Feral Jundi

Friday, July 20, 2012

Technology: Google Declares War Against The Cartels!!

Filed under: Mexico,Technology — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 1:29 AM

Eduardo Guerrero, a Mexico City-based security consultant, wasn’t optimistic that technology alone can disrupt narcotraffickers.
“You should never underestimate the power of these guys,” Guerrero said. “They’re probably even aware of what’s going on here, and will figure out a way to use it to their advantage.”
Even Google’s Schmidt conceded that better use of information isn’t enough.
“I think at the end of the day, there really are bad people, and you have to go in and arrest them and kill them,” he said.

Check this out. It looks to me like Google is picking a fight with the cartels down south. lol Thanks to Borderland Beat for posting  this story and this will be interesting to watch. Especially if they can actually come up with a sound anonymous tip line service that is completely safe and easy to use.

Google’s ideas include creating a network so citizens can safely report cartel activity without fear of retribution. It wants to make sharing real-time intelligence easier among police in different regions. It can identify how individuals are connected to each other, to bank accounts and even to corrupt government officials. It can create community Web platforms for citizens to share information and name and shame criminals.

‘Name and shame criminals’ or to ‘safely report cartel activity without fear of retribution’ would be a pretty big technological hit on the cartels. Let’s just hope that Google has posted close protection agents around those individuals tasked with coming up with this stuff. lol Because to the cartels, the weakest point and the easiest way to counter this stuff to them, is to kidnap the guys who figured it out and force them to give up the secrets. Or bribe, steal, or whatever. There are no rules with these guys, and everything is fair game.

Either way, I wish Google luck and I look forward to seeing these tools in action. –Matt

 

Google searches for ways technology can harness Mexico’s narcotraffickers, global crime
July 19, 2012
Google, so far, has won the search engine wars. Now it wants to target international crime, including Mexico’s powerful drug cartels.
Eric Schmidt, Google Inc.’s executive chairman, has taken a keen interest in Mexico, where more than 47,500 people have been killed in drug-related violence since President Felipe Calderon launched an offensive against the cartels in 2006. Schmidt recently visited most of Mexico’s most violent cities, Ciudad Juarez, where civic leaders asked if he could help.

(more…)

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Cool Stuff: The Great Space ‘Gold Rush’ And The Commercial Mining Of Planets And Asteroids

Diamandis has long talked about creating an ‘exothermic reaction,” — science jargon for a process that releases energy in the form of light or heat, often in the form of an explosion — in space.
Curiosity started the space race. Then fear that the Russians would overtake the United States. Now it’s time for greed to play a role. “That’s the only way it’s going to happen irrevocably, I’m trying to start a gold rush,” Diamandis said.

This is all types of cool. The space gold rush is on, and I really think this is the most logical and best approach we can have towards exploring space. Governments should not have the monopoly on space travel, and should encourage entrepreneurial efforts to get up there. Besides, if a company can make money by going up there and actually ‘produce’ something of value for their efforts, then that is far better than just going up there for the hell of it.

From a security point of view, I am very much enthused. The protection of this earth from asteroids or other types of  large and deadly space projectiles, is essential to the survival of the human race. We need to be in space in order to master it and our fate.  Having companies that specialize in reaching asteroids to mine them, only helps in the process of being able to destroy one of these things if we ever had to. Theory is one thing, but experience and capability is quite another.

Also, if these guys do land some big scores of Platinum or Palladium, and they bring it down to earth, then those companies will soon be extremely wealthy. These companies will require cyber security and physical security in order to protect their hard fought intellectual property. Or if they find new elements, and those elements lead to some fantastic discoveries in technology, then small armies will be required to protect that. The launch facilities and manufacturing plants will also need the type of security on order with what nuclear plants have, or what NASA had.

The other point I wanted to make, was the use of X Prize or contests in order to invigorate the process of innovation for space exploration. This approach is powerful and creating innovations by leaps and bounds.  It is the thrill of profit and bragging rights that fuel these innovations and collaborations within these companies. It is a big game, and competition between all of the players makes this fun and focused. These elements of contest, are exactly why I continue to explore offense industry for warfare. And especially using offense industry to stop piracy (online or ocean), criminal organizations, and terrorists.

This brings up another point. In the commons called space, eventually we will see criminal elements take advantage. Imagine hacking a mining drone and then having that thing being directed to land on earth in a place where the hacker knows the owners cannot reach? Or they could demand ransom for that vessel. Imagine hackers attacking these highly complex space travel computer systems and sabotaging competitors, or stealing intellectual property?

If these companies do in fact bring back trillions of dollars worth of riches, then there will be those who will want to take it. It is what happened during the early days of ocean exploration between governments, pirates, and privateers. It is what happened during the expansion out west in America with the gold rush. It happened and continues to happen in places like Africa, and it will happen in one form or another with space. It is just a matter of time and security will be essential in order to make space mining possible.

Either way, check it out and let me know what you think. This is an awesome and exciting time period, and I will be cheering these guys on. Companies mentioned are Moon Express and Planetary Resources Inc.Matt

 

Moon Express lander test vehicle. (Credit: Moon Express)

Planetary Resources Co-Founder Aims To Create Space ‘Gold Rush’
Brian Caulfield
4/20/2012
Earlier this year, entrepreneur and X-Prize impresario Peter Diamandis hinted he was about to unveil something amazing: a startup that will mine asteroids for precious metals.
“Since my childhood I’ve wanted to do one thing, be an asteroid miner,” Diamandis told Forbes. “So stay tuned on that one.”
It looks like Diamandis may be about to push the launch button on the idea.
Backed by a group including Google Chief Executive Larry Page, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, filmmaker James Cameron, former Microsoft Chief Architect Charles Simonyi, and Ross Perot Jr., Planetary Ventures will unveil its plans Tuesday at the Museum of Flight in Seattle.
To be sure, no one has said publicly — yet — that the new venture Diamandis is involved with will mine asteroids, but there are more than a few clues pointing in that direction.
The startup will be led by a team including former NASA Mars mission manager Chris Lewicki; co-founder Eric Anderson, co-founder of the International Space University; and Diamandis, whose X-Prize Foundation kicked off the commercial space tourism industry by awarding a $10 million prize to Paul Allen and Burt Rutan’s SpaceShipOne effort.
“The company will overlay two critical sectors – space exploration and natural resources – to add trillions of dollars to the global GDP,” according to a press release teasing the announcement. “This innovative start-up will create a new industry and a new definition of ‘natural resources.’”
Diamandis has long talked about creating an ‘exothermic reaction,” — science jargon for a process that releases energy in the form of light or heat, often in the form of an explosion — in space.
Curiosity started the space race. Then fear that the Russians would overtake the United States. Now it’s time for greed to play a role. “That’s he only way it’s going to happen irrevocably, I’m trying to start a gold rush,” Diamandis said.
It’s not as crazy as it may sound to some. Space scientists have long talked about mining asteroids, which could be rich in rare earths essential to the electronics industry.
Many of these rocks get awfully close: last November 8, for example, a 400-meter wide rock dubbed asteroid 2005 YU55 will passed within 201,000 miles of the earth. The average distance to the moon: 240,000 miles.
Depending on their orbit, some asteroids could be mined for a few years, and then abandoned before they zip out of reach. Others might be slowed and eased into near earth orbit.??Just securing gear in the low-gravity environment of an asteroid could be a challenge, however, with scientists weighing options ranging from harpooning asteroids to burrowing in with rotating screws.
Once secure, machinery could scrape the loose rocks on the surface of the asteroid; vaporize asteroids composed of ices and hydrocarbons; or cut and crush through asteroids composed of harder silicates and metal.
Figure out a way to extract those resources could create the world’s first trillionaire. “If I have a near-term shot at becoming a billionaire it probably be through my interest in asteroid mining,” Diamandis says.
But while greed may be the mechanism, it’s probably not Diamandis’ motive, say those who know him.
Robert Zubrin, chairman of the Mars Foundation, compares Peter Diamandis to Delos David Harriman, the protagonist of Robert Heinlein’s “The Man Who Sold The Moon.”
Harriman hyped the idea of riches on the moon to create a gold rush. Like Harriman, Diamandis sees capitalism as the force that will finally coax humanity off the planet.
“He’s not doing what he’s doing for greed,” Zubrin says of Diamandis. “It’s like Columbus selling Ferdinand and Isabella on the spice route to India, I think Columbus just wanted to go sailing; Diamandis is into opening the space frontier because he’s into opening the space frontier.”

Story here.

—————————————————————

Moon Express Details Plans to Mine the Moon
Moon Express, a Google Lunar X PRIZE contender, announced that it has successfully delivered a mission design package to NASA under its Innovative Lunar Demonstration Data (ILDD) Program, providing NASA continuing data on the development of the company’s commercial lunar missions and plans to mine the Moon for precious planetary resources.  The newest task order in the $10M ILDD contract called for Moon Express to provide NASA with data about the company’s progress through a Preliminary Design Checkpoint Technical Package that documents details of mission operations, spacecraft development, payload accommodations and Planetary Protection Plans.

(more…)

Friday, March 16, 2012

Technology: Dr. Regina Dugan Speaks At DARPA Cyber Colloquium, Sam Quint Reponds….

Boy, after listening to this, I am wondering if DARPA is reading the blog? I have talked about the Cyber Lance in the past, as well as Cyber Privateering and the issuance of the Letter of Marque, and the language I am hearing in this talk sounds a lot like Offense Industry talk to me. All I know is she really wanted to emphasize the complexity of the commons called cyber space, and that ‘capability’ must be explored for the defense and offense in such an environment.

I say offense industry because DARPA has been really exploring the possibilities for bounties. They also use rewards for contests as a prize for innovation. I know they are aware of the Letter of Marque concept because Michael Hayden brought it up in a speech, and myself and the Morgan Doctrine have been bringing it up in posts.

What is really interesting is that Dr. Dugan is heading off to work for Google. Google would be a fantastic place to work at, to truly explore the various ways to combat cyber criminals and enemies. She would also get an inside view as to what Google thinks is the answer.

As to my commentary on the whole thing?  I think I will let Sam Quint speak for me below…. lol –Matt

 

 

The honorable Sam Quint replies….

 

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Letter Of Marque: Inching Closer To A World Of Cyber Privateering

Lately, there has been an increased intensity of hacking attacks on government and business. Of course, government is doing all it can to keep up and stop these hackers. And like the piracy problem on the high seas, hackers in the commons called cyber space are operating with virtual impunity.

To me, there are several areas of weakness that today’s hackers are exploiting. One is the shear enormity of the internet and cyber space, and all the potential targets that a hacker can attack. Like with the pirates of Somalia, hackers have plenty of ocean and are constantly searching for new hunting grounds and weaknesses to exploit.

Their rewards can be immense. Hack into a bank, steal information from a technology firm, or hack a government website and exploit that information. Or they do it because of the ‘lulz’ or the hell of it, just to prove they are the best. Or worse, they attack individuals. (companies or the government has done nothing to protect the little guys– like this blog, from attacks)  And these hackers can do it all from a terminal at some random location in the world.

The other thing at play here is scale. Once folks see for themselves how successful one group or individual is, then others will copy them. They will borrow brilliance and follow a model of operation that works, all to achieve a goal. And like today’s example of piracy, hacking spreads because it is inspired by the success of others and by the rewards of the risk taking.

It also spreads when money or organizational influence comes into play. China or a cartel from Mexico can easily do things to add fire to the world of hacking and cyber warfare. All nations add to scale of such things. Just wait until ‘plomo o plata‘ comes to the world of hacking, and then that is when cyber lances will really become essential.

Which brings me to the point of this post. Because this problem is only growing, there must be measures that equal the size and scale of this global deluge. Legal tools like the LoM must be considered to even the scale between black hat and the company use of white hat hackers. Of course it would be nice if government and it’s law enforcement apparatus could be large enough enough to apply the rule of law to all corners of the cyber universe. But like with today’s modern day scourge of piracy, government cannot be everywhere and at all times.

So here is where I like to take the next step forward.  Companies need the legal authority to effectively combat black hat hackers. That legal authority can and should come in the form of a Letter of Marque and Reprisal.  Or maybe a government can come up with a different title for this license.  But either way, by giving companies the legal authority to do what they need to do to combat the problem, they in essence help to put ‘the armed guards on boats’. (another analogy with today’s piracy problem)

Here is some more food for thought. If the targets of hackers are companies, then is the government the best tool to use to protect all of these companies out there?  Who would have more interest and incentive to protect a company’s infrastructure–a government or the the company itself?  Of course a company would love for someone to do it for free, but the problem here is that there is too much at stake to put the security of a company simply in the hands of a burdensome, bureaucratic and highly inefficient  government organizations. Government does not have the resources to watch over every company, and it does not have the personal motivation to defend a company’s assets to the fullest degree.

Yet again, the piracy analogy works for this example. All of the navies in the world have not stopped piracy, and if anything, the problem has grown. Likewise, the US government was not able to protect Sony, Google or Lockheed Martin from vicious hacking attacks, even though the government has cyber warfare units and tons of agencies tasked with monitoring cyber related activities.

So what is the solution?  I say government should listen to what the companies have to say about how best to help them. The government would also have to re-evaluate what ‘help’ really means, in the context of this problem. If a company says it is legally constrained when trying to defend against black hat hackers, then what is the logical solution?  Do you put the government’s police forces in charge of a company’s security anti-hacking units, or do we license a company to combat this problem?  To me, issuing a license to companies so they can actually compete with these black hat hackers, is the equivalent of putting ‘armed guards on boats’ to defend against Somali Pirates. It makes sense, and it answers the problem of scale.

It also sounds like this is the natural progression anyways?  The new DIB Cyber Pilot program sounds like another step towards empowering companies. With companies like Lockheed Martin, it behooves the government to help them because this company is very much a part of our national security.  So will licensing companies be the next ‘natural progression’ as an answer to this world wide scourge? I know myself, and the Morgan Doctrine blog will be following this stuff, and we will see….-Matt

 

 

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Disaster Response: The Radiation Network

 

This is cool. The Radiation Network is a crowd based and privately run radiation monitoring system that is free for everyone to check out.  Each yellow disk on the map indicates a reading. The map is updated every minute by it’s network members.  So with the news in Japan in regards to their nuclear disaster, a site like this will be able show exactly the impact on the US in the West Coast.

Now what would really be cool is to turn this into a mobile application?  hint hint.  I bet a radiation network mobile app would get thousands of downloads through iTunes.  We will probably see other networks pop up, or even a group like Google might get in on the action and help the Radiation Network soup up their product?

Also, I expect the number of citizen monitors to increase, just because this nuclear disaster in Japan is causing folks to buy up detectors and everything else dealing with radiation monitoring.  But a word of caution–because this is a crowd based deal, it is very difficult to insure that quality readings are being done.

All in all though, I think this is a great resource, and in the coming days and weeks and months of this nuclear disaster, we will see the global impact of the event.  (from what I understand, a global network version is being fired up, and the network is expanding internationally) Bravo to Tim Flanegin and his crew for putting this resource together, and I just hope his host’s servers can handle the traffic. –Matt

We have received a lot of feedback on our Radiation Network, including gratitude for this service, and we really appreciate the support.  A lot of suggestions and questions (and some complaints) have been forwarded as well, so I would like to address those here, because we do not have time to respond to your individual email messages.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress