Feral Jundi

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Iraq: Iraq Hails Second Oil Auction, But Risky Sites Shunned

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iraq — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Matt @ 7:20 AM

Even Gharraf’s winners appeared concerned despite its location in the relatively calm south.

“It depends on the security situation,” Katsuo Suzuki, Japex’s vice president, said when asked when the companies would begin work. “We are in contact with several security companies to discuss the security situations and analyze carefully the situation to decide our program.” 

*****

    “In contact with several security companies?”  Interesting news out of Iraq, and it is only logical that the next step in these deals is to evaluate how to properly secure operations there.  These companies want to succeed in their oil ventures, and you can bet that they will be seeking the best security companies out there that will insure that success.

   That means protecting the fields, the equipment, the employees, and the executives and engineers for these projects.  So you can guarantee that security will be partially coming from Iraqi companies and locals, and with a small contingent of security coming from highly skilled expats.  That is my guess, and it only stands to reason.

   Now one security company that might stand to benefit from this latest deal, is Oryol.  It would make sense that Lukoil would use a Russian security company for protective details.  I have no clue who Japex would use, and maybe some of the oil security pros out there can help to fill in the blanks. Of course there is the Oil Police down south, but companies will also want their own security that they can control and trust.  Either way, good on Iraq for getting this going, and the money earned from these deals will certainly help in the reconstruction of this war torn country. –Matt

Edit: 12/14/2009- I added a newer story on top of the original, in order to add more meat to this post. Check out both of them.

—————————————————————–

Oil executives gird for work in risky Iraq

* Global firms arrive in Baghdad for oil auction

* Security still a major concern for oil work in Iraq

By Missy Ryan

BAGHDAD, Dec 14 (Reuters) – They sped into the Oil Ministry in armoured convoys, flanked by muscled guards and men in dark suits, but oil executives marked a milestone this week when they attended an oil auction outside Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone.

It was a measure of a broad improvement in Iraq’s security that executives from 35 global oil firms came for the ministry’s two-day bid round in downtown Baghdad, where the landscape is scarred by six years of suicide bombs and other bloody attacks.

(more…)

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Industry Talk: Jax Desmond Revealed, and It Ain’t Pretty

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 12:27 PM

     So here it is folks.  I am officially removing the company link from the site, and I have removed all connections to the company at Facebook.  Feel free to do whatever you want.  My reasons are simple.  There are three conversations that the reader can check out, which helped me to come to my own conclusions.  One is at SOCNET, one is at Tactical Forums, and one is from a post I did on them back on November 7th of this year. Check out the comments on that post, because my readership called it.

     And to highlight the power of the forums, this is a prime example of what they can do.  Over the years I have seen these forums, along with others, do some amazing investigative work on companies that claimed to be bad ass or something they weren’t.  Doom on you if you try to play games on those forums. Jax Desmond is the latest topic de jour, and they did a great job revealing what JD was all about.

     My readership here did a good job of pointing out JD’s stuff as well, but when you watch an entire crew of security professionals, investigators, law enforcement, and everything inbetween guys pick apart a company like this, it is really quite impressive to watch.  It is how this industry has named and shamed these groups in the past, and it ain’t pretty.  I saw them do the same thing with Top Cat and Custer Battles, and it is impressive to say the least.  That is all. –Matt

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Industry Talk: U.S. Seeks New Guards in Kabul

   Finally.  Now lets hope that they will square this stuff away and do what is necessary to prevent this from getting out of hand again in the future.  I would also hope that the State Department would fire a few folks responsible for not doing what was necessary to control this contract and maintain order starting back in 2007.

   Now one thing I hope doesn’t happen, is that the good guys on this contract who didn’t do anything wrong, don’t get shoved onto some black list.  That is stupid.  The folks who are at fault, are the leaders, and those are the ones that should be on a black list.  To put everyone that was ever involved with this contract on some dorkwad list, or who had worked for AGNA at one point or another on a no hire list, is not right.  Identify who the problem children were, and put them on the black list if need be.

    And for those guys who are innocent of any wrong doing or got caught up in this poorly managed mess, I wish you well and I really hope this doesn’t tarnish your chances for future employment.

   The other story on this, is check out David Isenberg’s article at PMH about IPOA and it’s slow progress on the investigation of complaints in regards to Armor Group North America’s performance. Especially after it was brought up at the hearing. –Matt

——————————————————————

U.S. Seeks New Guards in Kabul

December 9, 2009

By AUGUST COLE

The State Department plans to seek new bids to protect the U.S. Embassy in Kabul after the current firm ran into staffing and oversight problems.

The company, ArmorGroup North America, a unit of Wackenhut Services Inc., will be allowed to bid on the new contract, the State Department said.

“The recent allegations of misconduct and various contract compliance deficiencies led us to conclude it was in the best interest of the government to compete a new contract,” said P.J. Crowley, assistant secretary of state for public affairs.

The plan to rebid the contract was earlier disclosed by the Project on Government Oversight, an independent watchdog group that in September released lurid photos and videos of ArmorGroup guards at a party.

(more…)

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Industry Talk: Erik Prince Vanity Fair Article–‘I’m Through..I’m Going To Teach High School’

   This article is a good one, but it is also kind of sad.  Erik has given his all, and the political will just wasn’t there anymore to support him and his company.  Although I think he will probably remain relevant to the war effort in one capacity or another, it’s just he has been effectively ‘thrown under the bus’. The company will keep pushing forward, no doubt. But as for the man who started the company? Done.

     His case is also starting to look like Valerie Plame’s in my view, and maybe this is payback in some twisted political sense. I guess politics is more important than winning a war?

     I would like to think of our industry as a tool for all parties in the U.S., but hey, what the king and his merry men want, they get I guess.  The irony is that Obama and company has definitely attached ownership to this war, and I just don’t see how he will be able to prosecute the thing without men like Erik Prince and private industry.

    It is also very telling that Obama’s strategy for Afghanistan really doesn’t look any different than the one his predecessor had for Iraq.  I also don’t see a decline in the use of security contractors under this administration either.  Actually, I have seen an increase, and that should give the reader of this article below a pause.  If in fact the services of my industry are so despicable, so unethical, so wrong, then why are we still being used, and to such a high degree?  I think we all know the answer to that, and yet we nail men like Erik Prince to the cross? Our enemies are laughing at us. Pffft.

   By the way, Erik if you are reading this, I invite you to sit down and talk with Jake over at PMH radio, or start a blog and get connected.  If in fact you are out of the game, there is no better place for a guy like yourself to get online and start squaring away the record by filling the information void.  You would be surprised how many supporters would pop up, and your input about the industry and the war effort would be invaluable. –Matt

Edit: 12/5/2009 I highly suggest reading this post from the Jawa Report Blog in regards to Blackwater and EP.  They hit it on the nail as far as the big picture.

—————————————————————–

Tycoon, Contractor, Soldier, Spy

By Adam Ciralsky

January 2010

Vanity Fair

Erik Prince, recently outed as a participant in a C.I.A. assassination program, has gained notoriety as head of the military-contracting juggernaut Blackwater, a company dogged by a grand-jury investigation, bribery accusations, and the voluntary-manslaughter trial of five ex-employees, set for next month. Lashing back at his critics, the wealthy former navy seal takes the author inside his operation in the U.S. and Afghanistan, revealing the role he’s been playing in America’s war on terror.

     I put myself and my company at the C.I.A.’s disposal for some very risky missions,” says Erik Prince as he surveys his heavily fortified, 7,000-acre compound in rural Moyock, North Carolina. “But when it became politically expedient to do so, someone threw me under the bus.” Prince—the founder of Blackwater, the world’s most notorious private military contractor—is royally steamed. He wants to vent. And he wants you to hear him vent.

     Erik Prince has an image problem—the kind that’s impervious to a Madison Avenue makeover. The 40-year-old heir to a Michigan auto-parts fortune, and a former navy seal, he has had the distinction of being vilified recently both in life and in art. In Washington, Prince has become a scapegoat for some of the Bush administration’s misadventures in Iraq—though Blackwater’s own deeds have also come in for withering criticism. Congressmen and lawyers, human-rights groups and pundits, have described Prince as a war profiteer, one who has assembled a rogue fighting force capable of toppling governments. His employees have been repeatedly accused of using excessive, even deadly force in Iraq; many Iraqis, in fact, have died during encounters with Blackwater. And in November, as a North Carolina grand jury was considering a raft of charges against the company, as a half-dozen civil suits were brewing in Virginia, and as five former Blackwater staffers were preparing for trial for their roles in the deaths of 17 Iraqis, The New York Times reported in a page-one story that Prince’s firm, in the aftermath of the tragedy, had sought to bribe Iraqi officials for their compliance, charges which Prince calls “lies … undocumented, unsubstantiated [and] anonymous.” (So infamous is the Blackwater brand that even the Taliban have floated far-fetched conspiracy theories, accusing the company of engaging in suicide bombings in Pakistan.)

(more…)

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Industry Talk: DynCorp Fires Executive Counsel

   Thats rough if your chief compliance officer ends up being the guy that pulls the unethical stuff like this.  That’s great that they fired him if in fact he was acting out of line.  Just a suggestion though. Maybe hire a non-lawyer type for the position or do a more thorough vetting of the new legal eagle? Trust but verify, all the way. –Matt

——————————————————————

DynCorp Fires Executive Counsel

November 28, 2009

By August Cole

DynCorp International Inc. said it has terminated one of its top lawyers, a move that comes on the heels of the government contractor’s disclosure that some of its subcontractors may have broken U.S. law in trying to speed up getting licenses and visas overseas. The lawyer, Curtis Schehr, was a senior vice president, executive counsel and the firm’s chief compliance officer, a position created earlier this year. He joined DynCorp in 2006 as general counsel.

The company disclosed the “termination without cause” in a filing Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The move was effective Monday, according to the filing.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress