Feral Jundi

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Quotes: Putin Backs ‘Private’ Defense Company Idea

Filed under: Quotes,Russia — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 11:14 AM

This just popped up on the radar and I thought I would share. Russia already has a defense industry that provides all sorts of equipment and weapons world wide. But you don’t hear too much about Russian PSC’s or PMC’s aside from body guard work in Moscow. But that could change according to this quote below.

With that said, could we see a day where a Russian PMC (with the blessing and quite wink of the state) is contracted to fight and win a war in some region of the world? A victory that would be mutually beneficial for both Russia, and that client?  And like Putin said, it would be  “an instrument in the pursuit of national interests without the direct participation of the state.

Even for this Syria deal, Russia sent military advisers and they are getting some heat for that on the world stage.  Perhaps they are thinking now that maybe a private force would have been a better choice politically?  Or for legal reasons, they can wash their hands of any involvement, just because the state does not have any ‘direct participation’. I also imagine that Russia has been watching how the west uses private industry in it’s current wars, and taking notes.  Interesting…. –Matt

Edit: 04/18/2012- David Isenberg posted an excellent article about this deal. Especially the legal mechanisms that would support or hinder Russia’s move towards more foreign usage of PMSC’s. Check it out here.

 

Putin Backs Private Defense Company Idea
11/04/2012
Russian Prime Minister and president-elect Vladimir Putin on Wednesday supported the idea of private defense companies that would provide protection services and military training programs abroad without the participation of the Russian state.
The idea was proposed by A Just Russia deputy Alexei Mitrofanov during Putin’s report to the lower house of parliament, the State Duma.
Putin said that was “an instrument in the pursuit of national interests without the direct participation of the state.”
“I believe that it should be considered, thought over,” he said.
Story here.

3 Comments

  1. Interesting, but just a small correction.
     
    The Russian anti-terror troops thing is an error.  Russia has not publicly sent in troops to help Syria out.  For some reason, the Russians with guns in Syria were armed guards for a ship.
     
    Link:  http://russiamil.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/russia-has-not-sent-troops-to-syria/

    Comment by hqi777 — Thursday, April 12, 2012 @ 2:33 PM

  2. Yes, but this correction in the blog post you provided was only speculation as well. The author even said so. With that said, even the Russian Defense Minister admitted that they have military and technical advisers in Syria. Here is the quote and link.
    Russia’s Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov denied reports that Russian special forces were operating inside Syria. He did say, however, that there are Russian military and technical advisors in the country.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/russian-anti-terror-troops-arrive-syria/story?id=15954363#.T4dk-Y6exaU
    Although it could be possible that the anti-terror troops thing is an error, and if you can find any retractions or edits in any stories that were written on this, I would like to see that. Thanks for heads up.

    Comment by feraljundi — Thursday, April 12, 2012 @ 4:41 PM

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress