Feral Jundi

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Congo: U.N. Peace Mission Fueling Violence in Congo, Report Says

Filed under: Africa,Congo — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 7:00 AM

   Shameful.  The worlds largest peace keeping mission, and it is a total failure.  I actually think those in the U.N. who were responsible for managing such a cluster, should face a war crimes tribunal for allowing such a thing.

   Now if the U.N. were to pull their collective head out of their ass, and realize that if there is no peace to keep, then you do not send in peace keepers.  What needs to happen, is the conflict(s) must end, and the only way that happens is the two sides fight it out and to the victor go the spoils.  Or, the U.N. picks a side, and completely supports that side of the war by sending in war fighters with the mission of defeating the other side. All out warfare, and no half measures.

   You either contract it out to an Executive Outcomes type company, or assemble a coalition of actual war fighters from donor countries, or don’t do anything at all.  But all of that would take a mandate from the U.N. Security Council, and it would also take resolve and the will to fight a war like that.  Companies like EO are proof positive that a professional PMC could definitely do what has to be done, and I would say, for a reasonable price.  Much more reasonable that what the U.N. is paying for now, which is only doing more harm to the Congo. Shameful. –Matt

Edit: Here are some excerpts from the report, to include the summary, here at a blog called Congo Siasa.

—————————————————————–

UN peace mission fueling violence in Congo, report says

Security force costing $1bn a year has not defeated Rwandan Hutu rebels or halted plunder of lucrative minerals, experts find

Wednesday 25 November 2009

The world’s biggest UN peacekeeping mission has been branded a failure by experts who say it is fueling a surge of murders and rapes in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The UN security force of 25,000, estimated to cost more than $1bn a year, has proved unable to defeat Rwandan Hutu rebels or to halt the plunder of lucrative minerals in the east of the country, according to a scathing report.

Among the most damning findings of the UN-mandated Group of Experts is the free rein given to a military commander and war crimes suspect known as “The Terminator”, which the UN mission has previously denied.

The mission in North and South Kivu agreed to back Congo’s army in an offensive this year against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), some of whose leaders helped to orchestrate Rwanda’s 1994 genocide.

The experts found: “Military operations have … not succeeded in neutralising the FDLR, have exacerbated the humanitarian crisis in the Kivus and have resulted in an expansion of CNDP [the Congolese Tutsi militia National Congress for the Defence of the People] military influence in the region.”

Despite the surrender of more than 1,200 of its estimated 6,000-8,000 fighters, the FDLR continues to replenish its ranks through the active recruitment of Congolese and Rwandan Hutus, the group said.

The rebels benefit from complex support networks in Africa, North America, France, Germany and Spain, as well as financing from their control of the east’s lucrative deposits of gold, tin and coltan – a metallic ore used in many mobile phones and laptops – despite army efforts to drive them out of mining areas.

“The Group calculates that the FDLR could earn at least several hundred thousand dollars and up to a few million dollars a year from this trade,” the report said.

The most aggressive operations against the FDLR have been spearheaded by former CNDP units hastily integrated into the Congolese army. Some are under the command of General Bosco Ntaganda, dubbed The Terminator, who is wanted for war crimes by the international criminal court for alleged forced enrolment of child soldiers in 2002-03.

Officials from Congo’s UN mission, known as Monuc, have repeatedly denied Ntaganda’s involvement in the operations, which it is backing with logistical and operational support including helicopter firepower. But the group found that Ntaganda had ordered troop deployments, established a parallel taxation scheme in CNDP-controlled areas taking in $250,000 a month, and centralised control of hidden weapons caches. His men were deployed in some of the region’s most lucrative mining areas, which they now control.

Under Ntaganda’s management, integrated CNDP units are accused by the group of experts of widespread abuses including killings, rape, torture, forced labour, looting and extortion. “Ex-CNDP units have also forcibly displaced large numbers of civilians … in order to find grazing areas for cattle being brought in from Rwanda,” the report said.

This month the UN suspended its support to army units it believed were responsible for killing about 60 civilians in operations. The group of experts suggested this may not be enough. “The Group … underlines the possible contradiction within Monuc’s mandate to protect civilians on a priority basis, and that of providing logistic support to the [army], while the latter continues to commit abuses against the civilian population,” the report said.

The findings support the claims of NGOs that the UN military operations have inflamed the violence in eastern Congo, resulting in the displacement of 1 million villagers. This month Human Rights Watch said it had documented the deliberate killing by Congolese soldiers of at least 270 civilians in one area – mostly women, children and the elderly. They were decapitated, chopped to death by machete, beaten to death with clubs or shot as they tried to flee. Human Rights Watch called on the UN to suspend its support to the military operation or risk being implicated in further atrocities.

Story here.

2 Comments

  1. The biggest white elephant for the UN upto date, beautiful country that has gone down the tubes as another paradise lost,what is the latest figures on $ spend by MONUC on the de-arming process of militia?

    Comment by Raider4x4 — Wednesday, February 24, 2010 @ 1:38 AM

  2. Good question Raider 4×4. I am sure it is high. Take care.-matt

    Comment by headjundi — Wednesday, February 24, 2010 @ 8:54 AM

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress