Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Funny Stuff: Ridiculous Protests #322–Avatar In The Westbank
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Technology: Israeli Robots Remake Battlefield
“We’re trying to get to unmanned vehicles everywhere on the battlefield for each platoon in the field,” says Lt. Col. Oren Berebbi, head of the Israel Defense Forces’ technology branch. “We can do more and more missions without putting a soldier at risk.”
*****
Hmmmm. A UAV per platoon huh? Sounds like drone archer material if you ask me, and it is usually the Israelis that push the envelope on this stuff. I also posted a small deal on Scout Helicopter pilots being replaced by UAV’s for really dangerous missions. You know, the ones where they try to draw fire in order to locate the enemy. The Hummingbird, Fire Scout, or even the AH 6X Little Bird UAV would all be good choices for such a mission. –Matt
—————————————————————–
Israeli Robots Remake Battlefield
Nation Forges Ahead in Deploying Unmanned Military Vehicles by Air, Sea and Land
January 12, 2010
By CHARLES LEVINSON
TEL AVIV, Israel – Israel is developing an army of robotic fighting machines that offers a window onto the potential future of warfare.
Sixty years of near-constant war, a low tolerance for enduring casualties in conflict, and its high-tech industry have long made Israel one of the world’s leading innovators of military robotics.
“We’re trying to get to unmanned vehicles everywhere on the battlefield for each platoon in the field,” says Lt. Col. Oren Berebbi, head of the Israel Defense Forces’ technology branch. “We can do more and more missions without putting a soldier at risk.”
In 10 to 15 years, one-third of Israel’s military machines will be unmanned, predicts Giora Katz, vice president of Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd., one of Israel’s leading weapons manufacturers.
“We are moving into the robotic era,” says Mr. Katz.
Over 40 countries have military-robotics programs today. The U.S. and much of the rest of the world is betting big on the role of aerial drones: Even Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Shiite guerrilla force in Lebanon, flew four Iranian-made drones against Israel during the 2006 Lebanon War.
When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, it had just a handful of drones. Today, U.S. forces have around 7,000 unmanned vehicles in the air and an additional 12,000 on the ground, used for tasks including reconnaissance, airstrikes and bomb disposal.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Monday, October 5, 2009
Military News: Emulate Hezbollah To Beat Hybrid Foe
This is a follow up to that article I posted about the Israeli’s rating their performance during the Second Lebanon War. A lot was learned from the mistakes of that war, and it is being studied intensely. How did Hezbollah do it, and how do you combat that?
Super empowered infantry and getting smaller is the answer according to this article. Interesting concepts to say the least.
If I was to add to this, I would have to say that the internet and today’s computing devices (laptops, smart phones, video cams) have contributed greatly to creating these super empowered enemies. From researching warfare techniques, to weapons manufacture, to communications, propaganda etc., it is all contributing to making extremely intelligent and capable small units out there. Our enemies evolve, and we must evolve too, or be defeated on the field of battle. What do you guys think? –Matt
—————————————————————–
Emulate Hezbollah To Beat Hybrid Foe
By Greg Grant Monday,
October 5th, 2009
There’s a saying that the best weapon against a sniper is another sniper. If, as top military officials from Defense Secretary Robert Gates on down, say future enemies will be of the hybrid type, and Lebanese Hezbollah is repeatedly held up as the hybrid enemy archetype, does that mean the best way to counter Hezbollah is to fight like Hezbollah?
That’s exactly what some leading thinkers in the military establishment believe. A hybrid enemy comes equipped with modern, high-end, precision guided weapons, yet fights guerrilla fashion in distributed networks of small units and cells.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Israel: ‘Hizbullah Had Better Intel Than Israel’ -Second Lebanon War
A bitter pill to swallow, but overall this is healthy for an organization. I would be interested to see the same metrics applied to the Gaza campaign as well.
And on another note, this would be something to remember for the security contracting industry. The methodology sounds simple and straight forward, and could possibly be applied to company operations or incidents. The point being is that we might be able to learn something from the Israeli version of Kaizen. –Matt
——————————————————————
‘Hizbullah had better intel than Israel in 2006’
Sep. 29, 2009
Yaakov Katz
THE JERUSALEM POST
Hizbullah had better intelligence information than Israel and better control of its forces during the Second Lebanon War, according to an official IDF scorecard compiled recently by a top navy officer.
The article – which was given an award by Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi – was written by Lt.-Col. Robi Sandman, and was published in the latest edition of Ma’arahot, a monthly journal on military issues.
During his research for the article, titled “How the Arabs are preparing for the next war,” Sandman asked 24 senior IDF officers to grade the army and Hizbullah in 10 categories, on a scale of 1 to 10.