Feral Jundi

Monday, November 3, 2008

Training: Security Contractor Fitness-What is the Standard?

     So I wanted to do a little something about Physical Fitness Tests for security contracts.  It’s important stuff, because if you don’t pass these tests, you won’t get the job.  In the Smokejumpers, we called it “running for your job” every year.  And for those of you who were in organizations that required yearly or even quarterly PFT’s, you know how much of a pain in the ass they can be.  So it is important to keep up with your fitness.

   Now with security contracting, you have the same thing, but with a different twist.  You never know who you are going to get a job with, and the standards are always different from company to company. Or sometimes the company implements a PFT out of the blue, do to some new policy that came down the pipe.  So being ready for the various PFT’s out there can be kind of a challenge.

   The best thing to do, is to train to a level that would satisfy any PFT from any company.  And this is what I have attempted to do with the information below.  This is not a complete list of companies by any measure, nor is it particularly current.  But what this does, is give you an idea of what is expected out there over the last couple of years. And as a disclaimer, you need to develop your own plan based on your own research and talking with the companies.  I don’t want to give the impression that if you train to my standards below, that it applies to you.  There are too many factors(age, body weight, etc., location) and all I am attempting here is to show you my methodology.

   From the information below, we can start to see some patterns in what is expected.  What I will do is list those standards for each type of exercise, based on the most stringent requirements of the grouping below. Also, you should keep in mind the location of the PT test’s.  If you have to do a test up in the mountains, and your not ready for that elevation, then that can be a problem.  The SOC test is like that.  Or running body armor on can be a challenge, if you haven’t done that in awhile.

(more…)

Friday, October 31, 2008

Industry Talk: The Institute of Protection Specialists and Security Contractors

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , — Matt @ 7:24 PM

     I am not a member of IPSSC, but these guys offer a cool little resource for the industry for a nice price.  Check out the website, and you can get a feel for the types of services they offer.  These guys are just one more resource for our community, and that is a good thing.  –Head Jundi

—————————————————————–

Welcome to the IPSSC Members Web Portal & Information Center

This site is primarily reserved for members of the IPSSC member community and serves as a networking resource and information exchange. Full access to this site requires registration and membership to IPSSC.  

So what is the IPSSC?

(more…)

Industry Talk: More SOFA Stuff–David Isenberg Reports

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iraq — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 5:57 PM

     Ok, this is cool.  I am glad that David Isenberg is trying to add some clarity to this thing.  He kind of echoes a few of the points that have been covered here on FJ.  I am just glad that this story is getting the attention it needs, so that guys know what to expect and how to deal with it.  –Head Jundi 

—————————————————————–

Dogs of War: Losing sleep over SOFA

Private military contractors fret over Iraqi-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement

By DAVID ISENBERG

Published: Oct. 31, 2008 at 7:43 PM

 

WASHINGTON, Oct. 31 (UPI) — If, as now seems possible, Iraq and the United States cannot finalize a Status of Forces Agreement governing U.S. troops there, private military contractors will be sighing in relief.

The agreement, known as SOFA, is basically a document signed by a country and a foreign nation stationing military forces there. The SOFA is intended to clarify the terms under which the foreign military is allowed to operate. Typically, purely military issues such as the locations of bases and access

to facilities are covered by separate agreements. The SOFA is more concerned with the legal issues associated with military individuals and property. 

At the end of the Cold War, the United States had permanent status of forces agreements with approximately 40 countries. Today the number has grown to more than 90, meaning the United States has agreements with 46 percent of the more than 190 nation-states comprising the world community. 

The Iraq SOFA covers everything from prosecuting violations of law to establishing operational command and a deadline for withdrawal. The United States wanted it to be completed before Dec. 31, when the United Nations mandate, Security Council Resolution 1790, covering the presence of foreign troops in Iraq expires.

Without a signed SOFA, U.S. troops will lack legal authority to remain in Iraq. U.S. officials say they would have to cease operations and confine troops to bases unless some other arrangement, such as an extension of the U.N. mandate, could be worked out.

(more…)

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Industry Talk: Afghanistan-Pay Peanuts, You Get Monkeys

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 2:08 PM

   A couple of things to note with this article.  You pay peanuts, you get monkeys.  If companies want to do business in Afghanistan, then they are going to have to invest in security.  Obviously this ‘guard’ was not thoroughly vetted or that the security company tasked with watching their employees did not keep up with a ‘constant’ vetting process.  

    But vetting costs money, and if business does not want to pay for that expenditure in a contract, then they will get substandard guard service.

    The other thing I wanted to mention, is that the salaries need to go up in Afghanistan.  If we are to follow the Iraq model, then we can deduct that the Taliban are going to continue their attacks in the cities.  That they will continue to attack businesses, create chaos, and try to scare any foreign interests away.  This tactic will hurt the government and hurt the war effort, and hurt the local populations. And if the people lose faith in the Government’s ability to protect them, then that only helps the Taliban cause.  

    Yet again, the market dictates.  If big business is scared off because of this stuff, then they are scared off.  But if the upcoming US administration and the current Afghani administration wants to keep business there, then they are going to have to get busy in either protecting them or giving some kind of incentive to keep them there.  

    And if you are a company representative that is doing research about security in Afghanistan, all I will have to say is pay up if you want to play.  Just like the shipping industry is starting to see the light about security in the Gulf of Aden, you too will have to make security adjustments to be able to operate in Afghanistan.  That’s if you think that buck is worth the effort there.  

    But if you do want to stay, one adjustment that you can do is guard your high level company leaders with substantial security.  That is a no brainer to me.  Pay the money, and get yourself a protective detail that knows their stuff.  Or continue to think that no one wants to kill you? 

     Now I will not suggest low profile or high profile security, because that is up to the guy on the ground that is assigned to protect you.  All I will suggest is to pay the money to get a professional group that has your best interest and life in mind when they make decisions, and they have the experience to back up those decisions.    

    The other adjustment is that if you are going to hire local nationals to do your security, then you should have a security expert review that contract.  Pay the money for a guy that comes highly recommended and is trustworthy, to act as quality control for the security services provided and to help write up a good contract in the first place.  Pay a good salary, and keep him around for awhile.  You cannot just hire a local company, and expect quality service–you need a third party to watch them.  You actually have to pay attention and watch that service like a hawk, and ensure that you are getting a quality product.  But yet again, that costs money.

    Hopefully we will see the adjustments needed, to give those that are over there doing business, the best chance of survival.  You see this played out time and time again.  Security is something you should not be going cheap on, if you care about your employees and want to do business in a war zone. –Head Jundi  

——————————————————————-

Killings increase Westerners’ fears in Afghan capital

October 26, 2008

 

KABUL (AFP) — The gunning down of three Westerners in the Afghan capital in less than a week is a sharp reminder that Kabul is no longer a safe haven in a country gripped by violence, expatriates say.

Saturday’s shooting of a Briton and a South African, along with an Afghan, outside the offices of the international shipping company DHL appears to have been the result of a dispute unrelated to a growing Taliban insurgency.

Nevertheless, it feeds a sense of insecurity with international residents already concerned by Monday’s killing of a British-South African aid worker and a series of attacks against expatriates this year.

“It is the unpredictability of security incidents which is making it difficult,” said Anu John, who has been in Kabul for 15 months employed by an international non-government organisation.

“The security seems to have deteriorated significantly in the last three to four months… the changes are pretty visible,” she said.

(more…)

Monday, October 20, 2008

Industry Talk: Free Range International-Afghanistan Blog

     Today’s theme is blogs, and this site is awesome. These guys are currently writing from Afghanistan and their business is protecting clients that need to interact with the local populations there.  So they get out and about if you know what I mean. –Head Jundi

Free Range International 

   And here is an interview with the owner of the blog, Tim Lynch, on Covert Radio.  Check it out.

Covert Radio Interview with Tim Lynch 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress