead, Mallory stood on a dais in an anonymous hotel room in suburban Washington, D.C., looking pleased and slightly embarrassed as he was handed a Defense of Freedom medal.

(more…)

Industry Talk: IPOA/GIS Conference On Haiti– Resources For Reconstruction And Humanitarian Assistance

Filed under: Afghanistan,Haiti,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:34 AM

   A couple things on this particular conference.  It sounds like past conferences have been extremely successful in matching private industry with the various government needs of countries around the world. Their last conference was on Afghanistan, and it was so successful that they have decided to do more of them.  And usually these things take a little time to put together, but because Haiti just popped up on the scene, they have decided to put together a special conference just for that disaster.

   They are also donating the proceeds made at the conference to the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, and that is awesome.  Bravo guys and I hope the conference is a success.  I know Haiti needs action and not just words, and when the dust settles and all of the media and celebrities have packed up and gone home, there will still be a Haiti that needs to rebuild.  And because most of the companies that the IPOA deals with, have extensive experience in rebuilding in that other disaster called ‘war’, I think Haiti will be well served. Haiti also has all the power right now.  They can pick and choose what they want, and they can fire who they don’t want helping them.  The big one here is that they have some operating capital, thanks to all the donations world wide, and they will have plenty of assistance on how to properly spend that money to get the most bang for the buck.

    Private industry will answer the call, and the IPOA and GIS will be an excellent catalyst for that process. –Matt

—————————————————————–

 

 

Global Investment Summits

The United Nations has labelled the devastating January 2010 Haiti earthquake and its aftermath as one of the world’s ‘worst humanitarian crises in decades’.

International organisations, aid agencies and governments mobilised a massive emergency relief effort in its aftermath, bringing immediate assistance to millions of victims. The critical emergency relief phase now remains to be followed by a second phase of recovery and rebuilding, the outcomes of which will be essential to assuring the long-term infrastructural and economic rehabilitation of the country and the wellbeing of millions of Haitians. World leaders and international bodies have envisioned the need for a minimum 10-year reconstruction period. The UN and other organisations such as the World Bank will carry out post-disaster needs assessments to gauge the extent of the damage and needs in all fields in the following weeks.

The private sector will play a pivotal role in long term reconstruction projects in Haiti. The significance of including the private sector in reconstruction operations has been acknowledged by the Reconstruction Principles set out at the recent international summit on Haiti in Montreal, Canada. The private sector is undoubtedly essential to ensure that maximum amounts of aid can be delivered and distributed and that reconstruction projects operate successfully and beneficially.

This not-for-profit event constitutes a partnership between Global Investment Summits and the IPOA. Jointly, we plan to bring relevant international organisations and aid agencies together with key players from the private sector. The discussion and meeting-oriented format of the summit will allow the parties involved to begin addressing the vast efforts required to reconstruct Haitian infrastructure and rehabilitate the country’s economy and society. Most significantly, all profits from the event will be donated to leading Haitian relief funds.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress