This is odd, and it is kind of funny to read. Here is the US trying to regulate and license our guards to keep a check on the industry, and yet here is the UK trying to ‘reduce burdensome regulation’. lol
I will not say too much about this because it is a little out of my lane. In the past, we had some guest authors and readers discussing the pros and cons of the SIA and I really don’t know how effective it is right now? Maybe it is not needed or that it is not effectively screening folks and too costly? Perhaps government is not able to regulate it because of how inefficient and slow it can be?
Who knows but either way, the whole world is watching the UK and how it treats this issue. I have mentioned the US, India, and China as three countries looking hard at regulating this industry and the UK is one of the few places that has actually done this. Imperfect–maybe, but none the less they have licensed and regulated their industry.
The other thing I was thinking about was how this might impact contracts throughout the world? If the SIA is no longer in existence, then British and commonwealth type companies would have one less means of sifting through folks. It would be interesting to hear what Andy Bearpark and others have to say about this one? –Matt
——————————————————————–
Security sector quango faces axe in cost drive
By Glenn Campbell Scotland correspondent
22 September 2010
The Home Office is preparing to scrap the body which regulates bouncers and other security workers across the UK.
The Security Industry Authority has been placed under the axe as part of a wider plan to cut the number and cost of public bodies.
Abolishing the SIA will not save taxpayers money because it is largely self-financing, but a Home Office document, seen by the BBC, suggests the move would save security firms money and contribute to “reducing burdensome regulation”.
The document suggests the industry has matured enough to police itself.
A Home Office spokesman said no final decision had been made but the department expected to “make an announcement in due course”.
