Feral Jundi

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Bounties: US Offers $5 Million In Killing Of ICE Agent, Mexico Offers 10 Million Pesos

Filed under: Bounties,Law Enforcement,Mexico — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 10:15 PM

The Mexican government offered up a reward of 10 million Pesos for this deal as well, and obviously the case is going cold and they need some information to catch these guys. Hopefully this bounty will do the trick. –Matt

U.S. offers $5 million in killing of ICE agent
Two ambushed along highway, likely by a Mexican drug cartel
By Jerry Seper
March 30, 2011
The Departments of Justice, State and Homeland Security announced Wednesday a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the Mexican gunmen who shot and killed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Special Agent Jaime Zapata and wounded his partner, Victor Avila Jr. (more…)

Libya: About Those Rebels–Freelance Irhabists Join The Party And The Article ‘Destination Martyrdom’

Filed under: Africa,Al Qaeda,Libya — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Matt @ 10:44 AM

Freelance jihadists huh?  So this is what our no-fly zone is supporting?  I will say that not only does Gaddafi suck, but to support the opposition is not a good idea either.  I vote on staying out of the thing completely, and let the kids fight it out.

Both articles that I have posted below should definitely give anyone thinking about supporting these rebels a pause.  To think that coalition pilots are providing over watch and even CAS for rebel forces that quite possibly have Al Qaeda sympathizers in their ranks or even freelance irhabists working along side is disturbing. Especially after all we have been through in this war.

And if that doesn’t get you fired up, then read the Destination Martyrdom article that Newsweek published in 2008. That many of the foreign suicide bombers in places like Iraq or Afghanistan came from Libya, and they certainly killed innocents and soldiers alike. So these are the people we are supporting? I say let both sides of this conflict destroy each other, and stay out of the way.  Not to mention the costs of such operations?…..

Here is the analogy I have for Libya and all of these uprisings in the Middle East.  This is a raging forest fire, and in the world of forest fire fighting, when you have a ‘gobbler’ or fire that is uncontrollable, then you stay out of it’s way and let it do it’s thing. Because to do anything to try and stop this massive force of nature would be a waste of resources and man power, and a needless risk of life.  The only things you can do for gobblers is to evacuate people (which has been done in Libya), and put up a buffer around things you hope to save (which nothing has been done about the oil facilities in Libya).

The time where you fight a fire, is when you have the highest chance of success–and that is when it is small or manageable due to the terrain or weather.  Or to attack when the fire or the elements that support fire, are weakest and your forces are ready and capable. That is how you deal with fire, and that is how you deal with the ‘fires’ burning in the Middle East.

Which brings me to the Saudi Arabia/OPEC question.  If things blow up in the major oil producing countries, I could foresee some kind of effort to secure the oil facilities. That would be an appropriate use of military force, because those facilities are crucial to the world’s oil market stability. We can survive Libya being out for the count, but with countries like Saudi Arabia–that is the kind of thing you want to protect because those oil producing facilities are the life blood of the world.(Robert Baer mentioned the same thing in his book ‘Sleeping With The Devil‘)  I would classify that as putting a buffer around the things you want to save during a raging fire. Other than that, get the hell out of the gobbler’s way. –Matt

‘Freelance jihadists’ join Libyan rebels

Destination Martyrdom

‘Freelance jihadists’ join Libyan rebels
Ex-al Qaeda member speaks out
By Eli Lake
March 29, 2011
A former leader of Libya’s al Qaeda affiliate says he thinks “freelance jihadists” have joined the rebel forces, as NATO’s commander told Congress on Tuesday that intelligence indicates some al Qaeda and Hezbollah terrorists are fighting Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s forces.
Former jihadist Noman Benotman, who renounced his al Qaeda affiliation in 2000, said in an interview that he estimates 1,000 jihadists are in Libya. (more…)

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Industry Talk: In Libya, Fight Mercenaries With Mercenaries, By Dr. Deane-Peter Baker

Filed under: Industry Talk,Letter Of Marque,Libya — Matt @ 7:25 PM

I have received several emails and Facebook forwardings in regards to this particular op-ed, and I thought I would put it out there for folks to check out.  I have never talked with Dr. Deane-Peter Baker, but he does have some credentials and a few books under his belt.

My personal view is that we should not get involved with Libya’s civil/tribal war. But going beyond opinions, I wanted to focus on the capabilities of PMC’s and if in fact they could have an impact on the ground in Libya. I think so, because like Dr. Baker presented, there is precedent for companies participating in offensive operations  abroad and succeeding. The Flying Tigers and Executive Outcomes were mentioned below as companies that did such a thing, and I have my own list of folks that get an honorable mention (check my history section).

Now it has been established that companies have the potential to do this, but what is missing in the present is the legal will to do such a thing.  Operations like this would require a blessing from the highest levels of government, and the license would have to give a company all the same freedoms and liberties that today’s militaries enjoy–and then some. If you want success out of a company, and you care to achieve victory in a war, you must give that company total freedom to do what it needs to do. You must also give it the assurance that they will not be turned into criminals for the warfare they wage, and this is very important.

That’s not saying that a company would want the freedom to commit atrocity and war crime.  It’s just the company must know that it is legally authorized to do what it has to do in the context of the chaos and unpredictability of war.  Of course that is why I keep harping on the Letter of Marque and Reprisal or similar type license that is approved and signed in blood by the highest authorities of that issuing country.  Until that happens, the serious and most capable of companies will always default to the contracts that give them the happy medium of profit and legality.

Now of course a company can go off the grid and attempt to arrange a contract without anyone’s blessing. In a perfect world and free market society, this would work out just fine. But in today’s modern times, countries still rule the military and legal battlefields, and they will always exert control when it’s best interest is threatened or could be enhanced. If I had a dollar for every company that ‘wanted’ to provide a service in let’s say Somalia, and yet to be shut down or intimidated by any of the super powers or other authority… So yeah, the legal blessing is the key here.  The money and everything else involved with war fighing else is just business, but the legal authority along with the moral/legal will of the issuing party, is the most valuable thing that a company could have if they wanted to go down this path. Just my two cents on the whole thing. –Matt

 

In Libya, fight mercenaries with mercenaries
By Deane-Peter Baker
March 29, 2011
It is time to state the glaringly obvious. Without at least some boots on the ground in support of the rebels, the conflict in Libya will in all likelihood settle into a grinding stalemate. The air cover provided by the United States and a slowly growing coalition has pegged back Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s forces, but it will take more than air cover to ensure a rebel victory. (more…)

Funny Stuff: Aircraft Carrier For Sale!

Filed under: Cool Stuff,Funny Stuff,Maritime Security — Matt @ 3:11 PM

Wow!  Now this would be a fine addition to anyone’s pirate fighting armada. lol I am surprised there isn’t a disclosure that says ‘aircraft sold separately’. –Matt

Vessel ARK ROYAL R07
DESCRIPTION: Vessel ARK ROYAL R07 Light Aircraft Carrier

Completed: 1981

Current Displacement: 19,000 tonnes

Estimated Metal Weight: 10,000 tonnes, 95% steel

Length: 210m,

Draught: 5.8m,

Beam: 36m

Location: HM Naval Base Portsmouth

Date and time for viewings: ?8am Tuesday 3rd May ?8am Wednesday 4th May ??Requests for viewing MUST be submitted in writing no later than Wednesday 27th April together with a brief outline of your intentions regarding the vessel to the following: ?Noelle Gardner email: desdsa-bd1a@mod.uk (01869 256346)?Janet Kynman email: desdsa-mst1a2@mod.uk (01869 256017) ??Tender Closure: Monday 13th June 2011 at 10 am??NOTE: ?All Tender Documents to be sent to: ?Emma Harris MCIPS – Commercial Manager Special Projects,?Building H9 Room 7, H Site?DSA Bicester?DE&S Arncott?Bicester?OXON, OX25 1LP?Tel: 01869 256014??All Tender documentation will be found under Additional Specifications.
Product ID:  ARK001
Manufacturer:
Availability:
In stock
Our Price: N/A
Buy the product here.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Disaster Response: Global Rescue–The Small Company With A Personal Touch

Filed under: Cool Stuff,Disaster Response,Industry Talk — Matt @ 5:49 PM

In 1985, a French doctor and businessman co-founded the first travel-assistance company, AEA International, specializing in risk mitigation and pre-trip advice for European and Australian corporations operating in Asia. The firm, which is based in London, Philadelphia, and Singapore, changed its name to International S.O.S. in 1998. As global tourism boomed, ISOS expanded into a force that grossed $850 million and handled 1.2 million cases in 2009. (By contrast, Global Rescue handled about 300 cases that year. The company, which is private, declined to reveal revenue.) Travel assistance and crisis response are now a global industry worth billions, and there are no fewer than eight American companies offering those services.

Great article and I really liked the comparisons between this company and the larger ones like ISOS.  All of these companies have been busy this year and last, and they have really shown their necessity in these very dangerous times.

The article also brings up a similar theme in business, that you see in war. That when it comes to competition between companies, the underdog companies compete with the larger ones by going after that behemoth’s weakness. That would be the personal touch. They also copy what works in the bigger companies, and find that one little difference in operations or technology that makes them just a little bit better than the bigger companies.

Global Rescue does not handle the same amount of business as the bigger guys, but what they do offer is a more personal service that is appealing to those that want that kind of thing. It is a small company taking advantage of their size and filling a niche within their market. You can have the homemade deluxe burger made by Marge at the local restaurant, or you can pay less for that burger at a major chain like McDonalds. I would also add that this company probably does a better job at customer service and satisfaction? Who knows, and we will see how their service evolves as they get bigger and more popular?

Although I am curious about their cost, versus the other company’s costs?  Obviously their clientele are the type that want the personal touch of some former Navy SEAL and his team coming directly to their rescue and saying, ‘we are here to get you out’.  Cool stuff and hopefully someone from the company can chime in. –Matt

Global Rescue Website here.

Hero Complex
A brash new company is revolutionizing crisis response by sending ex-military to rescue adventurers. So why all the enemies?
April 2011
By Devon O’Neil

Global Rescue CEO Dan Richards  (Photo by Michael Lewis)
“WHAT’S THE LATEST on the lion bite in Zimbabwe?”
Ted Muhlner’s commanding voice fills the room, a spacious seventh-floor office in Boston’s financial district decorated with ten flatscreen TVs and little else. The place looks like a stockbroker’s warren, but it’s not. The 37-year-old Muhlner, a former Navy SEAL with an M.B.A. from Harvard, is senior director of operations for Global Rescue, a seven-year-old company that assists adventure travelers and corporate employees who find themselves in dicey situations far from home. At the moment, surrounded by four paramedics and two ex–military personnel, Muhlner is conducting a 20-minute briefing on the day’s workload, a checklist of ongoing operations around the world.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress