This is actually pretty interesting. This is a thousand troops that the Marines can use to do all sorts of violent things with, and with no limitations. But the most interesting aspect is Georgia wants in NATO, and this is kind of a double sided insurance policy.
On one side, a move like this will help to up the level of combat effectiveness of the Georgian military. Marines are already training Georgians in their country, and they were doing that even before Georgia’s quick war with Russia. I think a move like this is smart, because now the Georgians will have combat veterans that could make life for an invading force a little more painful if not damn near impossible.
The other side of this is Mikheil is also trying to earn his country’s admission into NATO, so that Russia would think twice before invading again. The question I have, is if Russia would actually care if Georgia was a NATO member or not? Because I think Russia will do whatever they want, despite what club Georgia is a member of.
Now if I was Mikheil, I would develop an asymmetric warfare capability big time. Keep working on this other diplomatic stuff, but if these guys want to make life miserable for an invading force again, they need to start thinking more like Hezbollah and less like some kind of a conventional army. Get some combat time, learn from the enemy in Afghanistan, and apply those lessons to defending Georgia. The Marines will definitely help them to get there, and help them with the asymmetric stuff as well. –Matt
——————————————————————
Georgia and the War in Afghanistan
December 19, 2009
Why the young democracy is sending nearly 1,000 troops to the war effort.
By MIKHEIL SAAKASHVILI
Following President Obama’s speech on our common mission in Afghanistan, NATO members and other countries pledged about 7,000 additional troops. My country committed just under 1,000, which makes Georgia the highest per-capita troop contributor to the war effort.
Some might be surprised that a small country not yet in NATO—and partly occupied by more than 10,000 hostile Russian troops—would make this commitment to an Allied mission abroad. Let me explain why it makes perfect sense.
As President Obama pointed out, the threat of violent extremism endangers all nations that subscribe to the principles of liberal democracy. Those principles made America the target on 9/11. Spain was hit on March 11, 2004, and Britain on July 7, 2005. Any of our countries could be next.
We see ourselves as firmly allied with the values of the U.S. and the trans-Atlantic community. That is why we are sending serious forces—a heavy battalion and two light companies—with no restrictions on the kinds of missions and combat in which they can participate. Almost 800 will be deploying with the U.S. Marines into Helmand Province, where some of the most intense fighting has occurred.
Georgia is making contributions in other ways. The U.S. and NATO have already started using Georgian ports, rail lines and roads to transport nonlethal supplies to Afghanistan. American military experts have concluded this is a safe and cost-saving transit route, and we stand ready to expand its use.
Less than a decade ago, Georgia was considered by many to be a failing state. But with the support of our friends in the West, we were able to make dramatic changes.
Our experience as a young democracy gives us confidence that success is possible on the political and civil fronts in Afghanistan, and we will do everything possible to help strengthen Afghanistan’s institutions. Our reform know-how could help in training Afghanistan’s police forces and other civil servants, an effort that is crucial to achieving long-term stability and a more transparent government.
The test of the bonds among nations is not what we do when it is easy, but rather what we do when it is hard. Georgia has been grateful for the extent to which the U.S. and Europe have stood alongside us over recent years. Now we are proud to stand—and fight—alongside you.
Mr. Saakashvili is president of Georgia.
Story here.
It is an excellent idea for other countries, regardless of affiliation, to send troops to assist, where possible because no country is immune from the new terrorist initiatives of delivering mayhem to the innocent populace.
For lack of a better term or designation, sending troops is a way to assess their own military'e effectiveness in a combat environment and expose themselves to how the 'big boys' close, engage and destroy the enemy.
Comment by salles — Saturday, December 19, 2009 @ 3:09 AM
Send troops and contractors and observers. Don't aim to mimic the 'big boys' but to do better. Learn from the contractors and irregulars to do things effectively and cheaply.
Comment by Vic Williams — Sunday, December 20, 2009 @ 9:09 AM
Although I am not a big fan of Saakashvilli or the necessarly the politics Russia plays in the region, I do agree with Vic Williams in that its pointless to learn from the "Big Boys". In any conflict that Georgia will encounter in the near future, they will most definitently not have any air superiority. So they will have to rely on unconventional tactics, so they actualy have more to learn from the Taliban then the Americans on the ground in Afghanistan.
Comment by Denis Malyavin — Monday, December 21, 2009 @ 12:41 AM
You know, Georgia might be the Marine's hybrid warfare project. That is the way I kind of looked at it. It would be interesting if they could do this with some other nations, and bring them in to the party.
Comment by headjundi — Monday, December 21, 2009 @ 1:14 AM
Not to put too fine a point on it, but we just gave Georgia $1 billion in aid and they are a candidate for more under the Millennium Challenge Account.
For sure, having partners in that part of the world is a good thing. But they don't come cheap.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/world/europe/04…
Comment by Alex — Monday, December 21, 2009 @ 6:28 AM