Feral Jundi

Monday, December 14, 2009

Legal News: Omnibus Bill FY 2010–Embassy and Worldwide Security Protection Stuff

     I found this over at Diplopundit, which is a great blog that tracks this stuff.  They basically broke down the bill as to the budget amounts and any new amendments.  I especially clued into the latest budgetary figures, increases in new security positions, and the latest ‘best value’ contracting mechanism that State has. They even mention the Kabul Fiasco specifically, as a reason for the amendment.  Check it out. –Matt

——————————————————————-

From Diplopundit:

Worldwide Security Protection

The conference agreement provides $1,586,214,000 for Worldwide Security Protection, which is $8,787,000 above the House and $8,786,000 below the Senate. The conferees note that $13,375,000 requested for fiscal year 2010 was included in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-32), bringing the total available for Worldwide Security Protection in fiscal year 2010 to $1,599,589,000. Within the amount provided, $221,926,000, and a projected 200 security positions, are to strengthen the Department’s capacity to respond to the growing security challenges at posts around the world, including the requested positions for the second year of the Visa and Passport Security Plan.

Embassy Security Constructions and Maintenance

The conference agreement provides $1,724,150,000 for Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance, which is the same as the House and Senate, of which $847,300,000 is for priority worldwide security upgrades, acquisition, and construction and $876,850,000 is for other operations, maintenance and construction.

The following provisions are new, modified from the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8), or further clarified in this joint statement.

Sec. 7006. Local Guard Contracts.

The conference agreement includes a new provision which allows the Secretary of State flexibility to award local guard contracts on the basis of either lowest price that is technically acceptable or the best value cost-technical tradeoff (as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation part 15.101) when awarding such contracts in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.

Current law requires that all local guard contracts must be awarded on the basis of the lowest price that is technically acceptable, and if other factors had been considered, the problems reported earlier this year involving the local guard contract in Kabul, Afghanistan may have been prevented. The conferees understand that providing the Secretary with authority to make awards through the best value approach can enhance the guard force’s effectiveness and justify the additional cost, particularly in countries with dangerous or hostile environments.

Check out Diplopundit here.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Iraq: Iraq Hails Second Oil Auction, But Risky Sites Shunned

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iraq — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Matt @ 7:20 AM

Even Gharraf’s winners appeared concerned despite its location in the relatively calm south.

“It depends on the security situation,” Katsuo Suzuki, Japex’s vice president, said when asked when the companies would begin work. “We are in contact with several security companies to discuss the security situations and analyze carefully the situation to decide our program.” 

*****

    “In contact with several security companies?”  Interesting news out of Iraq, and it is only logical that the next step in these deals is to evaluate how to properly secure operations there.  These companies want to succeed in their oil ventures, and you can bet that they will be seeking the best security companies out there that will insure that success.

   That means protecting the fields, the equipment, the employees, and the executives and engineers for these projects.  So you can guarantee that security will be partially coming from Iraqi companies and locals, and with a small contingent of security coming from highly skilled expats.  That is my guess, and it only stands to reason.

   Now one security company that might stand to benefit from this latest deal, is Oryol.  It would make sense that Lukoil would use a Russian security company for protective details.  I have no clue who Japex would use, and maybe some of the oil security pros out there can help to fill in the blanks. Of course there is the Oil Police down south, but companies will also want their own security that they can control and trust.  Either way, good on Iraq for getting this going, and the money earned from these deals will certainly help in the reconstruction of this war torn country. –Matt

Edit: 12/14/2009- I added a newer story on top of the original, in order to add more meat to this post. Check out both of them.

—————————————————————–

Oil executives gird for work in risky Iraq

* Global firms arrive in Baghdad for oil auction

* Security still a major concern for oil work in Iraq

By Missy Ryan

BAGHDAD, Dec 14 (Reuters) – They sped into the Oil Ministry in armoured convoys, flanked by muscled guards and men in dark suits, but oil executives marked a milestone this week when they attended an oil auction outside Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone.

It was a measure of a broad improvement in Iraq’s security that executives from 35 global oil firms came for the ministry’s two-day bid round in downtown Baghdad, where the landscape is scarred by six years of suicide bombs and other bloody attacks.

(more…)

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Job Tips: Pack a Voltage Tick Tester For Deployments

   This is one that I recommend for guys working all over the world, both in security and disaster response.  A quick way to know if your shower or bathroom is hot, is to test it with a voltage tick tester.  Shoddy electrical work is not just a problem in Iraq or Afghanistan, this is a problem all over, and if you want to protect yourself, then having a way to test your bathroom safely is something to consider. Not to mention testing stuff in disaster zones to insure everything is safe.

   The Greenlee was recommended to me by an electrician as one company that makes good testers, but there are others out there.  The idea is you want something that is easy to use and doesn’t take up too much space.  You could throw it in your hygiene kit and when ever you are using a shower and bathroom that you are new too, you could pull the tester out real quick and make sure you are not in a death trap.

   Now if you do find out that your bathroom is hot, then definitely tell someone at the camp, and also send Ms Sparky a email about the thing.  She is all over this stuff, and the basis for this post came from a discussion she had about an incident in Iraq with electrical work.  There have been 18 electrical deaths so far, and Adam Hermanson of Triple Canopy was the last one.  We can take matters into our own hands, and just use a twelve dollar device to protect ourselves and others when on contract. Something to think about for your deployment kit, and you too can be a ‘hero in waiting’ by preventing future electrical accidents with this simple device. –Matt

——————————————————————

Greenlee

The Greenlee GT-11 is a non-contact voltage detector that provides the electrician with AC voltage indicating capabilities up to 1000 volts. The GT-11 has the UL safety rating of category IV.

Greenlee GT-11 Features:

Bright LED and audible alarm if voltage is present

On/Off switch for longer battery life

Comfort grip

Pen size fits into pocket or tool pouch

Lifetime limited warranty

Includes 2 AAA batteries

Price: $ 12.69

Buy it here.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Industry Talk: Erik Prince Vanity Fair Article–‘I’m Through..I’m Going To Teach High School’

   This article is a good one, but it is also kind of sad.  Erik has given his all, and the political will just wasn’t there anymore to support him and his company.  Although I think he will probably remain relevant to the war effort in one capacity or another, it’s just he has been effectively ‘thrown under the bus’. The company will keep pushing forward, no doubt. But as for the man who started the company? Done.

     His case is also starting to look like Valerie Plame’s in my view, and maybe this is payback in some twisted political sense. I guess politics is more important than winning a war?

     I would like to think of our industry as a tool for all parties in the U.S., but hey, what the king and his merry men want, they get I guess.  The irony is that Obama and company has definitely attached ownership to this war, and I just don’t see how he will be able to prosecute the thing without men like Erik Prince and private industry.

    It is also very telling that Obama’s strategy for Afghanistan really doesn’t look any different than the one his predecessor had for Iraq.  I also don’t see a decline in the use of security contractors under this administration either.  Actually, I have seen an increase, and that should give the reader of this article below a pause.  If in fact the services of my industry are so despicable, so unethical, so wrong, then why are we still being used, and to such a high degree?  I think we all know the answer to that, and yet we nail men like Erik Prince to the cross? Our enemies are laughing at us. Pffft.

   By the way, Erik if you are reading this, I invite you to sit down and talk with Jake over at PMH radio, or start a blog and get connected.  If in fact you are out of the game, there is no better place for a guy like yourself to get online and start squaring away the record by filling the information void.  You would be surprised how many supporters would pop up, and your input about the industry and the war effort would be invaluable. –Matt

Edit: 12/5/2009 I highly suggest reading this post from the Jawa Report Blog in regards to Blackwater and EP.  They hit it on the nail as far as the big picture.

—————————————————————–

Tycoon, Contractor, Soldier, Spy

By Adam Ciralsky

January 2010

Vanity Fair

Erik Prince, recently outed as a participant in a C.I.A. assassination program, has gained notoriety as head of the military-contracting juggernaut Blackwater, a company dogged by a grand-jury investigation, bribery accusations, and the voluntary-manslaughter trial of five ex-employees, set for next month. Lashing back at his critics, the wealthy former navy seal takes the author inside his operation in the U.S. and Afghanistan, revealing the role he’s been playing in America’s war on terror.

     I put myself and my company at the C.I.A.’s disposal for some very risky missions,” says Erik Prince as he surveys his heavily fortified, 7,000-acre compound in rural Moyock, North Carolina. “But when it became politically expedient to do so, someone threw me under the bus.” Prince—the founder of Blackwater, the world’s most notorious private military contractor—is royally steamed. He wants to vent. And he wants you to hear him vent.

     Erik Prince has an image problem—the kind that’s impervious to a Madison Avenue makeover. The 40-year-old heir to a Michigan auto-parts fortune, and a former navy seal, he has had the distinction of being vilified recently both in life and in art. In Washington, Prince has become a scapegoat for some of the Bush administration’s misadventures in Iraq—though Blackwater’s own deeds have also come in for withering criticism. Congressmen and lawyers, human-rights groups and pundits, have described Prince as a war profiteer, one who has assembled a rogue fighting force capable of toppling governments. His employees have been repeatedly accused of using excessive, even deadly force in Iraq; many Iraqis, in fact, have died during encounters with Blackwater. And in November, as a North Carolina grand jury was considering a raft of charges against the company, as a half-dozen civil suits were brewing in Virginia, and as five former Blackwater staffers were preparing for trial for their roles in the deaths of 17 Iraqis, The New York Times reported in a page-one story that Prince’s firm, in the aftermath of the tragedy, had sought to bribe Iraqi officials for their compliance, charges which Prince calls “lies … undocumented, unsubstantiated [and] anonymous.” (So infamous is the Blackwater brand that even the Taliban have floated far-fetched conspiracy theories, accusing the company of engaging in suicide bombings in Pakistan.)

(more…)

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Funny Stuff: Iraqi Shoe-thrower Gets a Taste Of His Own Medicine

Filed under: Funny Stuff,Iraq — Tags: , , — Matt @ 10:24 AM

   You can’t make this stuff up. Shoe fight!!!! lol I have a feeling that this isn’t the last time someone will be throwing a shoe at this dude.-Matt

—————————————————————–

Iraqi shoe-thrower finds out what it was like

12/2/2009

PARIS — The Iraqi journalist who threw his shoes at President George W. Bush in Baghdad last year had a taste of his own medicine Tuesday when he nearly got beaned by a shoe thrower at a news conference in Paris.

Muntadhar al-Zeidi ducked and the shoe hit the wall behind him.

“He stole my technique,” al-Zeidi later quipped.

The identity of the new shoe-thrower — and his motivation — weren’t immediately clear, but he appeared to be an Iraqi. It was not known if the intruder was a journalist or just pretended to be one to attend the news conference at a center for foreign reporters.

Whatever his motive, the confrontation didn’t stop there.

Al-Zeidi’s brother, Maithan, chased the attacker in the audience and — what else? — pelted him with a shoe as he left the room.

Muntadhar al-Zeidi, a TV reporter, became a hero to many opponents of the Iraq war when he hurled his shoes at Bush during a news conference in Baghdad in December 2008 while shouting: “This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq.” Al-Zeidi was quickly wrestled to the ground by security guards, then imprisoned for nine months before being released in September.

The Paris news conference was held so he could talk about his experiences.

Story here.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress