Feral Jundi

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Maritime Security: Congressman’s Plan to Fend Off Pirates

Filed under: Maritime Security — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:52 PM

 “a free-market solution to make the high seas safer for cargo ships.”

   This should be the theme of Feral Jundi, although I would rework it to apply to the big three–piracy, drugs, and terrorism.  I really like this idea, and it is an ‘out of the box/building snowmobiles’ solution that has actually been implemented in the past with great success. Applying a free market solution to not just make the seas safer, but the world safer, is the kind of concept that could be a game changer in these endless wars we are fighting.  

   The other point I wanted to make, is nothing else seems to be working that great in the war on drugs, terror, or piracy. Why not try it out, and really give it a go?  Wars are extremely expensive, and the Letter of Marque might be the solution to actually save some money.  Things to think about, as these wars drag on. –Matt 

Edit:  Watch Ron Paul’s Youtube Talk about the Subject Here 

—————————————————————— 

Ron Paul’s plan to fend off pirates

By: Erika Lovley

April 15, 2009 04:16 AM EST

A little-known congressional power could help the federal government keep the Somali pirates in check — and possibly do it for a discount price.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and a growing number of national security experts are calling on Congress to consider using letters of marque and reprisal, a power written into the Constitution that allows the United States to hire private citizens to keep international waters safe.

Used heavily during the Revolution and the War of 1812, letters of marque serve as official warrants from the government, allowing privateers to seize or destroy enemies, their loot and their vessels in exchange for bounty money.

The letters also require would-be thrill seekers to post a bond promising to abide by international rules of war.

In a YouTube video earlier this week, Paul suggested lawmakers consider issuing letters, which could relieve American naval ships from being the nation’s primary pirate responders — a free-market solution to make the high seas safer for cargo ships.

(more…)

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Afghanistan: Military Hangs ‘Help Wanted’ Sign in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 7:37 PM

   I wanted to point out a couple of things that bother me about today’s articles about contractors.  I read a lot of them, and there is a definite model of article that all of these journalists are following–or so it seems.  For example, it is rare that a journalist forgets to mention something about Blackwater (Xe), any time they want to talk about anything relating to contractors.  The story could be about contractors handing out shower shoes to poor Iraqi families, and the reporter will throw in the standard story about Blackwater killing 13 civilians in cold blood…. (ad nauseam)   

     Ok, we get it.  We know that story already, and it is like beating a dead horse every time these guys do that. It would be like mentioning the Haditha incident, every time there was a story about the military–good or bad.  But it seems like the media is really hung up on doing it with our industry, as if they are like zombies, filling in the blanks on some contractor related report software.  Shower shoes…check.  Iraq…check. Contractor does this (fill in the blank). check.  Blackwater killed 13 civilians…check.  And now you have an article!  Pffft.

   The other one I wanted to hit on, is when is it journalistic, to write as a source ‘in recent online postings’?  I am a blogger, and even I take the time to point out the link to where I got the info from.  For this article, I have a wonderful little link down below, just so people know where this came from.  But ANNE FLAHERTY has felt that being vague with her source was acceptable.  Did she get it from a blog, a forum, or what?  Was it FedBizOp?(that would be my guess, but who knows?).  Either way Anne, if you are reading this, guys like me and Jake and the rest of the crew, like knowing where you got your info from.  Not because of credit reasons, but because if you have found some jobs for our industry, we would like to know about it so we can tell our community.  That’s all.  

   With that said, I will assume she has probably been cruising the same jaunts that our crew has been cruising for info, and what she has said is not that new to us.  I did want to post this as a flag though, that Afghanistan is picking up for contracts and now the media is catching on.  I have posted several gigs lately, to include that Cohort deal.  And Anne did mention a few things that I totally agree with and wish that the government would work on. So not all is lost with this article. lol  

   Let’s try this.  Iraq could be viewed as a big testing site for the proof of concept called security contracting.  And right now, there are plenty of resources, organizations, papers, subject matter experts, legal experts, laws and attention on the subject, to really formulate a solid plan on how to use us properly out there.  It just means getting off of your ass, and doing what you have to do to make it happen.(this is totally directed at the Obama Administration and Congress right now)  You guys are the leaders and this is your ship.  Afghanistan is something we need to get serious with, and by not dealing with these issues is dangerous.  If you do not, I guarantee that we will have another Blackwater type incident, and another company will be skylined as the flagship of all that is bad with the war in Afghanistan, and we will be set back even further in this fight.  You know the Taliban will do all they can to set it up, and take advantage.  

     The industry begs you to do something about this, so we can be more effective in this war effort.   Einstein had a great quote for leaders or anyone that does not learn from past mistakes. “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” –Matt

—————————————————————– 

 Military hangs `Help Wanted’ sign in Afghanistan

By ANNE FLAHERTY 

March 21, 2009

WASHINGTON (AP) — The military buildup in Afghanistan is stoking a surge of private security contractors despite a string of deadly shootings in Iraq in recent years that has called into question the government’s ability to manage the guns for hire.

In recent online postings, the military has asked private security companies to protect traveling convoys and guard U.S. bases in troubled southern provinces such as Helmand and Kandahar. And if truckers hired to transport fuel for the military want protection, they can hire their own armed guards, the military says.

The Bush administration expanded the use of such companies with the onset of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because it can save the military time and money. But the practice lost much of its appeal with Congress after September 2007, when five guards with what was then called Blackwater Worldwide (the company recently changed its name to Xe) opened fire in a crowded Baghdad square and killed 17 Iraqis.

Those killings followed a 2006 incident in which a drunken Blackwater employee fatally shot an Iraqi politician’s bodyguard.

(more…)

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Industry Talk: Congress Looks to Clean Up Contractors, But What About Themselves?

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , — Matt @ 4:33 PM

     Hey, I am all for trying to clean up this industry.  I really am, and much of my research goes towards bettering my little niche of an industry.  

    But when will Webb, McCaskill, Waxman and company take a critical look at the way the government manages these contracts?  I will admit poor leadership in my industry, but when will they admit that the government has done a terrible job in managing these contracts and applying quality control?  

    To me, this is like saying ‘hey, build my house, and I am going to go to Mexico for a year, and when I get back that thing better be perfect’.  I would never dream of building a house like that, and of course there would be problems if you are not actively involved with the process, or have someone you trust watching over the process. The government leadership involved in managing us, must also be questioned and held to some accountability too.  

   And what is government leadership?  Figure out what you want us to do, hash out all the loose ends and legalities, call us when you need us, and actually apply quality control and management over the whole thing.  If you need more oversight manpower, then hire more federal managers to do so.  It’s as if there is this moral disengagement in government, and you just don’t want to admit fault or deal with a problem that could lead to deaths.  I say deaths, because this is a war, and people have died because of poor government contracting practices.  

   When someone gets electrocuted in a shower, that was built by a contractor that cut corners, whose fault is that?  Is it the government’s fault for not insuring that shower was built to a standard, or was it that contractor’s fault for building it as cheaply as possible so the government could save money and that company could actually make money?  Like I said, the government has been absent in the ‘caring department’, and there have been victims do to that moral disengagement.

   Now I am not calling for micro-management, I am just calling for the government to get involved with the contracts, and apply quality control. The government would also be ill served to try to stymie the power of a free market with these companies as well.  The best they can do, is make sure all the companies are playing by the same set of rules, and the contracts are managed fairly and consistently.  

     Profit making is also a part of what makes business thrive, so I don’t really understand the logic of demonizing this concept.  Every businessman starts a company, with the idea of making money and succeeding.  To take that away, takes away the one force that drives business to be the best.  That’s unless government want’s business to be more like them?  But that is a whole different topic….. 

     We have stepped up and answered the call when this country reached out during their time of need. We provided a service, and some companies did better than others in that endeavor.  I admit we have our problems, but with the war and disasters like Katrina, we stepped up and did a service that the government could not provide on it’s own.  The least the government could do is care enough to make sure the job is done right, at the time it is being done, as opposed to dealing with a poorly built house when they come back from Mexico. Just my two cents on the whole deal. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

 

Congress looks to clean up contractors

By: Jen DiMascio

February 12, 2009 04:51 AM EST

Defense contractors blamed for waste, fraud and abuse — and even for some civilian casualties in Iraq — are now facing a new Congress intent on cleaning up the mess.

The contractors are contrite about their mistakes, making the case that not all of them are created evil.

“We have millions of transactions every year that work,” said Alan Chvotkin, a senior vice president for the Professional Services Council, a contractors trade group. But missteps by KBR, Blackwater USA and Hurricane Katrina contractors stand out, he said.

“We’re colored by the failures,” he said.

Congress already is engaging on the issue.

The bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting, pushed into law by Democratic Sens. Jim Webb of Virginia and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, recently held its first hearing. And the Senate Homeland Security Committee has launched an ad hoc subcommittee on contracting oversight, under the direction of McCaskill, a former state auditor who has made contracting accountability one of her trademark issues.

(more…)

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress