Feral Jundi

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

News: FBI Seeks Information About Former Agent Bob Levinson, Missing in Iran

Filed under: Iran,Kidnap And Ransom,News — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 7:35 PM

   This is an interesting one, because Bob has been missing since last year.  I am glad that the FBI is getting involved on this and putting out the word.  Hopefully they will get some movement on this.  It is possible that this could be an isolated case, but more than likely this is a product of the ‘tit for tat’ hostage taking that was going on last year.  We detained Iranian agents in Iraq, Iran detains some Brits and others, and so on and so forth.  I just hope that Bob gets released, if that is the case.  It could be possible that he is the victim of some random crime there.  Who knows, and FJ will keep an eye on this one.  –Head Jundi 

For Immediate Release

July 15, 2008

Washington D.C.

FBI National Press Office

(202) 324-3691

FBI Seeking Information about Missing Retired Special Agent Robert Levinson

Retired FBI Special Agent Robert Levinson has been missing since March 2007 and is believed to be in Iran. As Mr. Levinson is a retired Special Agent, the FBI has an interest in his disappearance. Through the FBI’s legal attaché offices worldwide, the FBI is working with the Department of State to gather information regarding his safety and whereabouts.

The FBI has obtained information that Mr. Levinson arrived on Iran’s Kish Island on March 8, 2007, had several meetings at the Maryam Hotel, and then checked out the next day. However, Mr. Levinson did not fly to Dubai on a previously scheduled flight. There is no record of Mr. Levinson leaving Kish Island. Nor is there any record of Mr. Levinson using his passport or credit cards after March 9, 2007.

“This is a matter of great concern for the FBI. Bob had a long and distinguished FBI career, and he has a wife, four daughters, three sons, one grandchild, and another on the way, all awaiting his return. Plain and simple, our goal is to bring Bob home to his family,” said FBI Assistant Director in Charge Joseph Persichini, Jr., Washington Field Office.

Anyone with information about Mr. Levinson’s disappearance should contact their local FBI field office, or if outside the U.S., the legal attaché at the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate. You can also submit information on the web site.

 FBI Web Site

Help Bob Levinson Web Site

Friday, July 11, 2008

News: Somalia and Nigeria Are Biggest Piracy Hotspots–Lloyds

Filed under: News,Nigeria,Somalia — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 12:16 PM

 

     Nigeria is the one to watch for security stuff, just because of the oil contracts there.  Just today, oil made a big push because of problems in Nigeria.  – Head Jundi

————————————————————————————————— 

 

Somalia and Nigeria are biggest piracy hotspots

By Marcus Hand in Singapore – Friday 11 July 2008

The IMB said the increasing use of automatic weapons remains unacceptable.

MORE than one-third of the piracy incidents reported worldwide in the first six months of this year took place in Somalia and Nigeria.

Out of the 114 piracy attacks reported to the International Maritime Bureau’s Piracy Reporting Centre in the first half of 2008, 24 were off the coast of Somalia and 18 offshore Nigeria.

The failed state of Somalia remained the global black spot with a spate of violent hijackings pushing out well into the main sea lane in the Gulf of Aden. Of the 24 actual and attempted Somalia attacks, 19 were in the Gulf of Aden.

“In the Gulf of Aden at least eight vessels reported being fired upon by pirates armed with rocket propelled grenade launchers and automatic weapons,” the IMB said.

In Nigeria there were 18 attacks largely centred on the port of Lagos.

“Lagos is becoming an increasingly dangerous port, with the number of reported attacks in the area growing from 8 in the first six months of 2007 to 12 for the corresponding period in 2008,” it said.

According to the IMB, in the first six months of 2008, 71 vessels were boarded, 12 vessels were hijacked and 11 vessels were fired upon. A total of 190 crew members were taken hostage, six kidnapped, seven killed and another seven are missing and presumed dead.

“The frequency and level of violence directed at seafarers is cause for alarm. The abduction of crew and the increasing use of automatic weapons remains unacceptable,” said Potengal Mukundan, director of the IMB.

Article from Lloyd’s List

Thursday, July 10, 2008

News: Roadside Bomb Kills 3 KBR Workers in Iraq

Filed under: Iraq,News — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 12:50 AM

 

 I had also heard that the fourth person killed was a Wackenhut employee.  Rest in peace. –Head Jundi

——————————————————————- 

KBR 

Roadside bomb kills 3 KBR workers in Iraq

 July 9, 2008, 6:36PM

By DAVID IVANOVICH

WASHINGTON – Three KBR employees in Iraq were killed and as many as 13 others were injured Monday when an armored passenger bus traveling near Mosul struck a roadside bomb, company officials confirmed today.

The bus, carrying 34 passengers, was traveling between Qayyarah Airfield West and Camp Diamondback in Mosul, when it is believed to have hit a large improvised explosive device, said Heather Browne, a spokeswoman for the Houston-based military contracting giant.

Citing their families’ privacy, KBR would not provide any other details about the victims.

A military spokeswoman for the Multi-National Force Iraq  declined to discuss the incident beyond saying that four people in all were killed and eight were injured. KBR said the fourth fatality was not one of its employees.

The discrepancy in the KBR and military injury counts could not be reconciled Wednesday.

To date, 87 KBR workers have been killed and another 849 wounded by hostile action in Iraq. The company has not said how many were Americans.

Article Link 

Sunday, July 6, 2008

News: US Removes Uranium from Iraq

Filed under: Iraq,News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 2:37 PM

   Boy, I had no idea that those sites were still buried and containing Uranium.  I would have thought that these sites would have been cleaned up, as opposed to just sitting there buried.  And what was the UN thinking?  Sure it is sealed up in containers and buried, but the problem is that Saddam had the stuff.  Now I know back in the eighties, we supported Iraq’s nuclear ambitions, kind of.  But Israel didn’t, and we all know that story.  

     But as soon as Saddam become an enemy of the region and the US in the nineties, then all bets were off.  The UN and the world should have insisted that Saddam take care of this material and hand it over.  We focused so much on the other stuff that Saddam had back then, but I had no idea that this ‘nuclear material’ was still buried and just sitting there.  You learn something new every day.  -Head Jundi 

Nuclear Facilities Iraq 

 Remains of a facility used for Iraq’s clandestine nuclear weapons program. The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) examined the site following the Persian Gulf War (1990–91)

AP Exclusive: US removes uranium from Iraq

Sat, Jul 5, 2008 (11:15 a.m.)

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program _ a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium _ reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

The removal of 550 metric tons of “yellowcake” _ the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment _ was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.

What’s now left is the final and complicated push to clean up the remaining radioactive debris at the former Tuwaitha nuclear complex about 12 miles south of Baghdad _ using teams that include Iraqi experts recently trained in the Chernobyl fallout zone in Ukraine.

“Everyone is very happy to have this safely out of Iraq,” said a senior U.S. official who outlined the nearly three-month operation to The Associated Press. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

While yellowcake alone is not considered potent enough for a so-called “dirty bomb” _ a conventional explosive that disperses radioactive material _ it could stir widespread panic if incorporated in a blast. Yellowcake also can be enriched for use in reactors and, at higher levels, nuclear weapons using sophisticated equipment.

The Iraqi government sold the yellowcake to a Canadian uranium producer, Cameco Corp., in a transaction the official described as worth “tens of millions of dollars.” A Cameco spokesman, Lyle Krahn, declined to discuss the price, but said the yellowcake will be processed at facilities in Ontario for use in energy-producing reactors.

“We are pleased … that we have taken (the yellowcake) from a volatile region into a stable area to produce clean electricity,” he said.

(more…)

Thursday, July 3, 2008

News: Lincoln’s Independence Day Address, 1863

Filed under: News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 5:34 PM

      I often think about the Civil War, and how difficult that time period was, when presented with today’s war and economic strife.  Today we are reminded of so many difficulties, and for perspective I always go back to remembering the darkest time periods of our history.  And compared to those times, we have it pretty good I’d have to say.  It doesn’t make the fight any easier or the gas any cheaper, but it certainly humbles you and stiffens your upper lip.

 

    This speech says it all, like so many of Lincoln’s speeches back then, and we can certainly gain strength from those words and the horrific American experience during the Civil War. Happy Independence Day America. –Head Jundi 

 

 

 

Lincoln

 

 

Abraham Lincoln’s Independence Day Address of July 7, 1863

Researched by James R. Heintze.

Abraham Lincoln’s Independence Day address of 1863 in Washington is significant in that it was presented three days after the city had celebrated the holiday and represented one of only a few Fourth of July addresses given in Washington during the 19th century that were reprinted in newspapers outside the city.

Perhaps not referred to as often as his other speeches, Lincoln’s July 7 address is nonetheless important. Presented, apparently spontaneously, as a response to hundreds of persons who had gathered in front of the White House as an expression of joy regarding news of the Civil War’s Vicksburg campaign, Lincoln’s words were elegant, and in some sense, might have been a prelude to his Gettysburg Address of November 19 later that year. The wording and theme of the July 7 address bears resemblance to the November 19 address. Its possible that the idea and emotion for Lincoln’s timeless Gettysburg Address were already gestating in his mind as early as July.

On July 4, Lincoln passed up any opportunities to participate in Washington’s ceremonies. He was aware of the direction the Gettysburg engagement had taken on that day and was encouraged that Southern forces were retreating. But the President was also concerned about the Vicksburg campaign and was reluctant to participate in any sort of festive celebration until he heard news of that battle’s outcome. He did issue a brief statement in the form of a letter to the American people on July 4:

Washington, July 4.–The President of the United States announces to the country that the news from the Army of the Potomac until 10 o’clock P.M., on the 3d inst., is such as to cover that army with brightest honor–to promise a great success to the cause of the Union, and to claim the condolence of all for the many gallant fallen, and that for this he especially desires that on this day, He whose will, not ours, should ever be done, be everywhere remembered and reverenced with profoundest gratification. (Signed) Abraham Lincoln. (“Congratulatory Address by the President,” The Frederick Examiner, 8 July 1863, 2.)

Vicksburg surrendered to the Union on July 4, but the news did not reach Lincoln’s desk in the White House until July 7. About midday Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles received the news and immediately went to the White House to report to Lincoln what he heard. Word spread quickly through the streets, taverns, and hotels in Washington. Crowds gathered and officers of the Thirty-Fourth Massachusetts Regiment promptly decided that a military parade to the White House was in order.

That evening the parade of military accompanied by one or more bands of music commenced up Pennsylvania Avenue drawing hundreds of citizens as it made its way to the White House. At 8 p.m. with the immense throngs in front of the Executive Mansion, Lincoln, who was in the War Department, was compelled to respond and thus quickly returned to the White House.

Benjamin B. French, a highly regarded citizen of the city, commented in a Fourth of July oration he gave in 1870 that he was on the White House grounds on July 7, 1863 and that President Lincoln was elated:

We were celebrating the day in the President’s grounds when the news of victory came, and I shall never forget the exultant joy with which it was received. The countenance of President Lincoln, never very demonstrative, beamed all over with gladness; and the sun that rose that day, on many fears, went down in glory on the universal idea that the Union was saved. (Washington Evening Star, 5 July 1870, 4.)

A local newspaper described the event and the festive atmosphere:

Last evening, in response to a notice hastily given, a large assemblage of citizens gathered in front of the National Hotel, and, preceded by the band of the thirty- fourth Massachusetts Regiment, marched to the Executive Mansion, to offer their congratulations to the President upon the late successes of our Army and Navy. As the column marched up the Avenue it gained constant accessions, like a rolling snowball, and an immense crowd entered the space in front of the White House, about half past 8 o’clock.

Mr. Lincoln was at that moment absent at the War Department, but he promptly came over, and made his appearance at the window of the portico of the Executive mansion. When he stood before them, hearing the marks of the excessive labor and care that has fallen to his lot ever since he assumed the duties of his office, but wearing a smile of supreme satisfaction at the glorious events which his fellow-citizens were celebrating, vociferous cheers vent the air. The crowd cheered Abraham Lincoln, General Grant, General Meade, General Rosecrans, and President Lincoln again. (“The Rejoincings Last Night,” Daily National Republican, 8 July 1863, 2.)

Another Washington newspaper thought the crowd “numbered many thousands” (Washington Evening Star, 8 July 1863, 2). News of the event quickly spread along the Eastern seaboard. In a dispatch sent to New York, it was reported that “The news spread like wildfire through the city[Washington]. Flags were thrown from public and private buildings, and cheers given to all extent and with an enthusiam such as have rearely been paralleled here. The fact that the capture was made on the Fourth of July gave an added zest to the general satisfaction (New York Times, 8 July 1863, 1.) Even in the Confederate South, in Charleston, S.C., the “tremendous rejoicing all over the North” was reported. However, Lincoln’s address was referred to there as a “foolish speech” (Charleston Daily Courier, 13 July 1863, 1).

Lincoln’s July 7 speech was made available and was printed in newspapers across the country. A comparison of some of these reprintings of the speech reveals that the texts do not exactly match. Apparently, editors of these newspapers recopied the text and in so doing changed and deleted words which resulted likely in detracting from Lincoln’s intentions. Among the variant versions of the speech, I have selected that printed in the Washington Evening Star,8 July 1863, 2, because first, its a version closer to home, likely not having passed through as many hands, and second, its text displays more elegance than the others I have examined; it just seems more Lincolnesque:

 

Fellow-citizens: I am very glad to see you to-night. But yet I will not say I thank you for this call. But I do most sincerely thank Almighty God for the occasion on which you have called. [Cheers.] How long ago is it? Eighty odd years since, upon the Fourth day of July, for the first time in the world, a union body of representatives was assembled to declare as a self-evident truth that all men were created equal. [Cheers.]

That was the birthday of the United States of America. Since then the fourth day of July has had several very peculiar recognitions. The two most distinguished men who framed and supported that paper, including the particular declaration I have mentioned, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, the one having framed it, and the other sustained it most ably in debate, the only two of the fifty-five or fifty-six who signed it, I believe, who were ever President of the United States, precisely fifty years after they put their hands to that paper it pleased the Almighty God to take away from this stage of action on the Fourth of July. This extraordinary coincidence we can understand to be a dispensation of the Almighty Ruler of Events.

Another of our Presidents, five years afterwards, was called from this stage of existence on the same day of the month, and now on this Fourth of July just past, when a gigantic rebellion has risen in the land, precisely at the bottom of which is an effort to overthrow that principle “that all men are created equal,” we have a surrender of one of their most powerful positions and powerful armies forced upon them on that very day. [Cheers.] And I see in the succession of battles in Pennsylvania, which continued three days, so rapidly following each other as to be justly called one great battle, fought on the first, second and third of July; on the fourth the enemies of the declaration that all men are created equal had to turn tail and run. [Laughter and applause.]

Gentlemen, this is a glorious theme and a glorious occasion for a speech, but I am not prepared to make one worthy of the theme and worthy of the occasion. [Cries of “go on,” and applause.] I would like to speak in all praise that is due to the the [sic] many brave officers and soldiers who have fought in the cause of the Union and liberties of this country from the beginning of this war, not on occasions of success, but upon the more trying occasions of the want of success. I say I would like to speak in praise of these men, particularizing their deeds, but I am unprepared. I should dislike to mention the name of a single officer, lest in doing so I wrong some other one whose name may not occur to me. [Cheers.]

Recent events bring up certain names, gallantly prominent, but I do not want to particularly name them at the expense of others, who are as justly entitled to our gratitude as they. I therefore do not upon this occasion name a single man. And now I have said about as much as I ought to say in this impromptu manner, and if you please, I’ll take the music. [Tremendous cheering, and calls for the President to reappear.]

It was reported in the Washington Evening Star that after Lincoln’s speech, there was music by the band and the crowd then went to the War Department to hear speeches by Secretary Stanton and others.

(Note: Lincoln’s July 7 speech was printed in, for example, New York Tribune, (8 July 1863, 1), New York Times, (8 July 1863, 8), Philadelphia Inquirer, (8 July 1863, 4), Alexandria Gazette, (8 July 1863, 1), Boston Evening Transcript, (8 July 1863, 4), Daily National Republican, (8 July 1863, 2.), and National Intelligencer, ( 9 July 1863, 2.))

This page was last updated May 20, 2008.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress