Feral Jundi

Monday, February 1, 2010

Legal News: U.S. Appeals Ruling In Blackwater Case That Involved A Baghdad Shooting

Filed under: Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 9:08 AM

   This was expected.  Hell, even the Vice President of United States was all over this.

   Although I tend to think that if prosecutors could not win this thing while violating the constitutional rights of these individuals, I don’t think they will be able to do much with some other angle.  Politically it looks great and helps to appease Iraq, but legally speaking? Whatever.

   Why not appeal some rulings on some military cases as well? Lots of political capital there and why stop at contractors? I am sure we could find some soldiers that accidently killed some civilians in Iraq during some fire fight, and I am sure those families would love to sue those soldiers or see them hang? –Matt

——————————————————————

U.S. appeals ruling in Blackwater case that involved a Baghdad shooting

Saturday, January 30, 2010

U.S. appeals ruling in Blackwater case

The U.S. government appealed a ruling by a federal judge that threw out all charges against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards in a Baghdad shooting.

Prosecutors have said the guards killed 14 Iraqi civilians and wounded 20 others in an unprovoked attack in Nisoor Square on Sept. 16, 2007.

(more…)

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Legal News: Australian Sentenced To Death In Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Australia,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 8:46 AM

   Unfortunate to say the least.  It is hard to comment on this, other than I truly hope that justice is being served and the Australian government can help to commute the sentence.  This kind of deal is one of those things where you had to be there, in order to understand the dynamics. Was there an ambush, or was Langdon trying to cover up a killing? Did he shoot this individual out of self defense, or what?

    What I can do is highlight the fact that just because this man was a contractor, does not make him a criminal or instantly label him guilty. It’s too bad that most folks out there, who call themselves human rights activists, seem to be pretty quite when folks in my industry get screwed over by less than perfect legal systems.

    In final, the Afghanis will do whatever they want with this case, and Langdon is at their mercy. If any readers have anything to add, feel free to do so in the comments section. Also check out this article that shows the high level negotiations going on between the governments about this.-Matt

——————————————————————

Australian Sentenced to Death in Afghanistan

January 27, 2010

SYDNEY (AP) — An Australian security contractor has been sentenced to death in Afghanistan for fatally shooting an Afghan colleague and trying to blame the slaying on the Taliban, Australian and Afghan officials said Wednesday.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said his government would try to prevent the former Australian soldier from being executed — an act that could raise tensions between Afghanistan and its largest non-NATO contributor of international security forces.

Australia strongly opposes the death penalty and regularly lobbies governments to commute the sentences of Australians convicted abroad of capital crimes.

Australian Robert William Langdon, 38, was convicted of murder and sentenced to death last October in a court in Kabul, and an appeals court upheld the verdict last week, Australian officials said Wednesday. They were confirming a media report Wednesday that detailed the case for the first time.

The Australian newspaper reported that Langdon was working for U.S.-based private security company Four Horsemen International and had admitted killing the Afghan guard last May during a heated argument about security for a convoy.

The newspaper said the convoy was ambushed by suspected Taliban in Wardak province south of Kabul but escaped to the provincial capital, where the two men argued about whether to continue.

(more…)

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Legal News: V.P. Biden Says U.S. Will Appeal Blackwater Court Ruling

Filed under: Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 2:05 PM

   Thanks to Matt for sending me this one. I am disappointed with this decision, and this is yet again another attack on a ruling determined in U.S. Federal Court.  When was it alright for the US Government to make appeasing Iraq, more important than respecting the rights of it’s US Citizens? Prosecutors completely violated the defendant’s constitutional rights, and the Judge made his ruling. So now we are using the full weight of the US Government legal system, to try and appeal that ruling? Pfffft. Not to mention that the second in command of the US has become the mouthpiece for such an ugly thing.

    Or why is this ok for the US Government to purposely go after these men with this kind of fervor and disregard for their service to nation, yet when it comes to prisoners in Gitmo, we catch and release them? And then these jackasses go on to kill innocents, or worse yet, US citizens and soldiers. I am no legal expert, but at face value, this whole thing is a truck full of ‘wrong’. –Matt

Edit: 01/26/2010 – Check out what the defense has to say about it this. I put it in the comments section.

——————————————————————

U.S. will appeal Blackwater court ruling: Biden

Jan 23, 2010

BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Vice President Joe Biden said on Saturday his government would appeal against a court decision to dismiss charges against Blackwater security guards accused of killing 14 Iraqi civilians.

The U.S. federal court decision last month, which found that the defendants’ constitutional rights had been violated, angered Iraqis. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s government has hired U.S. lawyers to prepare a law suit against Blackwater, a security contractor now called Xe Services.

“The United States will appeal this decision,” Biden said on a visit to Baghdad. Referring to the court ruling, he said “a dismissal is not an acquittal,” and that the U.S. government would lodge the appeal next week.

The former Blackwater security guards were accused of killing the Iraqis at a Baghdad traffic circle in September 2007.

The incident came to symbolize for Iraqis what they saw as foreigners’ disregard for their lives after private guards protecting U.S. personnel were given immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

It also threw a critical light on the U.S. use of private security contractors in Iraq.

The guards say they fired in self-defense in the incident, which occurred during some of the worst sectarian violence in Iraq.

Story here.

Legal News: Boss Who Sold Bomb Detectors To Iraq Arrested Over Fraud

Filed under: Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 2:57 AM

   Boy, this gets me fired up. This guy sold fake bomb detectors to Iraq, and wins the Bernie Madoff award for fraud for this year.  I would like to see this guy do hard time in an Iraqi prison, along with the dorks in the Iraqi military who bought off on this thing.

   What is most disturbing is that the US DoS and DoD had put out memos warning against such devices, and I am sure they were screaming at Iraq to reconsider.  I just don’t understand how a few leaders in the Iraqi military could be so dumb as to buy off on this thing. I am sure someone was getting paid to look the other way.

   Or how the Iraqi’s disgust for dogs (bomb sniffing dogs), prevents them from doing the life saving deed of actually using such an animal. Dogs work, as does actually searching vehicles or paying for xray machines that scan vehicles.  But magic wands?  Oh hell no.

 And now hundreds of Iraqis and many coalition forces and contractors have been killed or wounded, because some Iraqi check point used this crap and let slip suicide bombers and VBIEDs into target areas. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Jim McCormick

Jim McCormick, loser deluxe.

Boss who sold bomb detectors to Iraq arrested over fraud

Friday 22 January 2010

The managing director of a British company that has been selling bomb-detecting equipment to security forces in Iraq was arrested on suspicion of fraud today.

At the same time, the British government announced that it was imposing a ban on the export of the ADE-651 detectors because it was concerned they could put the lives of British forces or other friendly forces at risk.

The government promised to help investigate the multimillion-pound deal between the company, ATSC, and the security forces in Iraq.

Iraq has invested more than £50m in buying the devices and training people to use them. Police and military personnel have used them to search vehicles and pedestrians for explosives. But concerns over their effectiveness – and fears they could put lives at risk – have been raised.

(more…)

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Legal News: Paravant Contractors Arrested For Self Defense Shooting In Afghanistan, Legal Fund Established

   Well this sucks. Thanks to Cannoneer No. 4 for bringing this to my attention.  These guys have been through hell, and now they are being charged for murder because they actually defended themselves in a war zone.  What bothers me most, is how the company has treated them.  Paravant, a Xe subsidiary, has pulled some stuff with this case that enters the realm of abuse, and I highly suggest these guys to point their lawyers towards this amendment. If these men say they were given weapons by the company, and they were not drinking at the time, then it is up to the company to back them up unless the company has proof otherwise.

   The civilians that were killed or wounded in this incident, is tragic as well. But in war, there are numerous incidents where civilians are killed, and it is the unfortunate price that is paid by all in war.  No one wakes up one day, and decides they want to kill unarmed civilians.  And because the enemy uses vehicles for suicide bombing attacks, then I do not see how a jury could not find the logic with the defensive response of these men.  Oh, and did I mention that Justin is a former Ranger and not some mall guard who has no clue about threats in war zones?

   This stinks, and reminds me a lot of how the DoJ went after the Blackwater five in their case.  Of course this is all just my personal opinion, and because I wasn’t there, my opinion really doesn’t carry an weight.  All I can do is point any supporters of these contractors in the right direction.  I also want to remind my non-contractor/military readers that Afghanistan is not some city in the U.S., nor should people view it as such.  It is a war zone, and all actions taken by all parties have to be viewed with a war zone lens. There is a reason why security contractors are issued weapons in these areas. The way things have been going, any time a contractor uses that weapon in this war, it will be an automatic arrest and total career destruction. Pffft. –Matt

Edit: July 30, 2010 – Here is an update about these two guys.  It sounds like the judge is allowing them to face the witness in Afghanistan.

Edit: March 03,2011- The retrial for is happening this month.

——————————————————————

CBC

A wrecked contractor vehicle following a May 5 traffic accident in Kabul, Afghanistan. (Daniel J. Callahan/Associated Press)

The Story

Contractors Say Blackwater Armed Workers in Afghanistan

RALEIGH, North Carolina  — The security firm formerly known as Blackwater armed some of its workers in Afghanistan despite U.S. military documents that prohibited them from carrying guns, said two former contractors who were fired after they were involved in a fatal shooting in the country.

Justin Cannon and Steven McClain said Thursday that they frequently asked superiors why the company distributed the AK-47 assault rifles without Department of Defense authorization.

“We were just told, ‘Continue doing your job. Don’t worry about it. That’s above your paygrade,”‘ Cannon, 27, of Texas, said in an interview with The Associated Press. The men were involved in a shooting earlier this month that killed an Afghan and injured two others, and they recently returned to the U.S., saying they were cleared to leave after an interview with military investigators.

Blackwater, now known as Xe, has said the company’s subsidiary, Paravant, fired the men “for failure to comply with the terms of their contract.” McClain showed a letter detailing his termination, and it listed a violation of alcohol policy as the only specific reason for firing.

Both men said they weren’t drinking and hadn’t drank since arriving in Afghanistan in November. Their attorney, Daniel J. Callahan, said he believes the company is making up the alcohol issue so it can avoid scrutiny over contractors being armed.

“Blackwater’s concerned about getting kicked out of Afghanistan as it got kicked out of Iraq,” said Callahan, with Santa Ana, California-based Callahan & Blaine. “They’re trying to use these four men as scapegoats.”

Blackwater spokeswoman Anne Tyrrell declined to immediately comment on the accusations.

McClain and Cannon said the company issued weapons to the contractors even though they were supposed to train the Afghan National Army on other styles of weapons used by NATO forces. And they said the company told them to carry the weapons, even when they weren’t training, and that it was no secret that they had the guns.

“These weapons pretty much went wherever we went,” Cannon said. “If we go to the classroom, we take our weapons. If we go to the range, we take our weapons. If we leave the compound at all, we take our weapons.”

They had the guns with them as usual on the night of May 5. The men said they had dinner with some interpreters and then went to drive them to a taxi stand several miles (kilometers) away. On the way, the men said a speeding vehicle slammed into the first car of their two-vehicle convoy, causing it to roll.

McClain, 25, of California, said he was hurt and that he and his passengers had to climb out of the sport utility vehicle’s back window.

Cannon said the people in his Sport Utility Vehicle got out to help but saw that the car that had caused the accident had turned and sped toward them. Cannon said he and another contractor, Chris Drotleff, fired their weapons. He wasn’t sure how many rounds were fired.

“At that point, the vehicle was the threat,” Cannon said. “I thought I was about to get creamed by a 2,000-pound car.”

The brother of one of the wounded Afghans has said the car was full of shopkeepers heading home from work and that the people in the vehicle misinterpreted one of the Americans hitting the car as an order to move.

A passenger was hit in the stomach and died two days later, said Shah Agha, whose brother Farid was driving the car. Farid was shot in the hand and another person was injured outside the vehicle, Agha said.

McClain said three of the men who were fired in the aftermath of the shooting have left Afghanistan while a fourth, Armando Hamid, is still there. Callahan had accused the company of holding the men against their will. But they said Thursday that Blackwater told them to stay but didn’t physically detain them. They left the compound Saturday night.

Xe, which is based in North Carolina, dumped its brand name Blackwater earlier this year as it tried to distance itself from its operations in Iraq. The State Department is not renewing the company’s lucrative security work in there, which comprises an estimated one-third of Xe’s revenues.

Story here.

——————————————————————

How You Can Help

While your taxpayer dollars are being used to prosecute Justin, we need your support to help FREE Justin Cannon.   His legal expenses are going to be considerable.  Please donate what you can.  He needs all the help he can can get.

If you prefer to mail your donation you can send a check or money order made out to:

Rodney CannonP.O. Box 3609Fort Polk, LA 71459

Also please WRITE and CALL your Congressional Representative and Senators!

Legal Defense Fund website For Justin H. Cannon here.

Facebook page for Justin Cannon here.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress