Feral Jundi

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Law Enforcement: Unease As Security Groups Take Police Roles in the UK

   You guys will get used to it.  This is more indication of governments and law enforcement hemming and hawing about the monopoly on the application of the use of force.  I think there is plenty of room on the stage for private industry and the state to share.

    If anything, I think folks are just worried about competition, and that is what really drives these other conversations about ‘pushing the boundaries’ or whatever. It would be like the US Postal Service freaking out about Fedex or UPS, two private shipping companies who directly compete with the US government services.  There is plenty of work for everyone, and both sides are still in existence. Both sides have their place, and likewise for the private security industry and law enforcement. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Unease as security groups take police roles

By James Boxell

December 14 2009

Private security companies have started “pushing the boundaries” of frontline law enforcement and are becoming involved in highly charged areas such as the policing of protests, the Financial Times has learnt.

G4S, the FTSE 100 security group, has provided mobile custody cells and detention officers at two recent environmental demonstrations. It has also begun to supply full teams of investigators on complex criminal cases, another area that will prove contentious with some chief constables.

(more…)

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Industry Talk: U.S. Seeks New Guards in Kabul

   Finally.  Now lets hope that they will square this stuff away and do what is necessary to prevent this from getting out of hand again in the future.  I would also hope that the State Department would fire a few folks responsible for not doing what was necessary to control this contract and maintain order starting back in 2007.

   Now one thing I hope doesn’t happen, is that the good guys on this contract who didn’t do anything wrong, don’t get shoved onto some black list.  That is stupid.  The folks who are at fault, are the leaders, and those are the ones that should be on a black list.  To put everyone that was ever involved with this contract on some dorkwad list, or who had worked for AGNA at one point or another on a no hire list, is not right.  Identify who the problem children were, and put them on the black list if need be.

    And for those guys who are innocent of any wrong doing or got caught up in this poorly managed mess, I wish you well and I really hope this doesn’t tarnish your chances for future employment.

   The other story on this, is check out David Isenberg’s article at PMH about IPOA and it’s slow progress on the investigation of complaints in regards to Armor Group North America’s performance. Especially after it was brought up at the hearing. –Matt

——————————————————————

U.S. Seeks New Guards in Kabul

December 9, 2009

By AUGUST COLE

The State Department plans to seek new bids to protect the U.S. Embassy in Kabul after the current firm ran into staffing and oversight problems.

The company, ArmorGroup North America, a unit of Wackenhut Services Inc., will be allowed to bid on the new contract, the State Department said.

“The recent allegations of misconduct and various contract compliance deficiencies led us to conclude it was in the best interest of the government to compete a new contract,” said P.J. Crowley, assistant secretary of state for public affairs.

The plan to rebid the contract was earlier disclosed by the Project on Government Oversight, an independent watchdog group that in September released lurid photos and videos of ArmorGroup guards at a party.

(more…)

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Jobs: Security Officer, Nigeria

Filed under: Jobs,Nigeria — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 5:11 AM

Location: Nigeria

Salary: Competitive

Job Type: Permanent

Vacancy placed by: G4S Risk Management

Qualifications & Experience: Ex RMP, gendarmerie, police.Significant experience in the management and delivery of complex, multi-faceted and high value commercial projects within non-permissive or semi permissive environments.High level of integrity, professionalism and personal qualities that can effectively ensure an optimum level of performance is maintained.The ability to fully utilize ICT.

(more…)

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress