Feral Jundi

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Afghanistan: Government Has Barred Compass ISS And Watan Risk Management

     Wow, Compass ISS and Watan Risk are huge companies that have been operating for awhile there, so I am not sure if this is a for sure deal or not.  If so, all of their competitors are probably licking their chops right now.

     Overall, this is a necessary move in order to get a handle on the situation and send a message to the 52 registered security companies in Afghanistan. Which is a good thing, because every innocent killed will only enrage the civilian population, and increase support for the Taliban shadow government.

     Now if I was the Afghan government, I would pour on the juice when the Taliban kill civilians.  Do not give them a free pass, and every time a Taliban force kills a civilian, it should be highlighted as to how un-islamic they are and how little they care for the civilian population’s safety. It’s called propaganda and it should be part of their strategic communications plan.  The Afghan government must sell itself as a better idea than the Taliban, and win over the civilian population.  –Matt

——————————————————————

Afghanistan bars security firms

04/09/2010

KABUL — Afghanistan has barred two private security firms from one of the country’s most dangerous highways after their guards shot and killed two civilians, the government said Sunday.

The victims were killed accidentally in separate incidents on the road that connects the Afghan capital Kabul to the south — the heartland of the Taliban militants waging a bloody insurgency against the Western-backed government.

Civilian deaths are a highly sensitive issue in Afghanistan and interior ministry spokesman Zemarai Bashary said both companies had also been ordered to pay compensation to the victims’ families.

“The perpetrators of both incidents have been arrested and are being prosecuted,” he told journalists at a press conference in Kabul following the killings, which both occurred in the last two weeks.

“The ministry of interior warns all private security firms to conduct their operations within the boundaries of the law and avoid shooting at people.”

The two firms, Compass and Watan Risk Management, are among 52 private security companies registered to operate in Afghanistan, where security has deteriorated in recent years.

Their clients include NATO and US-led forces, aid agencies and private businesses, which use them to provide armed escorts for convoys travelling on dangerous roads.

Civilian deaths caused by foreign forces fell 28 percent last year, the United Nations has said.

But such incidents continue to undermine efforts to win Afghan hearts and minds and are a source of tension between the Afghan government and foreign forces.

The United States and allies are ordering thousands of extra troops to Afghanistan, where foreign troop numbers are set to peak at 150,000 by August, in a bid to reverse the Taliban insurgency as quickly as possible.

Most of the extra troops will deploy in the southern provinces of Kandahar and Helmand, where the Afghan government said three of its soldiers had been killed over the past 24 hours.

The troops were operating with international forces in the Sangin district of Helmand, the defence ministry said in a statement.

Story here.

Industry Talk: KBR To Get No-Bid Army Work As U.S. Alleges Kickbacks

     “Odierno said, ‘I’ve got three million pieces of equipment I’ve got to get out of Iraq, I’ve got 100 or so bases to close, I’ve got to move 80,000-plus people out of here and you want me to change horses in the middle of the stream?’” Casey recounted.

*****

   Interesting news.  I thought the current administration made a point of limiting the practice of no-bid contracts in this war? Reality sets in I guess…..

   My only thoughts on this whole deal is that the DoD realizes that they actually need KBR for the massive draw down in Iraq, and the build up in Afghanistan.  It is a crucial time period, and it could be costly and time consuming to switch companies during this time period.  The bottom line–the DoD and the administration needs KBR, if they want to be successful in their current strategies. Hell, the numbers and facts speak for themselves and we are more vital than ever before to the current war effort. –Matt

——————————————————————

KBR to Get No-Bid Army Work as U.S. Alleges Kickbacks

May 06, 2010

(Updates with General Casey’s comment in 10th and 11th paragraphs, McCaskill comment in third paragraph from end.)

By Tony Capaccio

May 6 (Bloomberg) — KBR Inc. was selected for a no-bid contract worth as much as $568 million through 2011 for military support services in Iraq, the Army said.

The Army announced its decision yesterday only hours after the Justice Department said it will pursue a lawsuit accusing the Houston-based company of taking kickbacks from two subcontractors on Iraq-related work. The Army also awarded the work to KBR over objections from members of Congress, who have pushed the Pentagon to seek bids for further logistics contracts.

The Justice Department said the government will join a suit filed by whistleblowers alleging that two freight-forwarding firms gave KBR transportation department employees kickbacks in the form of meals, drinks, sports tickets and golf outings.

(more…)

Friday, May 7, 2010

PMC 2.0: If You Have A Company Website, You Should Have RSS For News And Jobs

Filed under: Industry Talk,PMC 2.0 — Matt @ 2:11 AM

Today I wanted to do a quick little post on something that caught my eye. Something that one of the companies did out there that makes sense and is PMC 2.0 worthy. EODT has just souped up their website by putting an RSS button for their company news. This simple act, has now allowed guys like me to put their company directly into my Google Reader (RSS reader) and stay up to date easily about what is going on with them.

Why is that a good thing? Well bloggers, journalists, etc. all have time constraints, and they all do things to save time in their research. There is such a massive amount of information out there, that any tools used to make that search easier is great. Most of my time spent blogging, is actually just reading and going through all that information out there. In order to process all of that stuff, I use tools to make it easy to pick out the good stuff. I use alerts from Google Search, group pages, newsletters sent by companies, forums, and most importantly, RSS readers like Google’s RSS reader.

So with that said, if you have a website for your company and you post news or jobs through that website, it would be highly advisable to set up RSS for your news and jobs. It will make your company more accessible to guys like me, and it will also make your company more accessible and utilitarian to potential customers.

This will also help out those in the industry that are looking for work or looking for information about your company. That might catch them just in time before they submit a resume somewhere else. It also helps your employees as another way for them to keep up to date on news and jobs.

If you are constantly sending out news through your feeds, you will actually create a readership for your company too. But that is only if you make it easy to get that news, and your content is actually good. If you have a blog for your company, that should have RSS as well. The newsletter works to, but RSS feeds that post news as it happens is better.

Forum owners would be wise to set up RSS as well. There are threads that bloggers and journalists like to follow, that are filled with vital information about a subject they are researching. By making it easy to follow a thread, you might see an increase of traffic to your forum, because now you have folks who will instantly jump to that thread when something pops up.

RSS is a great feature to have on your website, and I recommend that companies follow EODT’s lead and get up to speed. This is also nothing new and to me, companies that are not doing simple things like this, are behind the times. –Matt

—————————————————————–

RSS (most commonly expanded as Really Simple Syndication) is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format. An RSS document (which is called a “feed”, “web feed”, or “channel”) includes full or summarized text, plus metadata such as publishing dates and authorship. Web feeds benefit publishers by letting them syndicate content automatically. They benefit readers who want to subscribe to timely updates from favored websites or to aggregate feeds from many sites into one place. RSS feeds can be read using software called an “RSS reader”, “feed reader”, or “aggregator”, which can be web-based, desktop-based, or mobile-device-based. A standardized XML file format allows the information to be published once and viewed by many different programs. The user subscribes to a feed by entering into the reader the feed’s URI or by clicking an RSS icon in a web browser that initiates the subscription process. The RSS reader checks the user’s subscribed feeds regularly for new work, downloads any updates that it finds, and provides a user interface to monitor and read the feeds.

RSS formats are specified using XML, a generic specification for the creation of data formats. Although RSS formats have evolved from as early as March 1999, it was between 2005 and 2006 when RSS gained widespread use, and the icon was decided upon by several major Web browsers.

Wikipedia for RSS here.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Industry Talk: What Investors Are Attracted To, And Why Companies Should Take Care Of Their People

    Private equity investors are attracted to companies as target platform acquisitions that have the sufficient size, management talent, and infrastructure to support the critical mass necessary to achieve arbitrage available through increased scale. In addition, the rate of growth, profitability and customer base and how they are perceived by investors are important factors to consider. Finally, the capabilities of the management team and its commitment to the execution of plan which will enhance the growth of the firm are other important considerations.

***** 

   “In my opinion, DynCorp has always been a tough public stock,” says Joseph Vafi, a stock analyst covering defense contractors at Jeffries & Co. “A lot of what they do carries a lot of headline risk with it.   

*****

   I don’t usually talk about the money stuff in this industry, because it is out of my lane.  But I want to understand it, and emphasize what matters to our industry. If in fact a company wants to be attractive to investors, they need to pay attention to what those investors are looking for in a company. With our industry, headline risk is a factor that can make or break a company.  Customer service and satisfaction can make a or break a company as well. To me, it is the guy on the ground, and his leadership, who matters most when it comes to preventing headline worthy incidents or preventing poor customer service. So in this case, taking care of your people is pretty damned important–if you want to be attractive to investors.

   The guy on the ground is what I like to focus on here at the blog, and any time I can convince a company to make the necessary investments into their people, I am happy. The individual on the ground, with the gun in his hand and fulfilling that contract in a war zone, can make or break that company. It is so important that a company do all they can to insure that contractor is happy and has guidance. Because the opposite of that, is an individual that can sabotage your company purely because they feel the company has wronged them or could care less about them.  Worse yet, if the company has not done the necessary things to insure quality management at all levels, and sound policy implementation at all levels, then that can further erode the desire of an employee/contractor to do well.

   In other words, customer service and satisfaction is highly dependent on how your people perform out there and how they feel they are being treated.

   Your leadership needs to be treated well too. They should be well compensated, well supported, and given plenty of guidance.  Because those are the guys who will either work hard to make their team shine, or fail miserably by not really caring what his people are doing.  So with both cases, a company must care for both the management and work force out in the field.

   Here is a metaphor for what I am talking about.  In this war, there is a lot of effort and talk about not creating more insurgents in a village through violent or repulsive actions.  When we accidently bomb a village and kill innocents, or go back on promises made to that village, or do actions that are offensive to that local population, we create people that hate us.  They will work against us in all manner, either by joining the insurgency or helping the insurgency in little ways.  We could create a hatred in someone that lasts a life time, and that someone will tell everyone about how they were wronged–for a life time. Some of these folks will even recruit people into their hatred campaign, and the damage will just keep perpetuating. Is your company creating insurgents in the work place?  That is the point.

  If a contractor felt they were wronged by a company, they could become like the villager turned insurgent.  These folks will not care to do a good job, they will tell others how terrible the company is, and they will not care about the property of the company.  And because most guys need to work in order to feed a family and pay bills, they will do just enough to stay with the company, but not care to do well for the company. Oh, and any guesses about how this individual will impact customer service and satisfaction?

   Worse yet, their drive to not care could translate into an incident that actually requires them to care.  Incidents where if that individual who has a gun, is tasked with a critical job in a convoy operation or static security, and now they are pissed off–will this askew their decision making ability for shoot/no shoot situations?  War zones are stressful enough, and companies should do all they can to minimize undo stress upon their contractors/employees.  Companies should ask, ‘will our actions and policies, create insurgents within my company’? Something to ponder if you want to make your company more appealing to investors. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Private Equity – The Fuel of Industry Consolidation

Philip McMann

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Private equity firms have left an indelible mark on the Defense and Government Technology Services (GTS) markets. The investments made by private equity funds in the industry have spawned many of the premier public companies, including Anteon, SI International and Veridian. Once dominated by the activity of a few giants such as the Carlyle Group, Frontenac, and GTCR Golder Rauner, the number of private equity firms that are active acquirers today has increased dramatically. Private equity funds now account for a significant share of the M&A transactions. In 2005, approximately 20% of the 85 M&A transactions in the GTS market were completed by either private equity funds directly or the platform companies within their portfolios. A wide array of private equity players have emerged as buyers including Arlington Capital, Veritas Capital, The Edgewater Funds, New Mountain Capital, Littlejohn and Company, and Riordan, Lewis and Hayden. While Veritas Capital has been an active acquirer of defense hardware companies since the early 1990’s, they recently turned their attention to the large and rapidly growing technical and professional services markets with their recent acquisitions of DynCorp International, McNeil Technologies, The Wornick Company and the assets of MZM, Inc, which they renamed Athena Innovative Solutions.

(more…)

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Industry Talk: Contractors And IDEA-NEW, A Successful Combination For Foreign Aid Work In Afghanistan

    “My team can go places and do things soldiers can’t,” he went on. They “operate low profile” and can move freely “because the communities invite them in and support them.” They work to “rebuild irrigation systems, plant fruit and forest trees, build walls around girls schools, drinking water schemes, microhydro power for villages” and more, he continued. Of his 370 in-country staff, only two are expatriates – the rest are Afghans.-Greenham

*****

     I thought about Tim and his gang with this story, and I wanted to highlight the good work of  a company that was doing some good things out there. Bravo to USAID for putting together a program that works and is built off of the input of those out in the field, and bravo to Development Alternatives Inc. for doing the job.

    Most importantly, this is the kind of stuff that puts the fear of allah in the Taliban, because it cuts into their poppy crops, it cuts into their market share of public support, and it makes the US and the Afghan government look like the good guys.  It also employs young men in jobs that help the community, and keeps them from working for the Taliban as soldiers. Intelligence benefits from this as well, because now people might be more apt to say something to help us out, or even protect their good deal going on with IDEA-NEW by dropping some tips that out some bad guys.

     Now you know why I like talking about this stuff, and why the Taliban have been attacking contractors lately.  They fear contractors, because we are a direct threat to their shadow governments.  Look at it like this.  If we are competing over the affections and respect of the people, then these contractors and USAID are giving the home team a run for their money. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Worldview: Successful model for foreign aid is IDEA-NEW

Sun, May. 2, 2010

By Trudy Rubin

JALALABAD, Afghanistan – You’ve all heard horror stories of U.S. aid funds misused by big contractors on failed projects with high overhead in war zones.

The U.S. military insists the war can’t be won by guns, yet our civilian-aid programs have floundered. They’ve been undercut by shifting goals and the fact that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has shrunk to little more than a contracting agency.

So I was looking for U.S. civilian-aid programs in Afghanistan that actually work, and offer Afghans the help they need to improve their lives. On this trip, I found such a program in eastern Afghanistan, called IDEA-NEW, which runs agricultural projects. The program is funded by USAID and led by a Washington contractor (Development Alternatives Inc.). Sounds like the same old, but it isn’t.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress