Feral Jundi

Monday, June 4, 2012

Syria: DIY Armored Trucks–The T-HOMS75

Filed under: DIY,Syria — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Matt @ 2:56 AM

Now this thing is an interesting creation and I will tell you why. It is wedge shaped, which indicates to me that it could be used for barrier busting. Like knocking down sandbags/walls and getting in some quick shots with the mounted DShK. Then they pull away so they can reload and maybe attack from another point.

The wedge shape is also great for deflecting incoming small arms fire, or maybe even some cannon fire from the front. So on the streets of Homs where every inch of territory is being fought over with a vengeance, something like this was probably purpose built to deal with an issue the rebels identified.

Another cool use for such a vehicle is creating mouse holes in walls. So if you are able to punch a hole in a wall, then your assault team can run into those breaches and either make an escape or obtain a tactical advantage in a fight. They can also rescue downed rebels in a fight if they had to.

Who knows, but it definitely looks like they are taking some notes from the Libyans in their war and the Narco Tanks in Mexico. They probably checked out all of the ‘Mad Max’ designs back in the day in Iraq as well.  Interesting DIY Armor and if anyone has anything to add about this vehicle, I would be interested to hear what you got. –Matt

 

 

….Something much weird of the anti-aircraft pick up was recently spotted in Homs, Syria. It’s a sort-of improvised Suzuki pickup converted into armored vehicle capable to open its way through barriers and sand bags, equipped with a Doshka machine gun.

Dubbed T-HOMS75 by the Zaman Al Wasl reporter that took the first pictures of it, the vehicle is operated by a crew three people (driver, gunner and assistant): the gunner stands behind the drivers cabin with the gun placed on top of it.

It is capable of a maximum speed of 80 km/h (due to the added weight) and gives protection against light and medium machine guns, allowing to move in places guarded by snipers.

From the Aviationist.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Technology: Boron Nanowires Could Turn T-shirts Into Body Armor

   How cool would that be?  Not to mention the reduction for the soldier’s load or a reduction in the amount of medical claims for back problems do to wearing heavy armor. I like this kind of science and keep it up guys. –Matt

——————————————————————

Boron nanowires could turn T-shirts into body armor

April 6, 2010

(Nanowerk News) A simple cotton T-shirt may one day be converted into tougher, more comfortable body armor for soldiers or police officers.

Researchers at the University of South Carolina, collaborating with others from China and Switzerland, drastically increased the toughness of a T-shirt by combining the carbon in the shirt’s cotton with boron – the third hardest material on earth. The result is a lightweight shirt reinforced with boron carbide, the same material used to protect tanks.

Dr. Xiaodong Li, USC College of Engineering and Computing Distinguished Professor in Mechanical Engineering, co-authored the recent article on the research in the journal, Advanced Materials.

“USC is playing a leading role in this area. This is a true breakthrough,” Li said, calling the research “a conceptual change in fabricating lightweight, fuel-efficient, super-strong and ultra-tough materials. This groundbreaking new study opens up unprecedented opportunities.”

The scientists started with plain, white T-shirts that were cut into thin strips and dipped into a boron solution. The strips were later removed from the solution and heated in an oven. The heat changes the cotton fibers into carbon fibers, which react with the boron solution and produce boron carbide.

The result is a fabric that’s lightweight but tougher and stiffer than the original T-shirt, yet flexible enough that it can be bent, said Li, who led the group from USC. That flexibility is an improvement over the heavy boron-carbide plates used in bulletproof vests and body armor.

(more…)

Monday, October 12, 2009

Gear Review: Armor and Weapons in the War-The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

Filed under: Afghanistan,Gear Review — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:51 AM

   I think these three stories do a pretty good job of discussing what’s what in the war.  In the second story, there is a article mentioned in the UPI about weight versus mobility, that you can check out as well.  My take away from all of this is that armor is too heavy–duh, and our weapons suck.  The thing to ask, is are we able to catch the Taliban up in the mountains when we hunt him?  And better yet, do our troops have a weapon that will work as advertised when we catch up to these ‘miscreants’. (I love using that word, because that is what the Pakistanis call the Taliban–lol)

   Don’t get me wrong though, because many of these advances in weapons and armor is amazing and they have their place.  But we have to be realistic about what really wins battles up in those mountains, and against mountain people. –Matt

——————————————————————

Captains Journal

A soldier hiking in the hills of the Korengal Valley. 

Weapons failed US troops during Afghan firefight

October 12, 2009

By RICHARD LARDNER

Associated Press Writer

In the chaos of an early morning assault on a remote U.S. outpost in eastern Afghanistan, Staff Sgt. Erich Phillips’ M4 carbine quit firing as militant forces surrounded the base. The machine gun he grabbed after tossing the rifle aside didn’t work either.

When the battle in the small village of Wanat ended, nine U.S. soldiers lay dead and 27 more were wounded. A detailed study of the attack by a military historian found that weapons failed repeatedly at a “critical moment” during the firefight on July 13, 2008, putting the outnumbered American troops at risk of being overrun by nearly 200 insurgents.

Which raises the question: Eight years into the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, do U.S. armed forces have the best guns money can buy?

Despite the military’s insistence that they do, a small but vocal number of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq has complained that the standard-issue M4 rifles need too much maintenance and jam at the worst possible times.

A week ago, eight U.S. troops were killed at a base near Kamdesh, a town near Wanat. There’s no immediate evidence of weapons failures at Kamdesh, but the circumstances were eerily similar to the Wanat battle: insurgents stormed an isolated stronghold manned by American forces stretched thin by the demands of war.

(more…)

Monday, December 22, 2008

Gear Review: The New PRU-70 Aircrew Vest with Halo-Tech Fire Resistant Material

Filed under: Gear Review — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:57 PM

     Merry Christmas to the Navy and Marine Aircrews that have to wear this vest.  If it is lighter than the old vest, and more comfortable, then I am all for it.  I also like the fact that it is made of Halo-Tech Fire Resistant material.  If this material actually delivers in durability, we will see it in everything.  

    Using fire resistant clothing and equipment is a great direction for us to take.  The only down side to focusing so much on FR based clothing and equipment, is the quality of those items.  Do we lose warmth, gain weight, lose durability, drive up cost or limit mobility when we go to these materials?  I hope not, and private industry can do a lot for us if we give them the proper direction of what we want.  

     I do not think we will see this vest for sale in the civilian market any time soon, but the design looks pretty basic.  I think the only thing that makes it different than most is the use of Halo-Tech.  We’ll see if this starts a trend with the other companies that make vests, and Halo-Tech might be the next big thing in equipment design.  –Matt

——————————————————————- 

The PRU-70/P22P-18 (V) Armored Survival Vest (ASV).

Press Release Number:  EAIR10200812181  18-Dec-08

NAVAIR develops new Aircrew Armored Survival Vest

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, Patuxent River, MD. – NAVAIR’s Human Systems Division, working under the Aircrew Systems program office Life Support Systems Fleet Support Team, has developed a new aircrew armored survival vest for helicopter and non-fighter aircraft aircrew.

The new system, designated the PRU-70/P22P-18 (V) Armored Survival Vest (ASV), will be fielded in three sizes and replace the current PRU-60B system that is available in only a “two sizes fits all” configuration.

“The development of this new vest is a direct result of working with and listening to our warfighters,” said Martin Ahmad, Aircrew Systems program manager, PMA202. “This new vest could not have been developed without the involvement of the Fleet and our joint engineering/aircrew systems team.”

(more…)

Monday, November 17, 2008

Gear Review: The SOHPC by Paraclete

Filed under: Gear Review — Tags: , — Matt @ 12:40 PM

 

    Cool armor set up.  I do not own the SOHPC, but I have been hearing some good reviews about this thing.  Paraclete has always been a name associated with quality, and these guys make some good stuff.  Personally I own a CIRAS by Eagle Industries, but there are no side plates on the thing, nor are there pockets for side plates.  With today’s armor carriers, you should try to get stuff that at least has built in pockets for side plates.  Of course you can always get the plates with MOLLE on them, and just attach it to your carrier, but that is kind of ‘hoopty’ to me.  

   The way I use armor is I make it part of a layering system.  I wear a over vest or harness over the top of my armor, and so the lowest profile armor carriers are what I look for.  My CIRAS is a little bulky, but extremely well built.  My next purchase would be something a little more lightweight, more low profile, and has side plate capability–like the SOHPC.  I also like the PACA low profile soft armor carrier with plate pockets. Oh, and I want something that will not fight my arms, when I tuck in to hold my rifle.  I do not have a wide chest area, and armor carriers always get in the way of shooting for me.  Also, I like a shoulder pocket that is conducive towards shooting.  Some vests are better than others in this department. 

   My layering system works great, if you wear a pistol on your belt.  That way, if you take your vest/patrol harness off, you still have a weapon and you still have armor.  I mention this because at some FOBs and remote camps, you might want to wear your vest as much as you can, but not necessarily your full combat load.  Or even at the bigger bases, if they were attacked consistently with rockets/mortars, the base commanders would give the order that everyone is to wear their body armor.  That means you are are wearing your vest at the chow hall.

    For security contracting, good body armor is priceless.  I highly suggest you buy your own, and invest in quality when you do so.  Do not depend on these companies to provide you with quality stuff, because most do not.  Same thing with helmets.  For my helmet, I have really tweaked it out with some quality comfort items to make that thing ride like a Cadillac on my head. (right…it still sucks to wear-LOL)  

   Oh, and one more thing.  Don’t just buy this stuff out of the blue, without talking to a sales rep.  The sizing of this stuff is very finicky.  Large and Medium and Small are all different with these companies.  If you ask these guys about how to size for your body, they will totally help you.  If anything, go just a bit smaller than what you would think.  My rule of thumb for armor, is if I sit in a vehicle for 12 hours straight, will the plates and armor rest on my legs and annoy the shit out of me, or is it set up just right so it doesn’t pinch on my legs.  

     For me, I bought a Medium sized CIRAS, just for that reason.  It fit perfect, and it totally worked out to barely miss my legs while sitting.  Plus the thing is adjustable so I can get it off my legs.  But if you get a vest that swims on you, your adjustments won’t do much. I learned this the hard way with an oversized TA 50.  Like I said, talk it up first with the sales rep.  Also, do your research on the forums, like www.lightfighter.net . –Head Jundi 

SOHPC

 

Special Operations Hard Plate Carrier by Paraclete

Product Information

Hard plate carrier with next generation side closure includes integral soft armor side protection and easy-to-position side plates.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress