Monday, November 1, 2010
Publications: Journal Of International Peace Operations, November-December 2010
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Industry Talk: International Stability Operations Association–IPOA’s New Name
Interesting change here. Also, ISOA has some exciting stuff coming up in the near future in regards to the Code of Conduct. But like the UN Global Compact, what will be the legal mechanisms or disciplinary mechanisms that will insure it has teeth and everyone abides by it? How does it interact with SOFAs, and the various constitutions and legal mechanisms throughout the world?
The proof of concept to me is what would happen to a contract guard or even employee of a company, if they committed a crime in a war zone of another country? How that code of conduct addresses this type of circumstance, as well as the other complex circumstances we have come up over the last nine or so years, is what I am interested in.
It is also important to address what the disciplinary measures will be when companies–both contracted and sub-contracted, do ‘bad things’ under that contract? These are the kinds of things that must be addressed if we want others to respect the effort. That respect could also translate into increased legitimacy and even increased business throughout the world, just because those who contract our services would know that there is such a process of control, legal accountability and regulation. –Matt
International Stability Operations Association: IPOA’s New Name
Oct. 25 , 2010
The association that represents the stability operations industry, formerly called IPOA, is now the International Stability Operations Association (ISOA). The new name and logo are designed to better reflect the broad industry that provides vital services and support to the international community in conflict, post-conflict and disaster relief operations.
“From the beginning, our goal has been to make international stability operations more successful by increasing accountability, ethics and standards within the industry,” said ISOA’s President, Doug Brooks. “For almost ten years we have grown as the ethical core of a unique and valuable international resource. Our new name reflects that evolution as an association and as an industry, and positions us for the future.”
Monday, August 30, 2010
Industry Talk: PSC’s And Their Customers Make Contingency Plans In Afghanistan
Here are some of the commentaries being made by some of our coalition members and companies tasked with vital protection duties over in Afghanistan. There are four stories posted, with some commentary in one from Andy Bearpark of BAPSC and an interview that Doug Brooks of the IPOA did awhile back. Maybe we can collect some more commentary from some industry leaders, CEO’s, or even some customers? Until then, I will continue to fill the information void as best as I can. –Matt
Edit: 09/01/2010 – It looks like Blue Hackle’s license has just been revoked. Check it out here.
UK private security fears in Afghanistan
Garda scrabbles to stay in Afghanistan
Canadian Forces to review nine private security contracts on Afghan ban
Karzai’s Call to Expel Contractors Poses Big Logistical Hurdles
—————————————————————–
UK private security fears in Afghanistan
By Peter Jackson
17 August 2010
Private security guards are widely used to guard compounds and convoys
As UK private security contractors are given four months to stand down in Afghanistan, security experts have warned the consequences could be dire.
President Hamid Karzai’s decision to scrap the extensive private security industry operating in his country will come as no real surprise.
He vowed to curb its operations when he was sworn in as president last year, and has made no secret of the fact that he considers it a major source of instability.
But ask the British elements of the industry what effect the move may have, and warnings are quickly sounded.
They say commercial reconstruction projects would be at risk of delay – and workers of attack – as the exodus leaves them dangerously exposed.
Afghan police are simply not up to scratch when it comes to guarding foreign staff, they argue, and that could leave embassies and Nato supply convoys and bases vulnerable.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Industry Talk: Stability Operations Industry–Opportunity And Risk, By Bullet Proof Blog
I liked this article, and it is a concept that all of the companies need to really wrap their heads around in today’s times. It is all about crisis communication, and it sounds like Mr. Levick is the guy to talk to about doing this kind of thing. What is cool is that he has plenty of contractor history to learn from and he is also reaching out to individuals in the industry like Doug to get a feel for what’s what.
This article also goes well with the interview Mr. Levick did with Doug Brooks, so I recommend watching that if you can.
Now something I would like to hear from the author is how he would have dealt with the Nisour Square incident differently than how BW and State dealt with it back then? Most of all, how would his firm handle the crisis management for such an incident if it happened again in the near future? He briefly touched on this contractor army that DoS plans on using in Iraq, but I would have liked to hear some details on how a true crisis management expert would handle the complexities of this industry’s incidents that tend to get so much attention. We need all the help we can get, because no easy solutions have materialized and companies are still getting sucked into crisis that not only embarrasses them, but embarrasses their clients as well. These incidents also negatively impact the war effort, and it is certainly important for companies to not cause that kind of harm.
As to an example of current crisis communication, DynCorp actually sent me a company release about the auto accident in Kabul. But because of the speed of information spread in Kabul and online, and how the negative aspects of the news spread, I just don’t know how you can stop the impact of such a thing? Or maybe DynCorp did all they could and this was the way to do it? They certainly responded quickly online to those of us trying to cover this stuff, and at least attempted to fill any information gaps that biased media or even the enemy was trying to fill with their own versions of the story. I wonder how he would rate DynCorp’s crisis management and communications, both in Kabul and online? How would you guys rate it? Interesting stuff. –Matt
—————————————————————–
Stability Operations Industry: Opportunity and Risk
Richard Levick
August 18, 2010
For one not uncontroversial sector of the defense industry, President Obama’s recent reaffirmation of a timetable for Iraqi troop withdrawal means new business opportunity, accompanied by heightened scrutiny — and predictably severe penalties for failure to comply with professionally, as well as politically, dictated operational standards.
The industry in question is called “stability operations,” a broad term that denotes activities by private contractors to support military, peacekeeping missions and disaster relief. To ensure safe and secure environments outside the United States, their multifarious deliverables include protecting vital infrastructure, training indigenous military and non-military forces, responding to emergencies, body-guarding key personnel, overseeing project logistics, assuring medical provisions, demining hazard zones — and so forth.
During the Iraq War, unwanted attention fell on a few such companies amid allegations of fraud and abuse. Now that the West’s role in the war is largely ending, and the role of the industry in Iraq will grow apace, those past mishaps are going to have a strong continuing influence on public perception. Fairly or not, the bigger the future role of the contractors, the more mistrust they can expect to engender.