Feral Jundi

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Call To Action: The Civilian Veterans Association

A big thank you to Doug for giving me the heads up about this association, and to Anthony for putting this together. The Civilian Veterans Association will be the equivalent to the VFW or any other number of associations dedicated to those that have served or are serving. And to me, it is about time we have something like this.

I should also note that the potential for this association is great. The headquarters is located in the heart of the defense world, and there are so many thousands of contractors that have served to draw from, that this could become a very big group. An association like this can also be an advocacy group for contractors who have served. They can also be an advocacy for those that were wounded, or for our POW and MIA contractors. In my post about the resolve and sacrifice of contractors, I have identified just such a group that needs all the support we can give them.

So here are some details. The CVA is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization registered in the Commonwealth of Virginia. On the website, you can make donations to this group at their donation page here. They are also looking for folks who would like to help with the various tasks of standing up the CVA. Most of all, they are looking for a director. Definitely head to the website and explore the various ways that you can contribute. Every little bit counts.

Finally, and this is really cool. The CVA is wanting to march in the New York City Veterans Day Parade. Here is an excerpt:

The CVA intends to march in the New York City Veterans Day Parade on 11 November 2011. This year’s theme is “Never Forget,” and pays special tribute to the 10th Anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. If you are a Civilian Veteran, particularly, if you are a Civilian Veteran who has served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom or any other formally or informally recognized warzone, you deserve recognition and it is high time to come out in force. If you would like to march, please march@civilianveteran.org.

I think this is the first time I have ever heard of a civilian veterans group wanting to march at this parade, and to me, that is awesome. We have had several thousand killed, and thousands more wounded in this war, and I would very much like to see some kind of recognition for this sacrifice. We should also have a national monument or memorial of some type so the friends and families of civilian veterans have something to remember at. Cool stuff and definitely check out the links below if you want to get involved. –Matt

Website for the Civilian Veterans Association here.

 

 

The Civilian Veterans Association (CVA) supports civilians who served the United States in official and nonofficial war zones or during domestic terrorist events.

Throughout our nation’s history, civilians have served the US government in war zones, whether as diplomats, intelligence officers, engineers, analysts, trainers, linguists or in support of the military. In particular, for many Civilian Veterans the post 9/11 environment has been one of extreme hardship and personal sacrifice. These Civilian Veterans of war and conflict deserve recognition and support for the sacrifices that they and their families have made in defense of our nation.

Membership in the CVA is open to those who have served in official and nonofficial war zones or during domestic terrorist events while in the employ of the United States Government, whether in a civilian or contractor capacity. The CVA also serves military veterans who have since gone on to serve as a government civilian or contractor in a warzone.

(more…)

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Industry Talk: The Contractor Sacrifice And Resolve Since 9/11

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 3:31 PM

You know, much will be said about the sacrifice and good work of the military during the last ten years of war. Much is being said of the loss of lives, both on that day and during the ten years of war, on this ten year anniversary of 9/11. Every bit of that loss and sacrifice deserve the attention of the nation and world…. But in the back of the room, quietly supporting the war effort, quietly being killed or wounded, and quietly serving for the last ten years is the contractor. And in my little corner of the internet, I wanted to make sure that the contractor sacrifice is counted.

So who is this contractor? They are the Sri Lanken who is building the barracks for an Iraqi brigade. He is the Ugandan standing guard at the DFAC or front gate. He is the former Navy SEAL, working in a PSD detail as a contractor for the State Department. She is a health and safety inspector for a camp in northern Afghanistan. He is an Afghan convoy guard transporting fuel to a remote camp. She is an interpreter working with the coalition to help them with their daily patrols in the villages. The contractor is everywhere in this war, and their contribution is certainly significant.

Some of these contractors are prior military, and some are former police officers. But many are civilians who wanted to make a difference. They are the plumbers, the carpenters, the teachers, the cooks, the paramedics, etc. that come from all over the US and the world to give their contribution to the war. I would speculate that well over a million civilian contractors have cycled in and out of the war over the years, but there are no statistics to back this up. Although we do know that our ratio of contractor to the military in the war zones over the years has been about 1 to 1, and sometimes higher. So whatever the military numbers, the contractor service is pretty close. And believe it or not, in Afghanistan there was a historically significant point in the war where there were more contractors than soldiers.

“As of March 2009, there were 68,197 DoD contractors in Afghanistan, compared to 52,300 uniformed personnel. Contractors made up 57% of DoD’s workforce in Afghanistan. This apparently represented the highest recorded percentage of contractors used by DoD in any conflict in the history of the United States.”CRS report

But what is the contractor sacrifice?  Well according to the Department of Labor, there have been 2,752 contractors killed and 71,662 wounded. The number of reporting companies is a staggering 1,831. (from 09/01/2001 to 06/30/2011) Think about those numbers and understand that each of those deaths and injuries are individuals that willfully came to these war zones to serve in their various capacities. Each had families and loved ones that mourned over their deaths. Or they had to deal with the struggle each day with the physical and mental fight that comes with rehabilitation and healing.

I personally think that the death and injury rates are much higher, but because there is no official commission to track all deaths and injuries of contractors, that the DoL statistics are really all we have. Of course there are individuals tracking deaths, but it has been noted that all they really care about is military deaths–with contractor deaths being a burden to count….

There is also another area of contractor sacrifice that gets little attention, and that is the POW’s and MIA’s of the industry. Just recently, James Coker was a Pentagon civilian contractor that was kidnapped, and then later beheaded in Afghanistan. It was barely a blip in the daily news cycle.  Or you have those contractors that have been wrongly detained in corrupt prison systems for years, just rotting away.

I have also touched on an area of contractor sacrifice that has not received any attention, and that is mental health. How many have taken their own lives since returning from the war?  I do not know, and it is a statistic that I think would match the military’s rates of suicide. (ProPublica touched on it a little)

But with all of this death and suffering, contractors continue to serve and in great numbers. They will continue to serve for as long as it takes, and they will do it quietly and willingly. So I give praise to the military for their sacrifice in this war, but we must also recognize and give praise to the sacrifice and resolve of our contractor force.

Lastly, the main reason why contractors and the military are fighting this war, is the cowardly act of terrorists  on 9/11, and the equally cowardly act of groups supporting those terrorists around the world. Hence why we have taken the fight into places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen, and other rocks of the planet where the enemy chooses to organize and scheme under. It is our desire for justice and the urge to defend the homeland, that will keep the fires of this war lasting as long as it takes. That desire for justice is what drives all of us, both contractor and soldier, and we will not stop until justice is served and the enemy is no more. –Matt

From left to right, Tim Newman working as a DynCorp contractor in Iraq; the aftermath of the IED explosion that took Newman's leg; Newman after his recovery. (Photos courtesy of Tim Newman)

In April 2004, Reggie Lane was driving a fuel truck in Iraq for a defense contractor when insurgents attacked his convoy with rocket-propelled grenades, causing him numerous injuries. For most of the five years since, Lane, now 60, has spent his days in silence, cared for at the Country Gardens Adult Foster Care in Central Point, Ore. (Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times)

Malek Hadi was working with the U.S. military police when a homemade bomb detonated beneath his Humvee in September 2006. (Allison V. Smith/For The Los Angeles Times.)

On the one-year anniversary of her husband's suicide, Barb Dill breaks down at her husband's tombstone. Wade Dill, a Marine Corps veteran, took a contractor job in Iraq. Three weeks after he returned home for good, he committed suicide (Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times / Redding, CA / July 16, 2007).

 

Friday, September 9, 2011

Finance: Higher Business Taxes May Follow Treasuries Definition Of ‘Small’

Filed under: Finance,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 11:50 AM

Boy, this is one of those deals that could impact a bunch of folks out there who have set up S Corps or similar business structures as independent contractors. In this quote below I have included a point of contact to follow on this matter who originally brought this front and center. His name is Bob Perry and he specializes in this particular area of the industry. Here is a quote from his article and by all means follow the link if you want to read more and contact him.

TAX ALERT: For Owners of Private Security Companies
September 8th, 2011
By Bob Perry
Congressional lawmakers consider rewriting the U.S. tax code for closely held businesses, including those organized as partnerships, S corporations and limited liability companies.
This could have a dramatic negative effect on the owners of these corporations as they operate the company; and on the net proceeds from an eventual sale of the operating assets.

Hopefully some CPA types can come up and add their two cents on this deal. –Matt

 

 

Higher Business Taxes May Follow Treasury’s Definition of Small
By Andrew Zajac
Aug 18, 2011
A new definition of what constitutes a small business being considered by the Treasury Department is raising concerns among some closely held companies that it’s a step toward requiring them to pay corporate taxes.
The proposed definition, included in an Aug. 9 Treasury report, places the upper limit for a small business at $10 million in annual gross income or deductions. Currently, there is no size limit on what constitutes a small business for purposes of tax policy discussions.
The parameters could affect larger, closely held businesses, including those organized as partnerships, S corporations and limited liability companies. Such firms are called flow-through entities because profits flow directly to their owners, who pay personal income tax without first being subject to corporate tax. Large investment firms, including D.E. Shaw LP of New York and Renaissance Technologies Corp. of East Setauket, New York, and major law firms such as Los Angeles- based Latham & Watkins LLP are organized as flow-through companies.

(more…)

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Iraq: US Says No Decision On Keeping Troops In Iraq

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iran,Iraq,Military News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 3:03 PM

This is an interesting development. Many folks were speculating that a much higher number of troops would stick around, and then this rumor of 3,000 troops came out and all hell broke loose. lol The article below mentions politics as a driver for this type of decision making….go figure?

The concern here is that if there is too small of a footprint, that these troops will be sitting ducks in Iraq, or Iraq will not be able to deal with their security issues without sufficient troop presence. My concern though is that companies in Iraq that are dependent upon the security services of the current troops, will have to once again re-adjust to the politics of the matter. Planning might have included a certain amount of US troop presence in specific areas, and all of their war fighting tools and capabilities that come with that presence. So if they were planning on a 10,000 troop presence, and now it is 3,000, that can have an impact.

It also can impact the logistics. If contracting companies were planning for a set amount of troops based off the feedback war planners were giving them, then those companies have made their moves and planed for those contracts. So yet again, the back and forth on the troop presence in Iraq has an impact on this industry. Of course companies will flex and adapt, but I am sure this is causing a lot of headaches.

The other aspect of Iraq that needs to be mentioned is the Iranian influence there. As we speak, rockets and mortars continue to fall on the various FOBs and outposts in Iraq. These munitions come from all sorts of sources, but the biggest arms provider is Iran. Their goal is to help along the exit of US Troops and destabilize the region so their pet leaders can rise to the top (like Sadr). So the environment in Iraq is less troops, but tons of contractors, and lots of Iranian weapons and influence pouring into the country to help destabilize it and in the long run control it with puppet leaders.

Iraq is also in dire need of maintenance of weapons and equipment, foreign investment to include oil contracts, training and upkeep of security forces, etc. If Iraq cannot depend upon a US troop presence to help in these areas, then they will probably depend on contractors to fill these needs. Which our industry will fill the need, but yet again we have the wolf called Iran and Al Qaeda still doing their best to do harm.

I contend that private industry can deal with these sets of problems, but private industry does not have the same freedom of war fighting and weapons/hardware that US troops enjoyed. So in essence, private industry will have to accomplish what the military used to do, and yet with one hand tied behind it’s back. If Iraq sinks into Civil War again, or the pace of war and problems pick up, contractors will be right in the middle of that. –Matt

 

US says no decision on keeping troops in Iraq
By LARA JAKES
September 7, 2011
The Obama administration pushed back Wednesday on reports it has decided to keep a few thousand troops in Iraq next year — a number that will do little to ease security concerns but may be too big for White House advisers who are worried about the slumping U.S. economy and the president’s re-election chances.
In Washington, new Joint Chiefs chairman Army Gen. Martin Dempsey and Undersecretary of State nominee Wendy Sherman separately said there has been no decision on how many troops might stay.
U.S. Ambassador to Iraq James F. Jeffrey went a step further, soundly dismissing as false news reports that about 3,000 troops would remain in Iraq beyond the final Dec. 31 withdrawal deadline.
He said that figure has not been part of ongoing discussions in Baghdad, where both governments have been weighing whether as many as 10,000 U.S. forces should stay.

(more…)

Friday, September 2, 2011

Industry Talk: Pentagon Business Goes To The Small Fry

Nice little article about the defense industry and where it is at today. It asks a really compelling question–will the larger defense firms eventually try to compete in the services industry as the big program defense contracts decrease? Could we see a Boeing or Lockheed Martin participating in TWISS or some other security contractor related ‘services’ contract? lol You never know?….

The other thing I wanted to mention is that this is a prime example of small companies or small forces attacking the weakness of a large company or force. What works for guerrilla warfare, can have similar application to the business world. These smaller services companies are geared towards their niches, they are able to flex and roll with the contracting tempo, and they know what the client wants. Not only that, but because this is their primary focus, they can provide a better service than the big guys.  The larger defense companies are more concerned with and tooled for the big contracts, just because they have such a massive organization to support.  Smaller companies can certainly be more nimble in these smaller defense markets.

That’s not to say that a Lockheed Martin couldn’t enter the services market and rock and roll. It’s just they would have to compete with these well established niche companies. It will be interesting to see how this goes, and I am sure all defense companies are retooling and looking to the future as to what’s next.  Because on the one hand, you have congress getting pressure to reduce costs and balance the budge, but on the other hand we have all this chaos and war going on around the world. So this is a very difficult market to plan for, and I do not envy these companies in this endeavor. –Matt

 

Pentagon Business Goes to the Small Fry
Foreign wars create opportunities for small and nimble contractors
By Nick Taborek
September 01, 2011
Real-life army grunts have more important things to do on the modern battlefield, goes the thinking at the Pentagon these days. The scut work—and a good deal more—is outsourced to companies that can swoop in with people, basic resources, and technical know-how.
CACI International (CACI) and ManTech International (MANT) have become two of the most successful providers of technical services to the U.S. armed forces as spending on contractors soared because of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Together they raked in $3.9 billion last year from the military for providing everything from security services to radar data analysis. “When DOD outsources work, it can surge and purge,” says Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington. “It can tell a contractor, ‘I want you to bring on hundreds or thousands of people quickly,’ and they’ll do it.” And when the job is done, “they’re gone,” he adds.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress