“We expect to see additional security on U.S.-flagged vessels that transit these waters,” said Watson, the Coast Guard’s director of prevention policy.
“It can involve the use of firearms,” he said, but added, “We are looking for things that work but that don’t make the situation worse.”
Thanks to Matt for sending me this one, and this is certainly significant. I have one issue here, that I hope is looked at from a very common sense point of view. If the Coast Guard is going to suggest that firearms are ok, then things are going to get ‘worse’. That is what happens in an exchange of gunfire–things get worse, and then hopefully they get better because your force is more violent and accurate and the will of the enemy is stomped. It is about the rule of force and cost benefit analysis, and that is all a pirate will really understand.
So if we know that the pirates use AK 47’s, PKM’s, and RPG’s, then I certainly hope that the Coast Guard will be recommending weaponry and tactics that will trump this lethal combination of weapons. Allowing just pistols, is not acceptable, and you want to give the security forces on these boats the best shot at survival, and for the defense of the boat. Please….. please….. pretty please, keep that in mind when reviewing the security plans of these ships. Anything else, and you are setting up these security forces and ships for failure. We have drawn blood with the last incident, the pirates have made their intentions known about American vessels, and now is not the time to get soft or play around. The pirates are probably going to default to more extreme violence if they come across a American vessel, or not. Either way, any meeting between the pirates and these ships must end with the pirates saying, this is not worth the risk.
Also, this will initiate what I believe to be a ripple effect within the rest of the shipping industry and their view on security. Once American ships become too problematic to attack, the pirates will simply go after the unarmed ships. They will start picking out flags that they think are easy pickings, and they will really depend upon their intelligence networks at the ports and harbors to make that process more efficient. In essence, once America goes towards the armed security realm, others should be wise to follow or become victims of these sea thugs.
Finally, I want to go back to what I have talked about in the past about security on these boats. The security contracting industry has a real opportunity to save the day here. Now is the time to apply some Jundism to this thing called contract maritime security, and do good things out there. –Matt
——————————————————————
U.S. ships must post guards if sailing off Somalia
By Jane Sutton Jane Sutton
Tue May 12, 2009
FORT LAUDERDALE, Florida (Reuters) – The U.S. Coast Guard will require U.S.-flagged ships sailing around the Horn of Africa to post guards and ship owners to submit anti-piracy security plans for approval, a Coast Guard official said on Tuesday.
The new requirements, which respond to a surge of piracy off the coast of Somalia, allow ship owners to decide whether to use armed or unarmed guards, Coast Guard Rear Admiral James Watson told shipping industry representatives at a maritime security meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
The revised Maritime Security Directive, highly anticipated by the shipping industry, was signed on Monday by Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen.