Feral Jundi

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Jobs: PSD Security Manager, Afghanistan

   Check it out, and let me know how it goes if you get the job.  I am not the POC or recruiter, so please do not send me a resume or personal information.

     By the way, for those that do not know how the mechanics of this blog works, just hit the highlighted blue sentences or words if you want to see that link or read the rest of the story.

     To read the rest of this post, you need to hit the tab below that is highlighted in blue, that says “Read the rest of this entry »”. I do that so I can fit more FJ stories on this first page, and not burden the reader with just one or two long posts that they may or may not be interested in. Good luck. –Matt

——————————————————————

PSD Security Manager

Job ID: 2009-1996

Location: AF-

Posted Date: 10/6/2009

Category: Security Services – Personal Security Detail

More information about this job:

Overview: RONCO Consulting Corporation is currently accepting resumes from experienced Personnel Security Detail (PSD) Managers. In this role you will be responsible for overall detail performance.

Responsibilities: Key Skill Sets:

•Demonstrated expertise in a post-conflict environment acting in a managerial capacity of Security Guard operations.

(more…)

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Podcasts: John Nagl Interview, NPR, Troop Requirements for Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Podcasts — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 11:39 AM

   Amazing that folks continue to scream about the civilian surge not having enough folks, or not having enough troops for commitments in the war, but you never hear too much about contractors filling that void (which we are, and will do, as per usual).  We are such a crucial element of this war, and have certainly sacrificed and contributed, and it always miffs me that none of the strategists or MSM observers acknowledge that fact.  We are the elephant in the room that no one wants to recognize, and when they do acknowledge us, it’s when a few bad apples screw things up. Thanks.

   Let’s get real on this.  Of course contractors will be the lubrication of any deployments or withdrawals in this war, and I fully expect to see us being used even more as the wars get more complex and taxing. And of course there will continue to be incidents here and there.  The military will continue to have incidents as well, and guess what, that is war and that is the way things are.  The best we can do is to continue to improve, and continue to minimize these incidents that hurt the war effort, and that is it.  It is absolutely unrealistic to say that we can have a ‘zero mistakes’ war, and that applies to the military and contractors.  Either way……

   The question I have is will contractors ever get that acknowledgement for contribution and sacrifice in this war?  Who knows, but you can guarantee I will definitely continue to bring it up and drive that point home to anyone that will listen. It is the least I could do for my fallen comrades, and for an industry that has certainly contributed. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Afghanistan Strains Already-Strapped Army

Date: 10/12/2009

Media: Audio

October 12, 2009 – CNAS President John Nagl spoke with Steve Inskeep of NPR’s Morning Edition about the strain on the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. “The requirement for increased troop strength is doable, but it is going to put additional strain on an army that is already feeling a lot of pain,” said Nagl. “Whatever troop level we increase to in Afghanistan in 2010 we need to be prepated to hold that level for 2-3 three years.”

Podcast here.

——————————————————————

Support Troops Swelling U.S. Force in Afghanistan

Additional Deployments Not Announced and Rarely Noted

By Ann Scott TysonWashington Post Staff WriterTuesday, October 13, 2009

President Obama announced in March that he would be sending 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan. But in an unannounced move, the White House has also authorized — and the Pentagon is deploying — at least 13,000 troops beyond that number, according to defense officials.

The additional troops are primarily support forces, including engineers, medical personnel, intelligence experts and military police. Their deployment has received little mention by officials at the Pentagon and the White House, who have spoken more publicly about the combat troops who have been sent to Afghanistan.

(more…)

Video: The Battle at COP Keating, From Those Who Were There

Filed under: Afghanistan,Military News,Video — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 9:15 AM

Monday, October 12, 2009

Gear Review: Armor and Weapons in the War-The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

Filed under: Afghanistan,Gear Review — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:51 AM

   I think these three stories do a pretty good job of discussing what’s what in the war.  In the second story, there is a article mentioned in the UPI about weight versus mobility, that you can check out as well.  My take away from all of this is that armor is too heavy–duh, and our weapons suck.  The thing to ask, is are we able to catch the Taliban up in the mountains when we hunt him?  And better yet, do our troops have a weapon that will work as advertised when we catch up to these ‘miscreants’. (I love using that word, because that is what the Pakistanis call the Taliban–lol)

   Don’t get me wrong though, because many of these advances in weapons and armor is amazing and they have their place.  But we have to be realistic about what really wins battles up in those mountains, and against mountain people. –Matt

——————————————————————

Captains Journal

A soldier hiking in the hills of the Korengal Valley. 

Weapons failed US troops during Afghan firefight

October 12, 2009

By RICHARD LARDNER

Associated Press Writer

In the chaos of an early morning assault on a remote U.S. outpost in eastern Afghanistan, Staff Sgt. Erich Phillips’ M4 carbine quit firing as militant forces surrounded the base. The machine gun he grabbed after tossing the rifle aside didn’t work either.

When the battle in the small village of Wanat ended, nine U.S. soldiers lay dead and 27 more were wounded. A detailed study of the attack by a military historian found that weapons failed repeatedly at a “critical moment” during the firefight on July 13, 2008, putting the outnumbered American troops at risk of being overrun by nearly 200 insurgents.

Which raises the question: Eight years into the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, do U.S. armed forces have the best guns money can buy?

Despite the military’s insistence that they do, a small but vocal number of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq has complained that the standard-issue M4 rifles need too much maintenance and jam at the worst possible times.

A week ago, eight U.S. troops were killed at a base near Kamdesh, a town near Wanat. There’s no immediate evidence of weapons failures at Kamdesh, but the circumstances were eerily similar to the Wanat battle: insurgents stormed an isolated stronghold manned by American forces stretched thin by the demands of war.

(more…)

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Military News: An Earwitness Account of The Battle at COP Keating

     This was a memo passed on to retired General Barry McCaffery in regards to the recent battle in Nuristan, and Thomas Ricks posted it on his blog over at Foreign Policy.  For me, I read these notes and tried to envision what these guys were up against.  I also read this and tried to understand what the camp defenses were, and how they faired.  From the sound of it, it looks like a lot was riding on Close Air Support (CAS) in the plan. It looked like the enemy knew about how long it took for CAS to show up, and the enemy also knew that if it fought close quarters with us, that CAS could not be used. Pretty basic stuff, when it comes to guerilla warfare type tactics and it sounds like this was the method in this battle.

     Our guys burned up their 7.62 fast, and their Ammo Supply Point was in the hands of the enemy early in the battle.  Not good.  That, and the ANA forces assigned to the COP ran off out of fear.  Not good either. Luckily CAS did show up, and our troops did fight bravely and was able to kill many of the enemy. But luck is nothing to depend upon.

     What gets me on this one, is what would have happened if this assault went down when the weather was crappy?  Which brings me back to my original thought about depending upon CAS in your defensive plan.  If anything, you must have multiple plans that stand the test of the ‘what ifs’.  There should be a plan in place that should account for CAS not being able to show up.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress