Feral Jundi

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Funny Stuff: Ridiculous Protests #322–Avatar In The Westbank

Filed under: Film,Funny Stuff,Israel — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 1:43 PM

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Technology: Israeli Robots Remake Battlefield

“We’re trying to get to unmanned vehicles everywhere on the battlefield for each platoon in the field,” says Lt. Col. Oren Berebbi, head of the Israel Defense Forces’ technology branch. “We can do more and more missions without putting a soldier at risk.”

*****

    Hmmmm. A UAV per platoon huh?  Sounds like drone archer material if you ask me, and it is usually the Israelis that push the envelope on this stuff. I also posted a small deal on Scout Helicopter pilots being replaced by UAV’s for really dangerous missions.  You know, the ones where they try to draw fire in order to locate the enemy. The Hummingbird, Fire Scout, or even the AH 6X Little Bird UAV would all be good choices for such a mission. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Israeli Robots Remake Battlefield

Nation Forges Ahead in Deploying Unmanned Military Vehicles by Air, Sea and Land

January 12, 2010

By CHARLES LEVINSON

TEL AVIV, Israel – Israel is developing an army of robotic fighting machines that offers a window onto the potential future of warfare.

Sixty years of near-constant war, a low tolerance for enduring casualties in conflict, and its high-tech industry have long made Israel one of the world’s leading innovators of military robotics.

“We’re trying to get to unmanned vehicles everywhere on the battlefield for each platoon in the field,” says Lt. Col. Oren Berebbi, head of the Israel Defense Forces’ technology branch. “We can do more and more missions without putting a soldier at risk.”

In 10 to 15 years, one-third of Israel’s military machines will be unmanned, predicts Giora Katz, vice president of Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd., one of Israel’s leading weapons manufacturers.

“We are moving into the robotic era,” says Mr. Katz.

Over 40 countries have military-robotics programs today. The U.S. and much of the rest of the world is betting big on the role of aerial drones: Even Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Shiite guerrilla force in Lebanon, flew four Iranian-made drones against Israel during the 2006 Lebanon War.

When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, it had just a handful of drones. Today, U.S. forces have around 7,000 unmanned vehicles in the air and an additional 12,000 on the ground, used for tasks including reconnaissance, airstrikes and bomb disposal.

(more…)

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Building Snowmobiles: Israeli Niv Calderon, Social Media Warriors, and Cyber Tribes

    As you guys know, I am always looking into the future of warfare, and the possible uses of today’s technologies.  No rock is left unturned here, and I love coming back to this stuff.  The theme of this post is that in order to apply these new Web 2.0 tools to warfare and business, we must study how others did it and build a snowmobile out of it.

   Now on to the meat of what I am getting at.  If you are a PMC, or even trying to start a grass roots cyber tribe revolution, then you need to study what Niv Calderon and his gang did during the last Israeli war in Gaza.  They were on the cutting edge of mixing Web 2.0 and their war effort, and the outcomes of that effort should be studied by all who are interested.  I know I am, and articles in the past on FJ, in regards to Web 2.0 and warfare, have been influence by these types of uses.

   Last week I made a comment on Steven Pressfield’s blog about the concept of starting a cyber tribe, to support the various tribes in the war that he thought would be helpful in winning the war in Afghanistan.  I discussed the concept of starting a social networking site that had the similar framework as President Obama’s social networking site, or even American Sniper’s website. The idea is to have sites that tap into the legions of supporters, possible supporters, and diaspora throughout the world, all with the goal of cheering on and supplying a tribe on the ground with what it needs to defeat a shared enemy.

   I would say that this ‘cyber tribe’ concept, is a way for chieftains to expand their immediate tribes, and really call on all of the supporters throughout the world for help and for supplies. It is a way to get the middle man out of the way (aid groups and government), and connect the supporters with the tribe directly.  The cyber tribes would have little donation buttons on the site, give calls of action, allow for personal pages, foster a community, set up encrypted email, and post Youtube videos of ambushing and killing the Taliban, all with the idea of bringing the cyber tribe together with the local tribe on the ground.

   Most of all, if the cyber tribe was able to make some money for the cause (google adsense, ad sales, e-books, donations), then the real tribe could conceivably ask for volunteers and pay them at cost for their services– and all through a cyber tribe system.  Call it a Cyber Tribe Co-op.  lol

    Hell, make it a non-profit so people can donate to the cause and benefit in their taxes (in the US at least). Or not, and this would be the choice of the tribe to decide upon.  I say non-profit, because if NGO’s can call themselves a non-profit, a cyber tribe can call themselves a non-profit too, just as long as the aid given by the cyber tribes is not a profit game, but purely a supply and demand game. (Jake had an awesome post about the non-profit PSC, for further exploration)

   With a Cyber Tribe Co-op, the chieftain could put out to the two tribes (cyber and local) what would be a good use of the money earned on the site? (Just an idea)  With a well structured social networking site and a truly democratic bunch of supporters, the crowd will decide how much they want to give to something like that, or how much they want to throw down for a contracted specialist.

    They could even put it out there for true volunteers.  You know, guys that actually want to go up in the hills and fight with their tribal brothers for free, all because they believe in the cause of their tribe.  I know Soldier of Fortune is filled with stories of guys going out to volunteer their time in war zones, all for the sake of assisting underfunded and undertrained groups.  That and to do a story about it afterwards, so they have material for the magazine.  I even remember SoF sending guys out to assist the Mujahideen during the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan, and there were tons of these types of stories. Cyber tribe reporters could be doing the same thing as SoF did, but for adding content to the cyber tribe’s website, thus increasing the SEO of the site, and then getting more traffic because of it!

   So that is all I have on this one, and I look forward to any replies on this.  I also suggest starting a cyber tribe if you think you can do it, and put some action to an idea out there.  There is no rule that you can only have one cyber tribe per local tribe.  You could have thousands of cyber tribes supporting one tribe.  Or maybe Steven will put something together, because I know he is really stoked on anything to do with tribes.  –Matt

—————————————————————–

 

Social media warriors at work in the war room for pro-Israel “Stand With Us”

How Social Media War Was Waged in Gaza-Israel Conflict

by Jaron Gilinsky

February 13, 2009

Both sides deployed dangerous new media weapons during this latest round of fighting in Gaza. Armed with Facebook profiles, Twitter accounts, and Lavazza espresso, warriors fearlessly and tirelessly scoured the cyber battlefield searching for enemy (blog) outposts. Outfitted with high-tech ammunition like HD videocameras, firewire 800s, and white phosphorescent keyboards, they attacked one-sided videos, slanted essays, and enemy propaganda with propaganda of their own. Instead of grad rockets, they launched grad school wits. Instead of anti-tank missiles, they battled with anti-spamming technology. In 22 days of combat in Gaza, these were the young fighters tasked with winning the merciless war of public opinion for their side.

(more…)

Monday, October 5, 2009

Military News: Emulate Hezbollah To Beat Hybrid Foe

Filed under: Israel,Military News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 9:17 PM

   This is a follow up to that article I posted about the Israeli’s rating their performance during the Second Lebanon War. A lot was learned from the mistakes of that war, and it is being studied intensely.  How did Hezbollah do it, and how do you combat that?

 Super empowered infantry and getting smaller is the answer according to this article. Interesting concepts to say the least.

 If I was to add to this, I would have to say that the internet and today’s computing devices (laptops, smart phones, video cams) have contributed greatly to creating these super empowered enemies.  From researching warfare techniques, to weapons manufacture, to communications, propaganda etc., it is all contributing to making extremely intelligent and capable small units out there. Our enemies evolve, and we must evolve too, or be defeated on the field of battle. What do you guys think? –Matt

—————————————————————–

Emulate Hezbollah To Beat Hybrid Foe

By Greg Grant Monday,

October 5th, 2009

There’s a saying that the best weapon against a sniper is another sniper. If, as top military officials from Defense Secretary Robert Gates on down, say future enemies will be of the hybrid type, and Lebanese Hezbollah is repeatedly held up as the hybrid enemy archetype, does that mean the best way to counter Hezbollah is to fight like Hezbollah?

That’s exactly what some leading thinkers in the military establishment believe. A hybrid enemy comes equipped with modern, high-end, precision guided weapons, yet fights guerrilla fashion in distributed networks of small units and cells.

(more…)

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Israel: ‘Hizbullah Had Better Intel Than Israel’ -Second Lebanon War

Filed under: Israel,Kaizen — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 11:47 PM

   A bitter pill to swallow, but overall this is healthy for an organization.  I would be interested to see the same metrics applied to the Gaza campaign as well.

   And on another note, this would be something to remember for the security contracting industry.  The methodology sounds simple and straight forward, and could possibly be applied to company operations or incidents.  The point being is that we might be able to learn something from the Israeli version of Kaizen. –Matt

——————————————————————

‘Hizbullah had better intel than Israel in 2006’

Sep. 29, 2009

Yaakov Katz

THE JERUSALEM POST

Hizbullah had better intelligence information than Israel and better control of its forces during the Second Lebanon War, according to an official IDF scorecard compiled recently by a top navy officer.

The article – which was given an award by Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi – was written by Lt.-Col. Robi Sandman, and was published in the latest edition of Ma’arahot, a monthly journal on military issues.

During his research for the article, titled “How the Arabs are preparing for the next war,” Sandman asked 24 senior IDF officers to grade the army and Hizbullah in 10 categories, on a scale of 1 to 10.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress