Feral Jundi

Monday, June 2, 2008

News: Pawns In The Jungles of Colombia

This story still pisses me off.  It’s been this long, and those guys are still being held captive?  I have slightly more hope that they will eventually be released as the FARC slowly diminishes, but who knows.  Private contractors do not add up to squat in this world, when you get captured.  Please note the Crescent guys that were captured in Iraq in 06. -Head Jundi

Pawns In The Jungles Of Colombia

June 2, 2008

By Jackson Diehl

Though it may be losing the battle in Congress over free trade withColombia, the Bush administration is close to recording a major success inColombia itself. Thanks in part to billions of dollars in U.S. aid andtraining for the Colombian army, the FARC terrorist group — which hasravaged Colombia’s countryside for four decades — is close to collapse.Since March it has lost three of its top seven commanders, includinglegendary leader Manuel Marulanda. Laptops containing its most sensitivesecrets have been seized by the Colombian government, and foot soldiers aredeserting in droves.

Yet this achievement has come at painful costs — some of which areshamefully little known to Americans. That point was brought home to merecently by Luis Eladio Pérez, a spirited survivor of Colombia’s war againstthe FARC who has made the rescue of three of its American victims a personalcause.American victims? Don’t be surprised if you have never heard of MarcGonsalves, Thomas Howes and Keith Stansell; The Post has published onlythree substantial stories about them in the past five years. All three areU.S. citizens who were working for Pentagon contractor Northrop Grumman whentheir surveillance plane crashed in a remote Colombian jungle on Feb. 13,2003. Since then, they have been hostages of the FARC, confined with chainsand forced to endure a nightmarish life of isolation, disease and brutality.The State Department and U.S. Southern Command routinely say that obtainingthe men’s release is a top priority. In practice not much has been done overthe years, largely because any action would be difficult or contrary tolarger U.S. interests. The Americans are among the most prized of the morethan 700 hostages held by the FARC; they are heavily guarded and nearlyimpossible to find in Colombia’s vast, triple-canopy jungle.Even worse, from the perspective of the captives, their government and mediararely even speak about them. It’s not just The Post: Both President Bushand Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have visited Colombia in the pastyear, but neither mentioned Gonsalves, Howes and Stansell in their preparedpublic statements.Pérez, a former Colombian senator, could not help but feel the men’sdistress. At the time Bush visited, Pérez was chained by the neck to Howe.Taken hostage himself in June 2001, Pérez lived with the Americans from late2003 to late 2004, and then again from October 2006 until his release inFebruary. The 55-year-old politician was freed in a deal orchestrated byVenezuelan President Hugo Chávez and appears to be in remarkably good healthnow. But he is anguished about those he left behind. “It hurts me to be hereenjoying coffee and knowing that they are there in the jungle chained toeach other,” Pérez told me. “I’m not happy to think of them rotting. Ihaven’t stopped one day trying to help them.”Pérez came to Washington in part because the men gave him letters addressedto President Bush, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the presidential candidatesand The Post, among others. FARC guards confiscated the letters, so Pérez istrying to deliver their messages himself. “They are asking the country toplease not abandon them,” he said. “They are saying that they love theircountry, they love the flag, that they are rotting in the jungle and pleasedo something for them.”What could be done? Pérez wishes that Bush would consider the FARC’s demandthat two of its members imprisoned in the United States — including onesentenced in January to 60 years for conspiring to hold the Americanshostage — be exchanged for the three men. He points out that ColombianPresident Álvaro Uribe has expressed a willingness to exchange FARCprisoners for hostages and that French President Nicolas Sarkozy haspromised to accept FARC detainees temporarily in France if it will lead tothe release of Ingrid Betancourt, a former Colombian presidential candidatewho holds French citizenship.Such suggestions get a cold reception in Washington, and for good reason.Among other things, the release of convicted FARC terrorists would underminewhat has been a successful extradition program between Colombia and theUnited States and give a political boost to a crumbling movement. Theimplosion of the FARC has been a huge setback to Chávez, who was trying torehabilitate it and use it as a vehicle to export his “Bolivarianrevolution” to Colombia.Therein may lie the Americans’ best hope. Pérez confirms that the FARC “islooking for a political solution” in conjunction with Chávez. He’s hopingits leaders can be convinced that such an end must begin with a unilateralrelease of the remaining hostages. “The FARC must make a decision,” Pérezsaid. If Betancourt or other hostages die, he added, “it will be the end ofthe FARC.” That would be a triumph for Colombia and for the Bushadministration — but not much consolation for three American families.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/01/AR2008060101914.html

The Website for the three hostages.

http://www.marc-gonsalves.com/

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Iraq: Al Qaeda Discusses Losing Iraq

Filed under: Iraq,News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:49 AM

     This was an awesome little article about the state of affairs of Al Qaeda in Iraq, and how they are losing there.  Our guys have done such an awesome job over there, and my hats off to them.  Next stop, Pakistan, so we can slay that booger eater Osama Bin Laden. -Head Jundi 

——————————————————— 

Al Qaeda Discusses Losing Iraq
May 27, 2008:  Al Qaeda web sites are making a lot of noise about “why we lost in Iraq.” Western intelligence agencies are fascinated by the statistics being posted in several of these Arab language sites. Not the kind of stuff you read about in the Western media. According to al Qaeda, their collapse in Iraq was steep and catastrophic. According to their stats, in late 2006, al Qaeda was responsible for 60 percent of the terrorist attacks, and nearly all the ones that involved killing a lot of civilians. The rest of the violence was carried out by Iraqi Sunni Arab groups, who were trying in vain to scare the Americans out of the country.
 

Today, al Qaeda has been shattered, with most of its leadership and foot soldiers dead, captured or moved from Iraq. As a result, al Qaeda attacks have declined more than 90 percent. Worse, most of their Iraqi Sunni Arab allies have turned on them,  or simply quit. This “betrayal” is handled carefully on the terrorist web sites, for it is seen as both shameful, and perhaps recoverable.

This defeat was not as sudden as it appeared to be, and some Islamic terrorist web sites have been discussing the problem for several years. The primary cause has been  Moslems killed as a side effect of attacks on infidel troops, Iraqi security forces and non-Sunnis. Al Qaeda plays down the impact of this, calling the Moslem victims “involuntary martyrs.” But that’s a minority opinion. Most Moslems, and many other Islamic terrorists, see this as a surefire way to turn the Moslem population against the Islamic radicals. That’s what happened earlier in Algeria, Afghanistan, Egypt and many other places. It’s really got nothing to do with religion. The phenomenon hits non-Islamic terrorists as well (like the Irish IRA and the Basque ETA).

The senior al Qaeda leadership saw the problem, and tried to convince the “Al Qaeda In Iraq” leadership to cool it. That didn’t work. As early as 2004, some Sunni Arabs were turning on al Qaeda because of the “involuntary martyrs” problem. The many dead Shia Arab civilians led to a major terror campaign by the Shia majority. They controlled the government, had the Americans covering their backs, and soon half the Sunni Arab population were refugees.

Meanwhile, the “Al Qaeda In Iraq” leadership was out of control. Most of these guys are really out there, at least in terms of fanaticism and extremism. This led to another fatal error. They declared the establishment of  the “Islamic State of Iraq” in late 2006. This was an act of bravado, and touted as the first step in the re-establishment of the caliphate (a global Islamic state, ruled over by God’s representative on earth, the caliph.) The caliphate has been a fiction for over a thousand years. Early on, the Islamic world was split by ethnic and national differences, and the first caliphate fell apart after a few centuries.  Various rulers have claimed the title over the centuries, but since 1924, when the Turks gave it up (after four centuries), no one of any stature has taken it up. So when al Qaeda “elected” a nobody as the emir of the “Islamic State of Iraq”, and talked about this being the foundation of the new caliphate, even many pro-al Qaeda Moslems were aghast. When al Qaeda could not, in 2007, exercise any real control over the parts of Iraq they claimed as part of the new Islamic State, it was the last straw. The key supporters, battered by increasingly effective American and Iraqi attacks, dropped their support for al Qaeda, and the terrorist organization got stomped to bits by the “surge offensive” of last year. The final insult was delivered by the former Iraqi Sunni Arab allies, who quickly switched sides, and sometimes even worked with the Americans (more so than the Shia dominated Iraqi security forces) to hunt down and kill al Qaeda operators.
If you can read Arabic, you can easily find these pro-terrorism sites, and see for yourself how al Qaeda is trying to explain its own destruction to its remaining supporters. While it’s common to assume the Information War has been going against the West, this was not the case when you checked with what was going on inside the enemy camp.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htiw/articles/20080527.aspx

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

News: State Department Renews Contract with Blackwater

Filed under: News — Tags: , , — Matt @ 9:41 AM

      It looks like Blackwater is coming out on top, and good for them.  Too much has been focused on all the negative that BW has done, and all the positive gets lost in the shuffle.  No one talks about all the successful missions BW has completed for the State Dept., in regards to protecting diplomats in Iraq.  Or the fact that BW has lost a few employees, in defense of those diplomats.  -Head Jundi
 
———————————————————

May 10, 2008
Iraq Contractor in Shooting Case Makes Comeback
By JAMES RISEN
WASHINGTON — Last fall, Blackwater Worldwide was in deep peril.

Guards for the security company were involved in a shooting in September that left at least 17 Iraqis dead at a Baghdad intersection. Outrage over the killings prompted the Iraqi government to demand Blackwater’s ouster from the country, and led to a criminal investigation by the F.B.I., a series of internal investigations by the State Department and the Pentagon, and high-profile Congressional hearings.

But after an intense public and private lobbying campaign, Blackwater appears to be back to business as usual. (more…)

Friday, May 9, 2008

News: NGO’s to Deploy Airborne Medical Teams in South America

     I talked with some dude from this group awhile back. They found my info somewhere and were asking about smokejumping operations and developing their own air operation. It looks like they will finally be doing the South America air drop thing, to fix a runway near a remote village and do some remote medicine. Great concept, and I hope it takes off as it get’s more attention.

     SOAR will be doing a partnership with RAM, and it should be cool to see how this pans out. Hopefully no one breaks a leg doing this shit. ha ha

     Air Drop Assist is the training side of the operation. For a small fee, they will train you for paracargo and parachuting operations. This group is working with both RAM and SOAR, and these are the guys I think I talked with. -Head Jundi

———————————————————-

This is a great little video about what they do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly9gLb1enxg&feature=user

————————————————-
http://www.airdropassist.org/en/index.html

————————————————–

http://www.aidrelief.org/

http://www.ramusa.org/
SOAR to deploy airborne medical team in South America
On March 25th of 2008, SOAR will send its airborne trained medical personnel on an important mission in Guyana. SOAR, in partnership with RAM Airborne, will deploy medical and non-medical skydivers into remote areas of the Guyana. (more…)

Thursday, May 8, 2008

News: 100 Mile-Per-Hour Battle-Buggie Competition

Filed under: News,Technology — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 9:13 AM

    Boy, with this mad dash to produce a product, I think it would be fun to see one of the shows on  Horse Power TV(Spike Network) produce a prototype.  Blackwater has a vehicle that they are going to throw into the ring, and this should be interesting to see who wins this. –Head Jundi 

 ———————————————————

Artist Rendering of ITV 

Army Eyes 100 Mile-Per-Hour Battle-Buggies
By Noah Shachtman May 05, 2008 | 1:35:00
PMCategories: Ground Vehicles
  
 The U.S. military is looking for light, high-speed four-wheelers that can zip troops around battlezones.  And just about every major player in the defense industry — including Blackwater — is lining up to supply the vehicles.

Military vehicles have generally gotten heavier in recent years, to protect troops from roadside bombs and other threats.  “The latest Humvee model, the M1151, weighs in at more than 5 tons, twice the weight of the original, unarmored M998,” GovExec.com notes. “The military’s new ‘Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected’ vehicle program is awarding contracts to build wheeled transports as heavy as 40 tons.”

Dean Lockwood, a Forecast International analyst, tells Defense News, “With the way they have up-armored the Humvees, they are too heavy to do many of the missions they were originally intended to do.” Moreover, he said, up-armored Humvees strain Army helicopters.

So “the U.S. Army, Marine Corps and Special Operations Command may order thousands of rugged, high-tech, high-speed vehicles that can climb mountains, rescue fallen comrades and lead quick-strike assault teams in combat,” Defense News’ Kris Osborn reports.  “Service officials are eyeing pro­totypes and early versions of sev­eral existing vehicles, including ones that can hit 100 mph on roads. [Army] engineers are also exploring individual technologies that may give vehicles the suspen­sion to handle rigorous terrain at high speed.” (more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress