Feral Jundi

Monday, January 24, 2011

Industry Talk: Security Firms Are The Target Of A Corrupt Afghan Government Once Again

“The lack of transparency makes it very difficult to operate effectively: The rules change every day depending on which department you are talking to,” said a second executive with one of the security firms, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “We’ve heard of companies being pulled up on everything from taxes to vehicle registrations to visas.”

     What can I say? This Afghan government is corrupt and greedy, and is doing all they can to juice this industry and the US.  From the taxation game to this crap, what’s next?

     One funny side note is that Xe was not on this latest list.  I guess they win for the moment. lol –Matt

Security firms are accused of breaking Afghan laws

By Joshua Partlow and Rajiv ChandrasekaranSunday, January 23, 2011

KABUL – The Afghan government has accused several prominent private security companies, including some that work with the U.S. government, of committing “major offenses,” a move that U.S. officials fear could hasten their departure from the country.

A list compiled by Afghan officials cites 16 companies, including several American and British firms, for unspecified serious violations and seven others for having links to high-ranking Afghan officials, according to a copy obtained by The Washington Post.

A decision to ban the major violators and those that have relationships with senior Afghan officials would affect firms that provide about 800 guards for the U.S. Agency for International Development projects and about 3,000 who work on military construction projects for the coalition, said a senior U.S. official.

“We’re wringing our hands over this,” the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. “We’re waiting to hear which companies will get disbandment notices and when they will have to disband.”

Among those listed as major offenders are Triple Canopy, based in Reston; Washington-based Blue Hackle; and the British firm G4S, the parent company of ArmorGroup North America, which provides security for the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

(more…)

Friday, January 21, 2011

Cool Stuff: CSIS Debate–Doug Brooks Vs. TX Hammes On The Benefits Of Using Armed Contractors

Monday, January 17, 2011

Industry Talk: Afghanistan’s Push To Tax US Contractors Could Renew Tensions

     “DOD and State and the primes are telling them ‘No, you’re subs, don’t pay taxes??” the company official said. But “the Afghan government has become so hard to work with on so many fronts that I’m not sure whether this issue is still in the embassy’s top ten list of things.”

     Another contracting executive said there was “tension in the embassy” between those officials who work on helping the Afghan government collect more revenue so it can pay its own way, and those “responsible for working on behalf of U.S. business.”

     “We know we’re going to have to pay at least $8 billion to $10 billion a year for the next 10 years to keep these guys running,” the executive said. “The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are putting heat on the government to create a tax base. Some of the biggest cash flow into the country is Western aid.”

     This is interesting.  You have two forces at play here.  There is the IMF and World Bank who want Afghanistan to have a tax base, and you have the US that is supposed to protect US business from being taxed.

     My view on it is that Afghanistan benefits from this western aid because their main goal is to get that country on it’s feet. Taxing these aid providing companies is wrong, and I certainly hope the US embassy will work to protect American companies from these blood suckers. –Matt

Afghanistan’s push to tax U.S. contractors could renew tensions

By Karen DeYoung and Joshua PartlowSunday, January 16, 2011

The Afghan government is ramping up efforts to tax U.S. contractors operating there – an effort that could raise millions for the cash-strapped government but could also provoke fresh confrontation with the United States, according to U.S. and Afghan officials.

Taxation of U.S. government assistance is barred by U.S. law, as well as by a number of bilateral accords between Afghanistan and the United States. But the wording in the documents is vague, and the two governments disagree on what “tax-exempt” means.

Non-Afghan contractors who have recently received tax bills for work done under U.S. government programs say they have appealed to the Defense and State departments to clarify the matter with the Afghans. But they have been told simply to ignore the bills and “stand up for our rights,” said one official of an American company that has multiple U.S defense contracts in Afghanistan.

(more…)

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Industry Talk: FBO Solicitations–The Air Force Wants Afghan Security Guards For 17 Locations!

     Now this is something else.  Look at all these solicitations for guards for all of these FOBs?  No wonder ISAF and NATO was pushing Karzai to reconsider banning PSCs. lol –Matt

***ONLY CONTRACTORS THAT HOLD A CURRENT AFGHANISTAN MINISTRY OF INTERIOR PERSONAL SECURITY LICENSE AND ARE LICENSED / REGISTERED WITH THE AFGHANISTAN MINISTRY OF TRADE WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD, OFFERORS WHO DO NOT POSSESS THESE QUALIFICATIONS ARE RESPECTFULLY ASKED TO NOT RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL***

Afghan Security Guards, FB Price

H92237-11-R-0618

R — Professional, administrative, and management support services

Department of the Air Force

Air Mobility Command

19th Contracting Squadron Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (Modified) Jan 03, 2011

Afghan Security Guards, FB Lane

H92237-11-R-0635

R — Professional, administrative, and management support services

Department of the Air Force

Air Mobility Command

19th Contracting Squadron Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (Modified) Jan 03, 2011

Afghan Security Guards, CP Mazar-E-Sharif

H92237-11-R-0608

R — Professional, administrative, and management support services

Department of the Air Force

Air Mobility Command

19th Contracting Squadron Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (Modified) Jan 03, 2011

(more…)

Friday, January 7, 2011

Legal News: Robert Langdon Escapes Death Sentence After Paying Afghan Family

     Thanks to Elena for forwarding me this news about Robert.  This article describes briefly what the ‘ibra’ is, and it is an interesting concept.

     As for Robert, the only thing I have to add is that I hope he survives imprisonment for the next 20 years in Pol-e-Charki prison. –Matt

Australian escapes death sentence after paying Afghan family

Ex-soldier has sentence commuted to 20 years in jail after paying relatives of murdered guard $100,000

By Jon Boone

Wednesday 5 January 2011

An Australian private security guard who murdered an Afghan worker has escaped the death sentence by paying the family of his victim $100,000 (£65,000), court documents reveal.

The former Australian soldier was handed the death sentence last January after a Kabul court found him guilty of shooting an Afghan colleague before making a crude attempt to make the crime look like a Taliban attack.

But it emerged this week that Robert William Langdon persuaded two supreme court judges that he should be allowed to live after the family of the dead man, who was known as Karimullah, accepted a large compensation payment raised by Langdon’s relatives in Australia.

However, the payment, known in sharia law as ibra, was not enough to commute the whole sentence, so Langdon will face 20 years in Kabul’s notorious Pol-e-Charki prison, home to Taliban and al-Qaida inmates as well as criminals. The jail term is thought to be the longest given to a westerner in Afghanistan since the toppling of the Taliban regime in 2001.

At the time of the killing in May 2009, Langdon was working for Four Horsemen International, a private firm which works with the US military and specialises in protecting military supply convoys.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress