Yet again, how come this does not surprise me? The one part that really stands out about this report, is the fact that they only had one contracting officer to monitor over a billion dollars worth of invoices. I am no expert on contracting officers, but it would seem to me that using just one guy to monitor all of that, is setting this up for failure. And seeing how this is government, I know there are manuals and studies that discuss the proper way to do this. Even so, commonsense would dictate that maybe, just maybe, State should have put some more folks in that department to help out.
It gets better though, because then the new kids on the block who are running DoS, have decided that ‘three’ contracting officers is sufficient to monitor these contracts. Oh, and they lack guidance, which is even more indicative of what is really going on. It takes leadership to make this stuff happen, and if you guys placed good leaders in those offices, increased the benefits and pay for the contracting officer positions, insure everyone has good guidance and training for the task, and properly fund the contracting office at State, you might actually get some good accountability out of the whole deal. State must do a better job about overseeing how tax payer’s money is spent. Anything else is unacceptable.
By the way, David Isenberg has a good article about this latest report here. –Matt
—————————————————————–
Audit hits State on failures to monitor Iraq work
January 25, 2010
By RICHARD LARDNER
WASHINGTON (AP) – For nearly $4.5 million a year, the State Department in June assigned a 16-person security detail to protect six U.S. contractors in Iraq who already had a team of hired guards they didn’t really need.
The expensive miscue is one of many described in an audit issued Monday of a $2.5 billion State Department contract with DynCorp International for training Iraq’s police force.
The department repeatedly failed to oversee the contract properly, according to the audit by the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction. The findings also suggest the department remains ill-equipped to watch over the vast amount of U.S. money flowing into Afghanistan.
“I think they need to act quickly to remedy this long-standing concern,” the special inspector general, Stuart Bowen, said about the State Department’s shortage of people and resources to oversee work done by the private sector.
In comments included in the report, Assistant Secretary of State David Johnson disputed the audit’s central conclusion that weak oversight made the $2.5 billion vulnerable to waste and fraud. Johnson said payments are only made to a contractor after the invoices have been carefully checked.
But the report challenges that assertion.