Feral Jundi

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Afghanistan: Lack of Troops + Lack of Afghan Police and Military + High Security Demand = Using Security Contractors?

   I would like to put this out there that this industry is ready to pounce on whatever the war effort requires.  If you need more security for your civilian surge, then hot damn, the security contracting industry will jump on it and meet your needs.  If you need to secure convoys and guard routes up in the north, then security contractors could totally do that.  If you need to train up thousands of Afghan police and military, then security contractors can totally do that as well.  Whatever the war effort needs, it could be solved by utilizing the free market power of the security contracting industry.  With just one caveat though.

     The government must take responsibility for contracting those services. You must manage these contracts by providing the necessary man power to watch the companies, and you must write smart contracts that give the companies everything they need to accomplish the mission yet still makes it easy to control them.  This is not a difficult concept to understand, and each contract should be treated with the utmost respect and care.  Give the contract what it needs to be successful, by applying quality control measures and some Kaizen. Be like the worried home owner, watching over the building of their house, and the government will do just fine with managing these contracts.

     The deal is that we have been doing these jobs in the war for awhile, and the only reason they have faltered is because of the lack of oversight by the government.  This lack of oversight allows the environment necessary for poor management to happen within the companies.

     And what really kills me is that we have seen an increase of security contractors in Afghanistan this year, so this post is completely relevant to the discussion about what is possible. Once there is good leadership on the government’s part, the companies will fall in line. We have a chance to do this right, but it takes real effort and an application of lessons learned to get it done.  The pay off will be mission accomplishment and victory, and that would be something we could all be proud of and celebrate.   –Matt

——————————————————————

Taliban grab foothold in north

By Jonathan S. Landay

MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

Monday, Aug. 31 2009

BAGHLAN-I-JADID, Afghanistan — Taliban insurgents have taken over parts of two

northern provinces from which they were driven in 2001, threatening to disrupt

NATO’s new supply route from Central Asia and expand a war that has largely

(more…)

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Industry Talk: Staffers Deemed Unsafe at 20 U.N. Outposts

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 11:55 PM

    How come this doesn’t surprise me?  Now I know the U.N. contracts out some security, but if this report is true, then obviously they are not putting enough effort into the deal.  Competent security contractors that are monitored and well managed can totally answer the needs of the U.N., if the U.N. could open up to the possibilities.

   Also, I would imagine that many of the sites are poorly positioned in the city or wherever, and does not have the buffer necessary to protect from attacks.  The rule of thumb is that if you can park a truck near your compound, or that people can get near your compound without any kind of screening or physical barriers stopping them, then you are unsafe. Please note the recent attack in Baghdad with the truck bombs parked near government facilities.  The U.N. should know better, and there are plenty of examples of what to do, and what not to do.

    Worse yet, in war zones, these compounds have to worry about complex coordinated attacks.  In Afghanistan, you see attacks using suicide bombers or VBIEDs, followed by ground assault forces.  The compound defense force must be organized and well armed to deal with all and any situations.  That force must have outstanding leadership and discipline, or you will be in trouble.  It is all about leadership, and the leaders at these U. N. outposts must demand that proper security be put in place to protect their people.  They cannot depend on good faith or luck to protect their most vital assets. –Matt

——————————————————————

EXCLUSIVE: Staffers deemed unsafe at 20 U.N. outposts

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Betsy Pisik

UNITED NATIONS | At least 20 U.N. outposts in dangerous corners of the world suffer from inadequate security despite rising threats to the organization, the U.N. director of security says.

Gregory B. Starr, a former State Department security specialist named as U.N. security coordinator a little more than three months ago, cited U.N. offices in Iraq and Afghanistan for particular concern.

He also classified outposts in Somalia, Sudan’s Darfur region, the Palestinian territories and Lebanon as dangerous spots for U.N. international and local staff.

(more…)

Medical: Steroid Use and Security Contracting, Is It Worth It?

   In this post I wanted to highlight a reality of our industry, and that is the use of steroids.  The availability of the substance in places like Iraq, makes it very easy to get into and you see the results of steroids walking around all the time on contracts and at FOB gyms and chow halls.  Steroid use is big in the military and law enforcement communities as well, and it is an issue that we all must deal with.

     Personally, I don’t use the stuff because I am pretty satisfied with my fitness and body type.  But for some guys who want to be big and look more the part of a muscle-bound protector, steroid use and heavy weight lifting is a big deal.  Not to mention the massive intake of supplements like protein powders, energy drinks or creatine, along with plenty of gym time on the various FOBs that contractors live at.  Like I said, you see a lot of big guys walking around out there.

    To me, I could care less about the physical stuff–it is the mental stuff that comes with steroid use that I am concerned with.  Roid Rage is of concern to me, because if you are carrying a gun out there and protecting someone, do you necessarily want an ultra aggressive mental element impacting your decision making process during a shoot, no shoot situation?

     Now I cannot say for sure that steroid abuse will lead to incidents, because there are no studies directly involving security contractors and steroid use.  What I am saying is that if you are taking the stuff, and you are getting into fights all the time, or snapping at people, or extremely irritable, etc. (noticeable mental change), then maybe you should take a pause and ask yourself if you are a liability?  During an incident, there is plenty of adrenalin and aggression pumping into your veins to carry you through the fight, and to add even more to that chemical stew is unnecessary and dangerous in my view. You want as much control over your mental processes as possible, and any threat to that control is not cool.

    If you are a friend of a steroid user, and you notice that they are mentally changing, then maybe you might want to approach them and give them a heads up.  What kind of friend are you, if you just keep quite as your friend turns into a roid raging monster? Let’s take care of our people out there and keep this stuff in check.

    I want to be careful with what I am saying too, because I know for some guys, steroids is something they depend upon and are able to use with no side effects at all.  It is not my place to preach on what guys should or shouldn’t do to their bodies. But I think if an individual’s use of that substance has become a liability to the team and a threat to the industry, then that is when we should be taking note and trying to police it.

    Also, a few of the companies out there actually have steroid use policies, but not because of the health reasons per se, but because of the legalities of the stuff.  Anabolic steroids were added to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act in the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990. Stuff to think about, if you are contemplating going down this path. –Matt

—————————————————————–

In Iraq, Muscle Is a Growth Industry

Security Needs Give Bodybuilding a Lift

By Ernesto Londoño and Saad al-IzziWashington Post Foreign ServiceTuesday, June 10, 2008; A01

BAGHDAD — Younis Imad, 18, started lifting weights at the Future Gym along Baghdad’s Palestine Street a little over a year ago. “I was overweight,” he said, taking a break between sets. “I was very upset about that.” He was also in need of a job.

The gym’s entrepreneurial owner, Ali Torkey, took Imad under his wing, gave him dieting tips and put him on a whey protein regimen. Four months ago, newly buff after weeks of working out, Imad secured work as a security guard at a radio station in Baghdad, a city where improving security is reflected in the revival of everyday activities such as bodybuilding.

(more…)

Monday, August 31, 2009

Disaster Response: The Security Officer and Incident Command

    I read this story below, and it reminded me of how little respect folks have for the security officer of a facility, all the way up until something awful happens.  Something like a terrorist attack or natural disasters or a response to a influenza virus outbreak like Novel Influenza A (Swine Flu). It usually takes a really bad deal to remind everyone how important an initial response and attack is, in order to combat these type of things.

   But what this story missed, and was ‘oh so close’ to mentioning, was the importance of Incident Command to the initial response to an incident like a pandemic.  Incident Command is the answer, and it is also something that has been federally mandated by DHS.  But what does that really mean, you might ask?

   It means that the US government has recognized the power and efficiency of such a system, based on it’s usage during the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the hurricane responses the last couple of years and the fires that ravage the west every summer.  It is a simple command language and structure, that all units involved can rally around and understand.  That is a powerful thing, because the emergency response that is most organized and most flexible to answer the rapid pace of an evolving incident, will win.  It has been proven time and time again, hence why it is the preferred command structure for emergency response in the US.

(more…)

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Industry Talk: Company Spotlight–Space Gateway Support and KSC SWAT

     How would you like to be the guy protecting the Space Shuttle and NASA’s employees and facilities? Talk about a big responsibility? lol

     I tell yah, contractors just don’t get any respect these days, yet we are used to protect this country’s space program.  Not to mention all the nuclear facilities that contractors are tasked with protecting….

     Or for that matter, how about all of the protection specialists out there that protect Fortune 500 CEO’s, politicians, dignitaries, and celebrities here in the US or in war zones and third world countries?  It really is impressive when you think about how much security stuff is contracted out.  Security contractors and the companies they work for are doing incredible things out there, and Space Gateway Support along with KSC SWAT is one of them.  Check it out. –Matt

——————————————————————

Space Gateway Support

PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Protective Services encompasses Security, Fire, Emergency Response, and Command and Control. We protect Spaceport assets while our firefighters, emergency services and communication personnel stand trained and ready to respond.

We provide all police functions; SWAT coverage for elevated security and protection of astronaut crews and space hardware; K-9 narcotics and bomb detection; resource protection; and investigations and industrial security. We operate the only NASA federal law enforcement academy in the United States.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress