This is not good. This is the kind of nightmare scenario that can go a number of ways. What if Al Qaeda or similar group, provides a better offer for the tanker than the owners of the boat or goods? For all we know, these guys are working with Al Shabaab and have something planned. You just don’t know, but now that the vessel is under the control of these pirates, they have all the power. And the shipping company is at fault for not properly securing this vessel.
I am also starting to get a headache from reading Roger Middleton’s crap assessments on shipping security. Who is this guy, and why does the media continue to give him a voice on this matter? For all we know, this shipping company followed the pathetic advice of this dork, and look what happened? Where is the voice of reason here?
Now tactically speaking, yeah, RPGs might ignite some kind of flammables in an attack, but the key to good security is to not even allow RPG armed pirates to get that close. With the proper surveillance systems in place, and a locked on and properly staffed security detail, I can guarantee that a tanker like this will not be taken again. Especially if this team is using weapons that will give them stand off distance. The basic math here is use weapons that reach out farther and do more damage than what the pirates use. Glock pistols will not do the trick. Long guns or a Bushmaster Cannon are what I am talking about. Or we can allow pirates who could be backed by terrorists, to take oil tankers or chemical tankers, and use them for whatever purpose. And with the case of this tanker, the pirates have all the power right now, all because the ship did not have the means to protect itself.
Another idea to protect a ship like this, is to use escort ships to draw fire away from the tanker. This would be expensive, but doable. A pirate will fire on a tanker or chemical tanker regardless, all with the idea of trying to terrorize and control the vessel. If you can draw the fire of the pirates away from the tanker, and take the battle zone away from that flammable vessel, then that is another idea. I will say this again, and in stark contrast to what Roger has to say. Pirates only understand one thing out on the high seas, and that is the rule of force. –Matt
—————————————————————–
Somali pirates hijack oil tanker going to US
By MALKHADIR M. MUHUMED
Monday, November 30, 2009
NAIROBI, Kenya — Somali pirates seized a tanker carrying crude oil from Saudi Arabia to the United States in the increasingly dangerous waters off East Africa, an official said Monday, an attack that could pose a huge environmental or security threat to the region.
The Greece-flagged Maran Centaurus was hijacked Sunday about 800 miles (1,300 kilometers) off the coast of Somalia, said Cmdr. John Harbour, a spokesman for the EU Naval Force. Harbour said it originated from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and was destined for the United States. The ship has 28 crew members on board, he said.
The shipping intelligence company Lloyd’s List said the Maran Centaurus is a “very large crude carrier, with a capacity of over 300,000 tons.” Officials could not immediately say how many barrels of oil were on board, but its value would be in the millions of dollars.
Pirates have increased attacks on vessels off East Africa for the millions in ransom that can be had. Though pirates have successfully hijacked dozens of vessels the last several years, Sunday’s attack appears to be only the second ever on an oil tanker.
The hijacking of a tanker increases worries that the vessel could crash, be run aground or be involved in a firefight, said Roger Middleton, a piracy expert at London-based think tank Chatham House.
Pirates typically use guns and rocket-propelled grenades in their attacks, and some vessels now carry private security guards, but Middleton said oil tankers do not.
“You’re sitting on a huge ship filled with flammable liquid. You don’t want somebody with a gun on top of that,” Middleton said. “Financially it’s a very costly exercise because the value of oil is so volatile. If it is held for a long time and the price of oil drops, they could lost millions of dollars.”
In November 2008, pirates hijacked the Saudi supertanker Sirius Star, which held 2 million barrels of oil valued at about $100 million. The tanker was released last January for a reported $3 million ransom after a two-month drama that helped galvanize international efforts to fight piracy off Africa’s coast.
Somali pirates are a separate group of criminals from the al-Qaida-affiliated Islamic militants who control large areas of southern Somalia, but anytime pirates hold such valuable and explosive cargo it raises international concerns.
In late 2007, pirates hijacked a chemical tanker carrying up to 10,000 tons of highly explosive benzene. Initially, American intelligence agents worried terrorists from Somalia’s Islamic extremist insurgency could be involved, and might try to crash the boat into an offshore oil platform or use it as a gigantic bomb.
When the Japanese vessel was towed back into Somali waters and ransom demanded, the coalition was relieved to realize it was just another pirate attack.
Somalia’s lawless 1,880-mile (3,000-kilometer) coastline provides a perfect haven for pirates to prey on ships heading for the Gulf of Aden, one of the world’s busiest shipping routes. The impoverished Horn of Africa nation has not had a functioning government for a generation and the weak U.N.-backed administration is too busy fighting the Islamist insurgency to arrest pirates.
Pirates now hold about a dozen vessels hostage and more than 200 crew members. The Maran Centaurus had 28 crew aboard – 16 Filipinos, nine Greeks, two Ukrainians and one Romanian, Harbour said.
Middleton said pirate demands and negotiations are becoming more complex.
“They still want the money but they have also asked for the release of imprisoned comrades,” he said. “That demand is an extra bargaining tool they can use to add extra layers to their negotiating position.”
Piracy has increased despite an increased presence by international navies patrolling the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden. The U.S. this fall began flying sophisticated drones over East African waters as part of the fight against piracy.
Story here.
Actually Roger Middleton is a nice Guy, however, Chatham House is one of the world major Think Tanks for Global Political Risk, Terrorism and Piracy; their opinions influence and also reflect the International Maritime Community and as such they have to state the wider, more conventional line of the academic and political process that has to be taken into consideration.
However, this does not get around or deny the fact that the pattern of attacks is becoming clearer;the actions (or lack of) of the Navies and their Political commitment to this problem is rapidly becoming thin on the ground and weakening in resolve! We are rapidly approaching a point where the Commercial industry has to recognise that the only way to prevent Pirates attacking your vessel is to provide a robust and enforceable deterrent that is presented in a managed, professional and calculated manner, ensuring clear Rules of Engagement and specific levels of Escalation which leave the Pirates in no doubt that to continue their attack will result in the loss or either their collateral assets (boats, weapons, liberty) or their lives.
Only last week, the US Government stated that the Maersk Alabama defended their vessel in line with the "Industry Best practice Guidelines" (I must have missed the chapter on Armed Security in that document!) and they also advised the Greek Shipping Owners to "Man Up" and get Armed Security, as it was, quote, "the logical solution to an escalating problem".
Well, guess what? We're ready to go, and at the start line, so surely one of the Industry Representative Organisations must step up to the plate and condone a correctly implemented framework of Armed Security? Because if not, it is they, who will be left behind; not their members, because it's the members that are becoming allergic to Goat Curry and Rice, not the Bureaucrats!!
Aye,
Corsair Hunter
Comment by Corsair Hunter — Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 10:25 AM
I think if developing the defense boarding system; it maybe minimize the risk of dangers. It is mainly using alert defense system around the ship and uses near-range radar overlay identification technology and intelligent software analysis system to analyzing collected signals, then building three-dimensional test system around the ship. Meanwhile, It has automatic defense function, which can control the ship’s high-pressure water gun through output and feedback signal of the control unit. For example, the system will adjust the water gun to ejecting intruder automatically through identify the intruder’s point coordinates. Besides, It has active defense function, which can shock the intruder by the high-voltage electric system, which installed in the vessel’s rail. For example, when someone on board, the system would focus attention on aisle defense?and it will activate defense function automatically and seize intruders in the shortest time, when the intruder access to this area.
Comment by L — Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:56 AM