Feral Jundi

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Call to Action: The Commission on Wartime Contracting Website

Filed under: Call To Action — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 6:37 PM

    Ok folks, this is a ‘call to action’. If you have had problems with your company in the past, or you have a suggestion on how the government could do something different to make our particular industry more efficient, then these are the guys to send a letter to.  You can send as many comments as you want to this commission, and your imagination is your only limit.  I will also put this in the Pages Section of Feral Jundi, and any time you see something not right with your company, or an idea pops in your head on something that would make contracting more efficient and organized, then head on over to the page.  Let’s let these guys know we exist, and that we care about being a part of the process.  –Matt

—————————————————————– 

Commission on Wartime Contracting

Welcome to the website of the Commission on Wartime Contracting (CWC), an independent, bipartisan legislative commission established to study wartime contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Created in Section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, this eight-member Commission is mandated by Congress to study federal agency contracting for the reconstruction, logistical support of coalition forces, and the performance of security functions, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

(more…)

Afghanistan: Tampa Contractor Killed in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Florida — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 12:22 AM

    Sad deal, and my heart goes out to the friends and family of Santos Cardona.  In this incident, both the handler and dog were killed. I also posted a little story about what this company was actually doing over there, and it sounds like it was  really dangerous work.  Especially if these bomb sniffing dogs and handlers were targeted by the Taliban, and caught by a secondary IED. I do not know if Cardona was working on the contract listed in the second article, but it is significant to point out the nature of his work. –Matt 

——————————————————————– 

Tampa Contractor Killed In Afghanistan

By KATIE CORONADO 

March 4, 2009

“I cried, when I got off the phone; I don’t think I’ve ever sobbed like I did at that moment.”

It has been less than a week since 36-year-old Heather Ashby received the news that her partner of 11 years was killed by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan.

Ashby said Santos Cardona was on a patrol early Saturday morning. There had been many roadside bombs in the past few days, and “they wanted him to go out with his dog. The explosion split the Humvee he was in, and it landed on top of him. He was killed instantly.”

(more…)

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Podcasts: COR Interviews Bill Roggio, Editor of The Long War Journal

 COR Interviews Bill Roggio, Editor of The Long War Journal.

   I thoroughly enjoyed this interview, and Bill is just a wealth of information when it comes to this war.  The Long War Journal is a highly effective ‘new media’ tool in getting the word out about this war and what we are doing right or wrong, and it was a pleasure to hear what Bill had to say.  I hope Bill comes back again.

   Some of the highlights for this show, was a quick down and dirty discussion about what is going on in Pakistan, and how important that conflict is to the rest of the war.  Jake and Bill also discussed this latest attack on the Sri Lanken Cricket Team in Pakistan.  They also discussed the latest appeasement actions of the Pakistani government in the Swat region, and how idiotic that is.

(more…)

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Media News: Tactical Success, Strategic Defeat–A Raid in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Media News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 2:54 AM

   Doug brought this to my attention, and it is a very interesting look at the speed in which the Taliban was able to distribute their propaganda about this raid in Afghanistan.  It really doesn’t matter if the guy was a bad guy or not, the perception was that he was not, and that the raiding party was in the wrong.  Although I am sure if our military media machine was able to pre-plan the media release and information distribution about this raid before the Taliban did, like Doug was telling me, then they could have controlled the message better.  The enemy is able to twist the details, and do whatever they can to make us out to be the bad guys, and that is exactly what they did here.  They could say ‘of course this man had an AK 47 in his hand, there were men that came in the middle of the night, and he had no idea who they were’.  No mention that he was a bomb maker. 

   With that little twist to the details, the Taliban could easily promote a concept that this guy was innocent, and that the Americans are the Russians incarnate. We must do a better job of defeating the Taliban propaganda machine, during raids like this.  And yes, maybe it would have been better to find a different way of nabbing this guy.  Like using the local police, or just sitting the guy out until he moves away from the village.  

   Either way, if we are to do any actions in these villages, we must look at it from their perspective, and from the Taliban’s perspective, and figure the best way to navigate that deal.  The information operations effort must do better than this, to stay ahead of this enemy.  

   I will even take it a step further. The Taliban could easily take a new media approach, and I am sure they have.  As soon as a raid happens, a Taliban info warrior blogs the crap out of it, and gets that info out to their network.  That network puts their slant on it, and keeps expanding the net.  New media has the potential to spread this fast, and spread it amongst a key group of opinion leaders out there in the jihadist networks. And then guess who monitors this kind of stuff?  The anti-war and human rights crew, and the pure gold of Info War for the Taliban, is to get the international community thinking that they have been wronged, or that the ISAF forces are committing the next ‘Mai Lai Massacre’.

   PMC’s and PSC’s need to be aware of the Taliban media machine as well.  They would love to create another Nisour Square situation, and pull start the population hate machine against western security contractors.  Things to think about. –Matt 

——————————————————————- 

Tactical success, strategic defeat

Afghan outrage at U.S. raid highlights challenges facing new military push

By Pamela Constable

The Washington Post

March. 1, 2009

FORWARD OPERATING BASE ALTIMUR, Afghanistan – The U.S. soldiers entered the sleeping village in Logar province in the dead of night on Feb. 20, sure of their target and heavily armed. They surrounded a mud-walled compound, shouting commands, and then kicked down the gate as cries of protest erupted within.

Exactly what happened next is disputed, but shots were fired and a man inside fell dead. Four other men were grabbed and arrested. Then the soldiers departed, leaving the women to calm the frightened children and the rumors to spread in the dark.

By midmorning, hundreds of angry people were blocking the nearby highway, burning tires and shouting “Death to America!” By mid-evening, millions of Afghan TV news viewers were convinced that foreign troops had killed an unarmed man trying to answer his door.

“We are afraid of the Taliban, but we are more afraid of the Americans now,” said Abdul Ghaffar, a truck driver in the raided village. “The foreign forces are killing innocent people. We don’t want them in Afghanistan. If they stay, one day we will stand against them, just like we stood against the Russians.”

(more…)

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Publications: Tell Me Why We’re There? Enduring Interests in Afghanistan (and Pakistan) by Fick, Kilcullen, Nagl, Singh

Filed under: Afghanistan,Pakistan,Publications — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 4:01 PM

   If you care about the direction we are taking in the war, then I highly recommend reading this report.  The authors should give you a clue as to how important this thing is. If President Obama was smart, he would read this report as well, and not have some staffer spoon feed it to him. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Tell Me Why We’re There? Enduring Interests in Afghanistan (and Pakistan)Publication Type: Policy Brief

Publication Date: 01/22/2009

Author(s): Nathaniel C. Fick, David Kilcullen, John A. Nagl, Vikram J. Singh 

January 2009 – In 2009, the Obama administration will attempt to deliver on campaign promises to change the Afghan war’s trajectory. In April, the Strasbourg NATO summit will determine the alliance’s role in shaping the future of the country and the region. By the fall, Afghans will have voted for their president for only the second time since 2001, an event which may irrevocably set the country’s course. By the end of this summer’s fighting season, the war in Afghanistan will not yet be won, but it could well be lost.

After seven years and the deaths of more than a thousand American and coalition troops, there is still no consensus on whether the future of Afghanistan matters to the United States and Europe, or on what can realistically be achieved there. Afghanistan does matter. A stable Afghanistan is necessary to defeat Al Qaeda and to further stability in South and Central Asia. Understanding the war in Afghanistan, maintaining domestic and international support for it, and prosecuting it well requires three things: a clear articulation of U.S. interests in Afghanistan, a concise definition of what the coalition seeks to achieve there, and a detailed strategy to guide the effort.

U.S. interests in Afghanistan may be summarized as “two no’s”: there must be no sanctuary for terrorists with global reach in Afghanistan, and there must be no broader regional meltdown. Securing these objectives requires helping the Afghans to build a sustainable system of governance that can adequately ensure security for the Afghan people—the “yes” upon which a successful exit strategy depends.

Read the Rest of the Paper Here

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress