Feral Jundi

Friday, November 4, 2011

Industry Talk: Erinys Talks About Picking Private Security In Iraq

In relation to the cost of security, there is an old saying: “if you have a five dollar head, then wear a five dollar helmet” – in other words, if you value what you have you are willing to pay to protect it.

This is cool. Erinys did a lot of great work in Iraq back in the day, and they will no doubt continue to be involved with oil security in Iraq now and into the future. So it is great to hear them talk about what they think is important for picking a PSC for operations in Iraq.

What I really liked though was the quote up top. I will have to use that one in the future, and it is just another way of emphasizing what happens when you go cheap. Especially in Iraq, and especially as the troops leave and oil security forces continue to face an active insurgency. –Matt

 

Picking private security in Iraq
November 3rd, 2011
Oil companies in Iraq still need to factor in a security cost overhead as part of doing business in the country in order to protect their people and assets. John McCaffery, Managing Director of British private security firm Erinys, gives his guide to choosing the right provider.
The securing of personnel and assets is a complex amalgam of procedural, technical and physical methods that establishes layered security “architecture” with multiple zones.
If one considers the client and a project as the core of an onion then layers of skin that surround the core would represent the security “zones” that protect the client.
In relation to the cost of security, there is an old saying: “if you have a five dollar head, then wear a five dollar helmet” – in other words, if you value what you have you are willing to pay to protect it.
As such it is important to note that the provision of a professional security architecture is expensive anywhere in the world. ?In Iraq though it is more so, given the cost of shipping in equipment and the labour rates of professional security personnel. This is compounded by the need to train and equip local personnel and the extremely challenging regulatory environment in which international PSC’s are required to operate.

(more…)

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Afghanistan: PSC News–IDG Security Saves The Day In Attack On UN Compound, Herat

     “In total four attackers have been killed. One detonated his explosives-packed vehicle at the gate, a second attacker was shot and killed outside the compound, and two other attackers have been shot and killed inside the compound,” he said.

     The interior ministry said three security guards contracted by the UN were injured in the attack.

     UN officials in Kabul and Herat confirmed the attack and that there were no deaths or injuries among UN staff, who had taken refuge in a safe bunker. –AFP

*****

     This is cool. Lately I have been trying to get a hold of someone with the UN to talk about this attack and who was involved in the defense. I did and low and behold, a PSC called IDG Security was involved in the defense of this compound. What is significant about this is that the UN is using PSC’s in Afghanistan and they are saving lives, contrary to what Karzai or the media might have you believe.

     IDG Security is a Nepalese staffed company, composed of former Gurkha and former British officers. Erinys also merged with IDG Security last year and so technically, kudos go to Erinys and their staff as well.

     The other point to bring up is that this attack is an exact repeat of prior suicide assaulter type attacks in the past. Although in this case, the suicide assaulters were wearing burqas and pretending to be women. Thanks to the quick thinking of the defenders and effective defenses of the compound, these are now dead suicide assaulters! Do you think the assaulter’s last thoughts as they passed were ‘damn, I was just killed wearing a burqa’? lol

     Bravo to IDG Security, and bravo to the UN for using a competent PSC for the defense. –Matt

——————————————————————

Taliban launch attack on U.N. compound in western Afghanistan

By Joshua PartlowSunday, October 24, 2010

KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN – The Taliban launched a midday assault on the United Nations headquarters in western Afghanistan on Saturday, crashing a car bomb into a compound gate to create an opening for suicide bombers disguised as women, according to U.N. and Afghan officials.

The attack was a startling reminder of the Taliban’s readiness to strike at the symbols of foreign presence in Afghanistan, in this case a heavily fortified facility in the relatively peaceful city of Herat, near the Iranian border. Although two Afghan policemen were injured, the attack largely failed, as U.N. guards and Afghan security forces were able to kill the insurgents. No U.N. personnel were hurt.

A thinned-out weekend staff was manning the U.N. offices when the attackers launched rocket-propelled grenades at the compound just before noon and rammed a car bomb into the back gate, U.S. and Afghan officials said. At least three other insurgents, each hiding a suicide vest under a burqa, the head-to-toe cloak worn by many Afghan women, managed to get through the gate before being killed by either guards or police, the officials said.

“This is quite significant,” one U.N. official said. “There was no such direct attack here, as far as I know, for a long time.”

It was the most serious attack on a U.N. facility since October 2009, when insurgents stormed a U.N. guesthouse in Kabul and killed several members of the foreign staff there, prompting the mission to evacuate many employees, change housing arrangements and bolster security.

After Saturday’s violence, the U.N. staff plans to relocate until its offices can be repaired and fortified but said operations in Herat will be unaffected.

“The United Nations will continue to maintain its presence and programs in Herat for the benefit of the population in need and in support of the Afghan authorities,” the mission said in a statement.

(more…)

Powered by WordPress