Feral Jundi

Friday, February 6, 2009

Publications: Civilian Surge, by Binnendijk and Cronin–What about Incident Command?

Filed under: Publications — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 8:32 PM

   I briefly read through this, as well as went through this summary by SWJ, and the one thing that struck me was that there was no mention of Incident Command? I have written about this in the past, and it still cracks me up that no one out there is catching on.  There is already a framework and model for managing complex operations, that is consistently used with great success every summer during the fire seasons in the US. It was also used at ground zero during 9/11, the Space Shuttle crash back in 2003, and the Katrina Hurricane disaster. It is a system that is remarkably simple, yet scalable and easily understood by all.  It is a command language and system that all the groups mentioned in this paper could easily understand and follow if implemented.  

   The question I have is why was there not one person on the panel of authors and experts, that had some kind of expertise in this department.  A quick call to the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho would have yielded some contacts.  Matter of fact, if any of the authors are reading this, I have a point of contact that could help you out.  He teaches the 400 series of Incident Command at NIFC, and was a Type 1 Incident Commander (kind of like a General of fire) and a Forest Management Officer.

     I could be wrong, but it sounds like this think tank kind of missed the boat on this.  Maybe an author could correct the record on why Incident Command wasn’t discussed or mentioned?  Like I said, I want to be wrong on this, so please correct the record for me.   

    In my opinion, if we want to get serious about organizing complex operations, with a unified command that could join military and civilian operations, then this is the system you need.  I have seen it first hand join together contractors, with federal/state resources, with multiple agencies, and with military and law enforcement even–all for fighting a complex fire operation.  For fighting fires, Incident Command is the glue that joins the pieces of that effort, and it can certainly be applied to the current war effort.  It deserves to be studied at the least and there is no need to reinvent the wheel.  Thanks to Small Wars Journal for posting this. –Matt 

——————————————————————- 

Civilian Surge: Key to Complex Operations

Posted by SWJ Editors on 

February 6, 2009 3:07 PM 

National Defense University’s Center for Technology and National Security Policy has just released an online report – Civilian Surge: Key to Complex Operations – by Hans Binnendijk and Patrick M. Cronin.

The United States needs to develop the capacity to conduct complex operations that require close civil-military planning and cooperation in the field. This study is comprehensive review of this national need and examines how the need can best be met.

(more…)

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Tactical Thought Process: Where Was the Incident Command in Mumbai?

Filed under: Tactical Thought Process — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:32 PM

   So I am watching video and reading all of these reports coming out of Mumbai, and I have just been cringing. I mourn the deaths of hostages, and my heart goes out to the families. But there is a part of me that watched this attack from a tactical command point of view, and it pissed me off.  Could the death toll have been minimized if in fact the Indian response was coordinated and well managed under one management system?  I think so.

   Incident Command System or ICS is the most important element of the response to any incident or attack.  And this management system, if applied correctly, could have saved lives.  It is a system that would have helped to organize and call up resources quickly, and help to control and end the attack quickly.  ICS is a system used to bring order to chaos, and if the Indian government would have trained on this aspect of command, then they could have dealt with this in a much more efficient manner. 

    As for some thoughts on what was missing from the response, where do I start?  For one, if all of the police and military were briefed on ICS and how it works, then that would be a great start.  From there, the police(who are the first responders), would act as the Incident Commander for their particular scene, and request more resources.  That request should be in the form of how do we expand the ICS, because this attack is spreading all over the city.  I would also ask all resources to make communications with the Incident Commander, and establish the on scene chain of command.  But really, the first order of business is make your assessments of the situation, and order resources. And if that initial Incident Commander of the scene is not qualified for larger incidents, then he orders up a more qualified Incident Commander through dispatch.  Until then, that individual is in command, because there is no one else.

(more…)

Friday, November 7, 2008

News: Contractors and Obama, By David Isenberg

Filed under: News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 10:07 PM

   Well here is that analysis I was talking about.  Check out what David had to say about Obama and contractors.  And as a disclaimer, I did not coordinate this with the guy, so I think it is pretty funny that he came out with this after I mentioned it a couple posts back. I am glad though that someone else besides me, is looking into the industry’s future under Obama. 

   So what is new?  Well, it sounds like Obama doesn’t have an issue with us.  He just wants more accountability, and I actually like that.  I think our industry does need more oversight. And I am not saying that we should be micromanaged to death by the government.  I am just saying give us some direction and some guidance is all.  Spell out exactly the terms, and get some of the ‘gray areas’ out of the industry that tend to give pause to those that have been critical.  The more the government can legitimize and give guidance to our industry, the happier the client(which is the government) will be.  

    I also like the fact that Obama wants to increase funding to DoS.  Today’s wars are not just a military battle.  It also requires a massive diplomatic effort.  And if the military is busy with other stuff, then security for DoS will have to come from contractors. I am sure the WPPS companies out there are pleased with that.

   On the down side, I was not aware of the provisions in the 2009 Defense Authorization Act.  The one I clued in on, was section 832.  It is a call for the military to do the security jobs that contractors have been fulfilling. Or if contractors are needed, that the decision to use us will be based on the discretion of the ‘relevant combatant command’. 

(more…)

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress