Feral Jundi

Monday, March 1, 2010

Paracargo: Army Testing New Airdrop System For Afghanistan

     Boy, I don’t know about this one.  Dropping paracargo without a chute, is the holy grail I guess, but in practice, there are a ton of issues.  If an aircraft has to drop low and slow, then now they are a prime target for an enterprising enemy.  How many aircraft will have to be shot down, before this ‘chute-less’ system becomes a failure is my question?

     The other point I want to make, is that if there is a need for more paracargo operations in Afghanistan, then a quick fix to get more folks over there, is for Dept. of Homeland Security to detail out the smokejumper units during the off season.  You have pilots, spotters (kickers), and tons of smokejumpers who all specialize in paracargo operations, who have nothing to do during the winters.  They could be called upon for disaster relief or the war effort, and they are all federal assets.  Or if companies wanted to tap into that resource, they could easily spread the word throughout the various lofts of smokejumper bases, and say they are looking for folks who specialize in small bundle paracargo operations.

     I think it is also pretty funny that the Army or whomever came up with this LCLA concept, and thinks that it is new or revolutionary. I have news for you folks, Low Cost Low Altitude paracargo operations is nothing new and the military, NGO’s, and smokejumpers have been performing such operations for a long time.

     At least with the smokejumpers, we actually make a point of retrieving, repairing, and reusing those cheap parachutes that the military is currently just throwing away.  But I guess if you guys are going to throw away paracargo chutes, then at least make the cheapest chutes possible.  In my experience, just a square piece of canopy with four lines made out of tubular webbing attached to it, worked pretty good.  Or you can take all of those old parachutes that the Army and Marines threw out, and convert them into usable paracargo chutes.  I know there are warehouses filled with that stuff, and it wouldn’t take much to get the machine of industry to modify all of that stuff for the war effort.  That is the kind of Low Cost paracargo operations that I am talking about. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Army Testing New Airdrop System for Afghanistan

By USArmy

February 25, 2010

WASHINGTON: The supply requirement in Afghanistan will dramatically increase this year according to the Army’s top logistician, and he said the Army is testing a new airdrop system to help meet the demand.

Speaking at an Association of the U.S. Army Land Warfare Institute breakfast series Feb. 19, Lt. Gen. Mitchell H. Stevenson, Army G-4, told the attendees that he hopes the new delivery system will be ready for deployment to Afghanistan by the end of summer.

The Army Freedrop Packaging Concept Project is currently developing and testing a new airdrop system called the Freedrop Delivery System forAfghanistan.

The new system will allow bundles of supplies such as ammunition, small generators and other Class IX repair parts, Meals Ready to Eat, and bottled water of up to 150 pounds to be freedropped (no parachutes) at about 70 knots airspeed from under 75 feet above ground level at the current 19Afghanistan outposts which can only receive supplies by air.

“The idea here was to develop a package that you just kick out the side of a helicopter or airplane when you’re flying very low… 50 feet above ground,” Stevenson said. “You eliminate the problem of packing, rigging the chute and of course doing any kind of recovery operation.”

The freedrop system is currently being developed and tested by the Army G-4’s Logistics Innovation Agency and involves a number of key stakeholders, to include operational partners in the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, N.C.

The Army already uses four airdrop systems in Afghanistan. Getting supplies to Soldiers there is tough because the country has no seaport and relies on two main land routes so “airdrop has become big business” said the Army’s chief logistician.

(more…)

Afghanistan: Marjah Update–The Afghans Are ‘Trash Talking’ Their Way To Victory

   I love stories like this.  I can just picture these guys all grouped together and listening to the radio, and planning their comebacks.  They probably have guys in these groups who pull up the ‘yo momma’ jokes, or some crude reference to ‘relationships with camels’. lol

   So my take on this, is why are we not helping these guys out with trash talk strategy?  In the US, we have some outstanding trash talking comedians or athletes that could certainly advise the Afghan army.  Think about it?  A perfectly crafted comeback or slam, could easily infuriate the opposition to the point of doing something that would compromise their position or force them to do something stupid.  I posted a similar story awhile back of US troops trash talking the Taliban in order to get them out for the fight.  It worked, and if I were these Afghans, and the Coalition forces working with them, I would take advantage of that weakness to no end.  Hell, get creative and infuriate them with the kind of trash talking that only Muhammad Ali or Mike Tyson would be proud of .  If the Taliban is that easily goaded, then by all means that weakness should be exploited. –Matt

——————————————————————

Trash Talking the Taliban During Firefights

By MIGUEL MARQUEZ

MARJA, Afghanistan, Feb. 25, 2010

It’s a remarkable combination of psychological warfare, political roundtable and trash-talking. Afghan soldiers and Taliban fighters taunt each other, debate each other and try to persuade each other almost daily over their radios, at times while even shooting at each other.

I came across the astonishing facet of the Afghan War while spending time with the 302nd kandak, or battalion, of the Afghan National Army. The foes chatter with each other over their Vietnam-era, two-way radio system. It’s such an antiquated system that the Taliban and the Afghan forces share radio frequencies, and verbal barbs, as they try to kill or capture one another.

I asked Maj. Said Rahim Hakmal what they talk about. Politics, he said. “The Taliban will say things like why do you side with the Americans? Why do you sell out your country? You love Obama more than Afghanistan.”

Hakmal said the standard response goes something like, “The Americans are here to help our country function again. They don’t want to stay. They want to help, then leave. You should help, too.”

Then the shooting starts.

To the Taliban, religion is politics and they are willing to die for their way of life. At least half the Afghan Army’s and its government’s job here is to sell the Talibs on the notion that they can have their religion, they just have to keep the politics separate. Easier said than done when it comes to fundamental beliefs about the nature of being and whom the almighty favors.

The Taliban and their politics aside, there are other questions Afghans have for America. While they do appear to trust that America has no interest in colonizing Afghanistan, they wonder about our true motives. Their No. 1 concern, maybe fear: Pakistan. They are desperate to know what America is really up to with their needed yet distrusted neighbor. Who does America support in Pakistan and why? Why doesn’t America, with all its power, just kill all the “terrorists” in Pakistan? For many Afghans, all their problems, and conspiracies, are rooted and imported from Pakistan.

Everybody Has an Opinion

Pro-government Afghans have a harder time wrestling with their beliefs than the Taliban. They have to simultaneously believe that the United States is good and questionable, maybe bad, for Afghanistan. Afghans are all for America when it comes to the surge, defeating the insurgency and building its government. They are less trustful when they look at U.S. actions outside Afghanistan.

It’s like Americans who love their congressmen but have few kind words for Congress.

Afghans want to know just about everything about America but they’ll settle for the American in front of them. The questions are non-stop. Where are you from? Who is your father? How big is your family? Do you have a wife? Children? What do you do for fun? What food do you like? Show me your pictures? Is that your phone? Signal? Can I call home?

When we’d go about our work shooting interviews or sending back material via a small satellite transceiver, the Afghans would gather around as though it were the day’s entertainment. They all want to be interviewed. They don’t really care about the questions. They have an opinion on just about everything and are always ready to share. That, too, reminds me of home.

Story here.

——————————————————————

Afghan Flag Raised Over Marja After Battling Taliban for 12 Days

Raising of the Afghan Flag Symbolizes a New Beginning in the Town of Marja

By ZOE MAGEE

Feb. 25, 2010

After 12 days of combat, U.S. commanders said today the worst of the fighting is over and as if to prove the point they watched as the new Afghan government raised its flag over the former Taliban stronghold of Marja for the first time in years.

U.S. military commanders were upbeat, bolstered by the high turnout in the center of town to watch the flag raising ceremony and the swearing-in of Abdul Zahir Aryan as the town’s new administrator.

“What you see here is Afghan government getting under way and the hard work really starts from today onwards,” Major Gen. Nick Carter said.

(more…)

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Quotes: Senator Claire McCaskill Joins The ‘I Was Protected By Xe/Blackwater, But I Still Hate Them Club’

     Thanks to Andreea for sending me this information. I love it, but I don’t think this is as good as the Grayson quote.  It’s close, and worthy of mention here on the blog.  I wonder if she even said anything to her PSD team, like a thank you or something? –Matt

—————————————————————–

Claire

 

    Fresh from a trip overseas that took her to Afghanistan and Kuwait, U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill blasted the Blackwater security firm — a private contractor providing protection in U.S. war zones.

     McCaskill acknowledged that, during her trip, she was escorted by Blackwater personnel — but that didn’t stop her from blasting the company, which has come under increased scrutiny for the actions of its hired soldiers.-St. Louis Dispatch

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Industry Talk: DoD Takes Over Afghan Police Training After IG Cites DoS Failures

   Late last year, I brought this story up during the time that DynCorp was protesting the whole deal.  Now it is official that DoD is taking over the project. Which is probably good, because of how much infantry related activities are involved with war time policing. That, and getting the training standardized so that police forces could be more utilitarian.  The standardization process will also allow for more accurate assessments of the program, and more input from folks who are all implementing the same training.  That means a more efficient learning organization, which is good. –Matt

——————————————————————

DoD takes over Afghan Police training after IG cites State Dept. failures

By Lisa M. NovakThursday, February 25, 2010

NAPLES, Italy — The Defense Department is taking over training of the Afghan National Police because State Department-hired trainers failed to keep pace with the growing instability in Afghanistan or address the security needs of the civilian population, according to a joint State and DOD Inspector General report released late last week.

“The ANP training program that is in place does not provide the ANP with the necessary skills to successfully fight the insurgency, and therefore, hampers the ability of DOD to fulfill its role in the emerging national strategy,” according to the report.

The report, initiated by members of the Senate Appropriations Committee last year, said the State Department failed on a number of fronts, mainly in its ability to provide training that adequately reflected the security needs of the country.

A Clinton administration-era directive gave the State Department responsibility for training civilian police forces around the world. Under that directive, the DOD transferred $1.04 billion to the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs to support training programs for the ANP.

(more…)

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Weapons Stuff: The Marines To Use MK 318 MOD 0 Ammo In Afghanistan

   Cool beans.  It’s always interesting to see what new ammo the guys are using out there.  It sounds like this MK 318 round is just a military version of a similar hunting round called the Federal Trophy Bonded Bear Claw, which is great.  I have never shot this round, so I really can’t comment on the thing. I like the 77 gr. Sierra Matchking MK 262 round, just because it is a little heavier for the long distance stuff.  But there is some question as to it’s barrier penetration I guess, and barrier penetration is what the Marines are wanting. What all of these ammunitions have in common is that they all have a hole in the bullet tip as well.

   That little open tip on the bullet continues to cause controversy when it comes to the legality of the ammunition. It was intended to make the bullet more accurate.  The confusion is wether or not this little hole constitutes a ‘hollow point’ or dum dum bullets, which is illegal according to the ‘law of land warfare’. (eyes rolling)  My personal thoughts are that ammunition will cause pain and death, regardless, and this idea of somehow making warfare less horrible or painful is just dumb. I wonder what the Hague has to say about drone strikes? Oh wait, they didn’t have UAV’s a hundred years ago. lol

    Either way, the round ‘has been approved’ for today’s war fighting, and I hope to high hell that it actually translates into more Taliban and Al Qaeda deaths. I still think we should just go to a bigger round for today’s battle rifles, or utilize the 7.62 in Afghanistan. That would make more sense, as opposed to trying to squeeze out every last bit of magical lethality out of a round that is more suited towards varmint hunting. Also, check out this publication called ‘Increasing Small Arms Lethality in Afghanistan: Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer’  here. Pretty interesting. –Matt

—————————————————————–

 

Corps to use more lethal ammo in Afghanistan

By Dan Lamothe

Tuesday Feb 16, 2010

The Marine Corps is dropping its conventional 5.56mm ammunition in Afghanistan in favor of new deadlier, more accurate rifle rounds, and could field them at any time.

The open-tipped rounds until now have been available only to Special Operations Command troops. The first 200,000 5.56mm Special Operations Science and Technology rounds are already downrange with Marine Expeditionary Brigade-Afghanistan, said Brig. Gen. Michael Brogan, commander of Marine Corps Systems Command. Commonly known as “SOST” rounds, they were legally cleared for Marine use by the Pentagon in late January, according to Navy Department documents obtained by Marine Corps Times.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress