Feral Jundi

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Iraq: Winning The Sniper War In Iraq

Filed under: Iraq,Military News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 2:48 PM

     The most dangerous enemy snipers proved to be the insurgents who mimicked the Washington, D.C.-area snipers who terrorized our nation’s capital in 2002 by firing from the concealment of a car. Cruising the streets of Baghdad, Mosul and other towns, these mobile sniper teams sought G.I.s manning roadside checkpoints, fixed security posts and sitting in armored vehicle cupolas. As quickly as they fired, the insurgent riflemen disappeared into urban traffic. Some sniping vehicles carried extra license plates, phony taxi markings and secret compartments for stowing a sniper rifle. Insurgent Web sites boasted that quick reaction forces arrived too late to catch them.

     Because al-Qaeda paid the gunmen up to $5,000 per kill, the mobile snipers documented their engagements on videotape, the spotter serving as both observer and videographer.

***** 

   This is a fantastic article, and kind of rare. The sniper guru talks about insurgent tactics and how we stopped them. If you would like to further expand your knowledge on how our guys did it, Plaster added a whole new chapter in his book dedicated to the current war.  Not only is he famous for his books and lectures on sniping, but he is also a veteran of MACV SOG during the Vietnam War and certainly a living legend.

   Why is this significant?  To me, SOG was probably the most daring and most innovative unit to come out of the Vietnam War, and I put them right on par with the Selous Scouts. Both units had to be masters of their environment and of their task, because both had to operate behind enemy lines.  They also had to operate in other countries, which made the advent of getting caught even more dangerous and extremely embarrassing to their home countries. I look at the Pakistan problem in today’s war as the same dilemma.

    Al Qaeda has no problem exploiting the borders of sovereign nations, and that is how they are able to survive and grow.  It is an aspect of this war that will most certainly have to be fought by covert warriors for a very long time, and in some very dangerous places.

   But back to this article.  Mr. Plaster mentioned one thing that caught my eye.  Al Qaeda introduced free market warfare into their strategy, and the end result was some pretty dangerous and innovative sniper teams.  Please note the quote up top. –Matt

—————————————————————-

Winning the Sniper War in Iraq

A war within a war.

By Maj. John L. Plaster, USAR (Ret.)

As an American military convoy rumbled along a dusty street in Habbaniyah, Iraq, 50 miles west of Baghdad, a silver van eased to the curb. Preoccupied with operating their heavy trucks, the U.S. Marine drivers didn’t notice the van and its civilian occupants.

Fortunately the convoy was overwatched by guardian angels: a Marine sniper and his spotter atop a nearby roof. Alerted by his spotter, the Marine marksman shifted his 10X optic to the silver van—and discovered the driver videotaping the convoy while his passenger raised a scoped rifle! As one, the Marine sniper and his spotter fired, shooting dead the cameraman and his sniping partner. By itself this was a dramatic accomplishment, but there was more: Pried from the dead terrorist’s hands was a Marine-issue M40A3 sniper rifle—taken from a Marine sniper killed by insurgents in August 2005. It was now back where it belonged.

The Habbaniyah engagement was a limited but significant milestone in this unnoticed war-within-a-war, a quiet triumph of skill and courage, strategy and technology, which yielded a victory as great as that of British snipers who wrested domination of the World War I trenches from Germany’s snipers in 1915.

(more…)

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Industry Talk: What Memorial Day Means To A Security Contractor

A memorial on campus at Xe honors fallen comrades. 

*****

What Memorial Day Means To A Security Contractor

5/30/2010

     What does Memorial Day mean to a security contractor?  Well for one, it is an American holiday, so I imagine that American security contractors would be more in the position of remembrance than any other contractors from other countries.  But under contract with companies who work for US DoD, DoS, etc., many contractors from other countries have died.  That includes local nationals like Iraqis or Afghanis, or third country nationals who include everyone else. I guess my point is that do we only recognize the sacrifice of American fallen during this day, when so many have died in support of America and this global war?  Or do these contractors only get recognized by their country for their sacrifice in this war, and we only focus on American contractors during our Memorial Day? Because on this day and in this war, a security contractor has many deaths to remember and pay respects to.

   For one, a security contractor in this war usually is a military veteran and from the combat arms.  So more than likely, they knew men or women that died in the war when they were in the military.  When that veteran got out of the military and went back into service as a security contractor, they might have been in a position to lose fellow contractors as well.  Those fallen contractors could be American, or they could be South African, or they could be some Iraqi team member. It could be all three in an attack, and an IED does not discriminate.  The common bond between all parties is the service given during the war and the companies they worked for.

   So the question comes up again.  What does Memorial Day mean to a security contractor?  Well to me it is a remembrance for all of those who died in the first Gulf War (I was a Marine in this war). I also have a profound respect for all the fallen soldiers of all other wars the US has been in.  It is not a day of picnics on the lake, or sales at shopping centers.  Memorial Day is a somber day, in which you are reminded that you are the lucky one who lived, and those that are in the ground are the ones who did not.

   Then there is the other side of me who is a security contractor.  As a contractor, I remember three groups who have all made sacrifices.  I remember the Iraqi jundis that I worked with who were killed in the war.  I remember the South African I worked with who was killed.  And I remember the Americans I worked with who were killed.  All of these deaths are sacrifices that have meaning to me and to my fellow contractors who worked in those companies and on those contracts.

   On this day I give equal attention to both the military deaths and contractor deaths, and that is what Memorial Day means to a security contractor.  The difference between the sacrifice of both sides, is that the military deaths are paid the ultimate respect by society, and the contractor deaths are ignored by society.  There are no holidays dedicated to fallen security contractors, no monuments at the Mall in Washington DC for security contractors, and no special headstones for fallen security contractors in cemeteries.  If anything, a fallen security contractor is buried with a headstone that has dedications to their military service.

   But that is changing, and private industry has found ways to remember the fallen.  For an example, the company Xe (Blackwater) has a memorial for it’s fallen contractors.  I imagine that the families and friends of fallen Xe contractors will be going to this memorial as well as to the cemetery where that individual was buried on Memorial Day.  So that is two places for the friends and family to go and bravo to Xe for building such a thing.

   Still, there is nothing in the US that is dedicated to contractors who have perished in the war. There isn’t even an accurate accounting of all the contractors that have been killed in this war.  At this time, I can’t even give a statistic like who was the first security contractor or regular contractor killed in the war. Were they an expat, local national, or third country national?  I could speculate or maybe just go off of wikipedia or icasualties.org, but both of these sites have proven to be insufficient in providing a complete database.  Even the Department of Labor’s count of deaths based on death benefits and insurance claims is incomplete. But we certainly know who was the first soldiers or federal employees to die in the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan.

   Then there is the historical perspective on contractor deaths in war. Is there a monument or memorial for the privateers that were killed during the early wars of the US?  Or do their sacrifices not count when it comes to the founding of this country?  How about the thousands of men and women who perished in all of the wars that the US has fought, who worked as contractors (or whatever name given to private industry warriors over the years).  I have made a point of bringing that history back into the discussion about contractors, because these are all sacrifices given during the process of defending and supporting the US over the years, and that should mean something.

   Perhaps one day congress will recognize the sacrifice of private industry during times of war. A monument that serves to recognize all types of contractors, and from all countries, who have all participated in and died in our wars.  I could not foresee the names of all of those contractors on a monument like this, because unfortunately there is no list for such a thing. Either way, a monument would be a great way to show that contractors are not forgotten and that their sacrifice does matter.

    So to answer the question I brought up in the beginning. Memorial Day for me is a remembrance for both the military and civilian deaths in this war, and wars past. I also remember those who died who were not only Americans, but were from other countries. And when I walk through a cemetery and see the head stones with crosses and military honors on them, I also think about the civilian contractors out there who were killed in the war that have nothing on their head stones to identify their service. If there is a monument locally where a veterans group is putting on a ceremony, I often like attending those.  Guys like myself pay their respects in ways that best suit them.  I like to write, and this blog gives me the opportunity to pay tribute.

    Others might be overseas working during this day, and paying tribute could mean attending a ceremony on some FOB or outpost.  In this digital age, many go on to the forums and pay their respect online. Contractors remember their fallen brothers when they were in the military, and they remember their fallen brothers in the various companies they have worked for. Most of all, military veterans and contractors remember their dead every day, and it doesn’t take a holiday to remind them to do so. But it is a day designed to put attention on war time sacrifice, and reminds those who have not served or have not lost someone that such a sacrifice exists.  That is Memorial Day for a security contractor, and my personal thoughts on the matter. Rest in peace to the fallen. –Matt

Friday, May 28, 2010

Publications: Contractor Support Of U.S. Operations In USCENTCOM AOR, Iraq, And Afghanistan-As Of May 2010

   Boy, if these guys wanted to do something really smart, they would publish this stuff on Scribd.  Then guys like me could put the report up on the blog and folks can quickly scan through it here.  Or make your graphics into JPEGs or something. Help me, to help you get the word out is all.

   So with this report, there was really no surprises.  Increases of contractors in Afghanistan, and a slight decrease in contractors in Iraq. That and we are still at a quarter million strong overseas, and that is pretty impressive given all the talk about trying to get rid of us.(not to mention the contractors with other agencies/departments) It looks to me like we are still pretty important to the war effort, regardless of whatever party in control at the White House.

    One thing to point out is this number does not include contractors working for other agencies. That number is probably pretty big as well.  Now if they can only keep track of how many of us have died or have been wounded in the war. Because as it stands, that effort has been pathetic and entirely disrespectful to the those that gave all.

     Also, check out the rest of the publication by following the links below if you want.  They mention the typical stuff they have promised to do year after year, when it comes to regulating contractors. Talk is cheap, and I sometimes wonder if government purposely wants to do a poor job or purposely chooses not to do the very things they keep saying they need to do? You have plenty of reports, plenty of studies, plenty of expert testimony and recommendations as to what needs to happen.  Now do it and quit talking about it. Pffffft. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Contractor Support of U.S. Operations in USCENTCOM AOR, Iraq, and Afghanistan-as of May 2010

This update reports DoD contractor personnel numbers in theater and outlines DoD efforts to improve management of contractors accompanying U.S. forces.  It covers DoD contractor personnel deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR).

Ending 2nd quarter FY 2010, USCENTCOM reported approximately 250,335 contractor personnel working for the DoD in the USCENTCOM AOR.

(more…)

Monday, May 24, 2010

Bounties: How The Taliban And Al Qaeda Use Bounties In The War

Filed under: Afghanistan,Al Qaeda,Iraq — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 10:16 AM

     “We can’t lie to our commanders: they can check to see if there was a fight in that area. We get money if we capture equipment too. A gun can fetch $1,000 [£690],” said a commander from Khost province who controls about 60 fighters.

The money usually reaches commanders via the traditional hawala transfer system found in many Muslim countries. They then share it among their men and sometimes celebrate with a feast.

     “It’s a lot of money for us. We don’t care if we kill foreigners: their blood allows us to feed our families and the more we kill, the more we weaken them. Of course we are going to celebrate this,” said a commander from Ghazni province.

*****

     This post is about what the enemy is doing to create an industry out of killing us. This is a disgusting topic to go over, but I still think it is important to study what the enemy is doing and learn from it. ‘Know your enemy’ is what I am all about, and this is what I am attempting to do here.

     So let’s talk about this. I guess the big difference between our bounty system, and their bounty system, is that they actually want people to either kill or capture folks and that there are no legal restrictions for that process. It is the purest form of a free market based killing mechanism.

     The west though are the only ones in this fight putting restrictions on how the bounty system is to be used, and in turn making the bounty system ineffective in my opinion. We have a 50 million dollar bounty on Usama Bin Laden’s head, but the only way to collect on it is that you can only give information on his whereabouts. A company or individual could not go after UBL and kill or capture him because the west abhors such things. It infringes on this so-called monopoly on the use of force that the we love to embrace, and meanwhile our enemies are mocking us.

(more…)

Friday, May 14, 2010

Iraq: Private Security To Be Used At Australian Embassy

   I am pretty sure that the only groups allowed to bid on this, will be Australian companies.  I could be wrong, but that is usually the case for stuff like this.  So this will be interesting to see who gets the contract and hopefully I will be able to get the job ad up for my Australian readership.

   By the way, it is always funny to see reporters attempt to inject their personal bias into the body of their work.  Calling private security guards at this embassy a bunch of mercenaries, is like calling a hair stylist a prostitute. lol (No offense to hair stylists, and no offense to private security officers….) –Matt

——————————————————————

Mercenaries to guard embassy

BY PHILIP DORLING

13 May, 2010

International mercenaries will take over security of Australia’s embassy in Baghdad as Australia’s residual military commitment in Iraq is wound down over the next two to three years.

Tuesday’s federal budget included the provision of $61.6 million over three years to continue security measures for the Australian embassy and staff in Baghdad $33 million is allocated to be spent in 2010-11 and $26.8 million in the following year.

According to budget papers the funding ”will enable the transition of responsibility for key elements of security from the Australian Defence Force to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade” which will contract a private military company to provide security for the Australian embassy in Baghdad.

Working under Operation Kruger, about 65 defence force personnel provide security and support for the Australian embassy and its staff in Iraq.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress